:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理解式球類教學法與ARCS動機模式之融合應用對學習動機之影響
書刊名:淡江體育學刊
作者:黃建智闕月清 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Jian-jimKeh, Nyit-chin
出版日期:2016
卷期:19
頁次:頁1-11
主題關鍵詞:專注力切身相關自信心滿足感AttentionRelevanceConfidenceSatisfaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:7
PURPOSE: This study was to investigate the effects of TGfU and ARCS motivational model using tennis table on student’s attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction of learning motivation. METHODS: The participants were twenty-six 6th graders (Boys = 15; Girls = 11) of an elementary school from Taipei city. The six phases of TGfU were integrated into ARCS motivational model as teaching strategies and implemented for fourteen lessons in 7 weeks, 40minutes per lesson. Pre-and posttest using ARCS learning motivational scale were administered to the participants. The data were analyzed statistically by paired sample t-test. RESULTS: Attention (t = -3.90,p< .05), relevance, (t = -1.73, p> .05),confidence (t = -.30, p> .05),satisfaction (t = -2.49,p< .05),learning motivation (t = -4.23,p< .05). Significant differences were found in attention, satisfaction, and learning motivation, but relevance and confidence were not significantly different. The findings indicated that combined application of TGfU and ARCS motivational model enhanced student’s learning motivation. It was suggested that PE teaching should gear to principle of relevancy and simplicity, and emphasize on student’s individual motivation need and successful experience.
期刊論文
1.Hopper, T.(2003)。Four Rs for tactical awareness: Applying game performance assessment in net/wall games。Journal of Teaching Elementary Physical Education,14(2),16-21。  new window
2.Holt, Nicholas L.、Strean, William B.、Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia(2002)。Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: New avenues for future research and practice。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,21(2),162-176。  new window
3.張良漢、許志賢(20020100)。休閒運動阻礙量表編製與信效度分析研究。國立臺灣體育學院學報,10,157-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Werner, P.、Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1996)。Teaching game for understanding: Evolution of model。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,67(1),28-33。  new window
研究報告
1.臺北縣少年輔導委員會(2003)。臺北縣少年休閒活動選擇與偏差行為之現況和相關分析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉威志(2011)。ARCS動機模式融入體育教學對學習成效之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鍾菁菁(2013)。理解式球類教學對國中生心理需求與學習動機之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育運動大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳嘉弘(2005)。資訊融入體育教學對國小五年級學童動作技能學習與學習動機之影響(碩士論文)。臺北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Siedentop, D.、Tannehill, D.(2000)。Developing teaching skill in physical education。View, CA:Mayfield。  new window
2.Mitchell, S. A.、Oslin, J. L.、Griffin, L. L.(2003)。Sport Foundations for Elementary Physical Education: A Tactical Games Approach。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
單篇論文
1.Keller, J. M.(1999)。Motivational by design,Florida State University。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。Landmarks on our way to teaching for understanding。Rethinking games teaching。Loughborough, England:University of Technology。  new window
2.蔡宗達、闕月清(2008)。理解式球類教學法與運動教育模式。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.闕月清、黃志成(2008)。理式球類教學法的起源與發展。理雜式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Keller, John M.(1983)。Motivational design of instruction。Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE