:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國發展模式是否成為亞洲國家的學習對象?--一項東亞13國民眾的調查
書刊名:政治學報
作者:楊喜慧陳明通
作者(外文):Yang, Shi-hueiChen, Ming-tong
出版日期:2016
卷期:61
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:中國模式北京共識華盛頓共識中國崛起中國威脅論The China modelThe Beijing consensusThe Washington consensusChina’s riseThe China threat theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:20
東亞民眾是否認知到中國崛起?是否肯定中國崛起對亞洲帶來正面的影響?是否覺得中國 模式是該國學習的對象? Min-Hun Huang 與Yun-Han Chu 的文章運用第三波「亞洲民主動態調 查」 (Asian barometer survey, ABS) 的資料,僅回答前兩個問題,殊為可惜,本論文運用同一筆 資料,繼續回答第三個問題。研究結果發現,包括中國在內的亞洲13 國家與地區19,434 位受 訪民眾中,有7.7% 受訪者認為「中國模式」可以作為該國未來發展學習的對象,相對於美國的 23.1%,比率可謂不高。若以國家來看,沒有一個國家優先選擇「中國模式」,卻有菲律賓、柬 埔寨、韓國、中國等四個國家的受訪者,選擇美國的比率高於任何國家。菲律賓、韓國選擇美 國作為學習的對象不令人意外,但是連中國自己的民眾都偏好學習美國,顯示中國雖在亞洲崛 起,但「中國模式」在亞洲並不具有吸引力,美國在此地區的「軟實力」仍屬第一。 進一步運用「複層次非線性模型分析」發現,傾向「中國模式」的個體層次變項有:中國 是亞洲最有影響力國家的認知、中國對亞洲的影響力是正面的、對中國有較高的民主評價等; 但取向於自由民主價值的受訪者,卻不認同「中國模式」。在總體層次變項上,與中國地緣政 治關係愈緊張,愈不傾向「中國模式」,顯示「中國威脅論」與地緣政治有關。
Do East Asians recognize the rise of China? Do they welcome China’s rise as beneficial for the Asia region? Do they believe their countries can learn from China’s development model? Research by Min-Hua Huang and Yun-Han Chu uses data from the Asia Barometer Survey to examine the first two questions. This article applies the data to look at the third question. The research shows that of 19,434 respondents in 13 East Asian countries, 7.7% view China as a model for their countries future development, compared to 23.1% who identify the United States as a model. Aggregate data for each country in the survey shows that no country’s public views China as a preferred model. Moreover, in the Philippines, Cambodia, South Korea and China, more respondents identify the US as a model than China. While it is not surprising that more Filipinos and South Koreans prefer America as a model, the fact that more Chinese view the United States as a model rather than their own country shows that despite China’s rise, China’s development model has limited appeal in Asia and the United States continues to lead the region in terms of “soft power.” Multi-level non-linear model statistical analysis shows that with respect to individual-level variables, respondents who see China as a model tend to perceive China as the most influential country in Asia, view China’s influence in Asia as positive, and have relatively more positive assessments of China’s level of democracy. However, respondents oriented toward liberal democratic values do not identify with China as a model. At the macro-level, respondents from countries with tense geopolitical relations with China show less preference for China as a model, showing that perceptions of a China threat are influenced by geopolitics.
期刊論文
1.Palley, T. I.(2006)。External Contradictions of the Chinese Development Model: Export-Led Growth and the Dangers of Global Economic Contraction。Journal of Contemporary China,15(46),69-88。  new window
2.Holz, C. A.(2008)。China's economic growth 1978-2025: What we know today about China's economic growth tomorrow。World Development,36(10),1665-1691。  new window
3.中國評論新聞網(2013)。鄭永年:為什麼中國沒有文化崛起?。中國評論月刊(網路版)。  延伸查詢new window
4.Economy, E.(2005)。China's Rise in Southeast Asia: Implications for the United States。Journal of Contemporary China,14(44),409-425。  new window
5.Fukuyama, Francis(1989)。The End of History?。The National Interest,16(2),3-18。  new window
6.Lai, H.(2010)。Uneven Opening of China's Society, Economy, and Politics: Pro-Growth Authoritarian Governance and Protests in China。Journal of Contemporary China,19(67),819-835。  new window
7.Huang, Min-hua、Chu, Yun-han(2015)。The Sway of Geopolitics, Economic Interdependence and Cultural Identity: Why Are Some Asians More Favorable toward China's Rise Than Others?。Journal of Contemporary China,24(93),421-441。  new window
8.Stiglitz, J.(2003)。Challenging the Washington Consensus: An Interview with Lindsey Schoenfelder。The Brown Journal of World Affairs,9(2),33-40。  new window
9.Rigger, S.(2004)。Taiwan's Best-Case Democratization。Orbis,48(2),285-292。  new window
10.Zhao, S.(2010)。The China Model: Can It Replace The Western Model of Modernization?。Journal of Contemporary China,19(65),419-436。  new window
11.Welsh, Bridget、Chang, Alex(2015)。Choosing China: Public Perceptions of 'China as a Model'。Journal of Contemporary China,24(93),442-456。  new window
12.Baek, Seung-Wook(2005)。Does China Follow the East Asian Development Model。Journal of Contemporary Asia,35(4),485-498。  new window
學位論文
1.洪玉瀞(2008)。從華盛頓共識到北京共識?霸權穩定理論與軟權力的觀點(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱雲漢(2015)。高思在雲:一個知識份子對二十一世紀的思考。臺北:遠見天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.當代中國研究所(2012)。中國模式:國情專題教學手冊。香港:國民教育服務中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fukuyama, F.(2014)。Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy。New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux。  new window
4.陳志武(2010)。沒有中國模式這回事!。臺北:八旗文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Halper, Stefan A.(2010)。The Beijing Consensus: How China's Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century。Basic Books。  new window
6.Ramo, Joshua Cooper(2004)。The Beijing Consensus: Notes on the New Physics of Chinese Power。Foreign Policy Center。  new window
其他
1.俄羅斯之聲(2012)。商務部長:到2015年中國將成為全球最大消費市場,http://goo.gl/7Tx0Ce。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部(2015)。主要國家經濟成長率(%),http://twbusiness.nat.gov.tw/old/pdf/sec6.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭永年(2005)。總結中國發展經驗無可厚非 切莫誇大北京共識,http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2005-02-22/13085903818.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
4.經濟部(2015)。平均每人GDP(Per Capita GDP),http://twbusiness.nat.gov.tw/old/pdf/sec9.pdf。  new window
5.經濟部(2015)。主要國家國內生產毛額(GDP),http://twbusiness.nat.gov.tw/old/pdf/sec8.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
6.Callick, R.(2007)。The China Model: Foreign and Defense Policy, Politics and Public Opinion, Public Economics,http://www.aei.org/publication/the-china-model/。  new window
7.Office of the Secretary of Defense(2009)。Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2009,http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/China_Military_Power_Report_2009.pdf。  new window
8.Rachman, G.(2007)。The Hard Evidence that China's Soft Power Policy Is Working,http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/367e1906-c089-11db-995a-000b5df10621.html?ft_site=falcon&desktop=true#axzz4ClzwhcZC。  new window
9.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(20051229)。The Rise of China;s Soft Power,http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/pubIication/1499/rise_of_chinas_soft_power.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.俞可平(2006)。「中國模式」:經驗與鑒戒。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.田春生(2006)。「中國模式」:如何理解--從制度轉型的角度。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊俊舉(2006)。「北京共識」與中國模式研究。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.馬德普(2006)。漸進性、自主性與強政府:分析中國改革模式的政治視角。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡佛、徐火炎(1988)。結構性的政治文化:概念、類型及面向的探究。政治學的科學探究(一):方法與理論。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。中國人的心理與行為(1989)。臺北:桂冠圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.楊原(2015)。世界主要國家實力與影響力(2014)。國際形勢黃皮書:全球政治與安全報告(2015)。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Heberer, T.、莊俊舉(2006)。中國是否可視為一種發展模式?--七個假設。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dirlik, A.、莊俊舉(2006)。「北京共識」:誰承認誰,目的何在?。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Schweickart, D.、周凡(2006)。從這兒你到不了那兒:對「北京共識」的思考。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ramo, J.、王曉博(2006)。為什麼要提出「北京共識」。中國模式與「北京共識」:超越「華盛頓共識」。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hsu, S. Philip(2011)。In Search of China's Development Model: Beyond the Beijing Consensus。In Search of China's Development Model: Beyond the Beijing Consensus。New York:Routledge。  new window
13.Kennedy, S.(2011)。The Myth of the Beijing Consensus。In Search of China's Development Model: Beyond the Beijing Consensus。New York:Routledge。  new window
14.Williamson, John(2008)。A Short History of the Washington Consensus。The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Stiglitz, J. E.(2008)。Is There a Post-Washington Consensus Consensus?。The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
16.胡佛(1998)。權力的價値取向:概念架構的建構與評估。政治學的科學探究(一):方法與理論。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE