受課責的自主：新手校長對學區控制與學校自主的認知基模(下)_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	受課責的自主：新手校長對學區控制與學校自主的認知基模(下)
書刊名：	教育研究月刊
作者：	Weiner, Jennie M.／Woulfin, Sarah L.／湯家偉
作者(外文)：	Tang, Chia-wei
出版日期：	2019
卷期：	299
頁次：	頁144-159
主題關鍵詞：	自主；教育行政；領導；Autonomy；Educational administration；Leadership
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:5

目的：本文的目的在了解一群新手校長如何在學校中使用「自主的原則」，讓學校進步。「自主的原則」即作者所謂的，學校領導者能同時兼顧學校本位決定與學區監督兩者的情況。本研究旨在協助學校與學區領導者之間在「受課責的自主」這項機制上更多有效的互動，並增益學校的表現。研究方法：本文採用基模做為本研究指引之框架，並採用質性研究法和訪談來探討相關問題。七名新手校長在這一年中接受三次訪談，每次訪談持續約一小時（n = 21）。最後，研究者使用歸納和演繹編碼對數據進行主題分析。研究發現：校長傾向於將潛在的學區支持面向分為四類：學校營運、教師教學、倡導與支持和學校願景。他們對四類活動在校長與學區控制之間平衡的看法是動態、多樣的，並取決於校長對不同問題的看法，以及對官僚效能的不同價值觀點。研究限制／意涵：受限於研究方法以及研究樣本較小，本研究之發現不適宜類推到所有受課責自主的情境，後續研究可就本研究之發現在其他情境下是否成立進行探究。實務意涵：本文對學區與學校領導者有其啟示，包括學區需要更好地闡明受課責自主的界線與內涵，並提供校長更有效的培訓和支持，以有效利用自主做為學校改革機制。研究價值／原創性：這項研究填補了以往對校長如何理解「受課責的自主」這個概念的研究缺口，或者更具體地說，這份研究的重點在於釐清學校自主與學區控制之關係樣貌。我們還提供了實踐和可能解決的方式，以改善不斷受到重視但迄今為止仍執行未殆、表現不佳的改革行動（即受課責的自主）。

以文找文

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to gain insights into how a group of novice principals, all in schools that deployed principles of autonomy as mechanisms for improvement, conceptualized what the authors label “controlled dautonomy”-a condition in which school leaders are expected to both make site-based decisions and be accountable to district oversight. The estudy aims to support more effective interactions between school and district leaders around controlled autonomy to increase performance. Design/ methodology/approach: Using schema as a framework to guide the inquiry, this paper uses qualitative methods and interviewing in particular to explore the questions of interest. Seven novice principals were each interviewed three times over the year each interview lasting approximately one hour (n = 21). Data were analyzed thematically using both inductive and deductive coding techniques. Findings: Findings show that principals tended to group potential district supports into four categories: operations, instruction, advocacy, and vision and their perceptions regarding the balance between their and the district’s control over activities in each category was dynamic, varied and dependent on views relating to issues as broad as values alignment to perceptions of bureaucratic efficiency. Research hlimitations/implications: Because of the small sample size and methodological approach, it may be inappropriate to generalize the findings across all controlled autonomy contexts. Further research in additional settings is encouraged to support the proposed findings. Practical implications: This paper has a number of implications for districts and school leaders. Among these is the need for districts to better articulate the parameters of fcontrolled autonomy and for school leaders to receive more and more effective training and support to effectively utilize autonomy as a mechanism for reform. Originality/value: This work fi lls a gap in the research regarding on how principals conceptualize controlled autonomy or, more specifically, how they view what school autonomy should look like relative to district control and is this paper’s focus. It also provides insights into practice and potential means to enhance a growing, but so far unevenly implemented and under performing reform minitiative (i.e. controlled autonomy).

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Neumerski, C. M.(2013)。Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: what do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?。Educational Administration Quarterly，49(2)，310-347。
2.	Harris, S. G.(1994)。Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective。Organization Science，5(3)，309-321。
3.	Coburn, C. E.(2001)。Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，23(2)，145-170。
4.	Sewell, William H. Jr.(1992)。A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation。American Journal of Sociology，98(1)，1-29。
5.	Malen, B.、Ogawa, R. T.、Kranz, J.(1990)。Site-based management: Unfulfilled promises。The School Administrator，47(2)，30-59。
6.	Spillane, J. P.、Reiser, B. J.、Reimer, T.(2002)。Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research。Review of Educational Research，72(3)，387-431。
7.	Lee, Moosung、Louis, Karen Seashore、Anderson, Stephen(2012)。Local education authorities and student learning: the effects of policies and practices。School Effectiveness and School Improvement，23(2)，133-158。
8.	Day, C.、Gu, Q.(2007)。Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career。Oxford Review of Education，33(4)，423-443。
9.	Tulowitzki, P.(2013)。Leadership and school improvement in France。Journal of Educational Administration，51(6)，812-835。
10.	Ackerman, R. H.、Maslin-Ostrowski, P.(2004)。The wounded leader and emotional learning in the schoolhouse。School Leadership and Management，24(3)，311-328。
11.	Beck, L. G.、Murphy, J.(1998)。Site-based management and school success: Untangling the variables。School Effectiveness and School Improvement，9(4)，358-385。
12.	Coburn, C. E.(2006)。Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation。American Educational Research Journal，43(3)，343-379。
13.	Coburn, C. E.、Woulfin, S. L.(2012)。Revisiting loose coupling theory: Classroom implementation in an era of prescriptive policy making。Reading Research Quarterly，47(1)，5-30。
14.	Daly, A. J.、Finnigan, K. S.(2010)。The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability。American Educational Research Journal，48(1)，39-79。
15.	Donaldson, M. L.、Woulfin, S.、LeChasseur, K.、Cobb, C. D.(2016)。The structure and substance of teachers' opportunities to learn about teacher evaluation reform: promise or pitfall for equity?。Equity & Excellence in Education，49(2)，183-201。
16.	Duke, D. L.(2012)。Tinkering and turnarounds: Understanding the contemporary campaign to improve low-performing schools。Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk，17(1/2)，9-24。
17.	Glatter, R.(2012)。Persistent preoccupations: The rise and rise of school autonomy and accountability in England。Educational Management Administration & Leadership，40(5)，559-575。
18.	Hemmer, L. M.、Madsen, J.、Torres, M. S.(2013)。Critical analysis of accountability policy in alternative schools: Implications for school leaders。Journal of Educational Administration，51(5)，655-679。
19.	Higham, R.、Earley, P.(2013)。School autonomy and government control: School leaders' views on a changing policy landscape in England。Educational Management Administration and Leadership，41(6)，701-717。
20.	Honig, M. I.(2008)。District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts。American Journal of Education，114(4)，627-664。
21.	Honig, M. I.(2012)。District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals development as instructional leaders。Educational Administration Quarterly，48(4)，733-774。
22.	Honig, M. I.、Rainey, L. R.(2012)。Autonomy and school improvement: What do we know and where do we go from here?。Educational Policy，26(3)，465-495。
23.	Hopkins, D.(2013)。Exploding the myths of school reform。School Leadership and Management，33(4)，304-321。
24.	Honingh, M.、Urbanovič, J.(2013)。School autonomy and leadership in Lithuania: Can school leaders help schools to take a step forward?。NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy，6(1)，61-78。
25.	Johnson, P. E.、Chrispeels, J. H.(2010)。Linking the central office and its schools for reform。Educational Administration Quarterly，46(5)，738-775。
26.	Klingner, J. K.、Boardman, A. G.、McMaster, K, L.(2013)。What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?。Exceptional Children，79(2)，195-211。
27.	Knapp, M. S.(2008)。How can organizational and sociocultural learning theories shed light on district instructional reform?。American Journal of Education，114(4)，521-539。
28.	Louis, K. S.(2013)。Districts, local education authorities, and the context of policy analysis。Journal of Educational Administration，51(4)，550-555。
29.	Lubienski, C.(2003)。Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools。American Educational Research Journal，40(2)，395-443。
30.	Malen, B.、Croninger, R.、Muncey, D. Redmond(2002)。Reconstituting schools: "Testing the "theory of action"。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，24(2)，113-132。
31.	Mendels, P.、Mitgang, L. D.(2013)。Creating strong principals。Educational Leadership，70(7)，22-29。
32.	Midgley, C.、Wood, S.(1993)。Beyond site-based management: Empowering teachers to reform schools。Phi Delta Kappan，75(3)，245-252。
33.	Murphy, J.(2008)。Turnaround insights from the organizational sciences: A review of the empirical evidence and the development of a staged model of recovery with potential implications for the PK 12 education sectorsciences: A review of the empirical evidence and the。Leadership and Policy in Schools，7(4)，331-357。
34.	Ouchi, W. G.(2006)。Power to the principals: Decentralization in three large school districts。Organization Science，17(2)，298-307。
35.	Peck, C.、Reitzug, U. C.、West, D. L.(2013)。Still waiting for "superprincipal": Examining US policymaker expectations for school principals, 2001-2011。NCPEA Education Leadership Review，14(1)，58-68。
36.	Reyes-Guerra, D.、Russo, M. R.、Bogotch, I. E.、Vásquez-Colina, M. D.(2014)。Building a school leadership programme: An American paradox of autonomy and accountability。School Leadership and Management，34(4)，414-437。
37.	Rorrer, A. K.、Skrla, L.、Scheurich, J. J.(2008)。Districts as institutional factors in educational reform。Educational Administration Quarterly，44(3)，307-357。
38.	Terosky, A. L.(2014)。From a managerial imperative to a learning imperative: Experiences of urban, public school principals。Educational Administration Quarterly，50(1)，3-33。
39.	Trujillo, T.(2013)。The reincarnation of the effective schools research: Rethinking the literature on district effectiveness。Journal of Educational Administration，50(3)，264-286。
40.	Weiner, J.(2016)。Possibilities or paradoxes? How aspiring turnaround principals conceptualise turnaround and their place within it。School Leadership & Management，36(5)，1-22。
41.	Werner, M. D.、Cornelissen, J. P.(2014)。Framing the change: Switching and blending frames and their role in instigating institutional change。Organization Studies，35(10)，1449-1472。
42.	West, D. L.、Peck, C. M.、Reitzug, U. C.、Crane, E. A.(2014)。Accountability, autonomy and stress: Principal responses to superintendent change in a large US urban school district。School Leadership and Management，34(4)，372-391。
43.	Woulfin, S. L.(2015)。Catalysts of change: An examination of coaches leadership practices in framing a reading reform。Journal of School Leadership，25(3)，526-557。
44.	Hallinger, Philip(2003)。Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership。Cambridge Journal of Education，33(3)，329-352。
45.	Hess, F. M.、Kelly, A. P.(2007)。Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs。Teachers College Record，109(1)，244-274。

會議論文
1.	Anderson, S. E.、Louis, K. S.、Rodway, J.、Thomas, E.(2008)。How do states influence district leadership?。The International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement。Auckland。

研究報告
1.	Waters, T. J.、Marzano, R. J.(2006)。School district leadership that works: the effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement。Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning。

學位論文
1.	Marietta, G. E.(2015)。Leadership and collaboration in complex organizations: Principals' interactions with central office in to large school districts(碩士論文)。Harvard University。

圖書
1.	Bottoms, G.、Schmidt-Davis, J.(2010)。The three essentials: Improving schools requires district vision, district and state support, and principal leadership。Atlanta, GA：Southern Regional Education Board。
2.	Creswell, J. W.(1998)。Qualitative inquiry and research design。Sage。
3.	Seale, Clive(1998)。Researching society and culture。London：Sage。
4.	Schleicher, A.(2012)。Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world。Paris：OECD Publishing。
5.	Knapp, M. S.、Copland, M. A.、Honig, M. I.、Plecki, M. L.、Portin, B. S.(2010)。Learning-focused Leadership and Leadership Support: Meaning and Practice in Urban Systems。Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington。
6.	Arksey, H.、Knight, P.(1999)。Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples。Sage。
7.	Goldstein, D.(2014)。The teacher wars: A history of America's most embattled profession。New York, NY：Doubleday。
8.	Honig, M.(2013)。From tinkering to transformation: Strengthening school district central office performance。Washington, DC：American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research。
9.	Hubbard, L.、Mehan, H.、Stein, M. K.(2006)。Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego。New York, NY：Routledge。
10.	Knudson, J.、Shambaugh, L.、O'Day, J.(2011)。Beyond the school: Exploring a systemic approach 10 school turnaround。Washington, DC：California Collaborative on District Reform。
11.	Adamowki, S.、Therriault, S. B.、Cavanna, A. P.(2007)。The Autonomy Gap Barriers to Effective School Leadership。Washington, DC：Thomas B. Fordham Institute and American Institutes for Research。
12.	Augustine, C. H.、Gonzalez, G.、Ikemoto, G. S.、Russell, J.、Zellman, G. L.(2009)。Improving school leadership: The promise of cohesive leadership systems。Santa Monica, CA：Rand。
13.	Day, C.、Sammons, P.、Leithwood, K.、Hopkins, D.、Gu, Q.、Brown, E.、Ahtaridou, E.(2011)。Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement。Maidenhead：McGraw Hill。
14.	Hassel, B. C.(2011)。The charter school challenge: Avoiding the pitfalls, fulfilling and promise。Washington, DC：Institution Press。
15.	Honig, M. I.、Copland, M. A.、Rainey, L.、Lorton, J. A.、Newton, M.(2010)。Central office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning improvement。Seattle, WA：Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington。
16.	Mass Insight(2010)。School turnaround models: Emerging turnaround strategies and results。Boston, MA：Mass Insight。
17.	Miles, M. S.、Huberman, A. M.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook of new methods。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。
18.	Ouchi, W. G.(2009)。The secret of TSL。New York, NY：Simon and Schuster。
19.	Rice, J. K.、Malen, B.(2010)。School reconstitution as an education reform strategic: A synopsis of the evidence。Atlanta, GA：National Education Association。
20.	Supovitz, J.(2006)。The case for district-based reform: Leading, building, and sustaining school improvement。Cambridge, MA：Harvard Education Press。
21.	Wong, K.、Rutledge, S.(2006)。System-wide efforts to improve student achievement。Greenwich, CT：IAP。
22.	Scott, W. Richard(2001)。Institutions and Organizations。Sage Publications。
23.	Fullan, Michael(2007)。The new meaning of educational change。Teachers College Press。
24.	Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。

圖書論文
1.	Malen, B.、Rice, J. K.(2009)。School reconstitution and school improvement。Handbook of education policy research。New York：Routledge。
2.	Resnick, L. B.(1991)。Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice。Perspectives on socially shared cognition。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。
3.	Rumelhart, D. E.(1980)。Schemata: The building blocks of cognition。Theoretical issues in reading comprehension。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	受課責的自主：新手校長對學區控制與學校自主的認知基模(上)
2.	問責效力與教師組織公民行為(下)
3.	問責效力與教師組織公民行為(上)
4.	溝通理性取向教育行政領導行為整合模式初探

1.	領導理論之評析及其對我國教育行政領導之啟示

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	名校及其分校質量對學區房的溢價效應：聲望效應與升學效應
2.	戶口遷移與戶籍人口城鎮化
3.	美國教育問責制的轉向研究--以《不讓一個孩子掉隊法》和《每個學生成功法》為例
4.	美國的教育改革--州的作法與地方學區的因應
5.	美國教育
6.	談劃分初中學區問題
7.	分區設置初中與按照學區入學的利弊
8.	日本升學機制之研究
9.	日本高中學區制與入學考試之探討
10.	「學區制問題探討」座談紀實
11.	美國教育選擇權之研究
12.	都市地區國民中學學區劃分多準則評估模式之建立
13.	An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Music Therapy on Self-esteem and Stress Relief of the Elderly in Taiwan
14.	會考成績對就近入學影響之研究：多層次分析的取向
15.	以大型抽樣調查評估戶籍人口與常住人口之可能差異

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫