教育行政作為效率控制或是公義解放？--R. Bates的批判理論對教育行政之啟示_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	教育行政作為效率控制或是公義解放？--R. Bates的批判理論對教育行政之啟示
書刊名：	教育實踐與研究
作者：	蘇鈺楠
作者(外文)：	Su, Yu-nan
出版日期：	2018
卷期：	31:2
頁次：	頁95-119
主題關鍵詞：	批判理論；教育行政；教育行政典範；Critical theory；Educational administration；Paradigm of educational administration
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:5 點閱:3

R. Bates是當代重要的教育行政學家，但目前在臺灣的相關研究卻極為稀少，其獨特之處在於從社會學的觀點切入分析教育行政，並將批判理論與教育行政做結合，Bates認為教育行政的目的在於解放，要達成此目的，行政過程中便不能讓管理主義操弄，在各種知識學習與行政手段上都需要注意有無違背此價值。這個思維論述或許可給予現今的臺灣在教育行政上一個新的觀點，並增添國內教育行政學對理論運動論述之辯證反思。本研究先行反思教育行政控制的源頭，發現地方自治改革運動、教育職業專業化和效率膜拜會加劇：(1)教育再製不平等；(2)知識成了學校體制再製下的產物；(3)形成說教式的教育文化；(4)失去公眾確信與社會關懷等四項問題。研究者並分析了管理主義和批判理論有三個本質差異，以此導出教育行政民主化、多元文化與公義化的三個教育行政上之啟示，期望藉由新的論述引入，增添教育行政領域中不同的觀點。

以文找文

R. Bates is one of the most important educational administration scholars in modern time. However, there has been little research about Bates in Taiwan. The uniqueness of Bates's theory lies in the analysis of educational administration based on sociology, combining critical theory with educational administration practice. For Bates, the purpose of educational administration is liberation rather than control, which corresponds to the aim of needing to anti-control the administration process, bringing to the forefront the contrary of every means of learning knowledge and administration regulations. Based on this theory, a new direction of educational administration perspective may begin in Taiwan, with focus on reflecting what the significance of the theory movement is. This study begins with the reflection on the origin of administration control, revealing the municipal reform movement, occupational professionalization, and the cult of efficiency as a source, which leads to four major problems: (1) reinforcing social reproduction on education, (2) knowledge as a product of school reproduction, (3) producing a didactic pedagogy, and (4) lacking a fundamental commitment to the ideas of community and to the mutuality of social concerns. The researcher also analyzes the three differences of control theory and critical theory, and deduces the three implications of educational administration democratization, multiculturalism, and justice, with expectation to reach different perspectives in educational administration by means of a new voice.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Bates, R. J.(1987)。Corporate culture, schooling, and educational administration。Education Administration Quarterly，23(4)，79-115。
2.	Bates, R. J.(1980)。New developments in the new sociology of education。British Journal of Sociology of Education，1(1)，67-79。
3.	Bates, R. J.(1980)。Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge。Educational Administration Quarterly，16(2)，1-20。
4.	Bates, R.(2006)。Culture and leadership in educational administration: A historical study of what was and what might have been。Journal of Educational Administration and History，38(2)，155-168。
5.	Bates, R. J.(1993)。On knowing: Cultural and critical approaches to educational administration。Educational Management and Administration，21(3)，171-176。
6.	楊玉惠(20121100)。大學繁星計畫學生學業成績表現分析。教育政策論壇，15(4)=44，63-93。延伸查詢
7.	Bates, R. J.(1978)。The new sociology of education: Directions for theory and research。New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies，13(1)，3-22。
8.	Bates, R. J.(1984)。Education, community and the crisis of the state。Discourse，4(2)，59-81。
9.	Erickson, D. A.(1979)。Research on educational administration: The state of the art。Educational Researcher，8(3)，9-14。
10.	Bates, R. J.(2008)。Teacher education in a global context: Towards a defensible theory of teacher education。Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy，34(4)，277-293。
11.	Hoy, W. K.(1978)。Science research in educational administration。Educational Administration Quarterly，14(3)，1-12。
12.	Willower, D. J.(1993)。Explaining and improving educational administration。Educational Management and Administration，21(3)，153-160。
13.	Park, S. H.(1999)。The development of Richard Bates's critical theory in educational administration。Journal of Educational Administration，37(4)，367-388。

會議論文
1.	Bates, R. J.(1988)。Is there a new paradigm in educational administration?。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。

圖書
1.	Hodgkinson, Christopher(1996)。Administrative Philosophy: Values and Motivations in Administrative Life。Pergamon Press。
2.	Tyack, David、Hansot, Elisabeth(1982)。Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America,1820-1980。New York：Basic Books, Inc.。
3.	Bates, R. J.(1983)。Educational administration and the management of knowledge。Geelong, Victoria：Deakin University Press。
4.	Larson, M. S.(1977)。The Rise of Professionalism。University Of California Press。
5.	Hoy, Wayne K.、Miskel, Cecil G.(1982)。Educational administration: Theory, Research and Practice。New York：Random House。
6.	Habermas, Jurgen(1987)。The Theory of Communicative Action: The Critique of Functionalist Reason。Cambridge：Polity。
7.	Bledstein, Burton J.(1976)。The Culture of Professionalism: the Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education In America。New York：Norton。
8.	林志忠(2004)。教育行政理論--哲學篇。臺北市：心理。延伸查詢
9.	Evers, C. W.、Lakomski, G.(1991)。Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research。Pergamon Press。
10.	Marx, Karl、Struik, Dirk J.(1964)。The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844。New York：International Publishers。
11.	Barnard, C. J.(1938)。The function of an executive。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
12.	Donmoyer, R.、Imber, M.、Scheurich, J. J.(1995)。The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。
13.	Evers, C. W.、Lakomski, G.(1996)。Exploring educational administration: Coherentist applications and critical debates。New York, NY：Pergamon。
14.	Rawls, John(1971)。A theory of justice。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。

其他
1.	張錦弘(20160315)。清大：繁星入學表現勝申請、分發學生，https://udn.com/news/story/6925/1563639。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	Griffiths, D. E.(1999)。[Educational administration: A decade of reform ] Introduction。Educational administration:A decade of reform。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。
2.	Bates, R. J.(1995)。Critical theory of educational administration。Educational administration: An Australian perspeative。Sydney：Allen and Unwin。
3.	Greenfield, T. B.(1975)。Theory about organization: A new perspective and its implications for schools。Administering education: International challenges。London：Athlone Press of the University of London。
4.	Lakomski, G.、Evers, C. W.(1995)。Theory in educational administration。Educational administration: An Australian perspective。Sydney：Allen and Unwin。
5.	Bates, R. J.(1982)。Bureaucracy, education and democracy: Towards a policy of participation。Critical practice in educational administration。Geelong：Deakin University。
6.	Murphy, J.、Forsyth, P. B.(1999)。A decade of changes: Analysis and comment。Educational administration: A decade of reform。Newbury Park, CA：Corwin Press。
7.	Chapman, J. D.、Sackney, L. E.、Aspin, D. N.(1999)。Internationalization in educational administration: Policy and practice, theory and research。Handbook of research on educational administration。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	不考試，公平嗎？以全國考招資料檢視多元入學公平性
2.	不同入學管道之大學生的學業表現差異：潛在成長模式分析
3.	大學多元入學是否有利「家境好」的學生？
4.	弱勢學生大學入學優惠政策及其入學前協助措施之研究
5.	十二年國教不同入學管道學生學習困擾之比較分析
6.	大學繁星計畫學生學業成績表現分析

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	書評：評S. J. Ball的《教育論辯》
2.	中國菁英高中、秀異與全球功績主義：評[Yi-Lin Chiang (姜以琳)著], «Study Gods» (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022)
3.	Content and Language Integrated Learning for Teaching the Theoretical Language of Sociology of Education to Preservice Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study
4.	重思學習障礙之定義與鑑定：一個特殊教育社會學的觀點
5.	書評：從移動的時空看教育的脈絡：評2018年世界教育年鑑《不平均的教育時空：歷史社會學的概念、方法與實踐》
6.	Effects of Social Influence and System Characteristics on Traceable Agriculture Product Reuse Intention of Elderly People: Integrating Trust and Attitude Using the Technology Acceptance Model
7.	評〈戰爭與臺灣的高等教育，1945～1990〉
8.	通識課程之研判思考能力的學習成效在校務研究之應用
9.	由教科書內容看臺灣教育社會學學科架構的發展
10.	高等教育社會學的研究與脈絡
11.	立法院外的春吶：太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象
12.	宗教教育的價值哲學思考：宗教教育課程內涵的教化論述
13.	書評：《把知識帶回來：從社會建構主義到社會實在主義的教育社會學》
14.	臺灣高等教育各學門實施前段不分系課程的知識理念探討--全球化知識生產模式轉變之分析
15.	運用芝加哥模式之網路藝術教學：以國小四年級社會學習領域為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫