WISC-Ⅲ中文版差異分數信度估計及其應用限制討論__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	WISC-Ⅲ中文版差異分數信度估計及其應用限制討論
書刊名：	測驗學刊
作者：	陳心怡
作者(外文)：	Chen, Hsin-yi
出版日期：	2006
卷期：	53:1
頁次：	頁79-102
主題關鍵詞：	魏氏兒童智力量表；差異分數；臺灣常模；信度；WISC-Ⅲ；Discrepancy score；Taiwan norm；Reliability
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:29 點閱:37

本研究皆在估計台灣魏氏兒童智力量表第三版 (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, the 3rd edition, WISC-III ) 各差異分數之信度，並且分析相關計量限制。本研究根據WISC-III1，100位6至16歲台灣常模樣本為分析對象，主要有下列四點發現：(1) WISC-III各差異分數中，以智商指數間差異分數的信度最高，平均在.80上下；(2) 兩兩分測驗差異分數的信度多在.60-.80之間；(3) 單一分測驗與一組分測驗平均差異分數的信度相對最低，若組合包含8個以上分測驗，信度中數在.60以上，若組合包含4間6個分測驗，則信度中數介於.45-.60之間；(4) 就個別分數言，包含語文智商、作業智商、語文理解指數、知覺組織指數、符號替代、記憶廣度或詞彙等分數的差異值普遍有相對較高的信度，但包含專心注意指數或物型配置分測驗之差異分數信度則普遍較低。文中討論相關限制並對後續應用提出建議。

以文找文

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliabilities of various WISC-III discrepancy scores, also discussed were the psychometric limitations built in these reliability estimations. The sample used was the WISC-III Taiwan standardization sample. A total of 1,100 children, ages from 6 to 16, were included in this study. Four major findings are: (1) IQ and index discrepancy scores shows the best reliabilities, roughtly with an average of. 80; (2) majority of the reliabilities of subtest discrepancy scores are around .60-.80 ; (3) when considering the discrepancies between a subtest and the mean of a group of subtests, discrepancy reliabilities increased with the number of subtests in the group. When there are 8 or above subtsets in this combination, reliabilities roughly are above.60; however, when the number of subtests is less than 6, reliabilities go down to .45-.60; (4) Discrepancy scores which relate to VIQ, PIQ, verbal comprehension index, perceptual organization index, coding, digit span, or vocabulary subtest relatively show higher reliabilities; on the other hand, reliabilities related to freedom from distracbility index and object assembly are lower, comparatively. Suggestions for future researches are discussed.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	陳淑麗、洪儷瑜(20030300)。學習障礙國中學生在不同差距標準差異之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，24，85-111。延伸查詢
2.	Anastasi, A.(1985)。Testing the test: Interpreting the scores from multiscore batteries。Journal of Counseling and Development，64，84-86。
3.	Atkinson, L.(1991)。Mental retardation and WAIS-R difference scores。Journal of Mental Deficiency Research，35，537-542。
4.	Atkinson, L.(1991)。On WAIS-R difference scores in the standardization sample。Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，3，292-294。
5.	Atkinson, L.(1992)。Mental retardation and WAIS-R scatter analysis。Journal of Intellectual Disability Research，36，443-448。
6.	Berk, R. A.(1982)。Verbal-Perofrmance IQ discrepancy score: A comment on reliability, abnormality, and validity。Journal of Clinical Psychology，35(3)，638-641。
7.	Caruso, J. C.、Cliff, N.(1997)。An examination of the five-factor model of normal personality variation with reliable component analysis。Personality and Individual Differences，23(2)，317-325。
8.	Caruso, J. C.、Cliff, N.(2000)。Increasing the reliability of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition difference scores with reliable component analysis。Psychological Assessment，12(1)，89-96。
9.	Caruso, J. C.、Witkiewitz, K.、Youngstrom, E. A.、Glutting, J. J.(2001)。The frequency of reliable component difference scores for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children-third edition in two samples。Psychological Assessment，13(4)，543-548。
10.	Charter, R. A.(2001)。Discrepancy scores of reliabilities of the WAIS-III。Psychological Reports，89，453-456。
11.	Charter, R. A.、Feldt, L. S.(2001)。Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: The art of decision making is still alive。Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology，23，530-537。
12.	Charter, R. A.、Feldt, L. S.(2002)。The importance of reliability as it relates to true score confidence intervals。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development，35(2)，104-112。
13.	Goh, D. S.、Teslow, C. J.、Fuller, G. B.(1981)。The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists。Professional Psychology，12，696-706。
14.	Humphreys, L. G.(1993)。Further comments on reliability and power of significant tests。Applied Psychological Measurement，17(1)，11-14。
15.	Humphreys, L. G.、Drasgow, Fritz(1989)。Some comments on the relation between reliability and statistical power。Applied Psychological Measurement，13(4)，419-425。
16.	Hutton, J. B.、Dubes, R.、Muir, S.(1992)。Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later。School Psychology Review，21，271-284。
17.	Iverson, G. L.、Tulsky, D. S.(2003)。Detecting malingering on the WAIS-III unusual digit span performance patterns in the normal population and in clinical groups。Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology，18，1-9。
18.	Linacre, J. M.(1997)。KR-20 or Rasch reliability: Which tells the "trith"?。Rasch Measurement Transactions，11(3)，580-581。
19.	McDermott, P. A.、Fantuzzo, J. W.、Glutting, J. J.、Watkins, M. W.、Baggaley, A. R.(1992)。Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's abilities。Journal of Special Education，25，504-526。
20.	Mcgnew, K. S.、Wrightson, W.(1997)。The calculation of new and improved WISC-III subtest reliability, uniqueness, and general factor characteristic information through the use of data smoothing procedures。Psychology in the Schools，34(3)，181-195。
21.	Mitrushina, M.、Staz, P.(1995)。Base rates of the WAIS-R intersubtest scatter and VIQ-PIQ discrepancy in normal elderly。Journal of Clinical Psychology，51(1)，70-78。
22.	Overall, J. E.、Woodward, J. A.(1975)。Unreliability of differences scores: A paradox for measurement of change。Psychological Bulletin，82，85-86。
23.	Parker, K. C. H.、Atkinson, L.(1994)。Factor space of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition: Critical thoughts and recommendations。Psychological Assessment，6(3)，201-208。
24.	Parker, K. C. H.、Atkinson, L.(1995)。Computation of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised factor scores: Equal and differential weights。Psychological Assessment，7(4)，456-462。
25.	Pfeiffer, S. I.、Reddy, L. A.、Kletzel, J. E.、Schmelzer, E. R.、Boyer, L. M.(2000)。The practioner's view of IQ testing and profile analysis。School Psychology Quarterly，15(4)，376-385。
26.	Ruff, C. F.、Templer, D. I.、Ayers, J. L.、Barthlow, V. L.(1977)。WAIS digit span differences between prisoners and psychiatric patients。Perceptual and Motor Skill，44，497-498。
27.	Saamio, P. K.(1995)。WAIS digit symbol and block design scores in abstinent alcoholics: A replication。Perceptual and Motor Skills，80，112-114。
28.	Schulte, A.、Borich, G. D.(1984)。Considerations in the use of difference scores to identify learning-disabled children。Journal of School Psychology，22，381-390。
29.	Stinnett, T. A.、Havey, J. M.、Oehler-Stinnett, J.(1994)。Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，12，331-350。
30.	Zachary, R. A.、Gorsuch, R. L.(1985)。Continuous norming: Implications for the WAIS-R。Journal of Clinical Psychology，41，86-94。
31.	陳心怡(20010400)。語文與作業能力差異之基本率研究--「魏氏兒童智力量表」臺灣常模分析。花蓮師院學報，12，51-73。延伸查詢
32.	陳心怡、洪儷瑜(20031200)。WISC-Ⅲ分測驗散布度研究：各指標之信度、相關與基本率呈現。測驗學刊，50(2)，171-197。延伸查詢
33.	陳心怡、陳榮華、朱建軍(20010100)。臺灣魏氏兒童智力量表「一般能力指數」之常模建立與運用。測驗年刊，48(1)，89-104。延伸查詢
34.	Bray, M. A.、Kehle, T. J.、Hintze, J. M.(1998)。Profile analysis with the Wechsler Scales: Why does it persist?。School Psychology International，19，209-220。
35.	Caruso, J. C.、Cliff, N.(1999)。The properties of equally and differentially weighted WAIS-III factor scores。Psychological Assessment，11，198-206。
36.	Cicchetti, Domenic V.(1994)。Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology。Psychological Assessment，6(4)，284-290。
37.	Fagan, T.、Bracken, B. A.(1993)。Reaction to Naglieri's "role of intelligence assessment"。School Psychologist，47，6-7。
38.	Payne, R. W.、Jones, H. G.(1957)。Statistics for the investigation of individual cases。Journal of Clinical Psychology，13(2)，115-121。
39.	Silversteim, A. B.(1981)。Reliability and abnormality of test score differences。Journal of Clinical Psychology，37(2)，392-394。
40.	Slate, J. R.(1995)。Discrepancies between IQ and index scores for a clinical sample of students: useful diagnostic indicators。Psychology in the Schools，32，103-108。
41.	Tellegen, A.、Briggs, P. F.(1967)。Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales。Journal of Consulting Psychology，31(5)，499-506。
42.	Watkins, C. E. Jr.、Campbell, V. L.、Nieberding, R.、Hallmark, R.(1995)。Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice，26，54-60。
43.	Tulsky, D. S.、Saklofske, D. H.、Wilkins, C.、Weiss, L. G.(2001)。Development of a General Ability Index for the Wechsler Adult。Intelligence Scale-Third Edition, Psychological Assessment，13(4)，566-571。
44.	Watkins, M. W.、Kush, J. C.(1994)。Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way?。School Psychology Review，23(4)，640-651。
45.	Weiss, L. G.、Saklofske, D. H.、Prifitera, A.、Chen, H.、Hildebrand, D.(1999)。The Calculation of the WISC-III General Ability Index Using Canadian Norms。Canadian Journal of School Psychology，14(2)，1-9。
46.	Willson, M. S.、Reschly, D. J.(1996)。Assessment in school psychology training and practice。School Psychology Review，25(1)，9-23。

會議論文
1.	Chen, H.、Zhu, J.、Chen, Y.(2000)。The legitimacy and utility of the WISC-III factor-based indexes: Taiwan standardization sample applied。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。
2.	Kaufman, A. S.、Balgopal, R.、Kaufman, J. C.、McLean, J. E.(1994)。WISC-III short forms: psychometric properties vs. clinical relevance vs. practical utility。The annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association。Nashville, TN。

圖書
1.	Cohen, J.、Cohen, P.(1975)。Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
2.	Sattler, J. M.(2001)。Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications。San Diego, Calif.：J.M. Sattler。
3.	Gregory, R. J.(2000)。Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。
4.	The Psychological Corporation(2002)。The WAIS-III WMS-III technical manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。
5.	Thorndike, R. L.、Hagen, E.(1977)。Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education。New York：John Wiley & Sons。
6.	Traub, R. E.(1994)。Reliability for the social science: Theory and applications。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。
7.	Wechsler, D.(1997)。Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd Editon (WAIS-III) Manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。
8.	Wechsler, D.(1999)。Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) Manual。San Antonio, TX：The Psychological Corporation。
9.	陳榮華(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表指導手冊。臺北：中國行為科學社。延伸查詢
10.	陳榮華、陳心怡(2000)。魏氏幼兒智力量表修訂版(WPPSI-R)中文指導版手冊。臺北市：中國行爲科學社。延伸查詢
11.	陳榮華、陳心怡(2002)。魏氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)中文版指導手冊。臺北：中國行為科學社。延伸查詢
12.	American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。
13.	Gregory, R. J.(1999)。Foundations of intellectual assessment: The WAIS-III and other tests in clinical practice。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。
14.	Groth-Marnat, G.(2003)。Handbook of psychological assessment。New York：John Wiley & Sons。
15.	Kaufman, A. S.(1994)。Intelligent Testing with the WISC-III。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
16.	Kaufman, Alan S.、Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O.(1999)。Essentials of WAIS-III Assessment。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
17.	Kaufman, A. S.、Lichtenberger, E. O.(2000)。Essentials of WISC-III and WPPSI-R assessment。New York：John Wiely & Sons, Inc。
18.	Kaufman, A. S.、Lichtenberger, E. O.(2002)。Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence。Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon。
19.	Murphy, K. R.、Davidshofer, C. O.(2001)。Psychological testing: Principles and Applications。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Pearson Education, Inc。
20.	Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。
21.	Nunnally, J. C.、Bernstein, I. H.(1993)。Psychometric theory。New York：McGraw-Hill。
22.	Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。

其他
1.	教育部(1998)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準，臺北：教育部。，http://www.set.edu.tw/frame.asp。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	Goodall, C.(1990)。A survey of smoothing techniques。Modern methods of data analysis。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。
2.	Hawkins, K. A.、Tulsky, D. S.(2003)。WAIS-III WMS-III discrepancy analysis: Six-factor model index discrepancy base rates, implications, and a preliminary consideration of utility。Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III。San Diego, CA：Academic Press。
3.	Matarazzo, J. D.、Herman, D. O.(1985)。Clinical uses of the WAIS-R: Base rates of differences between VIQ-PIQ in the WAIS-R standardization sample。Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications。New York：John Wiley。
4.	Prifitera, A.、Weiss, L. G.、Saklofske, D. H.(1998)。The WISC-III in context。WISC-III Clinical Use and Interpretation: Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives。San Diego：Academic Press。
5.	Rourke, B. P.(1998)。Significance of verbal-performance discrepancies for subtypes of children with learning disabilities: Opportunities for the WISC-III。WISC-III Clinical use and interpretation: Scientist- Practitioner Perspectives。San Diego, CA：Academic Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	心智圖教學對國中學習障礙學生故事體文章的閱讀理解學習成效
2.	國中一般智能資賦優異學生鑑定資料分析與預測力研究
3.	「閲讀理解篩選測驗」的再驗證和應用
4.	以證據本位的方式幫助讀寫困難的窮孩子--永齡希望小學臺東教學研發中心簡介
5.	華人青少年前期兒童之間接攻擊行為的反應評鑑與情緒經驗
6.	國民中小學學習障礙學生在魏氏兒童智力量表三版(WISC-III)表現特徵研究
7.	基本字帶字電腦教學對學習困難學童教學成效之個案探究
8.	低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究--馬太效應之可能表現
9.	以認知因素區辨不同閱讀能力組的效能分析
10.	國小原住民學習障礙兒童與非原住民學習障礙兒童在魏氏兒童智力量表的表現分析
11.	國小LD學生鑑定問題與可行方向
12.	以國語補救教學診斷原住民低成就學童是否為學習障礙：轉介前介入的效度考驗研究
13.	智能障礙兒童之WISC-Ⅲ認知特性研究
14.	學習障礙學生鑑定問題探討--以臺北市國小為例
15.	魏氏兒童智力量表第三版（WISC-Ⅲ）對學習障礙學生的診斷功能之探析

1.	學習障礙學生之智力組型與基本學業表現暨影響學障研判決策因素之探討
2.	應用教學反應模式對國小學習障礙學生鑑定之研究
3.	轉介前介入對原住民閱讀障礙診斷區辨效度之研究

1.	國小資源班教師專業知能與學習障礙學生服務現況之研究
2.	網路ECBM系統對國小學障兒童學習診斷與教學之研究
3.	智力與閱讀障礙

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫