資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.17.157.190)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
美國聯邦政府的幼教方案與幼兒入園狀況:Quality Counts 2015的調查報告
書刊名:
教育研究與發展期刊
作者:
洪福財
作者(外文):
Hung, Fu-tsai
出版日期:
2015
卷期:
11:3
頁次:
頁115-142
主題關鍵詞:
美國教育
;
幼兒教育
;
幼兒入園
;
教育政策
;
Education in the United States
;
Early childhood education
;
Children enrolled in preprimary programs
;
Educational policy
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:175
在美國政黨政治的競爭環境裡,支持幼兒教育發展是當前政黨競爭環境下少見的共識所在。美國聯邦政府從廿世紀陸續推出許多幼教方案,直到今日的Obama 政府亦然,伴隨而來的巨額經費補助,不僅資助幼教發展,同時左右幼教的走向。提升弱勢幼兒入園率與教育品質,是近年美國教育發展的主軸方向,幼兒入園是否能消除背景因素的影響,便成為各方關注的焦點。本研究採文件分析法,首先,分析美國聯邦政府廿世紀以來實施的幼教方案,探討美國幼教政策發展的梗概;其次,以 2015 年《教育周報》(Education Week)出版《教育品質衡鑑 2015》(Quality Counts 2015)年度教育特刊所進行的幼教調查為依,輔以美國教育部「教育統計中心」(National Center for Education Statistics) 的統計結果,探討最新幼兒入園及其相關影響因素的調查結果;最後,解讀前述教育政策發展與調查結果,析論對於我國幼教發展的教育蘊義。依據前述分析結果,本研究歸納出五項解讀重點,並依據探討結果提出七項對我國幼教發展的蘊義。本研究的探討結果有利於瞭解美國幼教政策發展脈絡與幼兒入園資訊,所得的結果將可供我國進行幼教研究與發展幼教政策的參考論據。
以文找文
In the competitive bi-partisan political environment of America, supporting the development of early childhood is a rare consensus between democratic and republican parties. The federal government has launched a number of early childhood education program since the beginning of 20th century, accompanied by huge financial subsidies and directing the policy orientation. Raising the enrollment rate of disadvantaged children, improving the quality of early childhood education and facilitating the equity of education have been main aims of educational policy in recent years. This study has three purposes. First, to analyze the early childhood education programs implemented by federal government since the 20th century and asses their impact. Second, to analyze the early childhood education survey conducted by “Education Week” published on "Quality Counts 2015" and the survey conducted by Education statistics National Center of Department of Education, discuss the findings and the accordance between them. Finally, to inquire into the meanings behind the above analyses and to conclude with the meaningful findings on early childhood education. The study is beneficial to understand the policy development and status quo on early childhood education in America, and the findings and the following hints will benefit the ongoing research and policy analysis of early childhood education in Taiwan.
以文找文
Other
1.
教育部(2014)。教育部電子報,http://epaper.edu.tw/old/print.aspxprint_type=topical&print_sn=868&print_num=606。
期刊論文
1.
張翔一(2012)。臺灣是富人的低稅天堂。天下雜誌,506,114-125。
延伸查詢
2.
Arnold, M. L.、Newman, J. H.、Gaddy, B. B.、Dean, C. B.(2005)。A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research。Journal of Research in Rural Education,20(6),1-25。
3.
Editorial Projects in Education(2015)。Leaders to learn from 2015。Education Week,34(22),s1-62。
研究報告
1.
洪福財、翁麗芳、鍾志從(2012)。「5歲幼兒免學費教育計畫」效益評估期末報告 (計畫編號:RDEC-PLN-101-001)。臺北市。
延伸查詢
2.
郭靜晃、黃志成、吳幸玲(2012)。金門縣101年度兒童及少年生活狀況及需求調查。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Morrison, G. S.(1995)。Early Childhood Education Today。New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc。
2.
原住民族委員會(2014)。102學年度原住民族教育調查統計。新北市:原住民族委員會。
延伸查詢
3.
Education Week Research Center(1997)。Quality count。Bethesda, MD:Editorial Projects in Education Inc。
4.
Education Week Research Center(2015)。Preparing to launch: Early childhood's academic countdown。Bethesda, MD:Editorial Projects in Education Inc。
5.
Fuller, B.(2008)。Standardized childhood: The political and cultural struggle over early education。Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press。
6.
Lascarides, V. C.、Hinitz, B. F.(2011)。History of early childhood education。New York, NY:Routledge。
7.
National Center for Education Statistics(2014)。Percentage of the population 3 to 34 years old enrolled in school, by age group: Selected years, 1940 through 2013。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。
8.
National Center for Education Statistics(2014)。Number and percentage of students in prekindergarten through grade 12 living in poverty, by control of school: 2000 through 2013。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。
9.
National Center for Education Statistics(2014)。Estimates of resident population, by race/ethnicity and age group: Selected years, 1980 through 2013。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。
10.
National Center for Education Statistics(2014)。Percentage of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children enrolled in preprimary programs, by attendance status, level of program, and selected child and family characteristics: 2012。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。
11.
Tobin, J. Jay、Hsueh, Y.、Karasawa, M.(2009)。Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。
其他
1.
內政部(2011)。內政統計通報:100 年第二十六週,https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/100children.doc。
延伸查詢
2.
內政部移民署(2013)。101學年度重點學校及新住民人數統計,https://www.immigration.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=34075&CtUnit=18351&BaseDSD=7&mp=tp。
延伸查詢
3.
臺北市政府社會局(2014)。102年度臺北市兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告摘要,http://www.dosw.gov.taipei/public/Attachment/410316134859.pdf。
延伸查詢
4.
Editorial Projects in Education(2014)。Mission and history,http://www.edweek.org/info/about/history.html?intc=thed。
5.
Editorial Projects in Education(2015)。Philanthropy,http://www.edweek.org/info/about/philanthropy.html?intc=thed。
6.
Education Week Research Center(2015)。States graded on indicators for early years,http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/08/states-graded-on-indicatorsfor-early-years.html?intc=EW-QC15-TOC。
7.
Education Week Research Center(2015)。Quality counts introduces new state report card; U.S. Earns C, and Massachusetts ranks first in nation,http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/early_years/2015/01/quality_counts_report_surveys_early-learning_landscape.html?qs=quality+counts。
8.
Family and Social Services Administration.(2014)。About first steps,http://www.in.gov/fssa/ddrs/4685.htm。
9.
Klein, A.(20150120)。In State of the Union, Obama pitches college access, child-care id,http://www.edweek.org/ew/section/blogs/index.html。
10.
SCCAP(2014)。About SCCAP,http://www.insccap.org/pages/ABOUT。
11.
SCCAP(2014)。SCCAP head start,http://www.insccap.org/styles/sccap/defiles/Head_Start/Head%20Start.pdf?phpMyAdmin=AL2cnc2oFpH%2CqySW%2ClwHYq4ZpU7。
12.
The North Carolina Partnership for Children, Inc.(2014)。Raising the quality of early care and education,http://www.smartstart.org/raising-quality-of-care-education/raisethe-quality-of-early-care-and-education。
13.
Will, M.(2015)。Government programs undergird early-ed. priorities,http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/08/government-programs-undergird-early-edpriorities.html?intc=EW-QC15-TOC。
14.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2014)。Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators,http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education_at_a-Glance-2014.pdf。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
幼兒教育階段新移民家庭的邊陲化現象探討
2.
政策的過程:政策與聲音兩者的關係
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
以多群組結構方程模式檢驗成就目標理論模式的測量恆等性
2.
國小輔導教師的工作壓力與因應策略
3.
雙和醫院實施全人照護教育經驗分享
4.
博物異誌:水火風土人神的媒介論--《不可思議的雲:邁向元素的媒介哲學》
5.
貪腐容忍度的類型化建構:內在與外在效度的評估
6.
教育型桌遊的設計循環模式之探究
7.
建立初入安置機構兒童之定向遊戲治療工作模式
8.
期待兩種心理學之中道發展
9.
從《幼稚園課程標準》到《幼兒園教保活動課程大綱》--談七十年來臺灣幼教課程的發展
10.
意義再建構團體對於癌症喪親者的悲傷介入之成效評估研究
11.
顧客價值、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度關係之研究--以拿鐵拉花咖啡店為例
12.
臺灣公立美術館館長專業職能初探
13.
未來教育的理念與策進作為
14.
華人差序式領導對運動團隊效能之影響
15.
互動性裝置藝術對幼保系學生壓力情緒療癒影響之案例探究
QR Code