:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:員工紅利與後續公司績效之關聯性
作者:陳俊合 引用關係
作者(外文):Chun-Ho Chen
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:會計學研究所
指導教授:林嬋娟
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2005
主題關鍵詞:激勵薪酬計畫公司績效公司治理員工紅利獎酬制度Employee bonusesCompensation planIncentive compensation schemeFirm performanceCorporate governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:53
員工分紅是國內企業常見的獎酬制度,尤其在高科技產業更是主要的財務激勵制度。國內科技業普遍利用員工分紅制度來激勵員工,乃希望發放大額員工紅利能吸引與留任優秀人才,且可激勵員工士氣,以期能提升公司未來績效。2002年外國投資機構對國內員工分紅制度提出嚴重質疑,因為國內員工紅利並沒有於損益表認列薪酬費用,將造成盈餘虛增與過度發放員工紅利,並損及股東權益。從此之後,員工紅利制度便成為一個熱門議題,本文針對我國員工紅利與後續公司績效之關聯性,提供較為完整之實證分析。
本研究發現員工分紅比率與後續公司績效具有微弱顯著的正關聯性,即產生正向的激勵效果;但調整員工紅利費用化後的後續經營績效,則出現負的關聯性,即員工分紅的稀釋效果大於激勵效果,可能肇因於不佳的公司治理,而產生過度發放員工分紅或過度利潤分享所致。此外,本研究發現,當股票紅利占員工紅利總額比例較高,其後續績效並未較佳。
本研究建議,企業管理當局不應過度發放員工分紅,以免損及股東權益,並可有效提升公司治理。此外,亦可考慮搭配其他有效獎酬制度來激勵員工。本文亦建議,主管機關或會計準則制定機構應盡快修改員工分紅會計處理,將員工紅利依公平價值允以費用化,除可提升財務報表的可靠性與透明度外,並有助於企業訂定合理的員工分紅制度,以增進有效的公司治理。本研究結果可提供政府主管機關、企業管理當局與投資人相關決策參考。
The employee stock bonus plan is a commonly adopted incentive compensation scheme in Taiwan, especially in high-tech companies. The main purposes of granting huge employee bonuses to employees are to attract and retain excellent employees, to motivate them and to improve their working attitude. Furthermore, granting firms expect this incentive scheme will improve their future firm performance.
Under the current accounting practice in Taiwan, the employee bonuses are not recognized as compensation cost, which results in an overstatement of the reported earnings and induces excess distribution of employee bonuses. Since 2002, when foreign investors raised concerns about the adverse impact of this accounting treatment for the employee bonuses, it has become a hot topic in the Taiwanese stock market. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between employee bonuses and subsequent firm performance.
This study finds that the employee bonuses have a weakly significant and positive incentive effect on subsequent firm performance. However, after adjusting subsequent operating performance by considering the expenses of employee bonuses, the results no longer support the hypothesis that higher bonus ratio will create better subsequent firm performance. This means that the dilution effect of the employee bonuses is greater than its incentive effect and that this is caused by an excess distribution of employee bonuses (or excess profit sharing). In addition, the results do not support the hypothesis that the higher the percentage of the stock bonus the better the subsequent firm performance.
The results suggest that managers should not distribute excess employee bonuses in order to improve corporate governance, but may adopt other effective compensation plans to motivate their employees. In addition, this paper suggests that regulatory agencies or accounting standards setting bodies have to amend the current accounting treatment to recognize the expenses of the employee bonuses. This would improve the reliability and transparency of financial reporting, and also help to generate a reasonable employee bonus plan.
一、中文部分
天下雜誌,2002,「股東.員工.CEO的戰爭-美國分贓台灣分紅?」,第202期:46。
馬秀如,2003,「員工分紅配股既是股東的成本,也是公司的費用」,會計研究月刊,第214期,62-70。
商業周刊,2002,「把分紅列入費用,許多公司都沒賺錢」:66-68。
施振榮,2002,「員工分紅入股有其存在意義與價值」,經濟日報,8月1日。
曹興誠,2002,「談台灣IC工業之競爭力」,經濟日報,5月17日。
曹興誠,2003,「為員工分紅入股說幾句話」,工商時報,1月6日。
許崇源、張仲岳、葉疏,2003,「我們認為員工分紅應列為費用」,中華會計教育學會:1-38。
張仲岳,1999,「員工紅利及董監酬勞對股價影響之研究」,一九九九當代會計理論與實務研討會論文集:194-211。
張培真,2003,「員工分紅入股與公司特質之關係及其對公司績效之影響」,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳安斌、王信文,2002,「知識經濟之競爭力泉源-獨步全球的台式員工分紅入股制度」,產業論壇,第3卷2期:1-19。new window
陳隆麒、翁霓,1992,「員工持股計畫與公司經營績效關係之研究」,管理評論 11:81-102。
陳裕仁,2003,「員工紅利與董監酬勞對企業經營績效及股票報酬影響之研究」,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
游淑禎,2003,「員工分紅配股與公司經營績效」,國立雲林科技大學管理研究所未出版博士論文。new window
鍾惠珍,2000,「員工紅利分配法律及會計問題座談會記實」,會計研究月刊,第170期:56-67。
鍾惠珍,2002 a,「員工分紅制度探討」,會計研究月刊,第202期:44-58。
鍾惠珍,2002 b,「員工分紅費用化?爭論不休!」,會計研究月刊,第205期:91-97。
歐進士,1998,「我國企業研究發展與經營績效之實證研究」,中山管理評論,第六卷第二期:357-386。new window
蔡志瑋,2003,「員工分紅與公司績效及投資人報酬之關聯性研究—以台灣上市資訊電子業為例」,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
顏明宏,2003,「員工分紅入股對公司股價與績效的影響」,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所未出版碩士論文。

二、英文部分
Aboody, D. 1996. Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22(1-3): 357-391.
Amir, E. and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30.
Banz, R.W. 1981. The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stock. Journal of Finance Economics(March): 3-18.
Bell, T. B., W. R. Landsman, B. L. Miller and S. Yeh. 2002. The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock-Option Accounting for Computer Software Firms. Accounting Review 77: 971-996.
Chen, C.Y. 2003. Investment Opportunities and the Relationship between Equity Value and Employee Bonus. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30(September): 941-974
Core, John E., Wayne R. Guay and S.P. Kothari. 2002. The Economic Dilution of Employee Stock Options: Diluted EPS for Valuation and Financial Reporting. Accounting Review (July): 627-652.
Core, John E., Robert W. Holthausen and David F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
Dean, J. and T. Uimonen. 2002. Taiwan Bonuses Trigger Concerns-Huge Stock Awards Prompt Closer Scrutiny of Company Accounting. The Asian Wall Street Journal(July 18).
Deng, Z., B. Lev and F. Narin. 1999. Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysts Journal(May/June): 20-32.
Elayan, Fayez A., Jammy S.C. Lau, Thomas O. Meyer. 2001. Executive Incentive Compensation Schemes and Their Impact on Corporate Performance:Evidence from New Zealand Since Legal Disclosure Requirements became Effective. Working paper, Masey University.
Fama, E.F. and K. R. French. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427-465.
Gaver, J. and K. Gaver. 1993. Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 125-160.
Gaver, J., K. Gaver and J. R. Austin. 1995. Additional Evidence on Bonus Plans and Income Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 3-28.
Gibbons, R. and K. Murphy. 1990. Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Compensation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43: 30-51.
Gibbons, R. and K. Murphy. 1992. Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 100, No. 3: 468-505.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.
Holmstorm, B. 1979. Moral Hazard and Observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74-91.
Holmstorm, B. and P. Milgrom. 1991. Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentives Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law Economica and Organization 7: 24-52.
Holthausen, R., D. Larcker and R. G. Sloan. Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 29-74.
Iqbal, Z. and S. A. Hamid. 2000. Stock Price and Operating Performance of ESOP Firms: A Time-Series Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics (Summer): 25-47.
Ittner, C., D. Larcker and M. Rajan. 1997. The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts. Accounting Review 72: 231-255.
Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling.1976. Theory of the Firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
Kerr, J. and R. A. Bettis. 1987. Boards of Directors, Top Management Compensation, and Shareholder Returns. Academy of Management Journal 30: 645-664.
Klein, K. 1987. Employee Stock Ownership and Employee Attitudes: A Test of Three Models. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph 72: 319-332.
Lambert, R. 1983. Long Term Contracts and Moral Hazard. The Bell Journal of Economic(Autumn): 441-452.
Lambert, R. and D. Larcker. 1987. An analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research 25: 129-149.
Lambert, R., D. Larcker and K. Weight. 1993. The Structure of Organizational Incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 438-461.
Lambert, R. 1990. The Use of Accounting and Security Price Measures of Performance in Managerial Compensation Contracts: A Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43: 101-124.
Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis.1996. The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107-138.
Long, R. J. 1978. The Effects of Employee Ownership on Organizational Identification, Employee Job Attitudes, and Organizational Performance. Human Relations 31: 29-48.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38: 163-184.
Murphy, K.J. 1985. Corporate Performance and Management Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis .Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 11-42.
Park, S. and M. H. Song. 1995. Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Firm Performance, and Monitoring by Outside Blockholder. Financial Management(Winter): 52-64.
Sloan, R. G. 1993. Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 55-100.
Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts. 1992. The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policy. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 263-292.
Sougiannis, T. 1994. The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D. Accounting Review(January): 44-68.
Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Wilson, N., J. R. Cable and M. J. Peel. 1990. Quit Rates and the Impact of Participation, Profit-Sharing and Unionization: Empirical Evidence from UK Engineering Firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations 28: 197-213.
Yeo, Gillian H.H., Sheng-Syan Chen, Kim Wai Ho and Cheng-Few Lee. 1999. The Effect of Executive Share Option Plans on Shareholder Wealth and Firm Performance: The Singapore Evidence. Financial Review 34: 1-20.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE