:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:休閒運動阻礙量表編製與信效度分析研究
書刊名:國立臺灣體育學院學報
作者:張良漢 引用關係許志賢
作者(外文):Chang, Liang-hanHsu, Chih-shien
出版日期:2002
卷期:10
頁次:頁157-171
主題關鍵詞:休閒運動阻礙量表探索性因素分析信度Recreational sport constraints scaleExploratory factor analysisReliability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:98
  • 點閱點閱:80
     本研究主要的目的在編製一份具有良好信、效度的休閒運動阻礙量表,研究方法 分為二個部分,一為質的研究,透過深度訪談以開放式問卷請受試者驢列休閒運動阻礙的因 素,經由歸納分類初編完成休閒運動阻礙量表;另一為量的研究:以中部地區十二所大專院 校的 979 位學生進行施測,以項目分析了解其鑑別度, 得知均是有效題,另以探索性因素 分析發展出四個構面,分別為「經驗阻礙」、「機會阻礙」、「社會阻礙」及「個體阻礙」 ,因素負荷量介於.532 ∼.806 之間,四個因素累積的解釋變異量為 63.231%,各分量表內 部一致性係數為.8262 ∼.9035,顯示本量表具有良好的建構效度及信度。
     This article describes the contrivance of a recreational sport constraints scale with in controvertible reliability and validity. Two studies, the qualitative and the quantitative analyses were examined. In the qualitative study, a recreational sport constraints scale was created by means of inducing and categorizing in-depth interviews with students and answers of open-ended questionnaires. In the quantitative study, the discrimination was found by the item analysis among 979 samples of students employed by experiments from 12 colleges in the central Taiwan, while four aspects significantly developed by the explanatory factor analysis were the constraints of experience, opportunity, society and individual. Given that the factor loading is between.532 ∼.806, the explanatory cumulative is 63.231% and the Cronbach α coefficient is between .8262 ∼.9035, the findings of the study suggest that the new denies manifests itself in both high constructive validity and reliability.
期刊論文
1.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.(1994)。Self-esteem, gender, and socioeconomic status: Their relation to perceptions of constraint on leisure among adolescents。Journal of Leisure Research,26,99-118。  new window
2.季力康、黃振興(19941200)。運動目標取向量表的建構效度--驗證性因素分析的應用。體育學報,18,299-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.、Von Eye, A.(1993)。Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test。Leisure Sciences,15(2),99-113。  new window
4.Crawford, Duane W.、Godbey, Geoffrey C.(1987)。Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure。Leisure Sciences,9(2),119-127。  new window
5.Crawford, Duane W.、Jackson, Edgar L.、Godbey, Geoffrey C.(1991)。A hierarchical model of leisure constraints。Leisure Sciences,13(4),309-320。  new window
學位論文
1.陳信安(2000)。休閒參與的知覺自由與阻礙之研究--以台北縣淡水鎮國小六年級學童為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉佩佩(1999)。未婚女性休閒生活之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳藝文(2000)。休閒阻礙量表之建構--以北部大學生為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃立賢(1996)。專科學生休閒興趣相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫孟君(1998)。身體障礙青少年休閒自由、休閒偏好及休閒阻礙之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
6.鐘瓊珠(1997)。大專運動員休閒行為之研究--以國立台灣體專專長學生為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.張玉鈴(1998)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙與其休閒無聊感及自我統合之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳南琦(2000)。青少年休閒無聊感與休閒阻礙、休閒參與及休閒滿意度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張良漢(2002)。休閒運動參與動機、身體活動態度、休閒運動阻礙及滿意度之相關研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Torkildesn, G.(1983)。Leisure and Recreation Management。E. & F. N. spon。  new window
3.Mull, Richard F.、Bayless, Kathryn G.、Ross, Craig M.、Jamieson, Lynn Marie(1997)。Recreational sport management。Champaign, Illinois:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.Kim, J. O.、Mueller, C. W.(1978)。Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it。Sage。  new window
5.Dattilo, John、Murphy, William D.(1991)。Leisure Education Program Planning: A systematic Approach。State College, PA:Venture Publishing。  new window
6.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。松崗。  延伸查詢new window
7.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE