在強調客觀性的運動科學高度發展的今日，運動技術的學習過程卻仍舊排除不了濃厚的主觀色彩。事實上，面對同樣的一套技術、同樣的科學研究成果，甚至同一位教練的講解與示範，不同的學習者仍然會產生出不同的理解。這些不同的理解是如何產生的呢？其存在是否合理呢？本文從高達美的哲學詮釋學觀點出發，探討運動技術的理解現象，結果發現，運動技術的學習並非排除一切主觀因素並對該技術進行客觀的重構或複製，而是學習者主觀因素與該技術之間不斷進行遊戲、逐漸融合並達成一致的過程。因此，學習者的主觀性便成了理解的必要條件，而不同的理解也就成了合法的、必然的結果。

Although sport science which take objectivity as the highest rule dominate the field of sport research in the modern time, it is still impossible to remove the influence of subjectivity during the process of learning sport techniques. In fact, different understandings always occur to different learners, even if they learn from the same studies or couches. Now we have to ask: How do these understandings come to be so different? Are they all reasonable and acceptable? The purpose of this study is to analysis the process of understanding and learning of sport techniques. The result shows that to learn sport technique is not to remove the subjectivity of the learner and copy the technique objectively. On the contrary, it is a game between the object and the subject, in which the learner fuses with the technique gradually and finally reach agreement. Therefore, the subjectivity of the learner becomes necessary while understanding, and different understandings of the same sport technique also become reasonable and necessary.