:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:會考成績對就近入學影響之研究:多層次分析的取向
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:張炳煌 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Ping-huang
出版日期:2019
卷期:42:1
頁次:頁39-69
主題關鍵詞:多層次分析高級中等學校就近入學臺灣後期中等教育長期追蹤資料庫Multi-level analysisSenior secondary schoolNearby enrollmentTaiwan upper secondary education database
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:270
  • 點閱點閱:17
引導學生就近入學,為近年來臺灣高級中等教育的改革方向,也是十二年國民基本教育的重要內涵,相關影響因素值得探討。本研究旨在採用多層次分析的研究架構,探討個人層次與學校層次國中教育會考成績對於高級中等學校學生就近入學的影響,並檢驗其調節效果。研究資料為「臺灣後期中等教育長期追蹤資料庫」所釋出之104學年度高一及專一學生調查資料,有效樣本數於學生層次為6,009人,於學校層次為234所學校。本研究依序建構分析模型,並採用統計套裝軟體 Mplus 8.1版進行統計分析。研究結果如下:一、高級中等學校之入學平均會考成績對於就近入學會產生負向影響;二、對個別高級中等學校而言,學生之會考成績與就近入學具有正向關聯;三、高級中等學校之入學平均會考成績對學生會考成績與就近入學之關係產生負向調節效果;四、多層次的分析架構可更清楚區分不同層次會考成績對就近入學的影響。
Encouraging graduates from junior high schools to attend their neighborhood senior secondary schools has been the main education policy in Taiwan. Therefore, it is of great interest to investigate relevant factors that affect a student’s decision to enroll in a neighborhood school. Accordingly, in this study, we employed a multi-level analysis framework to explore the influence of the grade received from the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students (CAP grade) on a student’s inclination to enroll in the nearby senior secondary school from different levels, and to examine its moderation effect. This study used survey data released from the Taiwan Upper Secondary Education Database of 2015, as the target population was tenth-grade senior secondary school students. After excluding participants due to missing data and/or other exclusion criteria, the final sample consisted of 6,009 students attending 234 senior secondary schools. Using a two-level sequential model, Mplus 8.1 software was employed for the multi-level analysis. Our analysis results can be summarized, as follows: (1) A school’s average CAP grade had a negative influence on a student’s inclination to enroll in their neighborhood school. (2) For individual schools, a student’s CAP grade was positively related to his/her matching level to nearby enrollment. (3) The relationship between a student’s CAP grade and his/her matching level to nearby enrollment was negatively moderated by the school’s average CAP grade. (4) A multilevel framework can appropriately analyze the impact of the CAP grade from different levels on students’ enrollment in their neighborhood schools.
期刊論文
1.楊朝祥(20100600)。預應十二年國教,後期中等教育何去何從。教育資料集刊,46,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.馮丹白、陳信正(20070500)。高中職社區化教育政策實施成效與問題分析。教育政策論壇,10(2),123-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡彣涓(20121200)。高中教育生產函數的估計--學校品質與家庭資源的投入產出分析。經濟論文叢刊,40(4),481-513。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張炳煌(20110500)。影響國中畢業生高中職選擇學校因素之研究。教育政策論壇,14(2)=38,145-175+177。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.宋修德、蘇景進(20101100)。高中職社區化之學生就近入學成效及其影響因素。教育政策論壇,13(4)=36,1-29+31-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林永豐(20070400)。追求均質學區--從高中職社區化反省學區的規劃。課程與教學,10(2),131-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃芳玫、吳齊殷(20100300)。臺灣國中學生個人特質、家庭背景與學業成績--追蹤調查資料之研究。經濟論文叢刊,38(1),65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Goldring, E. B.、Hausman, C. S.(1999)。Reasons for parental choice of urban schools。Journal of Education Policy,14(5),469-490。  new window
9.Goldring, E. B.、Phillips, K. J. R.(2008)。Parent preferences and parent choices: the public-private decision about school choice。Journal of Education Policy,23(3),209-230。  new window
10.Marsh, H. W.、Hau, K. T.(2003)。Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26 -country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools。The American Psychologist,58(5),364-376。  new window
11.銀慶貞、陶宏麟、洪嘉瑜(20120300)。補習對考大學真的有用嗎?。經濟論文叢刊,40(1),73-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Palardy, G. J.(2013)。High School Socioeconomic Segregation and Student Attainment。American Educational Research Journal,50(4),714-754。  new window
13.Marsh, H. W.、Seaton, M.、Trautwein, U.、Lüdtke, O.、Hau, K. T.、O'Mara, A. J.、Craven, R. G.(2008)。The big-fish-littlepond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research。Educational Psychology Review,20(3),319-350。  new window
14.楊朝祥(20130500)。釐清十二年國教政策爭議。教育資料與研究,109,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Kleitz, B.、Weiher, G. R.、Tedin, K. L.、Matland, R.(2000)。Choice, charter schools, and household preferences。Social Science Quarterly,81(3),846-854。  new window
16.黃政傑(20140900)。十二年國教高中高職入學制度啟動的問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(9),102-132。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃郁宜(20160300)。少子化對高中經營精進方案之研究。經營管理學刊,11,30-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.侯雅齡(20100900)。科學自我概念之大魚小池效應探究:資優生教育安置方式的思考。教育科學研究期刊,55(3),61-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Alves, F.、Elacqua, G.、Koslinki, M.、Martinez, M.、Santos, H.、Urbina, D.(2015)。Winners and losers of school choice: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile。International Journal of Educational Development,41,25-34。  new window
20.Andersson, E.、Malmberg, B.、Östh, J.(2012)。Travel-to-school distances in Sweden 2000-2006: Changing school geography with equality implications。Journal of Transport Geography,23(1),35-43。  new window
21.Bifulco, R.、Ladd, H. F.、Ross, S. L.(2009)。Public school choice and integration evidence from Durham, North Carolina。Social Science Research,38(1),71-85。  new window
22.Burgess, S.、Greaves, E.、Vignoles, A.、Wilson, D.(2015)。What parents want: School preferences and school choice。The Economic Journal,125(587),1262-1289。  new window
23.Chumacero, R. A.、Gómez, D.、Paredes, R.(2011)。I would walk 500 miles (if it paid): Vouchers and school choice in Chile。Economics of Education Review,30(5),1103-1114。  new window
24.Cullen, J. B.、Jacob, B. A.、Levitt, S. D.(2005)。The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago public schools。Journal of Public Economics,89(5),729-760。  new window
25.Denice, P.、Gross, B.(2016)。Choice, preferences, and constraints: Evidence from public school applications in Denver。Sociology of Education,89(4),300-320。  new window
26.Elacqua, G.、Schneider, M.、Buckley, J.(2006)。School choice in Chile: Is it class or classroom?。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,25(3),577-601。  new window
27.Glazerman, S.、Dotter, D.(2017)。Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,39(4),593-619。  new window
28.Söderström, M.、Uusitalo, R.(2010)。School choice and segregation: Evidence from an admission reform。Scandinavian Journal of Economics,112(1),55-76。  new window
29.黃龍欽(20101200)。從教育機會均等反思高中繁星計畫入學制度之施行:以南投縣某所高中為例。教育與社會研究,21,117-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.吳清山(2016)。免試入學。教育脈動,5。  延伸查詢new window
31.宋曜廷、周業太、曾芬蘭(20140300)。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊,59(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.李坤崇(20070600)。後期中等教育入學學區劃分之理念與趨勢。教育研究月刊,158,45-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.林新發、蔡明學、黃秋鑾、鄧珮秀、顏如芳(20171000)。臺灣十二年國教後期中等學校入學制度變革實施成效與改進建議。教育政策與管理,2,33-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.張炳煌(20181100)。學校選擇考量因素對高級中等學校就近入學影響之研究。教育政策論壇,21(4)=68,63-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Bosetti, L.、Pyryt, M. C.(2007)。Parental motivation in school choice: Seeking the competitive edge。Journal of School Choice,1(4),89-108。  new window
36.Dumay, X.、Dupriez, V.(2014)。Educational quasi-markets, school effectiveness and social inequalities。Journal of Education Policy,29(4),510-531。  new window
37.Eyer, J.(2018)。Does school quality matter? A travel cost approach。Education Finance and Policy,13(2),149-167。  new window
38.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015)。What do parents look for in their child's school?。PISA in Focus,51。  new window
39.Perry, L. B.、McConney, A.(2010)。Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003。Teachers College Record,112(4),1137-1162。  new window
40.Thelin, M.、Niedomysl, T.(2015)。The (ir)relevance of geography for school choice: Evidence from a Swedish choice experiment。Geoforum,67,110-120。  new window
41.Weiher, G. R.、Tedin, K. L.(2002)。Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,21(1),79-92。  new window
42.吳清山、高家斌(20050400)。十二年國民教育政策發展的回顧與展望。教育資料與研究,63,53-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.宋曜廷、黃瓅瑩、郭念平、曾芬蘭(20120900)。以縱貫學業表現檢驗大魚小池效應與見賢思齊效應。中華心理學刊,54(3),315-330。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.張郁雯(20080900)。對比效應對學業自我概念之影響--發展的觀點。教育心理學報,40(1),23-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.駱明慶(20180300)。誰是臺大學生?(2001-2014)--多元入學的影響。經濟論文叢刊,46(1),47-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.楊朝祥(20141100)。十二年國民基本教育:政策爭議與對策。教育資料與研究,115,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Marsh, H. W.、Baumert, J.、Köller, O.(2001)。Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept。American Educational Research Journal,38(2),321-350。  new window
49.Rumberger, R. W.、Palardy, G. J.(2005)。Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school。Teachers College Record,107(9),1999-2045。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2017)。中華民國106年教育統計。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立臺灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心(2016)。104學年度高一及專一學生調查技術報告。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hasting, J. S.、Kane, T. J.、Staige, D. O.(2008)。Heterogeneous preferences and the efficacy of public school choice。  new window
學位論文
1.楊金川(2005)。國中學生家長選擇社區高中職就近入學因素之調查研究--以台北縣河左岸學園為例(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊育仁(2009)。影響高中職學校社區化推動因素分析:以中三區高中職學校社區化為例(碩士論文)。中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張育菁(2010)。高級中學優質化的學校經營與作為之內容分析(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳俐曲(2012)。影響台南地區國中畢業生就近入學之因素(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.宋維哲(2015)。十二年國民基本教育實施前後學生學校選擇因素之比較--以高雄市公立高職學生為例(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李秋慧(2015)。國中生的生涯效能、家庭社經地位、學習成就對選填志願影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳曉媛(2017)。臺中市國中學生對十二年國民教育入學方式的認同程度及選校決策之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊正義(2014)。高雄市高中高職學生學校選擇因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.鍾國源(2010)。多元升學制度下高雄市國中畢業生升學選擇之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.魏燕貞(2009)。桃園地區高中生選擇就近入學因素及其效益之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.溫福星、邱浩政(2012)。多層次模式方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。前程企管。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hox, J. J.(2010)。Multilevel analysis, techniques and applications。Mahwah, N. J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.行政院(2011)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。臺北:行政院。  延伸查詢new window
4.秦夢群(2015)。教育選擇權研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱皓政(2017)。多層次模式與縱貫資料分析:Mplus 8解析應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016)。PISA 2015 results. Vol. 2, Policies and practices for successful schools。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
7.Heck, R. H.、Thomas, S. L.(2015)。An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
8.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Press。  new window
9.Cohen, Jacob E.(1988)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
其他
1.林國明(2014)。十二年國教入學制度的問題與改革,https://twstreetcomer.org/2014/07/07/linkuoming/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Chakrabarti, R.、Roy, J.(2010)。The economics of parental choice。Economics of education。Elsevier。  new window
2.Corcoran, S. P.、Cordes, S. A.(2017)。The economics of school choice。The Wiley handbook of school choice。Malden, MA:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Stein, M.、Goldring, E.、Cravens, X.(2011)。Do parents do as they say? Choosing Indianapolis charter schools。School choice and school improvement。Boston, MA:Harvard Education Press。  new window
4.Teddlie, C.、Stringfield, S.、Reynolds, D.(2000)。Context issues within school effectiveness research。The international handbook of school effectiveness research。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Wilson, D.(2017)。School choice and social class: Urban geographies and educational opportunities。Risk, protection, provision and policy。Springer Singapore。  new window
6.Kozlowski, Steve W. J.、Klein, Katherine J.(2000)。A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes。Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions。Jossey-Bass。  new window
7.Marsh, H. W.、Craven, R.(2002)。The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big fish little pond effect。Adolescence and education。Greenwich, CT:Information Age。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE