:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從臺、美之法制分析電子商務商業方法之專利適格性
書刊名:中正財經法學
作者:周伯翰
作者(外文):Jou, Bo-han
出版日期:2017
卷期:14
頁次:頁47-164
主題關鍵詞:專利專利適格性商業方法商業方法專利電子商務PatentPatentabilityBusiness methodPatents of business methodE-commerce
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:84
  • 點閱點閱:21
期刊論文
1.Guntersdorfer, Michael(2009)。The Death of State Street?。WAKE FOREST INTELL. PROP. L.J.,9,61-84。  new window
2.陳龍昇(20140800)。由美國聯邦最高法院Alice v. CLS Bank案探討電腦軟體專利適格性。萬國法律,196,13-20。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉國讚、徐偉甄(20150700)。電腦軟體之專利標的適格性在美國的演變--從Bilski到Alice判決。專利師,22,100-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.袁建中(20010300)。電子商務專利發展現況與探討。智慧財產權月刊,27,3-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王偉霖(20090600)。美國商業方法專利之最新發展與趨勢。科技法律評析,2,83-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李森堙(20090700)。結合通用電腦後讓軟體程式不再抽象?一個美國專利制度的難題。科技法律透析,21(7),2-6。  延伸查詢new window
7.宋皇志(20140900)。方興未艾之電子商務發明專利適格性的爭議--從智慧財產法院一○一年度民專上更(二)字第五號民事判決談起。月旦法學,232,153-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林冠宇(20150200)。美國聯邦最高法院Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International案之判決對軟體專利適格性審查標準之影響。科技法律透析,27(2),9-14。  延伸查詢new window
9.袁建中(20000200)。「電腦軟體相關發明專利審查基準」介紹(4)--談新基準之方法發明類型。智慧財產權月刊,14,13-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Evensen, Andrea Lynn(2004)。Comment: "Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me": an In-depth Look at Opportunistic Business Method Patent Licensing and a Proposed Solution to Allow Small-Defendant Business Method Users to Sing a Happier Tune。J. Marshall. Rev.,37,1359-1392。  new window
11.McNamara, Brian J.(2012)。Patent Protection of Computer Hardware and Software。Wake Forest J. Bus. & Intell. Prop. L.,12,137-214。  new window
12.Meurer, Michael J.(2005)。Symposium on Intellectual Property, Digital Nari Lee, Patent Eligible Subject Matter Reconfiguration and the Emergence of Proprietarian Nor ms-The Patent Eligibility of Business Methods。Idea,45,321-359。  new window
13.Meurer, Michael J.(2002)。Symposium on Intellectual Property, Digital Technology & Electronic Commerce: Business Method Patents and Bioinformatics: Business Method Patents and Patent Floods。Wash. U. J. L. & Pol'y.,8,309-434。  new window
14.Perel, Maayan(2013)。Reviving the Gatekeeping Function: Optimizing the Exclusion Potential of Subject Matter Eligibility。Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology,23,237-310。  new window
15.Polin, David(2005)。Proof of Patentability and Nonpatentability of Method of Electronic Commerce。Amjur Pof 3d,64,1-138。  new window
16.李森堙(20090100)。淺談美國CAFC限縮商業方法發明專利標的適格性之新近判決。科技法律透析,21(1),26-30。  延伸查詢new window
17.顏上詠、陳帝利(20041200)。歐洲與美國商業方法專利學理之研究。東海大學法學研究,21,243-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.經濟部智慧財產局(2014)。專利審查基準。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙晉枚、蔡坤財、周慧芳、謝銘洋、張凱娜(2014)。智慧財產權人門。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊崇森(2013)。專利法理論與應用。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.經濟部智慧財產局。專利法逐條釋義,https://www.tipo.gov.tw/public/Attachment/410179315298.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.Latham & Watkins LLP。Early lessons on Alice Corp. v. CIS Bank International and Section 101 from recent court decisions,http://www.iexology.com/library/detail.spx?g=3bb5c4e2-8bb3 -4688-897c-4bal5d635a06。  new window
3.USPTO。Preliminary Examination Instructions in view of the Supreme Court Decision in Alice Corporation Ply. Ltd. v. CLS Bank international, et al.,http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/patents/announce/alice_pec_25jun2014.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE