:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論食品輸入政策中風險評估之程序建構與審查必要:以嚴格檢視原則之脈絡為例
書刊名:月旦醫事法報告
作者:王郁霖
作者(外文):Wang, Yu-lin
出版日期:2018
卷期:24
頁次:頁149-177
主題關鍵詞:公益訴訟風險評估風險溝通科學不確定性程序性審查Public interest class actionRisk assessmentRisk communicationScientific uncertaintyProcedural review
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:7
期刊論文
1.宮文祥(20101200)。初探科學在環境法發展上所扮演的角色--以美國法為例。科技法學評論,7(2),129-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葉俊榮(20101000)。捍衛環評制度尊嚴的行政法院中科裁判。月旦法學,185,68-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳仲嶙(20140300)。環境影響評估事件之司法審查密度--比較制度分析的觀點。中研院法學期刊,14,107-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃銘輝(20141200)。論美國法上法院對行政行為的司法審查密度--以通訊傳播行政為中心。臺北大學法學論叢,92,187-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Kelly, Claire R.(2006)。The Dangers of Daubert Creep in the Regulatory Realm。Journal of Law and Policy,14,165-209。  new window
6.Meazell, Emily Hammond(2011)。Super Deference, the Science Obsession, and Judicial Review as Translation of Agency Science。Michigan Law Review,109,733-784。  new window
7.Raul, Alan Charles、Dwyer, Julie Zampa(2003)。"Regulatory Daubert": A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency Science by Incorporating Daubert Principles into Administrative Law。Law and Contemporary Problems,66(4),7-44。  new window
8.Walker, Vern R.(1991)。The Siren Songs of Science: Toward a Taxonomy of Scientific Uncertainty for Decisionmakers。Connecticut Law Review,23,567-626。  new window
9.Walker, Vern R.(2003)。The Myth of Scienceasa "Neutral Arbiter" for Triggering Precautions。Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,26,197-207。  new window
10.Roberts, John G.(2006)。What Makes the DC Circuit Different? A Historical Review。Virginia Law Review,92,375-377。  new window
11.Garland, Merrick B.(1985)。Deregulation and Judicial Review。Harvard Law Review,98,505-510。  new window
12.Garry, Patrick M.(2006)。Judicial Review and the "Hard Look" Doctrine。Nevada Law Journal,7,151-159。  new window
13.Stephenson, Matthew C.(2006)。A Costly Signaling Theory of "Hard Look" Judicial Review。Administrative Law Review,58,753-763。  new window
14.Bernstein, David E.(2016)。What to Doabout Federal Agency Science: Some Doubts about Regulatory Daubert。George Mason Law Review,22,549-551。  new window
15.Stewart, Richard B.(1975)。The Reformation of American Administrative Law。Harvard Law Review,88(4),1667-1813。  new window
16.Rabin, Robert L.(1986)。Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective。Stanford Law Review,38(5),1189-1326。  new window
17.Faigman, David L.(2013)。The Daubert Revolution and the Birth of Modernity: Managing Scientific Evidence in the Age of Science。University of California Davis Law Review,46(3),893-930。  new window
18.李建良(20040100)。環境行政程序的法制與實務--以「環境影響評估法」為中心。月旦法學,104,45-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.李建良(20000100)。論環境法上之公民訴訟。法令月刊,51(1),14-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張文郁(20140200)。淺論行政訴訟之公益訴訟--兼評最高行政法院一○一年度判字第九八○號判決。月旦裁判時報,25,14-37。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.韓憶如(2015)。食品安全衛生管理法之公告之法律性質及其救濟之研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Loether, Herman J.、Mctavish, Donald G.(1993)。Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: An Introduction。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Ghiselli, Edwin E.、Campbell, John P.、Zedeck, Sheldon(1981)。Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences。San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
3.湯德宗(2003)。行政程序法論--論正當行政程序。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carmines, Edward G.、Zeller, Richard A.、Sullivan, John L.(1979)。Reliability and Validity Assessment。Sage。  new window
5.倪貴榮(2016)。食品安全與國際貿易:貿易自由化與健康風險治理之平衡。臺北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2015)。餐飲衛生安全管理面面觀。衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。  延伸查詢new window
7.The European Food Information Council(2017)。How to Communicate Food Risk? A Handbook for Professionals。  new window
8.Aman, Alfred C. Jr.、Mayton, William T.(2004)。Administrative Law。  new window
9.Strauss, Peter L.(2002)。Administrative Justice in the United States。Durham, North Carolina:Carolina Academic Press。  new window
其他
1.衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。受輻射影響食品之人體健康風險評估,https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteList.aspx?sid=9808。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20180129)。日本核災區食品解禁?衛福部報吿:用4大配套與美國、歐盟同步,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/88633。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20171206)。日民調:對福島食品不安臺灣人最怕,https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20171206/1254663/。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院食品安全辦公室。我國食品安全風險評估機制之推動及其運作機制,https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/3AA33683340CE477?A=C。  延伸查詢new window
5.衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。「行政院食品安全會報」105年度第2次會議紀錄,http://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/siteList.aspx?sid=4567。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mecham, Leonidas R.。Judicial Business of the United States Courts: 2004 Annual Report of the Director 77-80 (TableB-1: U.S. Courts of Appeals - Appeals Commenced, Terminated, and Pending, by Circuit, During the 12-Month Period Ending Sept. 30, 2004),http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/statistics_import_dir/b1_0.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.張文貞(2009)。美國行政法發展的最新趨勢。行政契約之法理/各國行政法學發展方向。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kaye, David H.、Freedman, David A.(2000)。Reference Guide on Statistics。Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。  new window
3.黃丞儀(2011)。環境決策、司法審查與行政合理性--試析臺灣與美國環境影響評估訴訟中行政判斷之合法性控制。2010行政管制與行政爭訟。新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Mashaw, Jerry L.(2006)。The Story of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the U.S. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.: Law, Science and Politics in the Administrative State。Administrative Law Story。  new window
5.Pintado, Citlali(2014)。A Taxanomy of EFSA's Scientific Outputs。Foundations of EU Food Law & Policy。  new window
6.MacMaolain, Caoimhin(2014)。EFSA in Respondent: A View from the Court of Justice of the European Union。Foundations of EU Food Law & Policy。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE