:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以MAIT網路促進科學教師探究教學能力之專業成長
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:余忠潔段曉林 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Chung-chiehTuan, Hsiao-lin
出版日期:2017
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁105-133
主題關鍵詞:數位網站探究教學概念改變自我效能教師專業成長Learning websiteInquiry teachingConceptual changeSelf-efficacyTeacher professional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:14
世界近年科學教育改革的趨勢是要學生探究科學,教師需具備科學探究與探究教學的知識與信念,才能進行這種以開放式為主的教學方式。本研究的目的利用網路,引用概念改變與促進教師自我效能的策略來建立MAIT網站學習情境,期望有效促進教師探究教學概念。研究中探討教師探究教學概念在網站學習的發展,並討論教師的探究教學概念與在課室的教學實務之間的相關。本研究分二階段進行,第一階段有25位在職中學教師參與,這些教師正在修「數理教學原理與策略」的課程,在課程融入MAIT協助教師學習。第二階段則運用MAIT網站,邀請17位中學教師上網學習。研究者利用質、量合併與影像分析的方法分析收集的資料。結果顯示:在第一階段科學與數學教師探究教學概念上均有顯著的進步,認為MAIT能夠提供「替代性經驗」、「口語勸說」、「成功的經驗」、「創造學習情境」及「陪伴學習」。在第二階段則發現具備不同自我效能的教師有不同的學習模式,高自我效能教師著重「引導探究教學」、「探究教學考量」、「探究教學觀點」並展現較多開放性活動。低自我效能教師重視「探究教學設計」、「本身教學」、「探究觀點」,出現較多結構性探究活動。
The modern trends in science education involve an open-ended approach that requires students to learn science by investigating concepts themselves. This open-ended approach means that teachers need to believe in it, and are enabled to conduct inquiry-based teaching. This study aimed to establish a website (MAIT) to facilitate teachers’ inquiry-based teaching competency by adopting strategies associated with conceptual change and the development of teacher self-efficacy. We investigated teachers’ conceptual development with regard to inquiry-based teaching in the learning environment provided by MAIT and discussed the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based teaching and their teaching practices. In the first stage of this research, twenty-five in-service teachers taking the "Instructional Principles and Strategies in Science and Mathematics" course participated in the research. MAIT was included in the course to assist in teachers’ learning. In the second stage, seventeen in-service teachers took the course online using MAIT. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect the data which were subsequently analyzed and the results combined. The method of video analysis was also used. The results indicated that participating teachers in the first stage showed significant improvement in their understanding of inquiry-based teaching. The results showed that MAIT could provide "vicarious experience", "verbal persuasion", "performance accomplishments", "creating a learning environment" and "accompanying learning". In the second stage, it was noted that teachers’ preference for a specific learning approach depended on their levels of self-efficacy. Teachers with high self-efficacy tended to focus on "guided-inquiry teaching", "considerations on inquiry teaching" and "developing inquiry teaching perspectives", and preferred more open-ended inquiry-based activities. In contrast, teachers with low self-efficacy focused on "designing inquiry teaching", "considering their own teaching" and "developing inquiry perspectives". They engaged in more structured inquiry-based activities.
期刊論文
1.Swan, Karen(2001)。Virtual Interaction: Design Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Asynchronous Online Courses。Distance Education,22(2),306-331。  new window
2.Colburn, A.(2000)。An inquiry primer。Science Scope,23(6),42-44。  new window
3.吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩(20101200)。錄影分析在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Dede, C.(2000)。Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Studies,32(2),281-303。  new window
5.Lotter, Christine、Yow, Jan A.、Peters, Thomas T.(20140200)。Building a Community of Practice around Inquiry Instruction Through a Professional Development Program。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,12(1),1-23。  new window
6.Park, S.、Oliver, J. S.(2008)。Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals。Research in Science Education,38(3),261-284。  new window
7.Owston, R. D.、Sinclair, M.、Wideman, H.(2008)。Blended learning for professional development: An evaluation of a program for middle school mathematics and science teachers。Teachers College Record,110(5),1033-1064。  new window
8.Brand, B. R.、Moore, S. J.(2010)。Enhancing teachers' application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model。International Journal of Science Education,7(33),1-25。  new window
9.Marshall, Jeff C.、Horton, Robert、Igo, Brent L.、Switzer, Deborah M.(20090600)。K-12 Science and Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs About and Use of Inquiry in the Classroom。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7(3),575-596。  new window
10.Mulholland, J.、Wallace, J.(2001)。Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy。Teaching and Teacher Education,17(2),243-261。  new window
11.Kazempour, M.(2009)。Impact of inquiry-based professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study。Science Educator,18(2),56-68。  new window
12.Hashweh, M. Z.(2003)。Teacher accommodative change。Teaching and Teacher Education,19,421-434。  new window
13.Feldman, A.(2000)。Decision making in the practical domain: a model of practical conceptual change。Science Education,84,606-623。  new window
14.Garrison, D. Randy、Kanuka, Heather(2004)。Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education。The Internet and Higher Education,7(2),95-105。  new window
15.Pajares, M. F.(1992)。Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct。Review of Educational Research,62(3),307-332。  new window
16.Evers, W. J. G.、Brouwers, A.、Tomic, W.(2002)。Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers' beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands。British Journal of Educational Psychology,72(2),227-243。  new window
17.Sinatra, G. M.(2005)。The "warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich。Educational Psychologist,40(2),107-115。  new window
18.Rodriguez, A. J.(1993)。A dose of reality: Understanding the origin of the theory/practice dichotomy in teacher education from the students' point of view。Journal of Teacher Education,44(3),213-222。  new window
19.Lotter, C.、Harwood, W. S.、Bonner, J. J.(2007)。The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(9),1318-1347。  new window
20.Oliver-Hoyo, M.、Allen, D.、Anderson, M.(2004)。Inquiry-guided instruction: Practical issues of implementation。Journal of College Science Teaching,33(6),20-24。  new window
21.Wee, B.、Shepardson, D.、Fast, J.、Harbor, J.(2007)。Teaching and Learning About Inquiry: Insights and Challenges in Professional Development。Journal of Science Teacher Education,18(1),63-89。  new window
22.Wolf, S. J.、Fraser, B. J.(2008)。Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities。Research in Science Education,38(3),321-341。  new window
23.Dede, Chris、Ketelhut, Diane Jass、Whitehouse, Pamela、Breit, Lisa、McCloskey, Erin M.(2009)。A research agenda for online teacher professional development。Journal of Teacher Education,60(1),8-19。  new window
24.Ferry, B.、Kervin, L.、Cambourne, B.、Turbill, B.、Hedberg, J.、Jonassen, D.(2005)。Incorporating real experience into the development of a classroom-based simulation。Journal of Learning Design,1(1),22-32。  new window
25.Higgins, T. E.、Spitulnik, M. W.(2008)。Supporting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review。Journal of Science Education and Technology,17,511-521。  new window
26.Mundry, S.(2005)。Changing perspectives in professional development。The Science Educator,14(1),9-15。  new window
27.Palmieri, P.(1997)。Technology in education...Do we need it?。ARIS Bulletin,8(2),1-5。  new window
28.Posnanski, T. J.(2002)。Professional Development Programs for Elementary Science Teachers: An Analysis of Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs and a Professional Development Model。Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(2),189-220。  new window
29.Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change。Science Education,67(4),489-508。  new window
30.Wallace, C. W.、Kang, N.(2004)。An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,936-960。  new window
31.Anderson, D.、Nashon, S.(2007)。Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting student metacognition in an amusement park physics program。Science Education,91,298-320。  new window
32.Berger, H.、Eylon, B.、Bagno, E.(2008)。Professional development of physics teachers in an evidence-based blended learning program。Journal of Science Education and Technology,17(4),399-409。  new window
33.Blanton, W. E.、Moorman, G.、Trathen, W.(1998)。Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review。Review of Research in Education,23,236-275。  new window
34.Bursal, M.(2010)。Turkish preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,8(4),649-666。  new window
35.Swinkels, M. F. J.、Koopman, M.、Beijaard, D.(2013)。Student teachers' development of learning-focused conceptions。Teaching and Teacher Education,34,26-37。  new window
36.Schuck, S.(2003)。The use of electronic quest ion and answer for ums in mathematics teacher education。Mathematics Education Research Journal,5,19-31。  new window
37.Lee, B.、Cawthon, S.、Dawson, K.(2013)。Elementary and secondary teacher self-efficacy for teaching and pedagogical conceptual change in a drama-based professional development program。Teaching and Teacher Education,30,84-98。  new window
38.Gengarelly, L. M.、Abrams, E. D.(2009)。Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom。Journal of Science Education and Technology,18,74-84。  new window
39.El-Deghaidy, H.、Mansour, N.、Alshamrani, S.(2015)。Science teachers' typology of CPD activities: A socio-constructivist perspective。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13,1539-1566。  new window
40.Driver, R.、Scanlon, E.(1989)。Conceptual change in science。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,5(1),25-36。  new window
41.Crawford, B. A.(2007)。Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,613-642。  new window
42.Clarke, David、Hollingsworth, Hilary(2002)。Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth。Teaching and Teacher Education,18(8),947-967。  new window
43.Guskey, T. R.(1986)。Staff development and the process of teacher change。Educational Researcher,15(5),5-12。  new window
44.Borko, Hilda(2004)。Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain。Educational Researcher,33(8),3-15。  new window
45.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14。  new window
46.Zwiep, Susan Gomez、Benken, Babette M.(20130400)。Exploring Teachers' Knowledge and Perceptions Across Mathematics and Science Through Content-Rich Learning Experiences in a Professional Development Setting。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,11(2),299-324。  new window
47.Pintrich, P. R.、Marx, R. W.、Boyle, R. A.(1993)。Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change。Review of Educational Research,63(2),167-199。  new window
會議論文
1.Tuan, H.-L.、Wen, M. C.(2005)。The development of an inquiry teaching efficacy questionnaire。The International Conference of Authentic Science and Mathematics (Teacher) Education in the Netherlands and Taiwan。Hsinchu。  new window
2.Skibba, K.(2006)。A cross-case analysis of how faculty connects learning in hybrid courses。The 47th annual adult education research conference。  new window
3.Siegel, M.、Derry, M.、Kim, J.-B.、Steinkuehler, C.、Street, J.、Canty, N.、Fassnacht, C.、Hewson, K.、Hmelo, C.、Spiro, R.(2000)。Promoting teachers' flexible use of the learning sciences through case-based problem solving on the WWW: A theoretical design approach。The Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences。Ann Arbor, Michigan:ICLS。273-279。  new window
圖書
1.Creswell, John W.、Plano Clark, Vicki L.(2011)。Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Ball, D. L.、Cohen, D. K.(1999)。Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice。San Francisco:Jossey Bass。  new window
3.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the national science education standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
4.Boyatzis, Richard E.(1998)。Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
6.教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Garrison, D. R.、Anderson, T.(2003)。E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice。London:Routledge/Falmer。  new window
8.Gess-Newsome, J.(2001)。Professional development: Planning and design。Arlington, VA:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
9.Hawley, W. D.、Valli, L.(1999)。Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice。San Francisco:Jossey Bass。  new window
10.National Research Council(2012)。Nutrient Requirements of Swine。Washington, DC:National Academic Press。  new window
11.National Research Council(1996)。The national science education standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
12.Bishop, K.、Denley, P.(2007)。Learning science teaching: Developing a professional knowledgebase。Maidenhead:Open University。  new window
13.Rodriguez, A. J.、Kitchen R. S.(2005)。Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
14.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Magnusson, S.、Krajcik, L.、Borko, H.(1999)。Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge。Examining pedagogical content knowledge。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic。  new window
2.Strike, K. A.、Posner, G. J.(1992)。A revisionist theory of conceptual change。Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology and Educational Theory and Practice。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
3.diSessa, A. A.(2006)。A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines。The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Pajares, F.(2003)。William James: our father who begat us。Educational psychology: A century of contributions。Mahwah:Erlbaum。  new window
5.Schunk, D. H.、Pajares, F.(2009)。Self-efficacy theory。Handbook of motivation at school。Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE