Strikes, picketing, boycotts and lockouts are the major weapons of labor-management confrontation in the private sector in the US. Both unions and employers use the weapons to place economic pressure on each other in order to prevail in the bargaining process. The first major federal statute affecting labor-management confrontation is the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. It provides an entire framework for governance of labor-management relations and protection of employee rights. The Act prohibits an employer from interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights. The National Labor Relations Act imposes limits and duties on unions as well. For example, it imposes substantial limits on secondary boycotts by unions. The Labor Management Relations Act was enacted in 1947, which amended and expanded the National Labor Relations Act. The changes made by the Labor Management Relations Act limit the power of trade unions and move the federal government from the position of obvious advocate of organized labor to a more neutral position. The other related federal statutes include Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 and Labor Management Relations And Disclosure Act of 1959. The former substantailly limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts in matters arising out of labor disputes; the latter amends the law regulating “secondary boycotts” and prohibits unions from using “hot cargo” clauses. The labor-management confrontation law in the US includes statutes and common law (case law). Only related federal statutes and federal court decisions are discussed in this paper. At first, this paper classifies labor-management confrontation activities into strikes, picketing, boycotts and lockouts. It then discusses the legitimacy of these activities separately. At last, this paper will proposes some ideas to refer the relevant US law to the related problems in Taiwan.