:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:空的空間:彼得.布魯克的《哈姆雷特的悲劇》與呂柏伸的《哈姆雷》研究
書刊名:成大中文學報
作者:廖玉如 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Yu-ju
出版日期:2008
卷期:23
頁次:頁123-156
主題關鍵詞:哈姆雷特彼得.布魯克呂柏伸空的空間凝視HamletPeter BrookLu Po-ShenEmpty spaceGaze
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:74
彼得.布魯克的劇場論著《空的空間》在西方現代劇場有其不可忽視的影響力。其「空的空間」概念,強調的是從傳統找出創新的表現形式。布魯克所導的《哈姆雷特的悲劇》,捨棄傳統繁複的舞台設計,以一張地毯為主要的舞台空間,實乃貫徹其「空的空間」概念。呂柏伸的《哈姆雷》以一張沙發為舞台調度的主軸,則明顯受布魯克的影響,然而兩劇所呈現的氛圍卻南轅北轍。此文以布魯克《空的空間》的理念為基本架構,探討布魯克和呂柏伸作品的空間運用技巧,獨白及其他劇場語彙處理的異同點,以了解兩位導演的劇場美學。
The Empty Space, written by Peter Brook, has a prominent influence on the modern western theatre. The concept of ‘the empty space’ makes the most of its points in the innovative performance based on the traditional forms. In The Tragedy of Hamlet, directed by Brook, the stage is not designed in a conventional and complicated way but with only a simple carpet, which practices the concept of ‘the empty space’. Affected by The Tragedy of Hamlet, Lu Po-Shen puts a focus on a sofa which plays the main blocking during the stage buildup in his work Hamlet. The two performances present very different styles while they similarly emphasize the unrestrained space. This essay attempts to discuss the space in the two performances, Hamlet’s monologues and other theatre syntaxes, based on the theory from The Empty Space, in order to understand the two directors’ aesthetics.
期刊論文
1.Cerniglia, Kenneth J.(2002)。Performance Review on The Tragedy of Hamlet。Theatre Journal,54(1),156-158。  new window
2.Tate, Joseph(2001)。Review of The Tragedy of Halmet。Early Modern Literary Studies,7(2),18(1)-18(9)。  new window
圖書
1.Freud, Sigmund(1994)。夢的解析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm(2005)。悲劇的誕生。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Shakespeare, William(2001)。哈姆雷。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫康宜(2001)。緒論。抒情與描寫:六朝詩歌概論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡妙勝(2001)。充滿符號的戲劇空間。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kennedy, Dennis(1993)。Introduction: Shakespeare without His Language。Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance。Cambridge & New York。  new window
7.王婉容(2000)。布魯克。布魯克。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂柏伸(2005)。向大師致敬。哈姆雷表演手冊。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
9.Brook, Peter(2008)。空的空間。空的空間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.耿一偉(2008)。《空的空間》之前與之後。空的空間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.耿一偉(2008)。劇場就是生命─尚-居‧勒加專文訪談。空的空間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.陸愛玲(2008)。使不可見的,被看見了:彼得‧布魯克給表演者的一點筆記。空的空間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.安德烈‧巴贊(1971)。What is Cinema?。What is Cinema?。Berkeley/California。  new window
14.Brook, Peter(1994)。The Shifting Point: 1946-1987。The Shifting Point: 1946-1987。New York。  new window
15.Roose-Evans, James(1984)。Experimental Theatre: from Stanislavsky to Peter Brook。Experimental Theatre: from Stanislavsky to Peter Brook。New York。  new window
16.Lavender, Andy(2001)。Hamlet in Pieces: Shakespeare Reworked by Peter Brook, Robert Lepage, Robert Wilson。Hamlet in Pieces: Shakespeare Reworked by Peter Brook, Robert Lepage, Robert Wilson。New York。  new window
17.Rosenberg, Marvin(1992)。The Masks of Hamlet。The Masks of Hamlet。London/Toronto。  new window
18.Wiles, David(1997)。Tragedy in Athens。Tragedy in Athens。Cambridge。  new window
其他
1.Balderstone, Peter(1997)。Hamlet,London。  new window
2.臺南人劇團。莎士比亞不插電─哈姆雷。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺南人劇團。作品介紹─演出類。  延伸查詢new window
4.Billington, Michael(2000)。Journeys into space,UK。  new window
5.Billington, Michael(2001)。The Tragedy of Hamlet,UK。  new window
6.Blume, Mary(2001)。What Is a Classic? Peter Brook on 'Hamlet',Paris。  new window
7.Brantley, Ben(2001)。Sweet Prince, You're a Scamp,New York。  new window
8.Heilpern, John(2001)。Who's There? Peter Brook's Hamlet Leads the Way。  new window
9.Lester, Mark(2001)。Broook rejuvenates Hamlet。  new window
10.Simmons, Paulanne(2001)。Hamlet's Abridged: Peter Brook's adaptation, staged at BAM, leaves too much on the cutting room floor。  new window
11.Wolf, Matt(2001)。Two Hamlets Explore New Paths in an Old Terrain: Interview of Adrian Lester and Simon Russell Beale,New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE