:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民為何(不)科學:新竹我們要喝乾淨水行動聯盟的運動軌跡(2017~2020)
書刊名:科技、醫療與社會
作者:陳震遠
作者(外文):Chen, Chen-yuan
出版日期:2023
卷期:36
頁次:頁1-51
主題關鍵詞:公民科學管制科學科學主義環境運動Citizen scienceRegulatory scienceScientismEnvironmental movement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:7
期刊論文
1.Centeno, Miguel Angel(1993)。The New Leviathan: the Dynamics and Limits of Technocracy。Theory and Society,22(3),307-335。  new window
2.Brown, Phil(1992)。Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing。Journal of Health and Social Behavior,33(3),267-281。  new window
3.Jobin, Paul、曾育慧(20110400)。白老鼠上法院:從兩例工業污染訴訟案談起。科技、醫療與社會,12,159-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田、徐健銘(20140600)。塑化風險社會:塑化劑風暴背後之管制脈絡與結構分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,95,109-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Brown, Phil(1997)。Popular epidemiology revisited。Current sociology,45(3),137-156。  new window
6.范玫芳、張簡妙琳(20140300)。科學知識與水政治:旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究。人文及社會科學集刊,26(1),133-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.施佳良、杜文苓(20170300)。環境管制行政的科學技術框架與決策僵局:六輕工安事件環評過程析論。公共行政學報,52,81-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ottinger, Gwen(2010)。Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science。Science, Technology, and Human Values,35(2),244-270。  new window
9.杜文苓、施佳良(20190100)。挑戰空汙:初探社區行動科學的在地實踐。傳播研究與實踐,9(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Water W.(1983)。The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields。American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160。  new window
11.Tu, Wen-ling(20190600)。Combating Air Pollution through Data Generation and Reinterpretation: Community Air Monitoring in Taiwan。East Asian Science, Technology and Society,13(2),235-255。new window  new window
12.謝新誼(20161000)。化學物質的拼裝、風險與治理:臺灣洗衣精的百滅寧防蟎爭議(2013-2014)。科技、醫療與社會,23,137-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李艾倫(20181200)。職災毒物集體訴訟的漫漫長路--以RCA案為例。臺灣人權學刊,4(4),135-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.施逸翔(20181200)。正義女神如何掂量六輕的排氣?雲林臺西居民向臺塑民事求償之法庭觀察報告。臺灣人權學刊,4(4),145-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.許明華、黃妙如(20021100)。我國水源保護區劃設現況與因應對策。自來水會刊雜誌,21(4)=84,26-52。  延伸查詢new window
16.張崑振(20140800)。臺灣伏流水水道的代表--記日據時期新竹水道的營造。竹塹文獻雜誌,57,8-33。  延伸查詢new window
17.曾靖越(20210700)。公民科學與創客運動:空氣盒子計畫的案例探討。傳播研究與實踐,11(2),221-258。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Jobin, Paul(2020)。Our ‘'good neighbor' Formosa Plastics: petrochemical damage(s) and the meanings of money。Environmental Sociology,7(1),40-53。  new window
19.Kimura, Aya H.、Kinchy, Abby(2016)。Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research。Engaging Science, Technology, and Society,2,331-361。  new window
20.Pellow, David(2003)。Polular Epidemiology and Environmental Movements: Mapping Active Narratives for Empowerment。Humanity & Society,27(4),307-321。  new window
21.杜文苓、李翰林(20110600)。環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題--以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議為例。臺灣民主季刊,8(2),59-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Tu, Wen-Ling(2004)。Challenges of Environmental Planning and Grassroots Activism in the Face of It Industrial Dominance: A Science-based Industrial Parks in Taiwan(博士論文)。University of California,Berkeley, CA。  new window
圖書
1.Latour, Bruno(1987)。Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society。Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Epstein, Steven(1996)。Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
3.Corburn, Jason(2005)。Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice。MIT Press。  new window
4.Jasanoff, Sheila(1994)。The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Kimura, Aya Hirata(2016)。Radiation Brain Moms and Citizen Scientists: The Gender Politics of Food Contamination after Fukushima。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
6.Li, Fabiana(2015)。Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru。Duke University Press。  new window
7.Weber, Max、Fischoff, Ephraim、Gerth, Hans、Henderson, Alexander Morell、Kolegar, Ferdinand、Mills, C. Weight、Parsons, Talcott、Rheinstein, Max、Roth, Guenther、Shils, Edward、Wittich, Claus(1978)。Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology。University of California Press。  new window
其他
1.地球公民基金會(2012)。霄裡溪污染,https://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/1619。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文姿(2015)。友達、華映16年污染畫句點?環團:回復霄裡溪生態才算數,https://e-info.org.tw/node/112490/。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪少凡(20180629)。我們還需要下一座園區?竹科三期更名重啟紀事,https://www.twreporter.org/a/hsinchu-science-park-third。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳容璟(20201105)。稻米將成熟卻遭無預警停灌 桃竹苗農民痛訴:勿再犧牲農業,https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/98447。  延伸查詢new window
5.林悅(20180712)。台南環團保護曾文溪 反對玉峰堰解編引水,https://www.ettoday.net/news/20180712/1211115.htm。  延伸查詢new window
6.林健生(20180531)。南投縣長林明溱表態 贊成拆集集攔河堰,https://news.pts.org.tw/article/395588。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳文姿(20161227)。湖山水庫水質保護區 嘉義三鄉反對 雲、投先公告,https://e-info.org.tw/node/202073。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳俊華(20171212)。公投法三讀 打破鳥籠公投大幅下修門檻,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201712125003.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ottinger, Gwen(2017)。Reconstructing or reproducing? Scientific authority and models of change in two traditions of citizen science。The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Ottinger, Gwen(2016)。Social movement-based citizen science。The rightful place of science: Citizen science。Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes。  new window
3.Haklay, Muki(2013)。Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information--Overview and Typology of Participation。Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice。Berlin:Springer。  new window
4.盧敬文(2022)。醫療、身體與污染感知:從流病研究到免費健檢。福利之鄉、煙囪之城:麥寮與六輕的矛盾共生。群學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Irwin, Alan(2015)。Citizen Science and Scientific Citizenship: Same Words Different Meanings?。Science Communication Today: Current Strategies and Means of Action。Presses Universitaires de Nancy。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE