:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:晚明至民初視覺文化與男同性關係之想像
書刊名:中正漢學研究
作者:郭劼
作者(外文):Guo, Jie
出版日期:2013
卷期:2013:2=22
頁次:頁213-238
主題關鍵詞:晚明至民初視覺文化男同性關係乾旦可見性Late imperial and early Republican ChinaVisual cultureMale same-sex relationshipsThe male danVisibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:52
為何乾旦在展現男同性關係的現、當代華語作品中一再出現?本文認為,近世作品中,乾旦並非唯一用來展現男同性關係的人物類型,但相對其他人物類型而言,乾旦在展現男同性關係(male same-sex relations)的作品中地位特殊,這與其在晚明以來的大眾文化中的「可見性」(visibility)息息相關。乾旦獲得這個地位一方面歸因於作為視覺文化重要形式的戲劇文化的繁榮。另一方面,由於出版、印刷業的繁榮和物質文化的發展,通過小說、詩歌、花譜、報紙、廣告、戲曲雜誌等渠道,乾旦形象得以視覺形式(版畫插圖、照片、廣告等)及文字形式(小說、詩歌、花榜、報導、花邊新聞等)抓住大眾「視線」,並長久停留在集體文化記憶中。男同性主題的作品在五〇年以后從大眾文化圖景中淡出,但在八〇、九〇年代當男同性關係表述再次得以出現的時候,乾旦扮演了關鍵角色。把近世中國視覺文化與男同性關係的表述放在一起研究,既有助於我們探詢近世主流視覺文化形式的變遷,也有助於我們理解這些變遷下男同性關係表述及想像的發展變化。
How should we understand the frequent appearance of the figure of the male dan in modern Chinese-language representations of male same-sex relations? This paper holds that this is partly due to the strong visibility this figure enjoyed in the late imperial Chinese culture scene. On the one hand, his visibility had to do with the flourishing theater culture in Ming-Qing China; on the other, the booming print and publishing culture of this period also enhanced the visibility of this figure, who was frequently featured in works of a wide variety of the genres and forms, both visual (e.g. illustration, photography, and advertisement) and literary (e.g. novel, poetry, guidebook entry, newspaper report, and tabloid article). As a result, this figure continued to linger in the collective memory of Chinese-speaking societies. By deliberately bringing visual culture and representations of male same-sex relationships together, this paper seeks to trace the development of visual forms in popular culture from late Ming to the early Republican era, and at the same time how the changes shaped the visualizations of male-male relations.
期刊論文
1.郭劼(20091200)。文本與觀看:近年來英語漢學界對視覺與文本關係之研究。中正大學中文學術年刊,14,35-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chi, Ta-wei。Performers of the Paternal Past: History, Female Impersonators, and Twentieth-Century Chinese Fiction。Positions: east cultures critique,15(3),580-608。  new window
3.Guo, Jie(2013)。From Patriarchal Polygamy to Conjugal Monogamy: Imagining Male Same-Sex Relationships in Modem China。Modern Chinese Literature and Culture,25(1),165-205。  new window
4.Tian, Xiaofei(2002)。A Preliminary Comparison of the Two Recensions of Jinpingmei。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,62(2),347-388。  new window
5.Meyer-Fong, Tobie S.(2007)。The Printed World: Books, Publishing Culture, and Society in Late Imperial China。Journal of Asian Studies,66(3),787-817。  new window
圖書
1.Clurms, Craig(2007)。Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China, 1368-1644。Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
2.蘭陵笑笑生、秦修容(1998)。金瓶梅:會評會校本。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Pang, Laikwan(2007)。The Distorting Mirror: Visual Modernity in China。Honolulu:University of Hawai'i Press。  new window
4.Hegel, Robert(1998)。Reading Illustrated Fiction in Late Imperial China。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
5.間昭典、王汝梅、孫言誠、趙炳南(2011)。金瓶梅:新刻繡像批評。香港:香港三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.馮夢龍、魏同賢(1994)。情史。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.醉西湖心月主人(1995)。弁而釵。臺北:臺灣大英百科股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.曹雪芹、俞平伯、王惜時(1993)。紅樓夢八十回校本。人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳森、徐德明(2010)。品花寶鑑。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾樸(2006)。孽海花。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.秦瘦鷗(2009)。秋海棠。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.老舍(2008)。兔。上海:文匯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.巴金(1965)。第二的母親。香港:今代圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.李英儒(2005)。野火春風鬥古城。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.巴金(2010)。家。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.巴金(2010)。春。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.巴金(2010)。秋。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.王小波(2009)。東宮西宮。北京:北京理工大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.么書儀(2008)。晚清戲曲的變革。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.張次溪(1991)。清代燕都梨園史料。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.伊芙.科索夫斯基.塞吉維克、郭劼(2011)。男人之間:英國文學與男性同性社會性欲望。上海:上海三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
22.Hsiao, Li-ling(2007)。The Eternal Present of the Past: Illustration, Theatre, and Reading in the Wanli Period, 1573-1619。Leiden。  new window
23.Volpp, Sophie(2011)。Worldly Stage: Theatricality in Seventeenth-Century China。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Asia Center。  new window
24.Wu Cuncun(2004)。Homoerotic Sensibilities in Late Imperial China。London:Routledge Curzon。  new window
25.Van Gulik, Robert Hans(2004)。Erotic Colour Prints of the Ming Period: With an Essay on Chinese Sex Life from the Han to the Ch'ing Dynasty, B. C. 206-A. D. 1644。Leiden:Brill。  new window
26.Kang, Wenqing(2009)。Obsession: Male Same-Sex Relations in China, 1900-1950。Hong Kong University Press。  new window
27.白先勇(1991)。孽子。臺北:允晨。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳平原、夏曉虹(2001)。圖像晚清:點石齋畫報。天津:百花文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.曾秀萍(2003)。孤臣.孽子.台北人:白先勇同志小說論。爾雅出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.Brook, Timothy(1998)。The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China。University of California Press。  new window
31.張在舟(2001)。曖昧的歷程:中國古代同性戀史。中州古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.毛文芳(20080000)。圖成行樂:明清文人畫像題詠析論。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Goldstein, Joshua(2007)。Drama Kings: Players and Publics in the Re-creation of Peking Opera, 1870-1937。University of California Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.徐德明(2010)。品花寶鑑考證。品花寶鑑。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.張明高(2006)。前言。孽海花。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE