:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:初探科學在環境法發展上所扮演的角色--以美國法為例
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:宮文祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Kung, Wen-hsiang
出版日期:2010
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁129-180
主題關鍵詞:科學不確定性變異性風險評估科學決策程序價值Scientific uncertaintyVariabilityRisk assessmentScience-based decisionsProcedural values
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:106
期刊論文
1.Orts, Eric W.(1995)。Reflexive Environmental Law。Northwestern University Law Review,89(4),1227-1340。  new window
2.蔡瑄庭(20091100)。美國風險法規之作用與其司法審查案件之分析。國立中正大學法學集刊,27,71-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Wagner, Wendy E.(1995)。The Science Charade in Toxic Risk Regulation。Columbia Law Review,95,1613+1618-1628。  new window
4.牛惠之(20050500)。預防原則之研究--國際環境法處理欠缺科學證據之環境風險議題之努力與爭議。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,34(3),1-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Applegate, John S,(1992)。Worst Things First: Risk, Information, and Regulatory Structure in Toxic Substances Control。YALE J. ON REG.,9,277。  new window
6.Applegate, John S,(1995)。A Beginning and Not an End in Itself: The Role of Risk Assessment in Environmental Decision-Making。U. CIN. L. REV.,63,1643。  new window
7.Applegate, John S.(1997)。Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Priorities Projects: A Forum, Not a Formula。N. KY. L. REV.,25,71。  new window
8.Applegate, John S,(2008)。The Temporal Dimension of Land Pollution: Another Perspective on Applying the Breaking the Logjam Principles to Waste Management。N. Y. U. ENVTL. L. J.,17,757。  new window
9.Bergeson, Lynn L.,、Carla N. Hutton(2004)。The Food Quality Protection Act-Implementation and Legal Challenges。ENVTL. L. REP.,34,10733。  new window
10.Blais, Lynn E.,、Wendy E. Wagner(2008)。Emerging Science, Adaptive Regulation, and the Problem of Regulatory Ruts。TEX. L. REV.,86,1701。  new window
11.Cross, Frank B.(1986)。Beyond Benzene: Establishing Principles for a Significance Threshold on Regulatable Risks of Cancer。EMORY L. J.,35,1+12-43。  new window
12.Cross, Frank B.(1997)。The Consequences of Consensus: Dangerous Compromises of the Food Quality Protection Act。WASH. U. L. Q.,75,1155。  new window
13.Doremus, Holly(2007)。Precaution, Science, and Learning While Doing in Natural Resource Management。WASH. L. REV.,82,547。  new window
14.Doremus, Holly(2008)。Scientific and Political Integrity in Environmental Policy。TEX. L. REV.,86,1601。  new window
15.Flynn, James et al.(1994)。Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risk。RISK ANALYSIS,14,1101。  new window
16.Frankfurter, Felix(1933)。Social Issues Before the Supreme Court。YALE REV,22,476。  new window
17.Latin, Howard(1988)。Good Science, Bad Regulation, and Toxic Risk Assessment。YALE J. ON REG.,5,89。  new window
18.Madigan, Dominic P.(1996)。Setting an Anti-cancer Policy: Risk, Politics, and the Food Quality Protection Act of 199。VA. ENVTL. L. J.,17,187。  new window
19.McCubbin, Patricia Ross(2005)。The Risk in Technology-Based Standards。DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL’Y F.,16,1。  new window
20.McDonald, Edward M., Jr(1996)。The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996: By Removing Chemical Irritants from Our Environment Will It Generate Trade Irritants to Replace Them。WM. & MARY ENVTL. L. & POL’Y REV.,25,749。  new window
21.McGarity, Thomas O.(1992)。Some Thoughts on “Deossifying” the Rulemaking Process。DUKE L. J.,41,1385。  new window
22.McGarity, Thomas O.(1997)。The Courts and the Ossification of Rulemaking: A Response to Professor Seidenfeld。TEXAS LAW REVIEW,75(3),525-558。  new window
23.McGarity, Thomas O.(2004)。Our Science Is Sound Science and Their Science Is Junk Science: Science-Based Strategies for Avoiding Accountability and Responsibility for Risk-Producing Products and Activities。U. KAN. L. REV.,52,897。  new window
24.Miller, Andrew J(1997)。The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996: Science and Law at A Cross-roads。DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL’Y F.,7,393。  new window
25.Sargentich, Thomas O.(1997)。The Critique of Active Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: A Reevaluation。ADMIN. L. REV.,49,599。  new window
26.Seidenfeld, Mark(1997)。Demystifying Deossification: Rethinking Recent Proposals to Modify Judicial Review of Notice and Comment Rulemaking。TEX. L. REV.,75,483。  new window
27.Shapiro, Sidney A.(2007)。OMB and the Politicization of Risk Assessment。Environmental Law,37(4),1083-1106。  new window
28.Sunstein, Cass R.(1984)。In Defense of the Hard Look: Judicial Activism and Administrative Law。HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL’Y,7,51。  new window
29.Swanston, Samara F.(1994)。Race, Gender, Age, and Disproportionate Impact: What Can We Do About the Failure to Protect the Most Vulnerable?。FORDHAM URB. L. J.,21,577。  new window
30.Thompson, Kimberly M.(2002)。Variability and Uncertainty Meet Risk Management and Risk Communication。RISK ANALYSIS,22,648。  new window
31.Verchick, Robert R.M.(1996)。In a Greener Voice: Feminist Theory and Environmental Justice。HRV. WOMEN’S L. J.,19,23。  new window
32.Wagner, Wendy E.(2003)。The “Bad Science” Fiction: Reclaiming the Debate Over the Role of Sci-ence in Public Health and Environmental Regulation。LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS.,66,63。  new window
33.Wagner, Wendy E.,、Lynn Blais(2007)。Children’s Health and Environmental Exposure Risks: Information Gaps, Scientific Uncertainty, and Regulatory Reform。DUKE ENVTL. L. & POL’Y F.,17,249。  new window
34.West, William F.(2004)。Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis。PUB. ADMIN. REV.,64,66。  new window
35.(1996)。Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogenic Risk Assessment。Fed. Reg,61,17960, 17964。  new window
圖書
1.McGarity, Thomas O.(2005)。The Story of the Benzene Case: Judicially Imposed Regulatory Reform through Risk Assessment。ENVIRONMENTAL LAW STORIES。  new window
2.National Research Council(1996)。Understanding Risk, Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society。  new window
3.Aman, Alfred C. Jr.(2004)。The Democracy Deficit: Taming Globalization Through Law Reform。New York University Press。  new window
4.Breyer, Stephen G.(1993)。BREAKING THE VICIOUS CIRCLE: TOWARD EFFECTIVE RISK REGULATION。Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Jasanoff, Sheila(1990)。The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.US National Research Council(1993)。Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
7.National Research Council(1983)。Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process。National Academies Press。  new window
8.Carson, Rachel(1962)。Silent Spring。Houghton Mifflin。  new window
9.AMAN, ALFRED C., JR.(2006)。ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCESS。  new window
10.APPLEGATE, JOHN S. ET AL.(2000)。THE REGULATION OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS WASTES。  new window
11.KLINE, BENJAMIN(2007)。FIRST ALONG THE RIVER: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE US ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT。  new window
12.NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL(1998)。ENSURING SAFE FOOD FROM PRODUCTION TO CONSUMPTION。  new window
13.NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL(2000)。THE FUTURE ROLE OF PESTICIDES IN US AGRICULTURE。  new window
14.NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL(2008)。SCIENCE AND DECISION: ADVANCING RISK ASSESSMENT。  new window
15.Cranor, Carl F.(2006)。The Dual Legacy of Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceutical: Trading Junk Science for Insidious Science。RESCUING SCIENCE FROM POLITICS, REGULATION AND THE DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH。  new window
16.McGarity, Thomas O.(2006)。Defending Clean Science from Dirty Attacks by Special Interests。RESCUING SCIENCE FROM POLITICS, REGULATION AND THE DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFIC RE-SEARCH。  new window
17.O’Leary, Rosemary(2006)。Environmental Policy in the Courts。ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY NEW DIRECTIONS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Doremus, Holly(2006)。Using Science in a Political World: The Importance of Transparency in Nature Resource Regulation。RESCUING SCIENCE FROM POLITICS: REGULATION AND THE DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH。  new window
2.Hornstein, Donald T.(2006)。The Data Wars, Adaptive Management, and the Irony of "Sound Science"。Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research。  new window
3.Shapiro, Sidney A.(2006)。Politicizing Peer Review: The Legal Perspective。RESCUING SCIENCE FROM POLITICS: REGULATION AND THE DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH。  new window
4.Wagner, Wendy E.,、Rena Steinzor(2006)。Conclusion: The Imperative of the Principles。RESCUING SCIENCE FROM POLITICS, REGULATION AND THE DISTORTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE