臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：後設認知觀點的歷史人物主題策展設計：以張七郎紀念展為例
書刊名：設計學報
作者：馬睿平 引用關係／陳維翰 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ma, Jui-ping／Chen, Wei-han
出版日期：2013
卷期：18:4
頁次：頁41-64
主題關鍵詞：後設認知；展覽；策展設計；Metacognition；Exhibition；Curatorial design
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:84
  • 點閱點閱:129
一般博物館歷史類的主題展，可分為文物或人物兩類，但在紀念館的歷史人物主題展，往往由於涉及特殊族群的情感、詮釋觀點甚至政治立場等問題，策展設計因此有別於相對較單純的文物展。此外，現今博物館的發展趨勢促使策展參與者（策展人、展示設計師）重視觀賞者的感官認知和參與學習的效果，並思考如何轉換、演繹策展理念，使觀賞者能理解敘事觀點，連結陌生的展覽內容，從而形塑更貼近人心的觀看經驗和情感。然而，直到目前，不論學界或實務界對於策展設計尚未有較系統的研究，因此，本研究嘗試以台北228紀念館張七郎紀念展的策展設計為樣本，運用文獻探討、後設認知分析、深度訪談進行個案解析，並歸納、統整後設認知與經驗學習相關理論，呈現一個「策展認知─學習」分析架構，以探究團隊式策展設計對於歷史人物主題展的貢獻，並供後續研究參考。結果發現：（1）歷史人物主題的策展設計，是策展團隊、展館人員、受難者遺眷三方共同妥協出來的成果，其中，受難者遺眷是主導策展定位的主要力量；（2）展出人物年代接近當代，策展過程可能會引起部分政治干擾；（3）三類受訪者在「後設認知」分析的共通點為，對於互動情境塑造的體驗最為深刻；（4）三類受訪者在「後設認知」分析的差異點，主要由個人立場、企圖分歧而產生。
Generally, the exhibitions of historical theme can be classified into styles of object and figure in the museums. However, it is relative to some special people due to the exhibitions of historical figure raised by memorial hall; the exhibitions are different from that of objects. The purpose of this study is, therefore, to take the Zhang Qi-Lang Memorial Exhibition as a case study and analyze the curatorial perspectives from three groups, attended to arrange curation. The data of case study are scrutinized with content and literature analysis methods. Then, in order to understand how curators construct concepts, ideas by themselves to shape the exhibition, we develop an assessing tool, named ”Curation-Learning Analysis” frame by integrating theories of metacognition and Experience Learning Theory (ELT). The evaluation of the three-group curators focuses on their preference and attitudes. The findings are as follows: (1) the curatorial design of historical figure's theme is a compromise by working team, exhibition side, and victim's family; (2) the stance from exhibition side is more neutral, whereas victim's family owns a main power to lead the curatorial activity; (3) due to the fact that the historical figure is closer to contemporary, some topics are made by political issues in the curatorial period; (4) the impression of all interviewees is profound to experience the interactive scenario. Finally this study presents a framework of metacognition analysis in historical figure curation to some possibilities for further research.
期刊論文
1.黃光男(20061100)。博物館展覽理念與規劃。書畫藝術學刊，1，1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Connor, L. T.、Dunlosky, J.,、Hertzog, C.(1998)。Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy。Psychology and Aging，12，50-71。  new window
3.Georghiades, P.(2004)。From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition。International Journal of Science Education，26(3)，365-383。  new window
4.Keniston, A. H.,、Flavell, J. H.(1979)。A developmental study of intelligent retrieval。Child Development，50，1144-1152。  new window
5.Nelson, T. O.、Dunlosky, J.、Graf, A.、Narens, L.(1994)。Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning。Psychological Science，5，207-213。  new window
6.Paris, S. G.、Paris, A. H.(2001)。Classroom application of research on self-regulated learning。Educational Psychologist，36(2)，89-101。  new window
7.Schwartz, B. L.(2001)。The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time。Memory and Cognition，29，117-126。  new window
8.Son, L. K.、Metcalfe, J.(2000)。Metacognitive and control strategies in studytime allocation。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，26，204-221。  new window
9.Thiede, K. W.,、Dunlosky, J.(1999)。Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，25，1024-1037。  new window
10.Wellman, H. M.(1983)。Metamemory revisited.。Contribution to Human Development，9，31-51。  new window
11.Macdonald, Sharon(2005)。Accessing Audiences: Visiting Visitor Books。Museum and Society，3(3)，1-18。  new window
12.Yore, L. D.、Treagust, D. F.(2006)。Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and in forming instruction。International Journal of Science Education，28(2)，291-314。  new window
13.羅傑‧麥爾斯、陳盈芊(1997)。展示學習。博物館學季刊，11(2)，41-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林崇熙(20050700)。博物館文物演出的時間辯證：一個文化再生產的考察。博物館學季刊，19(3)，7-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳佳利(20130300)。質性觀眾研究初探：理念與方法。博物館簡訊，63，6-9。  延伸查詢new window
16.Silverman, L. H.(1995)。Visitor meaning-making in museums for a new age。Curator: The Museum Journal，38(3)，161-170。  new window
17.Paris, S. G.、Lipson, M. Y.、Wixson, K. K.(1983)。Becoming a strategic reader。Contemporary Educational Psychology，8(3)，293-316。  new window
18.Hart, J. T.(1965)。Memory and the Feeling-of-knowing Experience。Journal of Educational Psychology，56(4)，208-216。  new window
19.Cross, D. R.、Paris, S. G.(1988)。Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology，80(2)，131-142。  new window
研究報告
1.李子寧(2011)。臺灣博物館與歷史展示—從總督府博物館到省博初期的變遷（1920～1960）。台北：國立臺灣博物館。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Flavell, J. H.(1987)。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Hall, A., Wellman, B.(1985)。Social nerworks and social support。Social support and health。New York, NY：Academic Press。  new window
3.Hooper-Greenhill, E., & Moussouri, T.(2001)。Making meaning in art museums 2: Visitors' interpretive strategies at Nottingham Castle Museum。Leicester：Research Centre for Museums & Galleries.。  new window
4.Kluwe, R. H.(1982)。Cognitive knowledge and executive control.。Human mind – animal mind。New York, NY：Springer。  new window
5.Marshall, J. C., & Morton, J.(1978)。On the mechanics of EMMA。The Child’s Conception of Language。Berlin：Springer。  new window
6.Melton, A.W(1988)。Problems of Installation in Museums of Art。Washington, DC：American Association of Museums。  new window
7.O’Neill, P.(2007)。The curatyorial turn: From practice to discourse。Issues in curating contemporary art and performance。Bristol:：Intellect Books。  new window
8.Perfect, T. J.、Schwartz, B. L.(2004)。Applied metacognition。Edinburgh:：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Son, L. K.、Schwartz, B. L.(2004)。The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control。Applied metacognition。Cambridge:：Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.愛莉森．卡羅、桂雅文(2004)。獨立策展人--從企劃到執行的學習手冊。台北：五觀藝術管理。  延伸查詢new window
11.Nelson, T. O.(1988)。Predictive accuracy of the feeling of knowing across different criterion tasks and across different subject populations and individuals。Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1。New York, NY：Wiley。  new window
12.Nelson, T. O.、Narens, L.(1990)。Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings。The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 26。San Diego, CA：Academic Bess。  new window
13.Dean, David、蕭翔鴻(2006)。展覽複合體：博物館展覽的理論與實務。臺北：藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.凱斯‧詹京斯、賈士蘅(2001)。歷史的再思考。台北：麥田。  延伸查詢new window
15.Falk, J. H.、Dierking, L. D.(2000)。Learning from Museums。Oxford：Altamira Press。  new window
16.Giles, Judy、Middleton, Tim(1999)。Studying Culture: A Practical Introduction。Oxford：Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
17.陳佳利(2007)。被展示的傷口：記憶與創傷的博物館筆記。臺北：典藏藝術家庭。  延伸查詢new window
18.姚村雄(2005)。設計本事：日治時期臺灣美術設計案內。臺北：遠足文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Stanford, Michael、劉世安(2001)。歷史研究導論。臺北：麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Kolb, David A.(1984)。Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development。Prentice-Hall。  new window
21.劉婉珍(20110000)。博物館觀眾研究。臺北：三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Hein, George E.(1998)。Learning in the Museum。Routledge。  new window
23.Baudrillard, M. Jean、林志明(1997)。物體系。時報。  延伸查詢new window
24.耿鳳英(2009)。魔幻與寫實：時間與空間在博物館展示之呈現。製作博物館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Castle, M. C.(2004)。Teaching in the virtual museum.，Peterborough, Ontario。，http://www.mccastle.com/userdata/oma04_teaching_in_the_virtual_museum.pdf， 2013/06/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.Flavell, J. H.(1981)。Cognition monitoring。Children’s oral communication skills。New York, NY：Academic Press。  new window
2.馮品佳、劉紀蕙(2001)。創造異質空間 : 《無禮》的抗拒與歸屬政治。他者之域：文化身分與再現策略。臺北：麥田。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hacker, D. J.(1998)。Definitions and empirical foundations。Metacognition in educational theory and practice。Mahwah, NJ：Boca Raton：Erlbaum：Routledge。  new window
4.Brown, A. L.(1987)。Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms。Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1054（臺灣：1041，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67662013
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上