:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:羽球發高遠球運動技能學習之研究
作者:鍾祥賜
作者(外文):Hsiang-Szu Chung
校院名稱:國立體育大學
系所名稱:體育研究所
指導教授:陳五洲
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:羽球發高遠球運動學習精熟動作主成份分析badmintonlong high servemotor learningmastered movementprincipal component analysis(PCA)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:38
羽球是台灣民眾喜愛且經常從事的一種運動,發高遠球則是羽球比賽中基本且重要的動作。本研究目的在探究學習者的共同特徵及個別差異,提供教學者參考,10名11-12歲國小男性學童為實驗參與者(年齡11.2 ± 0.5歲,身高141.9 ± 7.4公分,體重40.6 ±11.5 公斤)。參與者接受每次40分鐘100球、每週二次共8週的羽球發高遠球訓練,每週訓練結束後進行發球測驗10次,使用9台VICON高速攝影機及動作捕捉系統以120Hz拍攝動作,並以得分記錄表記錄其得分。將所得結果以主成分分析及重複量數單因子變數分析,並以杜凱法進行事後比較(α=.05)。結果發現:(1)參與者經過八週練習,發球成績有顯著進步,所有參與者都達成學會之目標。(2)參與者全身18個關節點54維運動學資料可縮減成2-4個主成分即可描述全身90%以上的變異量。(3)參與者的主成份數目沒有顯著差異,但多數參與者第一主成分的可解釋變異量會隨練習時間增加而增加。(4)隨著練習時間增加,持拍手側部份關節的活動度、角速度及正角加速度也會有顯著增加的現象。本研究結果顯示,學習有其群體趨勢,但也有個別差異,指導者要充分了解後因材施教。
The people in Taiwan love badminton and often engaged in this movement. Long high serve(LHS) is the basic and important skill of playing badminton game. The purpose of this study was to explore the common characteristics of learners and individual differences to provide information for teachers. Ten 11-12 year-old elementary students as the experimental male participants (age 11.2 ± 0.5 years, height 141.9 ± 7.4 cm, weight 40.6 ± 11.5 kg). Participants received 40 minutes of 100 balls, twice a week for 8 weeks in LHS training. They have a serving test for 10 balls after they got training for a week. VICON motion capture system and 9 high-speed cameras were used to collect the LSH motion by 120Hz, and record the score of LSH by scoring sheets. After statiscal analysis with principal component analysis(PCA), one-way ANOVA repeated measure and Tukey’s post hoc procedure (α=.05) were applied, the results indicated that: First, participants practice after eight weeks, they got lots of significant improvments in serving performance. All of them achieve the goal of mastery movement. Second, 54-dimensional kinematic data points from 18 joints of each participant’s body can be reduced into 2-4 components, which can be described more than 90% of the variance of body movement. Third, most of participants have no significant differences in the number of principal components, but most participants in the first principal component explained the variance will be increased with practice time. Fourth, with the increased practice time, there are significant differences in some joints’ range of motion(ROM), angle velocity , and angle acceleration in the hand side which holding the racket. There are individual differences though the results of this study shows there is a major learning pattern. Thus the instructors should make the specific training schedule for the learners according to their personal abilities and learning paces.
參考文獻
中華羽球協會網站(2007)。http:// www.ctb.org.tw/ 02-3-RuleList.asp。2008/04/11檢索。
中華民國全民羽球協會網站(2007)。http:// www.seniorbad.org.tw/1-introduct.htm。2007/12/11檢索。
毛連塭、陳麗華(編譯)(1987)。精熟學習法。台北市:心理出版社。(Guskey, T. R.,1985)
石昌益(1998)。Mosston命令式、練習式與互惠式對羽球教學效果之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育大學體育研究所。
成戎珠(1994)。動作發展新理論-動力系統理論之介紹。中華物療誌,19卷1期,88-98頁。
李易潔(2010)。以主成份分析探討學習獨輪車過程中動作型態之轉移。未出版之碩士論文,台北市,國立台灣師範大學運動科學研究所。
何榮桂、姚漢禱(1994)。桌球發長球效標參照測驗之編製。測驗年刊,41,109-122頁。new window
邱憲祥(2007)。新修訂羽球規則對羽球運動的影響分析。中華體育季刊,21卷,1期,115-121頁。new window
林文煌(2006)。羽球新制的變革及未來性探討。福爾摩沙體育學刊,1期,33-40頁。new window
林靜萍、楊繼美、黃郁琦(2007)。學校體育教材教法與評量—羽球。台北市:國立教育資料館。
林韓司(2003)。影像回饋對羽球反手發短球動作技能學習的影響。台東大學體育學報,創刊號,21-37頁。new window
周賢銘(2008)。不同外在回饋訊息對國小學童羽球發高遠球技能學習之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台北市,台北市立教育大學體育學系碩士班。
姚漢禱(2002)。體育測驗與評量。台北市:師大書苑。
紀世清(1996)。不同回饋方式對羽球發短球及發長球學習效果與保留效果的影響。台北:大日出版社。
紀世清(1999)。羽球-技術報告書。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育大學教練研究所。
施登堯(2004)。建構主義觀點下的體育教學。上課ppt檔。
高幸利(2006)。初學羽球。台北市:秀威資訊科技股份有限公司。
孫宜芬(1988)。羽球初學者對羽球發球應有的認識。中華體育季刊,2卷3期, 29-31頁。
孫宜芬(1991)。不同的練習方法對大學男生羽球反手發短球學習效果的比較研究。體育學報,13輯,95-116頁。new window
教育部體育司主編(1984)。大專院校運動技能測驗手冊。台北市:幼獅文化事業公司印行。
陳秀惠 (2003)。運動學習曲線所代表的意義-以跳舞機運動為例。台東師院學報,14 期(上),229 ~ 244 頁。new window
陳秀惠 (2005)。量化全身性運動協調之工具-主成份分析。體育學報,38卷4期,39-52頁。new window
陳秀惠、劉有德(2007)。複雜運動系統的學習曲線。體育學報,40卷2期,39-50頁。new window
陳美卿(2006)。Mosston包含式教學對國小五年級學童羽球學習效果之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台北市,國立台北教育大學體育學系碩士班。
許維茜、溫卓謀、吳玲宛(2006)。不同計分制度對國內羽球女子單打競賽表現之影響。成大體育,39卷4期,30-40頁。new window
許泰彰(2000)。國小教師運動行為及其相關因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,桃園縣,國立體育大學體育研究所。
許樹淵(1997)。運動生物力學。台北市:合記圖書出版社。
彭美麗(2006)。羽毛球技巧圖解。台北市:大展出版社有限公司。
陳金盛(2004)。基本教學技術。載於張春秀等合著:健康與體育領域教材教法。台北縣:冠學文化出版。
張治文(2007)。羽球新計分賽制改變對選手訓練方式調整之探討。學校體育,第17卷,第5號,67-71頁。
張家昌、林素婷(2000)。漸進分段教學法與逆進漸進分段教學法對羽球初學者正手發高遠球學習效果之比較研究-以淡江大學女子羽球興趣選項同學為例。淡江體育,3期,1-11頁。new window
張登聰、曾慶裕(2006)。動作學習的結果回饋理論探索。大專體育,82期,180-184頁。new window
張壽鴻(1996)。羽毛球幾種發球方式、特點及訓練要領的淺析。南京體育學報,10(4),67-68頁。
傅粹馨(2002)。主成份分析和共同因素分析相關議題之探究。教育與社會研究,第3期,107-132頁。new window
廖邦伶(2004)。結果獲知對羽球技能學習之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台中市,國立台灣體育學院體育研究所。
廖庭儀(2003)。自然回饋強度對運動技能學習曲線結構之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育系碩士班。
廖庭儀、劉有德(2003)。以學習曲線描述協調型態的轉移。台東大學體育學報,創刊號,73-78頁。new window
鄭元龍(2002)。羽球技戰術分析與落點規律之研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
鄭麗媛(1988)。心智練習對羽球高長球發球技能學習的影響。新竹市:易明企業有限公司。new window
駱俊霖、許嘉甫與蔡守浦(2006)。不同表現獲知對柔道大腰技能學習之影響。吳鳳學報,14 期,323-332頁。
駱俊霖、林芳伶(2007)。不同表現獲知對羽球反手發球技能學習之研究。遠東學報,24(4),407-416頁。
盧正崇、呂芳陽(2006)。2006年羽球落地計分變革解析。大專體育,83期,21-23頁。new window
劉于詮(2005)。投擲不同重量物體對過肩投擲型態與肌肉活化程度影響之研究。未出版之博士論文,桃園縣,國立體育大學體育研究所。new window
劉有德(2004)。動力系統與運動學習。成大體育,37(1),1-7頁。
戴遠成(2009)。應用文獻介紹。載於劉有德、Gottfried, J. Mayer、陳秀惠、戴遠成與嚴雅婷合著:運用主成份分析量化運動行為,26-42頁。台北市:五南出版社。
戴遠成(2008)。工作限制對人體多肢段運動學習的影響。未出版之博士論文,台北市,國立台灣師範大學體育學系博士班。new window
簡佑修(2005)。羽球基本技術及規則介紹。國高中體育課程羽球動作銜接發展研習。http://user.nksh.tp.edu.tw/ plan/nkcomm/94comm/intro01/files/03.doc(2008/12/4下載)
Adams, J.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
Balasubramaniam, R., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Coordination modes in mutisegmental dynamics of hula hoping. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 176-190.
Bernstein. N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford. England: Pergamon Press.
Chang, C. C. (2000). Effect of video instruction on the performance of female university students in beginning badminton. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of South Dakota, U.S.A.
Coker, C. A. (1995). Kinematic and outcome effects of combining knowledge of performance with constant versus alternating intrinsic knowledge of results on the acquisition of a complex, multiple degrees of freedom, Closed Skill. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Virginia, U.S.A.
Croom, A. P. (1992). The effects of a teacher-directed method and an individualized learning program in teaching motor skills to college students. Ph. D. Dissertation, The Florida State University, U.S.A.
Dai, Y.C., Yen, Y.T., & Liu, Y.T. (2006). Practice sessions and task constraints on the postural control of dynamical balance. NASPSPA Conference in Denver, Colorado, USA.
Dauptain, J., Holvoet, P., Gillet, C., Barbier, F., & Lepoutre, F.X. (2004). Segmental acceleration patterns during badminton serves. XXIXeme Congress de la Societe de Biomechanics. Creteil, 8-10 September 2004.
Davids, K., Button, C. & Bennett, S. (2010) 技能學習的動力:限制導向的觀點(劉有德、謝宗諭、陳秀惠、嚴雅婷、戴遠成、江函芸、王衍超、李易潔、陳尹華、鄭光志)。台北市:禾楓書局有限公司(原著於2008年出版)。
Davids, K., Glazier, P., Araujo, D., & Bartlett, R. (2003). Movement system as dynamical systems(the functional role of variability and its implication for sport medicine). Sport Medicine, 33(4), 245-260.
de Leva, P. (1996). Joint Center Longitudinal Positions Computed from A Selected Subset of Chandler’s Data. Journal of Biomechanics, 29(9), 1231-1233.
Fitts, p.m., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmoont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Hamill, j., Haddad, J. M., & MacDermott, W. J. (2000). Issues in quantifying variability from a dynamical systems perspective. Journal of Appied Biomechanics, 16, 407-418.
Heathcote, Andrew, Brown, Scott (2000). The Law of Practice and localist neural network models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23(4), p479.
Higuchi, T., Imanaka, K., & Hatayama, T. (2002). Freezing degrees of freedom under stress: Kinematic evidence of constrained movement strategies. Human Movement Science, 21, 831-846.
Hollands, K. L., Wing, A.M., & Daffertshofer, A. (2004). Principal components in contemporary dance movements, San Diego, USA, Society for Neuroscience Conference, Publication: 28427.
Hong, S., & Newell, K.M. (2006). Change in organization of degrees of freedom with learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 88-100.
Kamm, K., Thelen, E., & Jensen, J.L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70, 763-775.
Kreighbaum, E., & Barthels, K. M. (1996). Biomechanics: a qualitative approach for studying human movement. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Landy, J. M., & Burridge K. R. (1999). Ready-to-use fundamental motor skills & movement activities for young children: Teaching, assessment & remediation. New York: The center for applied research in education.
Li, Z.M. (2006). Functional degrees of freedom. Motor Control, 10 (4), 301-310.
Roberton, M. A., & Halverson, L. E., (1984). Developing children-Their changing movement. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
IBF(2006)IBF News of Annual General Meeting, Retrieved May8.2006,from http://www.internationalbadminton.org
/newscontent.asp?pageid={1A1FE179-DAAF-AC1A-B5CC-0D7369C21143} .
Keh, N. C. (1992). Student’ use of teacher feedback during badminton instruction. Ph. D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. U.S.A.
Kamm, K., Thelen, E., & Jensen, J. L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motordevelopment. Physical Therapy, 70, 763-775.
Gökdere, M. (2005). A Model for Gifted Science Teachers’ Performance Evaluation. Educational Sciences: Theory & Pratice. 5 (1), 89-100.
Morehouse, L. E., & Cooper, J. M. (1950). Kinesiology. London: Kinipton.
Newell, K. M. (1985). Coordination, control and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg , and I.M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in Motor learning, meomory, and control. North-Holland : Elsever Science Publishers. 295-311.
Newell, K. M. (1991). Motor skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 213-237.
Newell, K. M., Liu, Y. T., & Mayer - Kress, G. ( 2001). Time scale in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108(1), 57-82.
Newell, K. M., & Vaillancourt, D. E. (2001). Dimensional change in motor learning. Human Movement Science, 20, 695-715.
Rink, E. Judith. (1998). Teaching Physical Education for Learning. Mc Graw-Hill, Inc. New York, U.S.A.
Richman M.B.(1988). A cautionary note concerning a commonly applied eigenanalysis procedure. Tellus, 40B, 50-58.
Roberto, B., Angelo, F., Marco C., & Fausto, C. (2007). Effect of mental imagery on the development of skilled motor actions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 803-826.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning. (4th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Siedentop, D. (1991). Developing teaching skills in physical education. (3rd ed.) Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Steindler, A. (1955). Kinesiology of the human body. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Stergiou, N. (2004). Innovative analyses of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Tzetzis, G., & Votsis, E. (2006). Three feedback methods in acquisition and retention of badminton skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102, 275-284.
Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 133-142.
Wang, J. Y. (2004). Developmental trends for badminton game play across skill levels: An Exploratory Study. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE