:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「企業倫理」架構下的「權變型社會企業」的可行性
書刊名:輔仁管理評論
作者:吳成豐 引用關係吳文貴 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chen-fongWu, Wen-kuei
出版日期:2015
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁1-19
主題關鍵詞:企業倫理權變社會企業企業倫理文化權變型社會企業Business ethicsContingencySocial enterprisesBusiness ethics cultureContingency type of social enterprises
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:14
台灣社會企業的環境因「管理的矛盾」、「經管人才欠缺」與「法令欠周延」等因素,社企發展似乎面臨層層障礙,遂引發本文尋求台灣社企發展型式的動機。 本文選取台日企業為個案,採深度訪談與收集次級資料方法,分析「社會企業」與營利企業「企業倫理」的共同特質,分析發現 :個案企業負責人並不全然自許為「社會企業」,但均強調企業盈利才能擴大社會公益的貢獻;個案企業均相當程度做到「社會關懷」與「某種程度解決社會問題」的社會目標。 本文要申論的是,營利企業如果強化自身「企業倫理操作」功能,形塑更高程度的「企業倫理文化」,且更有效實踐社會公益等社會目標;換言之,在「企業倫理」架構下,營利企業運用既有的資源以便有效實踐社會目標,那麼,或可發展出具功能性的「權變型社會企業」的型態。
The development of social enterprise (SE) in Taiwan seems to be impeded by some contextual factors such as “managerial contradictions”, “lack of economic management talents”, and “inconsiderate decrees.” These barriers motivate the study to explore a better developing type of SE in Taiwan. The study selected several enterprises in Taiwan and Japan as cases to analyze the common traits of “SE” and the “business ethics” of profit-seeking enterprises by conducting the methods of in-depth interviewing and secondary data collection. The results showed that corporate responsible persons of the cases did not entirely consider their enterprises as SE though they all stressed that only corporate profits can enlarge the contribution to social welfare. All of these cases also achieved the social goals of “social care” and “social problem solving from some perspective” to a certain extent. What the study intends to expound is that profit-seeking enterprises can more effectively achieve social goals such as social welfare if they strengthen the function of “business ethics operation” and mold a higher level of “business ethics culture.” From this perspective, the study managerially implies that profit-seeking enterprises can effectively implement social welfare by exercising existing resources under the framework of “business ethics”; then this perhaps also develops a functional “contingency type of SE.”
期刊論文
1.王娟嬑、夏侯欣鵬、胡哲生、蔡淑梨(20110300)。營利事業經營社會企業之初探。創業管理研究,6(1),29-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sagaw, S.、Segal, E.(2000)。Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value Through Business and Social Fector Partnership。California Management Review,42(2),105-122。  new window
3.Waddock, S. A.(1988)。Building Successful Partnerships。Sloan Management Review,29(4),17-23。  new window
4.Wu, Chen(2004)。Research on a Typology of Business Ethics Operation across the Taiwan strait。Journal of Business Ethics,52(3),229-242。  new window
5.楊君琦、郭欣怡(20110100)。社會企業組織型態與經營類型之初探。輔仁管理評論,18(1),53-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李郁怡(2013)。台灣社會企業三大趨勢。哈佛商業評論,84,135-143。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dees, J. Gregory、Elias, Jaan(1998)。The Challenges of Combining Social and Commercial Enterprise。Business Ethics Quarterly,8(1),165-178。  new window
圖書
1.Robbins, S. P.、Judge, T. A.(2011)。Organizational behavior。Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
2.吳成豐(2010)。企業倫理的實踐。臺北:前程文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dees, J. Gregory、Emerson, Jed、Economy, Peter(2001)。Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
4.Light, Paul C.(2008)。The search for social entrepreneurship。Washington, D.C:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.涂瑞德(2012)。社會企業在台灣的法律規範與管理矛盾。社會企業:台灣與香港的比較。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王仕圖、官有垣(2012)。歐洲與美國的社會企業與社會創業精神的概念內涵:趨同與分歧。社會企業:台灣與香港的比較。高雄:巨流圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Wu, Chen(2004)。Altruism in the Chinese Buddhist Tradition and the Realisation of Business Ethics in Modern Chinese Society。Stakeholders and Social Responsibility。Malaysia:Ansted Service Center。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE