:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試題反應理論在國小高年級學生乘除文字題的列式之分析研究--以暗隱模式理論為基礎
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:劉湘川林原宏 引用關係
出版日期:1995
卷期:9
頁次:頁205-261
主題關鍵詞:試題反應理論國小學生乘除文字題暗隱模式
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:25
     本研究旨在以Fischbein, E. 等人(1985)所提出的暗隱模式(implicit model)為理論基礎,探討國小高年級學生在各種不同數值型態的乖除文字題的列式表現,並以國內學者鄭富森新近發展的「無參數試題反應理論」(item response theory of non-parameter)為分析工具,針對不同數值型態的乘除文字題,分析並歸納其試題特徵曲線(item characteristic curve,簡稱ICC)類型、難度、信度等相關試題的特性。 研究者以國立臺中師範學院輔導區(臺中市、臺中縣、彰化縣、南投縣)國小學童為研究對象,每縣(市)隨機抽取二所國小,每所小學又隨機抽取五、六年級各一班,組成研究樣本,共得有效樣本725名學童。 經過試題反應理論分析後,獲得以下結果: 一、乘法部份、依試題特徵曲線的形狀,可將試題分成五類型,隨著乘數為整數、帶小數、純小數,其試題的難度逐漸升高。 二、等分除部份,依試題特徵曲線的形狀,可將試題分成三類型。重要發現的是,根據「較大的數除以較小的數」(a larger number is divided by a smaller number,簡稱LDS)、「除數為整數」(multiplicator or divisor is integer,簡稱MDI)兩個原則,第I類型不違背LDS、MDI兩個原則;第II類型違背LDS、MDI其中一個原則;而第III類型則違背LDS、MDI兩個原則。且其試題難度隨著I、II、III類型逐漸升高。 三、包含除部份,依試題特徵曲線的形狀,可將試題分成三類型,同樣的,根據LDS的原則,第I類型不違背LDS原則;第II類型違背LDS、MDS其中一個原則,屬於過渡型試題;而第III類型則違背LDS原則,且其試題難度隨著I、II、III類型逐漸升高。而包含除與等分除不同的是,包含除三類型的試題特徵曲線,其影響分類的因素只有LDS原則,不似等分除部份,其影響因素有LDS、MDI兩個原則。根據試題反應理論的分析結果,將可對「暗隱模式」理論提供更進一步的解釋。此外,研究者亦根據研究的發現與缺失,提出國小數學教學上、課程設計以及未來研究等方面的建議。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate sutdents' performance in multiplication and division word problems, which consist of different number types. The theoretical orientation of the research was based on the "implicit model" propounded by E. Fischbein et al. (1985). The Item Response Theory of Non-Parameter software, developed by Fu-shen Teng, was used to analyze item characteristic curve (ICC) types, item difficulty, and reliability estimates of the test items. The target population of the study were students from the supervising districts of the National Taichung Teachers College; that is, elementary school students from Taichung city, Taichung county, Changhua county, and Nantucounty, A stratified random sample of 754 5th and 6th graders from the above four areas were chosen and 725 pupils participated in the study. The results of the study were as follows: 1. The multiplication word problems indicated five ICC types. When the multiplicators were integers, the test items were the easiest for the students. By contrast, when the multiplicators were pure decimals, the test items were the most difficult for the students. 2. The partition word problems revealed three ICC types. According to the rules of "a larger number is divided by a smaller number" (LDS) and "the multiplicator or divisor is an integer" (MDI), the items of the first category followed the above two rules and were thus the easiest for the students. The items of the second category violated one of the above two rules. The items of the third category violated the two rules and were the most difficult for the students. 3. The quotation word problems indicated three ICC types. The items of the first category did not violated the "LDS" rule, while those of the second category violate either the "LDS" or the "MDI" rule. Items of the third category violated the "LDS" rule. The "LDS" was the factor that determines the item difficulty and ICC types of the quotation word problems, while the "LDS" and "MDI" were the factors that influence the item difficulty and ICC types of the partition word problems. Finally, the authors offered suggestions for further research as well as teaching methods and curriculum planning for elementary school mathematics education.
期刊論文
1.Graeber, A. O.、Tirosh, D.、Glover, R.(1989)。Preservice teachers' misconception in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,20,95-102。  new window
2.Bell, A.、Greer, B.、Fischbein, E.(1984)。Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: the effects of number size, problem structure and context。Educational Studies in Mathematics,15,129-147。  new window
3.Greer, B.(1987)。Nonconservation of multiplication and division involving decimals。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,18(1),37-45。  new window
4.Sellke, D. H.、Behr, M. J.、Voelker, A. M.(1991)。Using data tables to represent and solve multiplication story problems。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,22,30-38。  new window
5.Fischbein, E.、Deri, M.、Nello, M. S.、Marino, M. S.(1985)。The role of implicit models in solving decimal problems in multiplication and division。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,16,3-17。  new window
6.林原宏(19931000)。影響學童乘除表現的因子--淺談暗隱模式。國教輔導,33(1)=297,31-34。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ekenstam, A.、Geoger, K.(1983)。Some aspects of Childrens' ability to solve Mathematical problems。Educational Studies in Mathematics,14,369-384。  new window
8.Carpenter, T. P.、Moser, J. M.、Bebout, H. C.(1988)。Representation of Addition and Subtraction Word Problems。Journal for Research in Mathematics,19(4),345-357。  new window
9.Bell, A. W.、Swan, M.、Taylor, G.(1981)。Choice of operation in Verbal Problems with decimal numbers。Educational Studies in Mathematics,12,399-420。  new window
10.余民寧(19911200)。試題反應理論的介紹(1)--測驗理論的發展趨勢。研習資訊,8(6),13-18。  延伸查詢new window
11.Carpenter, Thomas P.、呂玉琴(19880300)。加、減法文字題的分類、解題策略及影響因素。國民教育,28(8/9),17-29。  延伸查詢new window
12.林福來、郭汾派、林光賢(19860200)。國中生的比例概念發展。科學教育,87,14-42。  延伸查詢new window
13.高敬文(19891200)。我國國小學童測量概念發展之研究。初等教育研究,1,183-219。  延伸查詢new window
14.許永賢(19900700)。從「數學作文」教學的嘗試探討「教學評量」的新途徑。研習資訊,63,45-50。  延伸查詢new window
15.林碧珍(19911200)。國小兒童對於乘除法應用問題之認知結構。新竹師院學報,5,221-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳春杏(19890600)。國民小學數學科乘法、除法教材類型之分析與研究。國教學報,2,183-220。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳英豪、吳裕益(19860600)。新舊測驗理論之比較及其應用。臺南師專學報,19,187-224。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊美伶、蔣治邦(19920600)。國民小學數學科加減法教材關鍵字之分析研究。國教學報,4,109-128。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃湘武(19850200)。國中學生質量守恒,重量守恒,外體積觀念,與比例推理能力之抽樣調查與研究。中等教育,36(1),44-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.蔡長添(19930900)。項目關係構圖(IRS)測驗構造圖的作法及其應用。科學教育,162,14-25。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔣治邦、鍾思嘉(19910800)。低年級學童加減概念的發展。教育與心理研究,14,35-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Bebout, H. C.(1990)。Children's symbolic representation of addition and subtraction word problems。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21(2),123-131。  new window
23.Ball, D. L.(1990)。Prospective elementary and secondary teacher's understanding of division。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21,132-144。  new window
24.Bell, A.、Greer, B.、Grimison, L.、Mangan, C.(1989)。Children's performance on multiplicative word problems: Elements of a descriptive theory。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,20(5),434-449。  new window
25.Esse, G. V.、Hamaker C.(1990)。Using self-generated drawings to solve arithmetic word problems。Journal of Education research,83(4),301-312。  new window
26.Koub, V. L.(1989)。Children's solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,20,147-158。  new window
27.Jerma, J. M.、Ress, R.(1972)。Predicting the relative difficulty of verbal arithmetic problems。Educational studies in Mathematics,4(3),306-323。  new window
28.Har, K.(1981)。Hierarchies in Mathematics Education。Educational studies in Mathematics,12,205-218。  new window
29.Neshe, P.(1982)。The development of semantic categories for addition and subtraction。Educational studies in Mathematics,13,373-394。  new window
30.Neshe, P.(1976)。Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems。Educational studies in Mathematics,7,369-388。  new window
31.Tirosh, D.、Graeber, A. O.(1990)。Evoking cognitive conflict to Explore preservice Teachers' Thinking About Division。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,20(5),434-449。  new window
32.鄭富森(19931100)。傳統試題分析原則與試題反應理論的關係。初等教育學刊,2,1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.楊瑞智(19900600)。四則運算的錯誤類型研究及教學上的應用。國教月刊,36(9/10),18-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.許榮富、楊文金(1989)。IRT及其對科學過程技能測量影響分析研究。中華民國第四屆科學教育學術研討會。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳順宇、鄭碧娥(1992)。國中生機率能力評量分析。中華民國第八屆科學教育研討會。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。39-67。  延伸查詢new window
3.甯自強(1994)。新課程對乘除法啓蒙教材的處理。82學年度數學教育研討會論文暨會議。嘉義縣:嘉義師院。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡茂發、劉湘川、許天維、郭伯臣(1993)。試題反應理論在國民教育階段國小數學科基本學習成就評量上的運用。第一屆華文社會教育測驗研討會。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭富森(1994)。一個CTT與一個IRT之整合模式。民國83年中華心理學會年會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Greer, B.、Mangan, C.(1984)。Understanding Multiplication and Division。The sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the psychology of Education Research。WI:University of Wisconsin Madison。  new window
研究報告
1.林福來(1987)。國中生反射、旋轉、平移概念發展研究 (計畫編號:NSC75-0111-S0003-01)。  延伸查詢new window
2.林福來(1985)。國中生比例的概念發展。  延伸查詢new window
3.張靜嚳(1986)。我國國中學生四則運算概念發展研究--國中、小四則概念之發展。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉湘川、劉好、許天維(1992)。我國國小學童對稱概念的發展研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳昭容(1990)。圖示對國小兒童解數學應用題之影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江南青(1983)。比例概念的診斷與補救(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁嘉英(1988)。國小兒童解數學應用問題的認知歷程(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林慧麗(1991)。幼兒解答乘除問題的策略(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳怡欣(1994)。試題反應理論與知識結構分析在國小六年級學生社會科學習成就評量上(碩士論文)。台北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉兆文(1994)。「無參數試題反應理論之等化模式」適用性之探討:國小數學科成就測驗之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.Mangan, C.(1986)。Choice of operation in multiplication and division word problems(-)。Queen's University,Belfast。  new window
8.葉雪梅(1990)。國小兒童對「比較」類應用問題的解題行為(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林義雄、陳澤民(1992)。數學學習心理學。九章出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.許擇基、劉長萱(1992)。試題作答理論簡介。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
3.許天維(1994)。數學試題分析法--以「八十一學年度國民教育階段小數學科基本成就評量」分析為例。高雄市:大漢唐有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳梅生、周筱亭(1982)。美國小學數學教學。臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
5.簡茂發(1987)。心理測驗與統計方法。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Allen, M. J.、Yen, W. M.(1979)。Introduction to measurement theory。Monterey:Brooks/Core Publishing Company。  new window
7.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H.(1985)。Item response theory: principle and applications。Hingham, MA:Kluwer Boston。  new window
8.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H. M.、Rogers, H. J.(1991)。Fundamentals entals of Jerman, J. & Rees, R. item response theory。Newbury Park, CA:SAGE。  new window
9.Post, T. R.(1988)。Teaching Mathematics in Grades K-8。Boston:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
10.Lord, F. M.(1980)。Application of item response theory to practical testing problems。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
11.Resnick, L. B.、Ford, W. W.(1984)。The psychology of Mathematics for Instruction。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
12.Quintero, A. H.(1981)。Conceptual understanding in solving multiplication word problems。Columbus Ohio:ERIC/SMEAC。  new window
13.郭生玉(1989)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃敏晃(19930808)。數學教育的目的是什麼?。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.余民寧(1993)。測驗理論的發展趨勢。心理測驗的發展與應用。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.屠耀華(1991)。我國國中學生圖形概念發展之研究。數學科教學輔導論文集。  延伸查詢new window
3.Carpenter, T. P.(1985)。Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving。Teaching and Learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Linn, R. L.(1990)。Diagnostic testing。Diagnostic monitoring。NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Vergnaud, G.(1983)。Multiplicative structures。Acquisition of mathematics concepts and process。New York:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE