:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣「混合型非營利組織」治理的挑戰--組織使命的維護V.S組織生存的維護
書刊名:東吳社會工作學報
作者:潘中道 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Chung-dao
出版日期:2019
卷期:36
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:非營利組織使命漂移混合型組織組織治理Nonprofit organizationMission driftHybrid organizationOrganizational governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:27
台灣政府部門,在過去三十年間,將個人及家庭福利服務供給的責任制度化地轉移至民間非營利組織,使得台灣福利服務供給朝向「社會福利服務供給非營利組織化」的方向發展,也促使台灣「混合型非營利組織」的興起。「混合型非營利組織」跨界為政府提供福利服務,即不再只是為回應社區弱勢群體需求、提供民眾參與公共事務管道而存在的公民社會組織;同時也成為協助政府提供福利服務的專業代理機構。因此,在成為「混合型非營利組織」後,組織治理的實踐便需要面對一項重大挑戰-如何因應組織可能發生使命漂移的問題。本文的論述是立基於一項探討台灣「混合型非營利組織」治理的質性研究,其中關於組織產生使命漂移的原因、及因應組織使命漂移策略的研究發現,提出具體結論,最後並對政策、實務工作、及未來研究提出建議。
In the past thirty years, Taiwanese central government has institutionally delegated the services provision for individuals and families to nonprofit organizations. It has resulted in the development of social service provision system towards "Nonprofitization of social service provision" in Taiwan. It also pushes the emergence of "Hybrid Nonprofit Organizations". When a nonprofit organization comes across the sectoral boundary to provide social services which are delegated by government, then the nonprofit organization has been transformed into a "Hybrid Nonprofit Organization". A "Hybrid Nonprofit Organization" does not only play a role of services provider for the needed in local community, a vehicle of civic participation for public affairs, but also a professional agent of public services provision. Therefore, a "Hybrid Nonprofit Organization" will face an important organizational governance challenge-how to prevent organizational mission drift happened. The discussion of this article is based on the findings of a qualitative research. The important issues which have been discussed as follows: why mission drift happened, and how to deal with mission drift in Taiwanese "Hybrid Nonprofit Organizations". This article also provides suggestions for social policy, social work practice, and future research.
期刊論文
1.陳芬苓(20070600)。國家與市場之外:地方政府中福利混合經濟之實踐。國家與社會,2,83-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王篤強、高迪理、吳秀照(20101200)。臺灣社會福利民營化的未預期後果:地方政府相關人員「官僚自主性」的初步闡釋。社會政策與社會工作學刊,14(2),91-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Froelich, Karen A.(1999)。Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(3),246-268。  new window
4.Cornforth, Christopher(2014)。Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises。Social Enterprise Journal,10(1),3-20。  new window
5.林淑馨(20150400)。我國非營利組織與地方政府協力現況之初探與反思:以臺北市為例。文官制度季刊,7(2),17-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林萬億(19901000)。The Chinese Gentry and Social Philanthropy。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,20,143-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林淑馨(20160900)。臺灣非營利組織與地方政府協力的實證分析:以六縣市為例。政治科學論叢,69,103-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.魏季李(20151200)。非營利福利機構與政府的服務契約委託過程的決策與影響研究:以臺灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊,19(2),109-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Ebrahim, A.、Battilana, J.、Mair, J.(2014)。The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations。Research in Organizational Behavior,34,81-100。  new window
10.Evers, A.(2005)。Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services。International Journal of Public Administration,28(9/10),737-748。  new window
11.Smith, S. R.(2010)。Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: The governance challenge。Policy and Society,29(3),219-229。  new window
12.DiMaggio, P. J.、Powell, W. W.(1983)。The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields。American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160。  new window
13.Hood, Christopher(1991)。A Public Management for All Seasons?。Public Administration,69(1),3-19。  new window
14.葛雨琴(20050300)。全心全意關懷社會的人民團體--中華救助總會。社區發展季刊,109,272-278。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Bennett, R.、Savani, S.(2011)。Surviving mission drift: How charities can turn dependence on government contract funding to their own advantage。Nonprofit Management and Leadership,22(2),217-231。  new window
16.Brandsen, T.、van de Donk, W.、Putters, K.(2005)。Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector。International Journal of Public Administration,28(9/10),749-765。  new window
17.Chaua, N. H.、Huysentruyt, M.(2006)。Nonprofits and public good provision: A contest based on compromises。European Economic Review,50(8),1909-1935。  new window
18.Considinea, M.、O'Sullivan, S.、Nguyen, P.(2014)。Governance, boards of directors and the impact of contracting on not-for-profit organizations--An Australian study。Social Policy & Administration,48(2),169-187。  new window
19.Dolnicar, S.、Irvine, H.、Lazarevski, K.(2008)。Mission or money? Competitive challenges facing public sector nonprofit organizations in an institutionalized environment。International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,13(2),107-117。  new window
20.Grohs, S.(2014)。Hybrid organizations in social service delivery in quasimarkets: The case of Germany。American Behavioral Scientist,58(11),1425-1445。  new window
21.Hefetz, A.、Warner, M.(2004)。Privatization & its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contraction process。Public Administration Research and Theory,14(2),171-190。  new window
22.Hendersona, E.、Lambert, V.(2018)。Negotiating for survival: Balancing mission and money。The British Accounting Review,50(2),185-198。  new window
23.Housego, A.、O'Brien, T.(2012)。Delivery of public services by non-government organizations。The Australian Journal of Public Administration,71(2),211-220。  new window
24.Hyndman, N.、Mcdonnell, P.(2009)。Governance and charities: An exploration of key themes and the development of a research agenda。Financial Accountability & Management,25(1),5-31。  new window
25.Jäger, U. P.、Schröer, A.(2014)。Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda。Voluntas,25(5),1281-1306。  new window
26.Maier, J.、Mayer, J.、Lutz, E.(2015)。Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations。Organization Studies,36(6),713-739。  new window
27.McClusky, J. E.(2002)。Rethinking Nonprofit Organization Governance: Implications for Management and Leadership。International Journal of Public Administration,25(4),539-559。  new window
28.Neumayr, M.、Schneider, U.、Meyer, M.(2013)。Public funding and its impact on nonprofit advocacy。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,44(2),297-318。  new window
29.Skelcher, C.、Smith, R. S.(2015)。Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: the case of nonprofits。Public Administration,93(2),433-448。  new window
30.Salamon, L. M.(2015)。Introduction: The nonprofitization of the welfare state。Voluntas,26(6),2147-2154。  new window
31.Stone, M. M.、Ostrower, F.(2007)。Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,36(3),416-438。  new window
32.Valentinov, V.、Larsen, K.(2010)。The meaning of non-profit mission breadth: A constitutional economics perspective。The Social Science Journal,48(1),29-38。  new window
33.Young, D. R.、Kim, C.(2015)。Can social enterprises remain sustainable and mission-focused? Applying resiliency theory。Social Enterprise Journal,11(3),233-259。  new window
34.王增勇(20090600)。解嚴後臺灣福利運動建制化的過程。臺灣社會研究季刊,74,407-417。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Greiner, Larry E.(1972)。Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow。Harvard Business Review,50(4),37-46。  new window
圖書
1.Smith, S.、Lipsky, M.(1993)。Nonprofits for Hire。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Kramer, Ralph M.、Lorentzen, Hakon、Melief, Willem B.、Pasquinelli, Sergio(1993)。Privatization in Four European Countries: Comparative Studies in Government--Third Sector Relationships。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Alford, Robert R.、Friedland, Roger(1985)。Powers of Theory: Capitalism the State and Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.林萬億(2006)。台灣的社會福利:歷史經驗與制度分析。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hatch, M. J.(1997)。Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Salamon, Laster M.(1995)。Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state。Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
7.Lyons, M.(2001)。Third sector: The contribution of non-profit and cooperative enterprises in Australia。Sydney:Allen & Unwin。  new window
8.Neuman, W. L.(2013)。Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative Approaches。Pearson Education Limited。  new window
9.Pan, C. D.(2007)。Third sector organizations and social welfare: A study of the role of social service and charitable organizations in Taiwan。Aston University。  new window
10.Winston, C.(2006)。Government failure versus market failure: Microeconomics policy research and government performance。Washington, D.C.:AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies。  new window
11.Bryman, Alan(2004)。Social Research Methods。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Anheier, Helmut K.(2005)。Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy。New York:Routledge。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2003)。九十二年度社會發展趨勢調查【社會參與】,https://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas03/ca/society/index.html。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.官有垣、杜承嶸、康峰菁(2009)。非營利組織之治理。非營利部門:組織與運作。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Billis, David(2010)。From Welfare Bureaucracies to Welfare Hybrids。Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.Jones, C.(1993)。The Pacific challenge: Confucian welfare state。New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe。Routledge。  new window
4.潘中道(2017)。未付出靈魂的浮士德交易:福利服務民營化對非營利組織治理影響的研究。非營利組織與社會關懷。台北:商鼎出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Billis, D.(2010)。Towards a theory of hybrid organizations。Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
6.Billis, D.(2010)。Revisiting the key challenges: Hybridity, ownership and change。Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
7.Brandsen, T.、Pestoff, V.(2008)。Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction。Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services。Routledge。  new window
8.Chan, G. H. S.(1985)。Social welfare in Taiwan。Social welfare in Asia。Kent:Croom Helm。  new window
9.Cornforth, C.、Spear, R.(2010)。The governance of hybrid organizations。Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy。Palgrave。  new window
10.Donnelly-Cox, G.(2015)。Civil society governance: Hybridization within third sector and social enterprise domains。Civil society, the third Sector and social enterprise: Governance and democracy。London:Taylor and Francis, Routledge Goup。  new window
11.Harris, M.(2010)。Third sector organizations in a contradictory policy environment。Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Minkoff, D. C.、Powell, W. W.(2006)。Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection?。The non-profit sector。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
13.McKinley, W.、Mone, M. A.(2003)。Micro and macro perspectives in organization theory。The Oxford handbook of organization theory。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Renz, D. O.、Andersson, F. O.(2014)。Nonprofit governance: A review of the field。Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches。London:Routledge。  new window
15.Ritchie, J.、Spencer, L.、O'Connor, W.(2004)。Carrying out qualitative analysis。Qualitative Research Practice。London:Sage。  new window
16.Smith, S. R.(2004)。Government and nonprofits in the modern age: Is independence possible?。In Search of the Nonprofit Sector。New York:Transaction Books。  new window
17.Snape, D.、Spencer, L.(2003)。The foundation of qualitative research。Qualitative research practice。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE