在全球化局勢中，各邦各族對「良善治理」（good governance）的追求，顯現出歸返人性與內求道德的「復古風」，本文將以「君子儒」此一儒家思想中良善官僚之「理念型」，藉其古典政治理想與現代行政實踐的會通，探討現代文官的倫理修持。本研究歸納儒家經典論述：相較於儒家論述中「君子」所代表的道德理想人格，「君子儒」則是猶如良善官僚的「理念型」，亦即儒之專業性（ professionalism）結合君子之道德性（ morality），產生出相得益彰的公共性（ publicity）；並藉由《論語》中涉及公務倫理之案例分析，將君子儒意涵對觀公益之義務、過程之義務、自我之義務等三類公共行政德性之義務與責任領域。 本研究之論證顯示出，古今中外對德性與倫理之嚮往，實乃「人同此心、心同此理」，再思君子儒，使吾人謙卑地歸返民主自治政府不可或缺的道德基礎，並衷心期待致力於達成良善治理的良善官僚（ the good bureaucracy）。儒家思想著重官僚正當性之道德證成觀點，已逐漸受到 Frederickson等西方公行學者關注 ——身處儒家思想影響深遠的東亞文化圈，應可嘗試將理論建構與實務教學的範疇，朝向人治與法治之理想原則平衡，務實統攝君子儒與小人儒之間千百形色之文官，將價值與行動相連結，在自身系絡中尋索實踐公共價值、支持良善治理所需之「文化力」。

Under globalization’s circumstance, every nation and race pursuing “good governance” shows the “retro” falling back to humanity and innermost moral seeking. On account of “Junzi-ru (gentleman scholar ),” the ideal type of good bureaucracy in Confucianism, this study probes into contemporary bureaucracy’s ethical practice through its converging on classical political ideal and contemporary administrative practice. To induce the discourses in the Confucianism scriptures, relative to “junzi” representing to moral personality, “Junzi-ru” is just as the “ideal type” of the good bureaucracy; that is to say, it is the combination of Ru’s professionalism and Junzi’s morality that is the publicity to complement each other. By case study about administration ethics in “the Analects of Confucius,” we contrast the implication of Junzi-ru’s with the duty and responsibility domain of public administration virtue, e.g. the duty of public welfare, procedure and self. This study argues that it is the sense of justice and rationality is the same with everybody that people look forward virtue and ethics in ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign; at all times and in all countries. Rethinking Junzi-ru lets us be modestly back to the moral pillars which are indispensable in democratic government and expect the good bureaucracy who is devoted to make good governance. Western public administration researchers, like G. H. Frederickson, have paid close attention to the viewpoint emphasizing moral justification of bureaucratic legitimacy in Confucianism. The researchers in East Asia culture circle may try to switch the scope of theory and tuition to balance the theorem of rule-of-law and rule-of-man, comprehend with all kinds of public officers between Junzi-ru and Xiaoren-ru, connect with value and action, and search for “the cultural strength” from the indigenous context for practicing public value and supporting good governance.