:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界高水準女子排球比賽得分因素表現效益與比賽成績表現之關聯研究--以2011年世界杯女子排球賽為例
書刊名:交大體育學刊
作者:吳美玉
作者(外文):Wu, Meei-yhu
出版日期:2012
卷期:3
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:排球得分因素競技能力成績表現灰關聯分析VolleyballScoring factorsCompetitive abilityPerformance of matchGrey relational analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:32
目的:探討12支參賽隊得分技術表現效益之差異和不同得分因素表現效益與比賽成績表現之間的關聯性;方法:以2011世界杯女子排球賽參賽12支球隊為研究對象,並以該12隊所進行單輪循環賽共66場233局的比賽之各項技術表現效益進行分析,研究內容為各隊主要得分技術(攻擊得分、攔網得分、發球得分、對方失誤得分)表現效益之差異分析,並以模糊理論的灰關聯分析法,探討不同得分因素之表現效益與比賽成績表現之間的關聯性;結論:一、不同得分因素之單局平均得分經分析後結果如下:(一)攻擊得分:全部賽程單局平均得12.38分,各隊是以美國隊(USA)單局平均得14.54分最高,日本隊(JPN)單局平均得14.24分次之;並以阿爾及利亞(ALG)單局平均得7.86 分為最低。(二)攔網得分:全部賽程單局平均得2.38分,以義大利隊(ITA)單局平均得3.18分為最高,美國隊(USA)單局平均3.00分次之;並以阿爾及利亞(ALG)單局平均得1.40分表現最低。(三)發球得分:全部賽程單局平均得1.28分,以德國隊(GER)單局平均得1.81分為最高,日本隊(JPN)單局平均1.47分次之;並以巴西隊(BRA)單局平均得0.93分表現最低。(四)對失得分:全部賽程單局平均得5.20分,以阿根廷(ARG)單局平均得6.09分為最高,義大利隊(ITA)單局平均得6.00分次之;並以肯亞隊(KEN)單局平均得3.78分表現最低。二、12支參賽隊不同得分因素與成績表現,經以灰關聯運算分析後,獲得初步研究的結果為:與勝率關聯度最高的為攻擊得分(0.796007),與勝率關聯度次高的為發球得分(0.724641),與勝率關聯度再次高的為對失得分(0.676294),與勝率關聯度最低的為攔網得分(0.642779)。
Purpose: To explore the correlation of scoring factors based on competitive abilities and competition performance of the 12 teams participated in the matches. Methods: This research was based on the statistics from 12 teams competed in the FIVB Volleyball Women's World Cup 2011. In the duration of 233 games from 66 matches, the competitive abilities and techniques (including game points scored from spikes, blocks, serve, and error from opponents) were studied and analyzed. In additions, Grey Relation Analysis (GRA) from fuzzy theory was used in this research to determine the correlation between scoring factors and competition performance. Conclusion: I. The results of this research can be summarized as follows: Spikes Score: The average score obtained from spikes was 12.38. The top two teams, USA and JPN had average scores obtained from spikes of 14.54 and 14.24 respectively. ALG had the least average score obtained from spikes of 7.86. Blocks Score: The average score obtained from blocks was 2.38. The top two teams, ITA and USA had average scores obtained from blocks of 3.18 and 3.00 respectively. ALG had the least average score obtained from blocks of 1.40. Serve Score: The average score obtained from serves was 1.28. The top two teams, GER and JPN had average scores obtained from serves of 1.81 and 1.47 respectively. BRA had the least average score obtained from serves of 0.93. Opponent Error Score: The average score obtained from opponents' error was 5.20. The top two teams, ARG and ITA had average scores obtained from opponents' errors of 6.09 and 6.00 respectively. KEN had the least average score obtained from opponents' errors of 3.78. II. In addition to the above findings, based on the grey relational analysis from the statistics of the 12 teams performed in the games, a preliminary conclusion could be: Spike was the most important technique to win the match with a correlation factor 0.796007. The second and third important techniques of winning the match were serve and error from opponents with a correlation factor 0.724641 and 0.676294, respectively. Finally, block was the least important technique among scoring factors with a factor 0.642779.
期刊論文
1.林柏化(20051200)。排球比賽關聯技術效益模式評價之研究。大專體育學刊,7(4),113-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丁世聰、張紅松、丁世勇(2005)。從主動得分效果看雅典奧運會女排三甲現狀。西安體育學院學報,22(3),88-115。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳雪梅、李新紅、薛明陸(2004)。亞洲女排制勝因素分析。解放軍體育學院學報,23(4),61-63。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃漢升、葛春林(1994)。優秀男子排球比賽得失分規律的研究。中國體育科技,30(5),44-49。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊再淮、任書堂(1997)。我國優秀男排隊比賽中得失分與勝負率的關係。上海體育學院學報,21(2),34-38。  延伸查詢new window
6.袁川、劉建華(2002)。從得失分看男排聯賽接發球進攻系統特點。解放軍體育學院學報,21(1),43-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.李函潔(2001)。排球比賽得分結構差異性討論。大專排球研究論集,7,131-138。  延伸查詢new window
8.張承玉(2001)。從第8屆女子排球世界盃比賽探討女子排球比賽得失分因子及規律。中國體育科技,37(5),40-41。  延伸查詢new window
9.鍾秉樞、董天姝、張然、闕永伍、辛沂、李耀先、安琪、胡恆、呂亞軍(2000)。實行新規則後排球比賽規律初探。體育科學,20(2),34-38。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳昭元(20020600)。亞洲青年男女排球賽前四強得分方式與比賽成績相關性之研究。德霖學報. 文史法商類,16,163-204。  延伸查詢new window
11.杜曉偉、楊勁蒼(1999)。每球得分制新規則對男排比賽得分規律影響的初步研究。西安體育學院學報,16(2),45-47。  延伸查詢new window
12.張桂青(2000)。每球得分制對排球技戰術影響的研究。濱州師專學報,16(2),57-61。  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡崇濱(19991200)。贏球得分制對排球比賽的影響和對策。中華體育季刊,13(3)=51,29-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳嘉毅(2001)。對99世界杯男排賽中國隊的得失分分析。浙江體育科學,23(1),43-45。  延伸查詢new window
15.胡森林(2006)。中國女排與世界強隊實力分析。體育成人教育學刊,25(5),59-60。  延伸查詢new window
16.張然(1999)。每球得分制的思考。中國排球,2,12-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.張歡(2004)。中外男排選手跳發球失誤的技術原因分析。廣州體育學院學報,24(1),46-48。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳一進、陳昭元、王敏憲(2003)。世界青年女子排球賽前八強得分方式與比賽成績關聯性之研究。中華排球,103,97-104。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.周圖南(2000)。排球每球得分制實施後對競賽的影響及因應策略。2000年國際大專運動教練科學研討會。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學體育學系。299-307。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.翁慶昌、陳嘉欉、賴宏仁(2001)。灰色系統基本方法及其應用。高立。  延伸查詢new window
2.李建毅(2006)。我國優秀男子排球選手得分因素競技能力與比賽成績表現之關聯研究。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.余清芳(2004)。2003世界大學運動會女子排球賽得分因素與比賽成績關聯研究。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE