:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討學生科學能力與教師探究教學實務的關係
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:林淑梤
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-fen
出版日期:2019
卷期:27:4
頁次:頁251-274
主題關鍵詞:科學能力探究教學教學效能教學實務評量Scientific competenceInquiry teachingTeaching effectivenessTeaching practiceAssessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.靳知勤(20020900)。效化「基本科學素養」問卷。科學教育學刊,10(3),287-308。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Bass, K. M.、Fredricks, J.、Soloway, E.(1998)。Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students。The Journal of the Learning Sciences,7(3/4),313-350。  new window
3.Glynn, S. M.、Muth, K. D.(1994)。Reading and Writing to Learn Science: Achieving Scientific Literacy。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(9),1057-1073。  new window
4.Blanchard, M. R.、Southerland, S. A.、Osborne, J. W.、Sampson, V. D.、Annetta, L. A.、Granger, E. M.(2010)。Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction。Science Education,94(4),577-616。  new window
5.Chinn, C. A.、Malhotra, B. A.(2002)。Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks。Science Education,86(2),175-218。  new window
6.Sadler, T. D.、Zeidler, D. L.(2009)。Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(8),909-921。  new window
7.Webb, N. M.、Nemer, K. M.、Ing, M.(2006)。Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups。Journal of the Learning Sciences,15(1),63-119。  new window
8.Bybee, R. W.、McCrae, B.、Laurie, R.(2009)。PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(8),865-883。  new window
9.Hogan, K.、Nastasi, B. K.、Pressley, M.(1999)。Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions。Cognition and instruction,17(4),379-432。  new window
10.Nieswandt, M.、Bellomo, K.(2009)。Written extended-response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(3),333-356。  new window
11.Gyllenpalm, Jakob、Wickman, Per-Olof、Holmgren, Sven‐Olof(2010)。Teachers' Language on Scientific Inquiry: Methods of teaching or methods of inquiry?。International Journal of Science Education,32(9),1151-1172。  new window
12.Krajcik, J.、McNeill, K. L.、Reiser, B. J.(2008)。Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy。Science Education,92(1),1-32。  new window
13.張德銳、李俊達、王淑珍(20140500)。認知教練對中小學教師教學省思及教學效能影響之研究:以參與教師專業發展評鑑方案之教師為例。臺北市立大學學報,45(1),61-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Lotter, C.、Harwood, W. S.、Bonner, J. J.(2007)。The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(9),1318-1347。  new window
15.Fensham, P. J.(2009)。Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(8),884-896。  new window
16.Osborne, J.(2014)。Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change。Journal of Science Teacher Education,25(2),177-196。  new window
17.Keys, Carolyn W.、Bryan, Lynn A.(2001)。Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,38(6),631-645。  new window
18.Lederman, N. G.、Lederman, J. S.、Antink, A.(2013)。Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy。International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology,1(3),138-147。  new window
19.余忠潔、段曉林(20170400)。以MAIT網路促進科學教師探究教學能力之專業成長。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(1),105-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Hurd, P. D.(1958)。Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools。Educational Leadership,16(1),13-16。  new window
21.Clarke, D.、Hollingsworth, H.(2002)。Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth。Teaching and Teacher Education,18(8),947-976。  new window
22.Banchi, H.、Bell, R. L.(2008)。The many levels of inquiry。Science and Children,46(2),26-29。  new window
23.林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹(20181200)。十二年國教國中階段自然科學領域素養導向評量試題之開發與初探。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),295-337。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Chin, C.(2007)。Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(6),815-843。  new window
25.Oliveira, A. W.(2010)。Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(4),422-453。  new window
26.林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林、姜志忠、楊巽斐(20061200)。一位高中物理教師對於探究取向科學演示的詮釋以及其實施的影響因素之研究。科學教育學刊,14(6),615-635。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.郭重吉(20181200)。從實務理論初探教學實務模型的發展與應用。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(3),31-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.郭重吉、邱美虹、黃台珠、張惠博、張俊彥、周進洋、王國華、陳忠志、譚克平、黃鴻博(20091200)。中小學學生科學學習成果的評量架構與命題示例之研發。科學教育學刊,17(6),459-479。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Grigg, J.、Kelly, K. A.、Gamoran, A.、Borman, G. D.(2013)。Effects of two scientific inquiry professional development interventions on teaching practice。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,35(1),38-56。  new window
30.Prilleltensky, I.(2014)。Meaning-making, mattering, and thriving in community psychology: From co-optation to amelioration and transformation。Psychosocial Intervention,23(2),151-154。  new window
31.Rushton, G. T.、Lotter, C.、Singer, J.(2011)。Chemistry teachers' emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: The effect of a professional development model on beliefs and practice。Journal of Science Teacher Education,22(1),23-52。  new window
32.Sawada, D.、Piburn, M. D.、Judson, E.、Turley, J.、Falconer, K.、Benford, R.(2002)。Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol。School Science and Mathematics,102(6),245-253。  new window
33.Tuan, Hsiao-lin、Yu, Chung-chieh、Chin, Chi-chin(20171200)。Investigating the Influence of a Mixed Face-to-Face and Website Professional Development Course on the Inquiry-Based Conceptions of High School Science and Mathematics Teachers。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,15(8),1385-1401。  new window
34.Volkmann, M.、Abell, S. K.(2003)。Rethinking laboratories: Tools for converting cookbook labs into inquiry。The Science Teacher,70(6),38-41。  new window
35.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.(2003)。How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy。Science Education,87(2),224-240。  new window
36.曾崇賢、段曉林、靳知勤(20110400)。探究教學的專業成長歷程--以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊,19(2),143-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Tuan, H.-L.、Wen, M. C.(2005)。The development of an inquiry teaching efficacy questionnaire。The International Conference of Authentic Science and Mathematics (Teacher) Education in the Netherlands and Taiwan。Hsinchu。  new window
2.Mead, A. D.、Meade, A. W.(2010)。Test construction using CTT and IRT with unrepresentative samples。The Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Atlanta, GA。  new window
研究報告
1.林煥祥、劉聖忠、林素微、李暉(2008)。臺灣參加PISA 2006成果報告 (計畫編號:NSC95-2522-S-026-002)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝宛秦(2015)。加強論證之探究教學對九年級學生科學學習成效之影響(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
2.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
3.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
4.Bybee, R. W.、Carlson-Powell, J.、Trowbridge, L. W.(2014)。Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy。Harlow:Pearson。  new window
5.Hassard, J.、Dias, M.(2013)。The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle school and high school。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
6.Jetton, T. L.、Shanahan, C. H.(2012)。Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines: General principles and practical strategies。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
7.Polman, J. L.(2000)。Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry。Williston, VT:Teachers College Press。  new window
8.Wiggins, G. P.、McTighe, J.、Kiernan, Leslie J.、Frost, F.(1998)。Understanding by design。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Lin, S.-F.,Shie, W.-C.(2015)。Development and validation of school-based science literacy test,Helsinki:The European Science Education Research Association。  new window
其他
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013)。PISA 2015 draft science framework,https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf。  new window
2.連啟瑞,李暉,李松濤,林淑梤,劉叔秋,鄭夢慈(20170710)。十二年國民基本教育科學課程時數--國際比較之摘要報告,http://www.ase.org.tw/?menuid=9705&lgid=2&siteid=100495。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2003)。The CIPP model for evaluation。International handbook of educational evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Schwab, J. J.(1962)。The teaching of science as inquiry。The Teaching of Science。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.佘曉清、黃莉郁、蘇怡蓓(2017)。臺灣學生科學素養的表現。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Van Den Akker, J. J. H.(1997)。The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes。The international handbook of science education。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE