WTO特殊與差別待遇條款的談判：歐洲聯盟的策略與影響__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	WTO特殊與差別待遇條款的談判：歐洲聯盟的策略與影響
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	周旭華
作者(外文)：	Chou, Hsu-hua
出版日期：	2011
卷期：	41:1
頁次：	頁221-280
主題關鍵詞：	世界貿易組織；歐洲聯盟；特殊與差別待遇；杜哈發展議程；開發中國家；World Trade Organization；WTO；European Union；EU；Special and Differential Treatment；S&D；Doha Development Agenda；DDA；Developing countries
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:48 點閱:35

歐洲聯盟(EU)在世界貿易組織(WTO)杜哈發展議程下，致力影響與「發展」攸關之「特殊與差別待遇」(S&D)條款談判。EU的整體策略脈絡，係在不挑戰WTO建制核心規範的前提下，增進本身於WTO下之利益。在策略運作上，EU採漸進方式，逐步呈現並強化「目的∕手段」及「S&D差異化」等二項主要論述，藉以重新界定EU在WTO建制下所須承擔的S&D義務，期能限縮其義務範圍及程度，並為其S&D立場與相關作為，建立正當性基礎。此外，EU亦提出若干雙邊及單邊措施，以助推進其S&D主張。EU之策略作為，對開發中國家有關S&D之論述，及此議題未來談判方向，皆可能產生影響。

以文找文

Developing countries once had high expectations of the negotia-tions on Special and Differential (S&D) treatment under the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The achievements realized have turned out to be more limited than they had hoped. The European Union (EU), employing compre-hensive and active strategies, has impacted S&D negotiations. The EU’s overall negotiation strategy regarding S&D has been that of maximizing its interests under the WTO without challenging the WTO regime itself, particularly the regime’s basic norms such as “de-velopment.” Tactically, the EU has taken a step-by-step approach to consolidate its “ends/means” and “S&D differentiation” arguments, so that it can legitimately redefine and minimize its S&D obligations un-der the WTO regime. It seems that EU’s strategic behavior on S&D has decelerated the progress of S&D negotiations under the DDA, and may establish a framework for future negotiations on related topics.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	林彩瑜(20020100)。開發中國家與WTO「特殊且差異之待遇」條款。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，31(1)，289-336。延伸查詢
2.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。
3.	李貴英(2004)。歐洲共同體對開發中國家之優惠待遇--法律規範與經濟發展。歐美研究，34(4)，675-735。延伸查詢
4.	Prévost, D.(2005)。“Operationalising”special and differential treatment of developing countries under the SPS Agreement。South Africa Yearbook of International Law，30，82-111。
5.	Babarinde, O.、Faber, G.(2004)。From Lomé to Cotonou: Business as usual?。European Foreign Affairs Review，9(1)，27-47。
6.	Chang, S. W.(2007)。WTO for trade and development post-Doha。Journal of International Economic Law，10(3)，553-570。
7.	Cottier, T.(2006)。From progressive liberalization to progressive regu-lation in WTO law。Journal of International Economic Law，9(4)，779-821。
8.	Dur, A.、Zimmermann, H.(2007)。The EU in international trade negotiations。Journal of Common Market Studies，45(4)，771-787。
9.	Lo, C. F.(2006)。From S&D treatment to S&D agreement under the WTO: Developing a friendlier global governance of trade for developing countries。Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy，1(1)，33-52。
10.	Meunier, S.(2007)。Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiation。Journal of Common Market Studies，45(4)，905-926。

研究報告
1.	Hoekman, B.、Michalopoulos, C.、Winters, L. A.(2003)。More favorable and differential treatment of developing countries: Toward a new approach in the World Trade Organization。Washington, DC。
2.	Keck, A.、Low, P.(2004)。Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how。
3.	WTO(2004)。Decision adopted by the general council on 1 August 2004。Geneva, Switzerland：WTO。

圖書
1.	Odell, John S.(2006)。Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Johseph S., Jr.(2001)。Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition。New York：Longman。
3.	Hoekman, Bernard、Kostecki, Michael(2001)。The Political Economy of the World Trading System:The WTO and Beyond。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
4.	洪德欽(200203)。WTO法律與政策專題研究。學林。延伸查詢
5.	Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。
6.	Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regimes。Cornell University Press。
7.	李貴英(2008)。世界貿易組織與歐洲聯盟。台北。延伸查詢
8.	Hoekman, B.、Mavroidis, P. C.(2007)。The World Trade Organization: Law, economics, and politics。Oxford, UK。
9.	OECD(2006)。Special and differential treatment under the GATS (TD/TC/WP24/FINAL)。Paris。
10.	Onguglo, B.(2005)。Development issues in the WTO in the post-July package period: Myth or reality?。Penang, Malaysia。
11.	Sutherland, P.、Bhagwati, J.、Botchwey, K.、FitzGerald, N.、Hamada, K.、Jackson, J.(2004)。The future of the WTO。Geneva, Switzerland。
12.	Kessie, E.(2007)。The legal status of special and differential treatment provisions under the WTO agreements。WTO law and developing countries。Cambridge, UK。
13.	Odell, J.(2002)。The Seattle impasse and its implications for the World Trade Organization。The political economy of international trade law。Cambridge, UK。

其他
1.	European Commission。Regions: Africa, Caribbean, Pacific，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/regions/africa-caribbean-pacific/index_en.htm， 20091020。
2.	European Commission。Development: Economic partnerships，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/wider-agenda/development/economic-partnerships/index_en.htm， 20091020。
3.	European Commission。Generalised system of preferences，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/global/gsp/index_en.htm， 20091020。
4.	European Commission。Overview of ACP-EC-Partnership Agreement--The Cotonou Agreement，http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/cotonouintro_en.cfm?CFID=1959679&CFTOKEN=23873060&jsessionid=2430e14d46316d7711a2， 20091020。
5.	European Commission。Wider agenda: Development，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/wider-agenda/development/index_en.htm， 20091020。
6.	Oxfam International，TWN Africa(2007)。A matter of political will: How the European Union can maintain market access for African, Caribbean and Pacific countries in the absence of Economic Partnership Agreements，http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/policy/trade/downloads/joint_epas_twnafrica.pdf， 20091020。
7.	Raghavan, C.(1993)。GATT working parties on Lome divided，http://www.sunsonline.org/trade/process/during/10060093.htm， 20091020。
8.	European Commission。EU agriculture and the WTO，http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/external/wto/newround/full.pdf， 20091020。
9.	Raghavan, C.(2006)。Review of current WTO situation--TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues，http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/twninfo460.htm， 20091020。
10.	Subhan, M.(2007)。What will India gain from the FTA with the EU?，http://www.neurope.eu/articles/What-will-India-gain-from-the-FTA-with-the-EU-/75943.php， 20091020。
11.	European Commission。Countries: India，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/india/index_en.htm， 20091020。
12.	Gambini, G.(2008)。International trade of the European Union in 2007，http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-08-092-EN.PDF。
13.	GATT.(1979)。Differentiation and more favourable treatment reciprocity and fuller participation of developing countries, Decision by Contracting Parties of the GATT, 28 November 1979 (L/4903)，http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/enabling1979_e.htm。
14.	GATT.(1994)。EEC-Import regime for Banana (Panel Report)，http://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91760043.pdf。
15.	Blandford, D.，Josling, T.(2006)。Options for the WTO mo-dalities for agriculture (IPC Discussion Paper)，http://www.agritrade.org/Publications/DiscussionPapers/WTO%20Modalities.pdf， 20091020。
16.	European Commission(2003)。Communication from the commission to the council and to the European parliament--reviving the DDA negotiations--the EU perspective (COM/2003/0734 final)，Brussels, Belgium。
17.	European Commission(2005)。Conditional revised services offer from the EC and its member states，http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/sectoral/services/wto_nego/index_en.htm， 20081130。
18.	(2007)。India, EU may wrap up FTA next year: Nath，http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/11/30/stories/2007113051591000.htm， 20091020。
19.	European Commission(2006)。Global Europe: Competing in the world (COM/2006/0567 final)，Brussels, Belgium。
20.	European Commission(2008)。EU trade commissioner Peter Mandelson's Geneva Blog-21-29 July 2008，http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2008/july/tradoc_139956.pdf， 20081130。
21.	European Commission。Development policies，http://ec.europa.eu/development/policiesgen_en.cfm， 20091020。
22.	WTO(1997)。European Communities--Regimes for the importation sale and distribution of bananas (EC-Bananas III) (Panel Report )，Geneva, Switzerland。
23.	WTO(1997)。European Communities--Regimes for the importation sale and distribution of bananas (EC-Bananas III) (Appellate Body Report)，Geneva, Switzerland。
24.	WTO(1999)。EC approach to services--Communication from the European Communities (WT/GC/W/189)，Geneva, Switzerland。
25.	Maes, M.(2007)。The EU approach to FTA talks with ASEAN, India, Korea，http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/twninfo490c.htm， 20091020。
26.	WTO(2001)。Implementation of special and differential treatment provisions in WTO agreements and decisions (WT/COMTD/W/77/Rev.1)，Geneva, Switzerland。
27.	WTO(2001)。Guidelines and procedures for the negotiations on trade in services (S/L/93)，Geneva, Switzerland。
28.	WTO(2002)。Submission for the committee on trade and development special session on special and differential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/13)，Geneva, Switzerland。
29.	WTO(2002)。The WTO work programme on special differential treatment and some EU ideas for the way forward-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/20)，Geneva, Switzerland。
30.	WTO(2002)。The WTO work programme on special differential treatment-communication from the European Communities (TN/CTD/W/26)，Geneva, Switzerland。
31.	WTO(2002)。Non-mandatory special and differential treatment provisions in WTO agreements and decisions-note by the secretariat-addendum (WT/COMTD/W/77/Rev.1/Add.3)，Geneva, Switzerland。
32.	WTO(2003)。Note on the the meetings of the committee on Trade and developmentof of 7 and 18 October 2002 (TN/CTD/M/7)，Geneva, Switzerland。
33.	WTO(2003)。Communication from the European Communities and its members states-conditional initial offer (TN/S/O/EEC)，Geneva, Switzerland。
34.	WTO(2003)。Communication from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, the People's Republic of China, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Phillipines and Thailand--Proposed liberalization of mode 4 under GATS negotiations (TN/S/W/14)，Geneva, Switzerland。
35.	WTO(1999)。Proposal for a framework agreement on special and differential treatment--Cmmunication from Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, India, Indonesia (WT/GC/W/442)，Geneva, Switzerland。
36.	WTO(2001)。Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Ministerial declaration，Geneva, Switzerland：WTO。((WT/MIN/DEC/1))。
37.	WTO(2001)。Doha WTO ministerial 2001: Decision on implementation-related issues and concerns (WT/MIN/17)，Geneva, Switzerland。
38.	WTO(2004)。Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicarragua, Pakistan, Peru, Phillipines and Thailand--Review of progress as established in paragraph 15 of the guidelines and proce，Geneva, Switzerland。
39.	WTO(2004)。Report of the meeting of council for trade in services--Special session held on 2 April 2004 (TN/S/M/10)，Geneva, Switzerland。
40.	WTO(2005)。Communication from the European Communities and its members states--Conditional revised offer (TN/S/O/EEC/Rev.1)，Geneva, Switzerland。
41.	WTO(2005)。Hongkong ministerial declaration (WT/MIN/DEC)，Geneva, Switzerland。
42.	WTO(2008)。Note on the the meeting of the committee on trade and developmentof of 7 December 2007 (TN/CTD/M/32)，Geneva, Switzerland。
43.	WTO(2008)。Elements required for the completion of the services negotiations (TN/S/33)，Geneva, Switzerland。
44.	WTO(2008)。Report by the chairman to the Trade Negotiations Committee on trade and development to special session of the committee on trade and development (TN/CTD/22)，Geneva, Switzerland。
45.	WTO(2009)。Work on special and differential provisions，http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/dev_special_differential_provisions_e.htm#legal_provisions， 20090831。
46.	WTO(2009)。The integrated framework for least developed countries，http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/teccop_e/if_e.htm， 20090831。
47.	WTO(1999)。Proposals regarding the GATS agreement in terms of paragraph 9(a)(i) of the Geneva ministerial declaration--Communication from India (WT/GC/W/224)，Geneva, Switzerland。

圖書論文
1.	Odell, John S.、Sell, Susan K.(2006)。Reframing the Issue: The Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health in the WTO, 2001。Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	歐洲聯盟強化外資控管之新架構：外國補貼併購交易之審查新制
2.	歐盟疫苗出口管制及其影響之評析
3.	論世界貿易組織上訴機構之改革：美國立場與歐洲聯盟應對方案之評析
4.	基因編輯技術對歐盟基因改造生物管理之挑戰
5.	SCM協定第14條之適用及審查權限--從WTO對國營事業補貼行為之實務見解談起
6.	新冠肺炎期間口罩禁止出口及紓困措施在WTO合致性之研究
7.	英國脫歐談判之現況與前瞻
8.	英國脫歐與英歐貿易關係之未來
9.	歐盟反傾銷法中之反規避措施之研究
10.	歐盟針對肉類食品進口管制之研究
11.	英國脫歐對其多元法律體系之影響
12.	專號序：食品安全的法理與論證
13.	兩岸特定非關稅貿易措施法令與政策之研究
14.	歐盟農業多功能政策
15.	歐盟食品安全制度對臺灣食安改革的啟示

1.	FTA非關稅措施規範多邊化之可行性探討－以技術性貿易障礙與服務貿易為例
2.	區域經濟整合之超國界法律治理基礎──以中國東協自由貿易區為例
3.	專屬保險法制之研究─兼論我國境外保險法制之立法芻議
4.	論國際貨幣基金之附條件在國際法上之實踐──以集體行動理論為分析架構
5.	人類永續發展與愛滋病防治之全球治理體系：兼論我國愛滋病防治政策
6.	歐盟與美國訴諸WTO有關生技(GMO)產品貿易爭端案的衝突與解決
7.	WTO國際機制對台灣與中國的影響：多邊主義與區域主義觀點的分析
8.	GATS建制演進的政治經濟分析-以觀光服務貿易為例
9.	從多哈發展議程之擬定論世界貿易組織中論貿易與人權之互動關係

1.	歐洲聯盟對外政策及其柔性權力評估

無相關著作

1.	中國崛起與美中互動關係解析(1990~2016)：權力轉移理論與貿易和平理論的應用
2.	APEC的中美領導權之爭：以亞太自貿區議題為例
3.	China Triggers a Race to Finance Infrastructure in Asia
4.	解析跨大西洋貿易與投資夥伴協議(TTIP)：理想與現實的可能矛盾
5.	剖析日本簽訂FTA與加入TPP的政策制定過程
6.	跨太平洋夥伴協定發展之探討：美國的角色
7.	支持開放的國內政治聯盟對政治領袖的影響力：「貿易互賴」與「國際衝突」關係中的關鍵調節變數
8.	世界貿易組織中金融服務談判的合作模式：以單邊、雙邊及區域行動困境觀點分析
9.	歐洲聯盟貿易政策的權力分析
10.	試探「歐體／歐盟」與「歐洲自由貿易協會」之貿易自由化的競爭
11.	美中貿易博弈：以智慧財產權保護為例
12.	金融海嘯後中國對於東亞貨幣整合的策略分析：亞元與人民幣之間的抉擇
13.	論「雙邊自由貿易協定」對「亞太經濟合作會議」的組織運作之衝擊
14.	多邊貿易談判的政治脈絡：國際關係理論作為WTO政策研究工具之初探
15.	世界貿易組織規約憲政主義化的省思--國際憲政主義的浮現與影響

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫