:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大專籃球聯賽選手之心理堅韌性、特質性焦慮、壓力因應策略與運動倦怠量表編制
書刊名:運動休閒餐旅研究
作者:楊欽城 引用關係柳立偉 引用關係鄒智盛
作者(外文):Yang, Chin-chengLiu, Li-weiZou, Jhih-sheng
出版日期:2015
卷期:10:4
頁次:頁79-105
主題關鍵詞:大專籃球選手心理堅韌性特質性焦慮壓力因應策略運動倦怠College basketballMental toughnessTrait anxietyStress coping strategiesSport burnout
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:10
本研究目的旨在編製適合大專籃球選手之心理堅韌性、特質性焦慮、壓力因應策略與運動倦怠之量表。研究對象為102 學年度大專籃球聯賽之選手,所得資料經統計分析後,結果顯示:心理堅韌性量表包含「積極奮鬥」、「抗壓性」、「忍受傷痛」三個構面22 個題項,累積解釋總變異量為67.32%;特質性焦慮量表包含9 個題項,累積解釋總變異量為65.83%;壓力因應策略量表包含「針對問題」、「針對情緒」及「逃避」三個構面15 個題項,累積解釋總變異量為53.58%;運動倦怠量表包含「情緒與身體的耗竭」及「對運動貶價」兩個構面7 個題項,累積解釋總變異量為82.07%;各分量表之Cronbach's α 介於.808~.937,顯示本量表具有可接受的建構效度與信度。接著採驗證性因素分析考驗量表假設模式之適配程度,心理堅韌性量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=579、χ^2/df=3.06、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.053、RMSEA=0.068、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.79、PGFI=0.67),特質性焦慮量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.56、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.022、RMSEA=0.075、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.56、PGFI=0.50),壓力因應策略量表之結果經修正後顯示量表具有可接受之適配度,運動倦怠量表之結果顯示量表具有可接受之適配度(χ2=32.86、χ2/df=2.53、GFI=0.98、SRMR=0.018、RMSEA=0.058、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.61、PGFI=0.50)。本量表可提供未來研究大專籃球運動做為參考。
The purpose of this study was to weave to mental toughness, trait anxiety, stress coping strategies and sport burnout questionnaire for a college basketball players. The subjects were for college basketball leagues players in the school year 102. The data through statistical analysis, The results indicated: Mental toughness questionnaire contains "active struggle", "resistance to stress," and "endure the pain," 22 questions of the three factors, the cumulative total explained variance of 67.32%; Trait anxiety questionnaire contains 9 questions, the cumulative total explained variance of 65.83%; stress coping strategiesquestionnaire contains, "for the problem, " "for the emotional," and "evade," 15 questions of the three factors, the cumulative total variance explained was 53.58%; Sport burnoutquestionnaire contains "emotional/physical exhaustion of burnout " and "devaluation of sport " 7 questions of the two factors, the cumulative total variance explained was 82.07%; The questionnaire demonstrated sound discrimination, validity, and reliability; Then, using confirmatory factor analysis ethod was used to measure the goodness of fit of the model. The results displayed questionnaire of mental toughness has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=579、χ^2/df=3.06、GFI=0.9、SRMR=0.053、RMSEA=0.068、NNFI=0.97、CFI=0.98、PNFI=0.79、PGFI=0.67); The results, as amended, displayed questionnaire of trait anxiety has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=42.75、χ^2/df=3.56、GFI=0.97、 SRMR=0.022、RMSEA=0.075、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.56、PGFI=0.50); The results, as amended, displayed questionnaire of stress coping strategies has goodness of fit of the model (for the problem: χ^2=56.47、χ^2/df=2.46、GFI=0.97、SRMR=0.030、RMSEA=0.057、NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.63、PGFI=0.50; for the emotional: After the mode identification shows "The Model is Saturated, the Fit is Perfect; evade: After the mode identification shows "The Model is Saturated, the Fit is Perfect); The results displayed questionnaire of Sport burnout has goodness of fit of the model (χ^2=32.86、χ^2/df=2.53、GFI=0.98、SRMR=0.018、RMSEA=0.058、 NNFI=0.99、CFI=0.99、PNFI=0.61、PGFI=0.50). This questionnaire can be provided for college basketball for future research as a reference.
期刊論文
1.Jones, G.、Hanton, S.、Connaughton, D.(2002)。What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of elite sports performers。Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,14,205-218。  new window
2.Sachs, M. L.(1991)。Reading list in applied sport psychology: Psychological skills training。The Sport Psychologist,5(1),88-91。  new window
3.吳穌、林紀玲(2004)。運動員焦慮量表編製。運動知識學報,6,45-57。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳儷今(2011)。全中運羽球選手運動心理堅韌性與競賽壓力因應策略之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,10(3),132-140。  延伸查詢new window
5.Roth, S.、Cohen, L. J.(1986)。Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress。American Psychologist,41(7),813-819。  new window
6.Smith, R. E.(1986)。Toward a cognitive-affective model of athletic burnout。Journal of Sport Psychology,8(1),36-50。  new window
7.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
8.呂青山(20100500)。大專籃球選手運動目標取向、運動員訓練能力與運動員自信心來源模式之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,9,105-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.盧俊宏、陳龍弘、卓國雄(20060900)。Raedeke和Smith運動員倦怠問卷(ABQ)之信效度研究。體育學報,39(3),83-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Finch, L. M.(1993)。The relationships among coping strategies, trait anxiety, and performance in collegiate softball players(博士論文)。University of North Carolina at Greensboro。  new window
2.林文山(2004)。國小躲避球運動員的賽前焦慮、因應策略與運動表現的關係(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃崇儒(2004)。運動心理堅韌性概念的建構與測量(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃清如(2000)。大學運動員的目標取向、自覺能力與認知評估對競賽壓力因應策略的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國大專院校體育總會(2013)。大專校院籃球運動聯賽102學年度秩序冊。臺北市:中華民國大專院校體育總會。  延伸查詢new window
3.馬存根(2001)。醫學心理學。北京:人民衛生。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭淑貞(1996)。精神科護理概念:基本概念及臨床應用。台北市:華杏。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.(1998)。Multivariate data analysis。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式:Amos操作。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, Appraisal, and Coping。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE