:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師體育專業背景與學生體適能之關係:跨資料庫取向研究
書刊名:臺灣運動教育學報
作者:戴玉林
作者(外文):Tai, Yu-lin
出版日期:2014
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁65-84
主題關鍵詞:體適能測驗生師比教師效能教育部國小體育教師增能計畫Physical fitness testStudent-teacher ratioTeacher efficacyPE teacher empowerment program from MOE
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:12
本研究目的在瞭解國小教師體育專業背景之生師比與學童體適能表現的關聯性,研究方法透過橫斷性的次級資料分析,運用「學校體育統計年報」及「學生體適能檢測」兩資料庫分別取得學校體育課教師的體育專業背景,同時對照該校學生體適能測驗成績,以獨立樣本 t檢定進行統計。以平均值而論,學校體育專業師資生師比之高低差距,於「仰臥起坐」,「立定跳遠」及「 800公尺跑走」等三項體適能成績存在顯著差異,男生在「坐姿體前彎」部分存在顯著差異,而女生則無。從過往文獻可知,影響學生體適能之相關因素涵蓋諸多因子,本研究結果發現「學校體育專業師資比例」亦為其中一環。體育專業教師人數相對較高的國小,其學生的體適能成績確實有較佳的表現,建議未來可將提高學校體育專業師資之比例做為體育政策推展重點。
This study aimed to explore the correlation between elementary school PE teachers’ professional background and school children’s physical fitness performance. The study employed secondarydata analysis, using two databases: the “ARPES” and “SPFT”, toobtain teachers’ educational backgrounds, and measured the ratio of students to teachers with a professional PE background. There existed a statistically significant difference between the quality of school PE teachers and student-teacher ratio. There was also a significant difference for onlymale students based on “Sit and Reach” and “Weight”. This study verified the difference in the number of “Schools’ Qualified PE Teachers.” With a higher ratio of students to professional PE teachers, students would have better physical fitness performance. Therefore, it is suggested that increasing the ratio of physical education teachers to students for elementary schools is the key to promoting the effectiveness of physical fitness.
期刊論文
1.林靜萍(200904)。教育部「中等以下學校體育教師增能計畫」簡介。學校體育,19(2),18-24。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱垂弘(20070500)。運動行為與身體狀況對國小學童體適能影響之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,6,277-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Seefeldt, V.、Malina, R. M.、Clark, M. A.(2002)。Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults。Sports Medicine,32(3),143-168。  new window
4.Malina, Robert M.(2001)。Physical activity and fitness: Pathways from childhood to adulthood。American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council,13(2),162-172。  new window
5.沈建國、黃榮松(20010900)。國小學生活動空間大小與健康體適能之探討。體育學報,31,81-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳萬福(20050800)。我國學校體育的現況與未來的課題。學校體育,15(4)=89,88-102。  延伸查詢new window
7.李彩華、方進隆(19980700)。國中學生身體活動量與體適能相關因素研究。體育學報,25,139-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉立宇、葉憲清(19951200)。國小高年級學童運動頻數對體適能的影響。體育學報,20,433-442。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.康美文(20031200)。新竹市國民小學體育教師專業能力現況之研究。大專體育學刊,5(2),27-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.詹宏基(20071000)。從國小體育教師甄試如何檢視體育教師專業能力。學校體育,17(5)=102,86-92。  延伸查詢new window
11.王育文、黃美瑤、林雅博(20111000)。國小學童學業、健康體適能與體育課同儕互動之相關性研究。臺灣運動教育學報,5(2),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林季蓉、林瀛洲、賴政秀、郭家驊、周適偉、黃美涓(20070900)。臺灣地區成年人居住區域別對體適能狀態的影響。臺灣復健醫學雜誌,35(3),145-151。  延伸查詢new window
13.施金水、李蘭、潘怜燕(19911200)。校園階梯環境與學生體能之關係研究。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,10(5),286-295。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳文長、李俊杰(20110300)。國小體育教師課程決定內涵之研究。體育學報,44(1),113-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.董惠美、游添燈(20061100)。伸展柔軟度。臺大體育,45,7-17。  延伸查詢new window
16.廖智倩、闕月清(20010300)。小學體育教師體育目標認同傾向之研究。體育學報,30,9-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.顏貝珊、闕月清(20091000)。國小體操專長與非專長教師學科教學知識與學生學習成就之比較研究。臺灣運動教育學報,4(1),59-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Chung, J. W. Y.、Chung, L. M. Y.、Chen, B.(2009)。The impact of lifestyle on the physical fitness of primary school children。Journal of Clinical Nursing,18(7),1002-1009。  new window
19.Huotari, P.、Nupponen, H.、Mikkelsson, L.、Laakso, L.、Kujala, U.(2011)。Adolescent physical fitness and activity as predictors of adulthood activity。Journal of Sports Sciences,29(11),1135-1141。  new window
20.Marta, C. C.、Marinho, D. A.、Barbosa, T. M.、Izquierdo, M.、Marques, M. C.(2012)。Physical fitness differences between prepubescent boys and girls。The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,26(7),1756-1766。  new window
21.McKenzie, T. L.、Sallis, J. F.、Faucette, N.、Roby, J. J.、Kolody, B.(1993)。Effects of a curriculum and inservice program on the quantity and quality of elementary physical education classes。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,64,178-178。  new window
22.Morrow, J. R.、Fulton, J. E.、Brener, N. D.、Kohl, H. W.(2008)。Prevalence and correlates of physical fitness testing in us schools-2000。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,79(2),141-148。  new window
23.Pesce, C.、Faigenbaum, A.、Crova, C.、Marchetti, R.、Bellucci, M.(2013)。Benefits of multi-sports physical education in the elementary school context。Health Education Journal,72(3),326-336。  new window
24.Seabra, A. F.、Mendonca, D. M.、Thomis, M. A.、Malina, R. M.、Maia, J. A.(2011)。Correlates of physical activity in portuguese adolescents from 10 to 18 years。Scandinavian Journal o f Medicine & Science in Sports,21(2),318-323。  new window
25.Smith, T.、Smith, B.、Davis, M.、Howell, D.、Servedio, F. J.(2000)。Predictors of physical fitness in a college sample。Perceptual and Motor Skills,91(3),1009-1010。  new window
26.Stare, G.、Strel, J.(2012)。Influence of the quality implementation of a physical education curriculum on the physical development and physical fitness of children。Bmc Public Health,12,61-68。  new window
27.Kelley, Truman L.(1939)。The Selection of Upper and Lower Groups for the Validation of Test Items。The Journal of Educational Psychology,30(1),17-24。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2008)。96年學校體育統計年報。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳明隆(2013)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.林貴福、盧淑雲(1998)。認識健康體適能。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.IOM(2012)。Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth。Washington, DC:The Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences。  new window
4.IOM(2013)。Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School。Washington, DC:The Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences。  new window
其他
1.黃文俊(20000623)。以學童體適能觀點談學校體育教學的現況。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE