:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:逆向給付爭議--競爭法與專利法之交錯
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:蔡鎛宇
作者(外文):Tsai, Bo-yu
出版日期:2015
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁127-164
主題關鍵詞:學名藥逆向付款推定違法合理原則專利權利範圍法Generic drugReverse paymentPay for delayRule of reasonPresumptively illegal
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:21
期刊論文
1.Hovenkamp, Herbert J.、Janis, Mark D.、Lemley, Mark A.(2003)。Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes。Minn. L. Rev.,87,1719-1766。  new window
2.Hovenkamp, Herbert(2014)。Anticompetitive Patent Settlements and the Supreme Court's Actavis Decision。Minn. J. L. Sci. and Tech.,15,3+8。  new window
3.Ghosh, Shubha(2014)。Convergence?。Minn. J. L. SCI. and Tech.,15,95-96。  new window
4.Shapiro, Carl(2003)。Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements。The Rand Journal of Economics,34(2),391-411。  new window
5.馮震宇(20120700)。藥品專利與競爭法之互動--從學名藥逆向付款爭議談起。專利師,10,98-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張哲倫、李素華(20141100)。專利法之經濟結構--經濟分析理論對於臺灣專利制度運作之啟發。月旦法學,234,229-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Carrier, Michael A.(2014)。Payment After Actavis。Iowa Law Review,100(1),7-49。  new window
8.Choi, William(2014)。Pay-'For'Delay Practices in the Pharmaceutical Sector: Lundbeck, Actavis, and Others。J. EUR. COMPETITION L. & PRAC.,5,44。  new window
9.Dickey, Bret(2010)。An Economic Assessment of Patent Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry。Annals Health L.,19,367。  new window
10.Lemley, Mark A.(2007)。A New Balance Between IP and Antitrust。Sw. J. L. & Trade Am.,13,237。  new window
11.Lewis, Jeffrey I. D.、Wittlin, Maggie(2015)。Entering the Innovation Twilight Zone: How Patent and Antitrust Law Must Work Together。VAND. J. Ent. & TECH. L.,17,517。  new window
12.Lim, Daryl(2014)。Patent Misuse and Antitrust: Rebirth or False Dawn?。MlCH. TELECOMM. & Tech. L. Rev.,20,299。  new window
13.Willig, Robert D.、Bigelow, John P.(2004)。Antitrust Policy Toward Agreements That Settle Patent Litigation。Antitrust Bull,49,655。  new window
14.Yu, Xiang、Chatterji, Anjan(2011)。Why Brand Pharmaceutical Companies Choose to Pay Generics in Settling Patent Disputes: A Systematic Evaluation of the Asymmetric Risks in Litigation。NW. J. Tech. & INTELL. PROP.,10,18。  new window
15.Fraile, Irene(2014)。Drug Test: When Are Pay-for-Delay Agreements Illegal?。GLOBAL Competition Litig. Rev.,4,214。  new window
16.王立達(20091100)。美國競爭法近期發展與政權移轉之可能影響--避免過度嚇阻、重視經濟學理到強化執法。月旦法學,174,230-240。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王立達(20080100)。限制競爭之專利侵害和解:尋求合適分析架構。全國律師,12(1),51-62。  延伸查詢new window
18.王偉霖(20110100)。公平交易法限制事業發侵害智慧財產權警告信之實務與探討。全國律師,15(1),27-40。  延伸查詢new window
19.熊誦梅(20081000)。不當行使專利權之法律效果及救濟途徑--從美國法上之專利地痞、專利濫用及智慧財產授權準則談起。全國律師,12(10),56-67。  延伸查詢new window
20.王立達、陳蔚奇(20101200)。學名藥上市審查之專利連結制度:從美國經驗檢證其存立基礎與制度設計。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,39(4),349-406。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.蔣大中(2014)。美國專利連結與橘皮書登錄制度研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院公平交易委員會(2014)。認識公平交易法。臺北:行政院公平交易委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖義男(2015)。公平交易法之釋論與實務。元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.葉雲卿。淺談美國專利聯結制度系列學名藥180天市場專屬權之起源,http://www.naipo.com/Portals/l/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/publish-318.htm, 2015/11/07。  延伸查詢new window
2.Botti, Mark J.(201306)。Redefining the Border Between Intellectual Property and Antitrust: Implications of FTC v. Actavis, Squire Patton Boggs,http://www.squirepattonboggs.com/~/media/files/insights/publications/2013/06/redefi.ning-the-border-between-intellectual-prope/files/redefiningtheborderbetweenintellectualpropertyan/fileattachment/redefmingtheborderbetweenintellectualpropertyan.pdf.。  new window
3.European Commission(20130619)。Antitrust: Commission Fines Lundbeck and Other Pharma Companies for Delaying Market Entry of Generic Medicines。  new window
4.Eur. Comm'n(20141205)。5th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (Jan.-Dec. 2013),http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/pharmaceuticals/inquiry/patent_settlem ents_report5_en.pdf。  new window
5.Eur. Comm'n(20140625)。Guidance on Restrictions of Competition "By Object” for the Purpose of Defining Which Agreements May Benefit from the De Minimis Notice,http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrast/legislation/de_miiiimisjnotice_annex.pdf。  new window
6.(20140916)。"By Object" Restrictions of Competition Revisited: European Court of Justice Endorses Narrow Interpretation,http://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/LW-European-Justice-Court-Groupement-Cartes-Bancaires。  new window
7.Crouch, Dennis(20131125)。IP Law Professors Rise-Up Against Patent Assertion Entities, PATENTLY-O,http://patentlyo.com/patent/2013/11/ip-law-professors-rise-up-against-patent-assertion-entities.html。  new window
8.European Commission(20140709)。Antitrust: Commission Fines Servier and Five Generic Companies for Curbing Entry of Cheaper Versions of Cardiovascular Medicine。  new window
9.Lakdawalla, Darius,Philipson, Tomas。Does Intellectual Property Restrict Output? An Analysis of Pharmaceutical Markets,http://www.ncbi.nlm,nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161291/, 2015/07/20。  new window
10.Pierce, Jennifer,Birch, Christopher(20140408)。UK: Reverse Payments in Patent Settlements--“Pay for Delay”?,http://www.mondaq.com/x/305206/Patent/Reverse+Payments+In+Patent+Settlements+Pay+For+Delay。  new window
11.Shadowen, Steve D.(201309)。Exclusion Payment Litigation: What's Next?,http://www.aipla.org/committees/committee_pages/antitrust-law/Committee%20Documents/Committee%20Programs/2013 %20Annual%20Meeting/Sh adowen%20paper.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃銘傑(2013)。『行政院公平交易委員會對於事業發侵害著作權、商標權或專利權警告函案件之處理原則』之法理及規範邏輯疑義。智慧財產法之理論與實務不同意見書。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE