方法和思想是兩個研究經學的重要視角。學者研究啖助學派對宋代《春秋》學的影響，已見不少成果，但從所得的結論來看，大體不離紀昀等人所謂「舍傳求經，實導宋人之先路」1和皮錫瑞所言「變專門為通學」。2此實只足以描述啖派與宋代《春秋》學解經方法之梗概，至於兩代學者思想之間的聯繫，就未有充分呈現。因此本文由思想角度出發，劃定範圍在宋代的主流學者理學家的著作，對比啖派與胡安國等人的《春秋》學說，以啖派新《春秋》學中的重要概念切入，從而發現兩代學者在思想和治經模式上有著不少相通之處，當中存在有意效法的痕跡以及思想傾向的相似。此應有助加深思考啖助學派對宋代《春秋》學所作的貢獻以至在唐宋思想史上的地位。

Methods and Thoughts are two important research perspective of Jing Xue. Current scholars wants to study the impact of Dan Zhu School upon Song's Spring and Autumn Annals Studies and there has been already a lot of conclusions, but they do not exceed what Ji Yun called ＂Studies Classics without Commentaries, to be the guidance of Song＂ and Pi Xi－Rui said about ＂the change in the Specifically to the General .＂These statements only sufficiently describe the outline of the Dan and Song's methodology, yet the link of thought between the scholars of two generations is not fully presented. This article adopts a ideological point of view to look into the Neo Confucians' writings during Song Dynasty, and compares Dan and Hu An- Guo on how to exploit the important concepts of the New Spring and Autumn Annals Studies, the result shows that the methods and the thoughts of scholars from two generations have a lot of similarities, some of them can prove their interest in following Dan. This would help deepen the thinking about the impact of Dan Zhu School upon Song's Spring and Autumn Annals Studies as well as the contribution to the intellectual history of Tang and Song Dynasty.