:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運動彩券投注者之認知分析:以美國職棒大聯盟賽事為例
書刊名:體育學報
作者:張寧劉昱伸
作者(外文):Chang, NingLiu, Yu-shen
出版日期:2017
卷期:50:4
頁次:頁439-450
主題關鍵詞:運動彩券因果關係好手氣的謬誤賭徒的謬誤社會判斷理論Sports lotteryCausalityGambler's fallacyHot hand fallacySocial judgment theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:2
緒論:運動彩券玩法簡單、多元又具備公益性質,在台灣相當受歡迎。同時也是運動產業發展的重要經費來源之一。投注者經常認為投注結果的輸贏並非運氣而是受到技術與知識的影響。然而運動彩券究竟屬於技巧性的賭博或機率性的賭博,可能與投注者的想像不同。本研究因此藉由了解投注者決策時所依賴的因素與謬誤,對此想法進行探討。方法:本研究在兩個月的期間內,記錄15位運動彩券專家預測美國職棒大聯盟比賽勝負的理由及正確率。並從預測勝負的理由中找出先發投手防禦率、近十場平均得分、後援投手防禦率、連勝場次等四項因素,做為設計社會判斷理論問卷的依據,以探討投注者預測勝負的判斷對策。結果:社會判斷理論問卷的研究成果顯示,受測者整體對連勝場次最為重視,且絕大多數為越高越好的正相關。其次為先發投手防禦率,亦以正相關為多數。其他兩個因素則不受重視。因此受測者深受好手氣的謬誤而非賭徒的謬誤所影響,且不因年齡、性別,以及投注經驗而有差異。又由觀察記錄中得知,15位運動彩券專家在調查期間預測的平均正確率為54.9%,因此尚無法認定運動彩券投注的輸贏是受技術與知識影響,而非隨機的結果。結論:運動彩券業者能夠獲利,除了莊家優勢外,還有投注者可以預測勝負的自信。認為自己可以預測比賽勝負的因果歷程提高了投注的動機,對設局者而言就是獲利的來源。
Introduction: Sports lottery is popular in Taiwan because it is simple, pluralistic and beneficial for the public welfare. Furthermore, sports lottery is an important financial resource for sports industry development. The gamblers of sports lottery usually think the outcome of betting is largely determined by gamblers' techniques and knowledge but not probability. However, sports lottery is the game of skill or the game of chance may be different from the image of gamblers. The study probes this notion by realizing the factors and fallacies that gamblers depend on and are involved. Methods: This study observes and records 15 sports lottery experts' reasoning for outcome prediction (winning or loss) and their accuracy rate about MLB matches in two months. According to their reasoning, the study found four key factors used by experts on betting. This study uses these four factors as the base for formulating a SJT (social judgment theory) questionnaire to investigate punters' judgment policy. Results: The results suggest that the length of the winning streaks is the most emphasized factor by the subjects, and the subjects believe that is the longer the better (a positive correlation). The second is the ERA of the starters, which also displays a positive correlation. The remaining two are less valued. As a result, subjects are affected by hot hand rather than the gambler's fallacy. Furthermore, the age, gender and experience of bet do not have a significant impact on subjects' judgment policy. It can be found from the record that the average accuracy rate of the 15 sports lottery experts is 54.9% only in investigation period. In other words, for sports lottery, winning or not may be only a matter of chance rather than techniques and knowledge. Conclusion: The reasons that the sports lottery companies have made profits for a long while, in addition to house advantage, is the gambler's confidence for predicting the match outcomes accurately. To predict the causality process of a coming game arouses the incentive to participate a bet. That ensures the house get profits.
期刊論文
1.Slovic, Paul、Fischhoff, Baruch、Lichtenstein, Sarah(1981)。Informing the Public about the Risks from Ionizing Radiation。Health Physic,41(4),589-598。  new window
2.張寧、汪明生、郭瑞坤(20070400)。社會判斷理論對互動管理成果之評估。管理學報,24(2),135-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Clotfelter, C. T.、Cook, P. J.(1993)。The 'gambler's fallacy' in lottery play。Management Science,39,1521-1525。  new window
4.Lagnado, D. A.、Newell, B. R.、Kahan, S.、Shanks, D. R.(2006)。Insight and Strategy in Multiple-Cue Learning。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,135(2),162-183。  new window
5.Ayton, P.、Fischer, I.(2004)。The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness?。Memory & Cognition,32(8),1369-1378。  new window
6.郭正德(2010)。運動彩券發行對運動休閒產業影響之探討。休閒運動保健學報,3,53-61。  延伸查詢new window
7.張寧(2015)。羈押與具保之認知分析。犯罪與刑事司法研究,24,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.施婉婷、王俊人(2014)。運動彩券購買決策因素:方法目的鏈之應用。大專體育學刊,16(2),136-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bateman, I.、Dent, S.、Peters, E.、Slovic, P.、Starmer, C.(2007)。The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles。Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,20(4),365-380。  new window
10.Anderson, N. H.、Whalen, R. E.(1960)。Likelihood judgments and sequential effects in a two-choice probability learning situation。Journal of Experimental Psychology,60,111-120。  new window
11.Croson, R.、Sundali, J.(2005)。The gambler's fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos。Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,30,195-209。  new window
12.Considine, J.、Crowley, F.、Foley, S.、O'Connor, M.(2008)。Irish national lottery sports capital grant allocations, 1999-2007: natural experiments on political influence。Economic Affairs,28(3),38-44。  new window
13.Cantinotti, M.、Ladouceur, R.、Jacques, C.(2004)。Sports betting: Can gamblers beat randomness?。Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,18(2),143-147。  new window
14.Forrest, D.、Perez, L.(2015)。Just like the lottery? Player behaviour and anomalies in the market for football pools。Journal of Gambling Studies,31(2),471-482。  new window
15.Dodig, D.、Ricijas, N.、Rajic-Stojanovic, A.(2014)。Sports betting among students in Zagreb - the contribution of irrational beliefs, motivation and experience in games of chance。Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada,21(2),215-242。  new window
16.DiCicco-Bloom, B.、Romer, D.(2012)。Poker, sports betting, and less popular alternatives: Status, friendship networks, and male adolescent gambling。Youth & Society,44(1),141-170。  new window
17.Dawes, Robyn M.、Faust, David、Meehl, Paul E.(1989)。Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment。Science,243(4899),1668-1674。  new window
18.Hall, C. C.、Oppenheimer, D. M.(2015)。Error parsing: An alternative method of implementing social judgment theory。Judgment and Decision Making,10(5),469-478。  new window
19.Lin, H. W.、Lu, H. F.(2015)。Elucidating the association of sports lottery bettors' socio-demographics, personality traits, risk tolerance and behavioural biases。Personality and Individual Differences,73,118-126。  new window
20.Ho, H.、Lee, S.、Lin, H.(2006)。Gambler's fallacy in the taiwan lotto market。Taiwan Economic Review,34(4),417-444。  new window
21.Ranyard, R.、Charlton, J. P.(2006)。Cognitive processes underlying lottery and sports gambling decisions: The role of stated probabilities and background knowledge。European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,18(2),234-254。  new window
22.Metzger, M. A.(1985)。Biases in betting: An application of laboratory findings。Psychological Reports,56,883-888。  new window
23.Towfigh, E.、Glockner, A.(2011)。Game over: Empirical support for soccer bets regulation。Psychology Public Policy and Law,17(3),475-506。  new window
24.Tversky, Amos、Kahneman, Daniel(1973)。Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability。Cognitive Psychology,5(2),207-232。  new window
25.Brunswik, Egon(1955)。Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology。Psychological Review,62(3),193-217。  new window
26.Rohrbaugh, J.(1981)。Improving the Quality of Group Judgment: Social Judgment Analysis and the Nominal Group Technique。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,28(2),272-288。  new window
27.Gilovich, Thomas D.、Vallone, Robert P.、Tversky, Amos(1985)。The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences。Cognitive Psychology,17(3),295-314。  new window
28.Tversky, Amos、Kahneman, Daniel(1974)。Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty。Science,185(4157),1124-1131。  new window
會議論文
1.Kelley, H. H.(1967)。Attribution theory in social psychology。Nebraska Symposium on Motivation。Lincoln, NE:University of Nebraska Press。192-238。  new window
圖書
1.POLICY PC(1991)。Judgment Analysis Software--Reference Manual。Executive Decision Services。  new window
2.鄭毓煌、蘇丹(2015)。理性的非理性:誰都逃不過的10大心理陷阱。臺北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hastie, R.、Dawes, R. M.(2001)。Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
4.Kahneman, D.(2013)。Thinking, fast and slow。New York:FSG。  new window
5.Nagel, E.(1961)。The structure of science: problems in the logic of explanation。New York:Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.。  new window
6.Cooksey, Ray W.(1996)。Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications。Academic Press。  new window
7.Hammond, Kenneth R.、McClelland, Gary H.、Mumpower, Jeryl(1980)。Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures。Praeger Publishers。  new window
8.Zeleny, Milan(1982)。Multiple Criteria Decision Making。McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
其他
1.ESPN(2015)。MLB player pitching stats--2011,http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/pitching/_/year/2011。  new window
2.(2015)。Statistics. Sortable player,http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/sortable.jsp?#sectionType=st&elem=%5Bobject+Object%5D&tab_level=child&click_text=Sortable+Team+hitting&game_type='R'&season=2011&season_type=ANY&league_code='MLB'&statType=hitting&page=1&ts=1437719896640&playerType=QU。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brehmer, B.、Joyce, C. R. B.(1988)。[Human judgment: The SJT view] Introduction。Human judgment: The SJT view。New York:North-Holland。  new window
2.Schank, R. C.、Abelson, R. P.(1995)。Knowledge and memory: The real story。Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Hammond, Kenneth R.、Stewart, Thomas R.、Brehmer, Berndt、Steinmann, Derick O.(1975)。Social Judgment Theory。Human Judgment and Decision Processes。Academic Press。  new window
4.Stewart, T. R.(1988)。Judgment Analysis: Procedures。Human Judgment: The SJT View。North-Holland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE