:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從美國逆向付款的案例發展來看我國專利連結制度下逆向付款爭議的審查
書刊名:公平交易季刊
作者:盧憶 引用關係洪亮瑄鄔育宏
作者(外文):Lu, Thomas YiHong, Liang-shuanWu, Yu-hong
出版日期:2020
卷期:28:4
頁次:頁157-209
主題關鍵詞:逆向付款龐大且不合理無授權學名藥條款反托拉斯法合理原則專利連結制度Reverse paymentLarge & unjustifyNo-AG provisionAntitrust lawThe rule of reasonPatent linkage system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:7
期刊論文
1.Hemphill, C. Scott(2006)。Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem。New York University Law Review,81(5)。  new window
2.Shapiro, Carl(2003)。Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements。The Rand Journal of Economics,34(2),391-411。  new window
3.Carrier, Michael A.(2014)。Payment After Actavis。Iowa Law Review,100(1),7-49。  new window
4.蔡鏄宇(20151200)。逆向給付爭議--競爭法與專利法之交錯。科技法學評論,12(2),127-164。  延伸查詢new window
5.Elhauge, Einer、Krueger, Alex(2012)。Solving the Patent Settlement Puzzle。Texas Law Review,91,283-330。  new window
6.Hovenkamp, Herbert J.(2014)。Anticompetitive Patent Settlements and the Supreme Court's Actavis Decision。Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology,15(1),3-29。  new window
7.李佳玲、史雅男、蕭詔芳(20150600)。總額預算制度下,醫師專業化程度、管理會計系統與預算控制行為之關聯性。臺大管理論叢,25(2),119-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.沈宗倫(20180700)。簡評我國專利連結制度之相關立法--以藥事法之解釋適用為中心。月旦法學,278,165-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.滕沛倫、宋皇志(20170300)。我國真有引進專利連結制度之必要嗎?--對藥事法與專利法修正草案之評析。智慧財產評論,14(2),43-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李素華(2019)。簡析藥事法修法:新適應症資料專屬權與專利連結專章。科學月刊,435。  延伸查詢new window
11.江浣翠(20170300)。論我國專利期間的調整與延長、資料專屬權與專利連結制度之發展現況--藥品智慧財產權保護相關修正草案評析。智慧財產評論,14(2),79-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李秉燊(2019)。專利有效性判斷雙軌制下臺灣專利連結制度觀察及建議。交大法學評論,5,125-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李素華(20191000)。生醫產業發展的重要一哩路--西藥專利連結制度。專利師,39,10-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李素華(20191200)。藥品研發與近用--從藥事法專利連結專章及資料專屬權談起。月旦醫事法報告,38,7-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃郁涵(20190500)。西藥專利連結對我國製藥業之可能影響。貨幣觀測與信用評等,137,137-146。  延伸查詢new window
16.張濱璿(20191200)。專利連結制度下之公平交易法議題--以美國經驗為借鏡。月旦醫事法報告,38,49-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳文吟(20161200)。由美國實務探討逆向付費和解協議於專利法上之適法性。中原財經法學,37,1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.顏雅倫、張濱璿、廖國雄(20170700)。藥品專利連結制度與競爭法規範之研究--以逆向給付協議為中心。公平交易季刊,25(3),75-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Cheng, Jessie(2008)。An Antitrust Analysis of Product Hopping in the Pharmaceutical Industry。Columbia Law Review,108(6)。  new window
20.Edlin, Aaron、Hemphill, Scott、Hovenkamp, Herbert、Shapiro, Carl(2013)。Activating Actavis。Antitrust,28(1)。  new window
21.Feldman, Robin、Frondorf, Evan(2016)。Drug Wars: A New Generation of Generic Pharmaceutical Delay。Harvard Journal on Legislation,53(2)。  new window
22.Grabowski, Henry G.、Kyle, Margaret(2007)。Generic Competition and Market Exclusivity Periods in Pharmaceuticals。Managerial and Decision Economics,28,491-502。  new window
23.Harris, Barry C.、Murphy, Kevin M.、Willig, Robert D.、Wright, Matthew B.(2014)。Activating Actavis: A More Complete Story。Antitrust,28(2)。  new window
24.Iyengar, Vikram(2015)。Should Pharmaceutical Product Hopping Be Subject to Antitrust Scrutiny?。Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society,97。  new window
25.Kobayashi, Bruce H.、Wright, Joshua D.、Ginsburg, Douglas H.、Tsai, Joanna(2014)。Actavis and Multiple ANDA Entrants: Beyond the Temporary Duopoly。Antitrust,29(2)。  new window
26.Mungan, Murat(2013)。Reverse Payments, Perverse Incentives。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,27(1)。  new window
27.Schmitt, Allison A.(2014)。Competition Ahead? The Legal Landscape for Reverse Payment Settlements After Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,29。  new window
28.Shadowen, Steve D.、Leffler, Keith B.、Lukens, Joseph T.(2009)。Anticompetitive Product Changes in the Pharmaceutical Industry。Rutgers Law Journal,41(1/2)。  new window
研究報告
1.理律法律事務所(2014)。美國專利連結與橘皮書登錄制度研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hemphill, C. Scott(2007)。Drug Patent Settlements Between Rivals: A Survey。  new window
學位論文
1.王茹玉(2016)。藥廠專利侵權訴訟外之紛爭解決機制探討(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE