臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：중국어권 학습자의 한국어 형용사 과거 시제 오류 연구
書刊名：高大人文學報
作者：王清棟 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Ching-tung
出版日期：2016
卷期：1
頁次：頁75-98
主題關鍵詞：외국어로서의 중국어권 한국어 학습자；한국어교육；형용사；과거시제；교육방안；Korean language；Korean education；Adjectives；Past tense；Teaching methods
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:1
The purpose of the article is to find effective methods for teaching past tenses, especially the adjective past tenses in Korean, to Chinese learners. Because of the lack of tense markers in Chinese, it is considerably difficult for Chinese learners to master the past tense in Korean. Verbal past tenses are easier to distinguish between present tenses since students can judge whether an action has happened or not; however, for the adjective past tenses, it is different. The difficulties are not only in the expression of the past tense or present tense in Chinese or Korean, but also due to the different cognitive ways of judging an event. The first step of this study is to analyze the form and significance of theʻ-었-ʼ that displays the past in Korean and the auxiliary words ʻ了ʼ that represent the past in Chinese. through this procedure, we obtained the correspondence between ʻ-었-ʼ in Korean and ʻ了ʼ in Chinese. The second step conducted Chinese Learners of Korean as a Foreign Language a survey by 40 questions. Twenty of these items have a temporal noun added in. The other twenties did not. The additions are to check the variations in responses due to the addition of a temporal noun. The survey revealed that adding temporal nouns in Korean sentences can help native Chinese classify what tense a Korean sentence is. Furthermore, it can also help the native Chinese Korean learners to use Korean tenses properly.
期刊論文
1.Bardovi-Harlig, K.(1998)。Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology。Studies in Second Language Acquisition，20，471-508。  new window
2.Bardovi-Harlig, K.、Reynolds, D. W.(1995)。The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect。TESOL Quarterly，29(1)，107-131。  new window
3.White, Lydia(1987)。Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence。Applied Linguistics，8(2)，95-110。  new window
4.Collins, L.(2002)。The roles of L1 influence and Lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology。Language Learning，52(1)，43-94。  new window
5.김홍실(2008)。한국어의 「-었-」과 중국어의 「了」의 대조 연구。이중언어학，38，123-147。  延伸查詢new window
6.김재욱(2005)。한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법형태의 용법별 중간언어 연구。언어과학연구，32，89-108。  new window
7.송화연(2002)。현대 중국어 시제 구조와 의미。중국학논총，14。  延伸查詢new window
8.박선희(2009)。중국인 한국어 학습자의 과거시제 습득 연구。한국어교육，20(3)，79-110。  new window
9.박진호(2011)。시제，상，양태。국어학，60，289-322。  new window
10.Ellis, Nick C.(2008)。The dynamics of language use, language change, and first and second language acquisition。Modern Language Journal，41(3)，232-249。  new window
11.Sun, X.、Du, J.(2009)。A cross-linguistic study on temporal acquisition: New evidence for L1 influence lexical aspect effect。Teaching English in China: CELEA Journal，32(1)，117-126。  new window
12.유현경(2008)。한국어 형용사의 시간구조 연구。배달말，43。  延伸查詢new window
13.이해영(2003)。한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법항목 발달패턴 연구。이중언어학，22，271-300。  new window
14.허용(2008)。한국어교육에서의 대조언어학과 보편문법의 필요성 연구。이중언어학，36，1-24。  new window
15.홍종선(1991)。국어의 시간어 연구：시간부사를 중심으로。민족문화연구，24。  延伸查詢new window
16.홍종선(1987)。국어 시제의 발달。어문논집，27。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.왕방(2007)。한국어와 중국어 시제의 대조연구(碩士論文)。상지대。  延伸查詢new window
2.이지혜(2010)。국어와 중국어 시간표현 대비 연구(碩士論文)。충남대。  延伸查詢new window
3.호선희(2012)。중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 시제표현 교육 연구：과거시제를 중심으로(博士論文)。부산대。  延伸查詢new window
4.최선희(2011)。경도 지적장애아동의 시제이해 연구：시간부사어 아까，지금，이따가를 중심으로(碩士論文)。대구대。  延伸查詢new window
5.제몽요(2013)。중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 과거시제 표현 교육 방안연구(碩士論文)。한남대。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黎錦熙(1924)。新著國語文法。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳俊光(2008)。對比分析與教學應用。台北市：文鶴出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.고영근、구본관(2008)。우리말 문법론。집문당。  延伸查詢new window
4.국립국어원(2006)。외국인을 위한 한국어 문법。  延伸查詢new window
5.강현화(2003)。대조분석론。도서출판 역락。  延伸查詢new window
6.김상태(2005)。현대국어 시간표현 어휘연구。학고방。  延伸查詢new window
7.김석득(1974)。한국어 시간과 시상 한불연구。연세대 한불문화연구소。  延伸查詢new window
8.남기심、고영근(1998)。표준국어문법론。탑출판사。  延伸查詢new window
9.남기심(1996)。국어 문법의 탐구。태학사。  延伸查詢new window
10.김진우(2002)。제2어 습득연구。한국문화사。  延伸查詢new window
11.박덕유(2009)。학교 분법론의 이해。도서출판 역락。  延伸查詢new window
12.高名凱(1986)。漢語語法論。上海：開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.Wong, W.、서종학(2012)。입력강화：이론 연구에서 교실까지。한국문화사。  延伸查詢new window
14.Comrie, Bernard(1976)。Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.송경안(2008)。시제와 상의 유형론。언어유형론。월인。  延伸查詢new window
2.이해영(2005)。한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법항목 발달패턴 연구。한국어학습자의 중간언어 연구。커뮤니케이션북스。  延伸查詢new window
3.최동주(1998)。시제와 상。문법 연구와 자료。태학사。  延伸查詢new window
4.홍종선(1989)。시간과 시제。이정정연찬선생회갑기념논총。탑출판사。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：555（臺灣：531，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2259778 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68063732
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上