臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：線上知識分享討論活動與其行為模式探究：以教師/學生社群為例
作者：侯惠澤
作者(外文)：Huei-Tse Hou
校院名稱：國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：資訊教育學系
指導教授：張國恩
宋曜廷
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2008
主題關鍵詞：知識分享；知識管理；線上討論；互動學習；專業發展；數位學習；knowledge sharing；knowledge management；online discussion；interactive learning；profesional development；e-Learning
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
數位學習的教學環境中，教師的專業發展與教學均受到科技的影響，然而研究發現，由於教師間缺乏知識分享的組織文化，教學知識的互動受到限制，此外，運用網路的專題導向教學中，學生社群也存在著資料分析與互動不足的瓶頸。
上述知識互動的侷限，均將可能影響教學與學習的深度，由於知識分享(Knowledge sharing)理論即聚焦於探討社群成員間知識的互動過程，為促進教師及學生社群的知識互動，本研究由三個子研究組成，分別以知識分享理論為基礎，將目前經常被討論運用於促進組織學習的問題解決(Problem-solving)、同儕評量(Peer-assessment)兩種互動學習策略與知識分享模式整合，針對教師社群及學習社群設計網路知識分享討論活動，並在研究方法上，同時採取質化與量化的各種研究法，包含序列分析、量化內容分析與文本分析等研究方法，藉由實徵、長期之觀察研究與行為模式分析，探究在運用各種知識分享策略時，各個子研究案例中社群成員在知識分享內容的知識建構深度與行為模式，以下為此研究三個案例分析之研究發現:
(1)運用同儕評量策略於學生社群，雖有一定程度之知識建構，然僅局限於某些層面，在促進知識內化與外化上仍有相當程度的限制，且討論容易偏題，在序列分析上，偏題行為連續性高且達到顯著。
(2)運用問題解決策略於學生社群，無論在解題歷程的合理性與知識的建構的深度上，均有一定的正面影響，於知識的內化與外化有一定程度上的助益。經進一步檢驗高低成就學生行為的差異，與分析各編碼之間的關聯後發現，其中，高成就學生在提問或釐清問題的行為次數顯著較多，此外，大多數的解題行為編碼次數與知識建構編碼次數均達到顯著之正向關聯，表示解題行為與知識建構幅度有關，然而關聯分析也顯示，學生之學習成就與知識建構編碼次數並無顯著關聯。
(3)運用問題解決策略於教師社群，在知識建構之深度上有一定程度的正面影響，其解題的行為模式係符合理論基礎，於知識的內化與外化有一定程度上的助益，此外，教師在提出解答後會有一定程度的反問或釐清問題的行為特徵，惟較缺乏統整式之解答。
(4)在學生社群方面，運用問題解決策略的知識建構程度與專注性，均較其運用同儕評量策略為高。
(5)在運用問題解決策略方面，學生社群在知識建構程度上較教師社群為高。
由上述結果我們初步了解各策略輔助的面向與瓶頸，並於文中進而提出人為引導介入、策略設計與智慧型代理人科技未來可能的各種輔助建議。
此一系列案例研究可有助於探究數位學習環境下知識分享策略對教師或學生知識互動的影響與其實施的限制，其中包含互動學習與知識分享策略模式的整合與結合量化與質化內容分析以及行為序列分析方式之實徵行為pattern分析，對於數位學習下教師或學習社群知識分享策略的評估與發展期待能有重要參考價值。
Under the instructional environment of e-Learning, teachers’ professional development and instructional methods are both influenced by technology. Previous studies have shown that as for professional development, interactions related to instructional knowledge are limited because teachers lack the culture of “sharing teaching knowledge.” Moreover, as for technology-assisted instruction, learner communities that utilize project-based learning also face the limitations of lacking sufficient data analysis and peer interactions.
The limitations in the above-mentioned knowledge interactions may influence the depth of teaching and learning. The research issues of knowledge sharing focuses on discussing the knowledge interactions between community members, we have conducted a series of pattern-discovering studies to deeply explore knowledge sharing discussions of teacher and learner communities. This study designed an online knowledge sharing e-Learning environment for teachers and consisted of three sub-studies. Problem solving and peer assessment, the two strategies that are often utilized to facilitate group interactive learning, were integrated in the knowledge sharing fundamental models, and online knowledge sharing discussion activities that focus on teacher and learner communities were also designed to assist the internalization and externalization of knowledge. As for research methods for pattern exploring, we adopted lag sequential analysis, quantitative content analysis, and original protocol analysis. Through the empirical observations, we explored the depth and the behavioral patterns of the discussions, and this allowed us to explore and compare the actual status of different knowledge sharing discussion activities with different strategies, as well as the limitations in the applications. The following are the findings of the three case analyses in this study:
(1)Although there is a certain degree of knowledge construction when applying peer assessment in the learner community, it is only limited to certain aspects, and knowledge internalization and externalization are still being limited. The discussions tend to deviate, and the sequential analysis shows that the deviations are continuous.
(2)When applying problem solving strategies in the learner community, the behavioral patterns have a positive effect on the rationality of problem solving and the depth of knowledge construction. When further examining the behavioral differences between high and low achieving students and the correlations between different codes, we can see that high-achieving students ask and clarify more questions. Moreover, the frequency of most of the coded problem solving behaviors and knowledge constructions show a positive correlation, indicating the problem solving behaviors and knowledge constructions have a positive correlation. However, correlation analysis also indicates that there is no significant correlation between students’ learning achievement and the scale of knowledge constructions.
(3)When applying problem solving strategies in the teacher community, a certain degree of positive influence is seen on the depth of knowledge construction. The behavioral patterns of problem solving also have a positive effect on knowledge internalization and externalization. Moreover, teachers tend to answer a question with a question or clarify questions after asking them, and they often lack integrated answers.
(4)As for the learner community, the degree of knowledge construction and concentration using problem-solving strategy is higher than the counterpart using peer-assessment strategy.
(5)Regarding applying problem solving strategies, the learner community demonstrates a higher level of knowledge construction than the teacher community does.
Based on the above findings, we have gained an initial understanding of the aspects and bottlenecks of each knowledge-sharing strategy. In turn, we propose suggestions regarding guiders’ intervention, strategy design, and intelligent agent development.
This series of studies helps us explore the influences and the limitations of these activities under the e-Learning environment. The study combines both theory integration and empirical observations, and we expect it will give contributions to the design, evaluation of online knowledge sharing activities/systems for teacher/learner communities in the context of e-Learning.
Achilles, C. M., Hoover, S. P. (1996). Exploring problem-based learning (PBL) in grades 6-12. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Allchin, D. (1999). Values in Science: An Educational Perspective. Science & Education, 8, 1-12.
Annis, L. F. (1982). The cognitive benefits of peer tutoring. Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Aroyo, L., & Kommers, P. (1999). Special Issue Preface: Intelligent Agents for Educational Computer-Aided Systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(3/4), 235-242.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd Ed.). UK, Cambridge University Press.
Banathy, B. H. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 85-112). Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489-542.
Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J.H. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G.., Moor, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & The ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 71-96
Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the creative process. In M. A. Runco (Ed), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, New Jersey: Blex.
Bell, M. (2001). Online Role-Play: Anonymity, Engagement and Risk. Educational Media International, 38(4), 251-260
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary Journal, 94(5), 539-551.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M. & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation knowledge sharing: Examining roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Bodzin, A. M., & Park, J. C. (2000). Dialogue patterns on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 19(2), 161-194.
Burnett, G. (2000). Information exchange in virtual communities: A typology. Information Research, 5(4), retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/5-4/paper82.html.
Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T., MacLean, A., & Rosson, M. B. (2003). Knowledge Management Support for Teachers. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 51, 4, 42-64.
Chancy-Cullen, T., & Duffy, T. M. (1999). Strategic teaching framework: Multimedia to support teacher change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 1-40.
Chang, C.K., & Chen, G. D. (1997). Constructing Collaborative Learning Activities for Distance CAL Systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(1), 2-15.
Chang, C-K., & McDaniel, E. D. (1995). Information search strategies in loosely structured settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(1), 95-107.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Hou, H. T. (2006). Web-based Tools for Designing and Developing Teaching Materials for Integration of Information Technology into Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (4), 139-149.
Cizek, G. J. (1997). Learning, achievement, and assessment: Constructs at a crossroad. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment. New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving behavior modification. Journal of Normal Psychology, 78(1), 112-119.
Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Silva, D. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oask, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organization manage what they know, US: Harvard Business School Press.
Dixon, K.T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445-455.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rhshworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: research into children’s ideas. London and New York: Routldege.
Edelson, D. C., Gordon, D. N, & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenge of inquiry based learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 392-450.
England, E. (1985). Interactional analysis: The missing factor in computer-aided learning design and evaluation. Educational Technology, 25(9), 24–28.
Erkens, G.., Kanselaar, G.., Prangsma, M., & Jaspers, J. (2003), Computer support for Collaborative and Argumentative Writing, Powerful Learning Environments: Unraveling basic components and Dimensions. US: Elservier Science Ltd.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47-61.
Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., & Ally, M. (2001). Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2 (1). Available online at http://www.irrodl.org/content/v2il/fahy.html
Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovation in Education and Training International, 32, 175–87.
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Education Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.
Fishman, B., & Pinkard, N. (2001). Brining urban schools into the information age: Planning for technology vs. technology planning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 63-80.
Gagne, R. M. (1980). Learnable aspects of problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 15(2), 84-92.
Gagne, R.M., & Briggs, L.J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gibson, S., Neale, D.C., Carroll, J. M., & VanMetre, C. A. (1999). Mentoring in a school environment. In proceedings of CSCL’99: Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, 182-188. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilbert, M., & Gordey-Hayes, M. (1996). Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation, 16(6), 301-312.
Glaser, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition. New York: Random House.
Goodlad, J.I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258-275.
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Guzdial, M., Rick, J., & Kehoe, C. (2001). Beyond adoption to invention: Teacher created collaborative activities in higher education. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 10, 265-279.
Hatch, L. (1988). Problem-solving approach. In Kemp, W. H., & Schwaller, A. E. (Eds.), Instructional Strategies for technology education. 37th Yearbook of Council on Technology Education, 88-89.
Hendriks, P. (1999), “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing”, Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
Henna, L. A., Potter, G. L., & Hagaman, N. (1995). Unit teaching in the elementary school. New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: the Najaden papers, New York: Springer, 117-136.
Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31–45.
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conference. The Journal of Learning Science, 14(4), 567-589.
Hobson, D., & Simolin, L. (2001). Teacher researchers go online. In G. Burnaford, J. Fischer, & D. Houbson (Eds.), Teachers doing research: the power of action through inquiry (pp. 83-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2007, in press). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive learning environment.
Hou, H. T. (2000). A research on web-based instructional design. Unpublished master dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsu, S. (2004). Using case discussion on the web to develop student teacher problem solving skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 681-692.
Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 65, 153-169.
Isaksen, S.G., & Parnes, S.J. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(1), 1-29.
Jeong, A. C. (2003) The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions, the American journal of distance education, 17(1), 25–43.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, C. Y. B., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
King, F., & Roblyer, M. (1984). Alternative designs for evaluating computer-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 23–29.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students, The Journal of Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350.
Kirs, P.J. (1994). A Role-Playing Approach to the Instruction of Information Systems Analysis and Design Courses. Journal of Education for Business, 69 (6), 317-25.
Kwok, S. H., & Gao, S. (2005). Attitude towards knowledge sharing behavior, Journal of computer information systems, 46(2), 45-51.
Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 48(1), 45-68.
Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2000). Children’s thinking, learning, teaching and constructivism. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 41-55). Buckingham [England], Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Leu, D. J., Hillinger, M., Loseby, P., Balcom, M., Dinkin, J., Eckels, M., Johnson, J., Mathews, K., & Raegler, R. (1998). Grounding the design of new technologies for literacy and learning in teachers’ instructional needs. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (203-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Levin, J., Kim, H., & Riel, M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Online education, New York: Praeger, 185–213.
Li, X.Q., Montazemi, A.R., & Yuan, Y. F. (2006). Agent-Based buddy-finding methodology for knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 43(3), 286-296
Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432.
Lochhead, J. & Yager, R. E. (1996). Is Science Sinking in a Sea of Knowledge? A Theory of Conceptual Drift. SUNY Monograph, Robert E. Yager (ed.). National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.
Malinowski, B. (1967). A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Mannaz, M. (1999). An expert teacher’s thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An Ethnographic study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 37-64.
Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
Mary, M. F., & J. A. Cook. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Learning in complex domains: a cognitive analysis of computer programming. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 19(1), 89-130.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, Problem solving, Cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
McCotter, S. S. (2001). Collaborative groups as professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 685-704.
Miller, S. R., Miller, P. F., Armentrout, J.A., & Flannagan, J.W. (1995). Cross-age peer tutoring: A strategy for promoting self-determination in students with severe emotional disabilities/behavior disorders. Preventing School Failure, 39 (4), 32-37.
Minbeava, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal International Business Studies, 34: 586-599.
Musser, J., O’Reilly, T., & the O’Reilly Radar Team (2006). Web 2.0: Principles and Best Practices. CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Newman, D., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 56–77.
Nonaksa, Ikujiro & Hirotaka Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company, NY: Oxford University Press.
Olson, M.R., & Craig, C.J. (2001). Opportunities and challenges in the development of teachers’ knowledge: the development of narrative authority through knowledge communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 667-684
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Patricia, K. G., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5-18.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (1999). Knowledge “What to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. California Management Review, 42(1), 83-108.
Plass, J.L., & Salisbury, M.W. (2002). A living-systems design model for Web-based knowledge management systems. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50, 35-38.
Rafaeli, S., Barak, M., Dan-Gur, Y., & Toch, E. (2004). QSIA: A Web-based environment for learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities. Computer & Education, 43(3), 273-289.
Ras, E., Avram, G., Waterson, P., & Weibelzahl, S. (2005). Using weblogs for knowledge sharing and learning in information spaces. Journal of Universal Computer, 11(3), 394-409
Roda, C., Angehrn, A., Nebeth, T., & Razmerita, L. (2003). Using conversational agents to support the adoption of knowledge sharing practices. Interacting With Computers, 15(1), 57-89.
Rosenholtz, S.J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in Quantitative Content Analysis, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(1), 5-18.
Ruth, V. S., Stuart S., Makiko M., Claire U., & Michael, E. (1998). Information seeking for instructional planning: An exploratory study, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 204-219.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In Grouws (Ed). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Canada: Macmillan Publishing Company, Maxwell Macmillan.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-14.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Sstatistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
Sing, C. C., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An Analysis of Interaction and Participation Patterns in Online Community. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 250-261.
Snow-Gerono, J.L. (2005).Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify of benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 241-256.
Soller, A. (2004). Understanding knowledge-sharing breakdowns: a meeting of the quantitative and qualitative minds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 212-223.
Spector, J .M. (2002). Knowledge management tools for instructional design, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(4), 37-47.
Sternberg, J.R. (1996). Cognitive psychology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
Sudweeks, F., & Simoff, S. J. (1999). Complementary explorative data analysis. In S. Jones (Ed). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net, 29-55. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., &Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a Web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 45(2), 187-202.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Hou, H. T. (2005). Technology-instruction integration: learning from America’s experience and reflecting on Taiwan’s development, Bulletin of Educational Research (in Chinese), 51(1), 31-62.
Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2001), The Design of Web-based Instructional Design Environment and the Examination of its Effects, Paper presented at International Conference on Computers in Education 2001, Korea.
Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2000). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. Proceedings of the WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, USA, 513–518.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research of project-based learning. Retrieved form http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf.
Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.). The Practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). New Jersey: Hillsdale.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90.
Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22–36.
Wallace, R., & Kupperman, J. (1997). On-line search in the science classroom: Benefits and possibilities, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, JL.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practices. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-58
Yang, C., & Chen, L.C. (2007). Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? Journal of Informational Science, 33(1), 95-109.
Yang, J.T. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture. Tourism Management, 28(2), 530-543.
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451-480.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1288（臺灣：1278，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67516071
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上