:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:對臺灣實施陪審制之建議
書刊名:檢察新論
作者:殷玉龍吳美齡
出版日期:2013
卷期:14
頁次:頁130-144
主題關鍵詞:陪審制陪審團陪審員職業法官優點困境美國臺灣
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:143
期刊論文
1.Park, Ryan Y.(2010)。The Globalizing Jury Trial: Lessons and Insights from Korea。American Journal of Comparative Law,58(3),525-582。  new window
2.林俊益(20111000)。穩健踏出人民參與審判的第一步:本土化的人民觀審制。刑事法雜誌,55(5),41-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Katsuta, Takuya(2010)。Japan's Rejection of the American Criminal Jury。Am. J. Comp. L.,58,497+509。  new window
4.McClanahan, Jon P.(2012)。Citizen Participation in Japanese Criminal Trials: Reimagining the Right to Trial by Jury in the United States。N. C. J. Int’L. & Com. Reg.,37,725+732-733。  new window
5.Hans, Valerie P.(2012)。What Difference Does Jury Make。Yonsei L. J.,3,36+39-40。  new window
6.Wilson, Matthew J.(2010)。Japan’s New Criminal Jury Trial System: In Need of More Transparency, More Access, and More Time。FORDHAM INT’L L. J.,33,487+521。  new window
7.Young, William(2003)。Summing-up to Juries in Criminal Cases--What Jury Research Says About Current Rules and Practice。Crim. L. Rev.,672。  new window
8.蘇佩鈺(20130100)。初探人民觀審制度--從臺灣士林地方法院觀審模擬法庭觀察出發。檢察新論,13,192-193+195。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hans, Valerie P.(2002)。U.S. Jury Reform: The Active Jury and the Adversarial Ideal。St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.,21,85-86。  new window
10.Hans, Valerie P.、Jehle, Alayna(2003)。Symposium: The Jury at a Crossroad: The American Experience。Chi.-Kent L. Rev.,78,1179-1180。  new window
11.Hans, Valerie P.、Jehle, Alayna(2003)。Avoid Bald Men and People with Green Socks? Other Ways to Improve the Voir Dire Process in Jury Selection。Chi.- KentL.Rev.,78,1179+1190-1191。  new window
12.林俊益、林信旭(20120600)。人民觀審制之建構。軍法專刊,58(3),29。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張永宏(201301)。論國民參與刑事審判制度的基本理念(上)--兼評人民觀審試行條例草案之立法宗旨。月旦法學雜誌,212,130-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.尤伯祥(20120100)。論國民參與審判--以歷史與比較法的考察為基礎。檢察新論,11,256-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.何賴傑(20121100)。從德國參審制談司法院人民觀審制。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,41(特刊),1189-1243。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃國昌(20110700)。美國陪審制度之規範與實證。月旦法學,194,68-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳景欽(2012)。法官應該我來當--各國人民參與審判制度。法治時報社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Vidmar, Neil、Hans, Valerie P.(2007)。American Juries: The Verdict。Prometheus Books。  new window
3.Ivkovic, Sanja Kutnjak(1999)。Lay Participation in Criminal Trials: The Case of Croatia。Austin & Winfield。  new window
4.Hans, Valerie P.、Vidmar, Neil(1986)。Judging the Jury。Perseus Publishing。  new window
5.WYoung, arren、Cameron, Neil、Tinsley, Yvonne(2001)。Sir Rob in Auld’s Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales: Report London HMSO。  new window
6.Singer, Michael(2012)。Jury Duty: Reclaiming Your Political Power and Taking Responsibility。Praeger。  new window
7.Jonakait, Randolph N.(2003)。The American Jury System。Yale University Press。  new window
8.施鵬鵬(2008)。陪審制研究。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20120826)。綠推國民參與刑事審判法--提陪審制改革司法,http://www.ettoday.net/news/20120826/93240.htm, 2012/12/24。  延伸查詢new window
2.Economist(200805)。Anglo-Saxon Attitudes,http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/FullPollData.pdf, 2013/05/02。  new window
3.Mize, Gregory E.,Hannaford-Agor, Paula,Waters, Nicole L.(2007)。The State - of- State Surver of Jury Improvement Efforts: A Compendium Report 27-30 & Appendix F。  new window
4.Census Bureau, United States(2013)。美國(估計的)居住人口,http://www.census.gov/popest/data/national/totals/2012/index.html, 2013/02/20。  new window
5.内政部統計處(201212)。人口數,http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100, 2013/02/20。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE