11參考書目
11.1中文
11.1.1專書與期刊論文
1.林子倫（2008）。〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉，《公共行政學報》28期，頁153-175
2.林子倫（2009）。〈後京都氣候談判的五大難題〉，《能源報導》，2009年10月，頁9-13。
3.李建良（2010）。〈氣候變遷的法律對策與規範模式—系列總說與之一〉。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
4.范文清（2009）。〈評能源稅條例草案〉，《月旦法學》，174期，頁69-87。
5.汪信君（2010）。〈氣候變遷減緩與保險機制〉。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
6.施文真（2005）。〈台灣參與國際環保類之組織與公約的意義與可行性〉，《臺灣國際法季刊》，2卷1期，頁139-142。
7.施文真（2008）。〈氣候變遷國際管制體系與關稅暨貿易總協定／世界貿易組織之關係──以京都機制為主要探討對象〉，《綠化WTO？－貿易、環境與台灣》，頁107-153
8.施文真（2008）。〈由交易單位之法律性質重新檢視排放權交易制度與WTO之關係〉，《政大法學評論》，105期，頁121-215
9.施文真（2009）。〈溫室氣體減量法草案簡評—以排放權交易為主要分析對象〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，174期，頁47-68
10.施文真（2010）。〈氣候變遷與調適措施的財務機制〉。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
11.張文貞（2002）。〈面對全球化──台灣行政法發展的契機與挑戰〉，《當代公法新論（中）：翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集》，頁7-15。台北：元照。
12.張文貞 （2010）。〈氣候變遷下的環境及政策影響評估初探：思考面向的提出〉。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
13.張亞中（2001）。〈全球治理：主體與權力的解析〉，《問題與研究》，40卷4期，頁1-23
14.張冠群（2009）。〈氣候變遷對責任保險法制之影響：美國法的觀察—自美國聯邦最高法院Massachusetts v. E.P.A一案出發〉，《月旦法學》，174期，頁193-222。
15.許耀明（2007）。〈氣候變化綱要公約／京都議定書、美歐不同立場與和WTO補貼暨平衡措施協定之互動〉，《中華國際法與超國界法評論》，3卷1期，頁73-120
16.許耀明（2010）。〈氣候變遷的跨國規範模式—巨災風險、跨國規範與其國際法意涵〉。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
17.傅岳邦、高文彬（2009）。〈京都議定書的國家履行〉，《問題與研究》，48卷1期，頁97-131
18.梁啟源（2008）。〈氣候變遷對臺灣經濟的影響〉，《科學發展》424期，頁50 ~ 53
19.柳中明、吳明進、林淑華、陳盈蓁、楊胤庭、林瑋翔、曾于恆、陳正達（2008）。〈台灣地區未來氣候變遷預估〉，Retrieved from http://apf.cier.edu.tw/upload/TFCCP-971225.pdf
20.袁鶴齡（2003），〈全球治理與國際合作：論其策略與困境〉，《全球政治評論》，4期，頁34-36
21.劉坤億（2003），〈全球治理的理想與現實〉，《中國行政評論》，13卷1期，頁29-56
22.蔡岳勳（2009），〈跛腳的能源法案〉，《月旦法學》，174期，頁69-87。
23.葉俊榮（1999）。《全球環境議題：台灣觀點》，台北：巨流。
24.葉俊榮（2008）。〈聯合國與永續發展：環境保育議題〉，陳隆志、陳文賢編，《聯合國：體制、功能與發展》，頁277-278。
25.葉俊榮（2009）。〈氣候變遷的治理模式：法律典範的衝擊與轉變。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理：法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會。台灣大學法律學院。
11.1.2碩士論文
1.張伯妃（2008）。《溫室氣體排放管制之研究》，國立臺灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士論文
2.宋書帆（2007）。《論我國應有之溫室氣體減量法制》，國立清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文
3.陳佩祺（2008）。《全球暖化與我國溫室氣體減量法制化之研究》，國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所在職進修碩士論文
4.陳欣湉（2010）。《氣候變遷時代的新興管制：全球行政法的啟示》，頁82，國立台灣大學法律學院法律研究所碩士論文
5.王皓正（2001）。《永續發展趨勢下全球氣候變遷議題之法律問題研究》，東吳大學法律學系研究所碩士論文。
11.2英文
11.2.1 專書
1.Alfredsson, G. et al eds. (2001). The Inspection Panel of The World Bank: A Different Complaints Procedure. Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
2.Axelrod, R. S., Downie, D. L., and Vig, N. J. (ed.) (2005), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy. Washington D.C., CQ Press.
3.Bothe, M. and Rehbinder, E. ed. (2005). Climate Change Policy. Ulrecht, the Netherlands, Eleven International Publishing.
4.Bull, Hedley. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order In The World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press
5.Caron, David D. & Harry N. Scheiber eds. (2004) Bring New Law to Ocean Waters. CA: Law of the Sea Institute, University of California
6.Carraro, C. ed. (2000), Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7.Clark, Dana. et al. eds. (2003). Demanding Accountability: Civil-Society Claims And The World Bank Inspection Pane., Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
8.Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
9.Conca, Ken. Michael Alberty, and Geoffry D. Dabelko. (1995). Green Planet Blues: Environmental Politics from Stockholm to Rio. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
10.Doelle, M. (2005), From Hot Air to Action: Climate Change, Compliance and the Future of International Environmental Law. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Carswell.
11.Faure, M. and Peeters, M. (ed.) (2008), Climate Change and European Emission Trading, UK, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
12.Faure, M. and Ying, S. (ed.) (2008), China and International Environmental Liability: Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution, UK, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
13.Franck, Thomas M. (1995). Fairness in International Law and Institution, New York: Oxford University Press
14.Gerrard, M. B. (ed.) (2007), Global Climate Change and U.S. Law, Chicago, American Bar Association.
15.Harris, P. G. ed. (2007), Europe and Global Climate Change: Politics, Foreign Policy and Regional Cooperation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
16.Harris, P. G. ed. (2009), The Politics of Climate Change: Environmental Dynamics in International Affairs, New York: Routledge.
17.Hatch, M. T. (ed.) (2005), Environmental Policymaking,: Assessing the Use of Alternative Policy Instruments, New York, State University of New York Express.
18.Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order, Cambridge: Polity Press
19.Held, D. & Keonig-Archibugi eds., (2003). Taming Globalization: Frontiers Of Governance, UK, Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.Henkin, Louis. (1979). How Nations Behave: Law And Foreign Policy, New York: Columbia University Press
21.Humphreys, Stephen ed. (2010). Human rights and climate change, New York: Cambridge University Press
22.Hunter, David., James Salzman, & Durwood Zaelke, (2007). International Environmental Law and Policy, West Publishing Company
23.Helm, D. and Hepburn C. ed. (2009), The Economics and Politics of Climate Change, New York: Oxford University Press.
24.Jepma, C. J., and Munasinghe, M. (1998), Climate Change Policy: Facts, Issues, and Analysis, UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.Koh, K-L, Lye, L-H, and Lin, J. ed. (2010). Crucial Issues in Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol: Asia and the World, Singapore, World Scientific.
26.Krisch, Nico. (2010). Global Administrative Law and the Constitutional Ambition, in M. Loughlin & P. Dobner (Eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, (pp. 245-266). Oxford: Oxford University Press, ,
27.Linklater, Andrew. (1998). The Transformation Of Political Community: Ethical Foundations For A Post-Westphalian Age, Cambridge: Polity Press
28.Loughlin M. et al eds. (2007). The Paradox Of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power And Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press
29.Louka, Elli. (2006). International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, And World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press
30.Mearns, R. and Norton, A. ed. (2010). Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
31.Peeters, M. and Deketelaere K. ed. (2006). EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
32.Posner, Eric A. (2009). The Perils of Global Legalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
33.Porter, Gareth. & Brown, Janet W. (1991). Global Environmental Politics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.Roberts, J. Timmons & Parks, Bradley C. (2007). A Climate Of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, And Climate Policy, MIT Press
35.Robinson, J., Barton, J., Dodwell C., Heydon M., and Milton, L. (2007). Climate Change Law: Emission Trading in the EU and the UK, London: Cameron May Ltd.
36.Rosenzweig, C., M. L. Parry, G. Fiser and K. Fohberg, (I993). Climate Change and World Food Supplies; Research Report No. 3. Oxford: University of Oxford, Environmental Change Unit.
37.Schneider, S. H., Rosencranz, A., Mastrandrea, M. D., and Kuntz-Duriseti, K. ed. (2010). Climate Change Science and Policy, Washington D.C.: Island Press.
38.Sandor, R. L., Bettelheim, E. C. and Swingland, I. R. (2002) An overview of a free-market approach to climate change and conservation, in: I. R. Swingland (Ed.) Capturing Carbon and Conserving Biodiversity: The Market Approach, (pp. 56–69), London: Earthscan.
39.Schoenbrod, David., Stewart, Richard B. & Wyman, Katriba M. (2010). Breaking the logjam—Environmental protection that will work, New Haven: Yale University Press.
40.Schreuder, Y. (2009). The Corporate Greenhouse: Climate Change Policy in a Globalizing World, New York: Zed Books Ltd.
41.Shaw, Malcolm N. (2003). International Law, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press
42.Slaughter, Anne-Marie. (2004). A New World Order, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
43.Smith, J. and Shearman, D. (2006). Climate Change Litigation: Analyzing the Law, Scientific Evidence & Impacts on the Environment, Health & Property, Australia, Adelaide: Presidian Legal Publications.
44.Spector, Bertram I., Gunnar Sjoestedt and I William Zartman eds. (1994). Negotiating International Regimes; Lessons Learned From The United National Conference On Environment And Development, Boston : Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff
45.Steward, R.B., Kingsbury, B. & Rudyk, B. (2009). Climate Finance: regutory and Funding Strategies for climate Change and Global Development, New York: NYU Press
46.Verheyen, Roda. (2005), Climate Change Damage and International Law, the Netherlands, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
47.Yamin, Farhana. & Depledge Joanna, (2004). The international climate change regime: a guide of rules, institutions and procedure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
48.Young, Iris. M. (2000). Inclusion And Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
49.Zillman, D., Redgwell, C., Omorogbe, Y. O, and Barrera-Hernandez, L. K ed. (2008). Beyond the Carbon Economy: Energy Law in Transition, New York: Oxford University Press.
11.2.2期刊論文
1.Abbott, Kennedy. & Duncan Snidal, (2000). Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization, 54, 421-456.
2.Ackerly, B. & Michael P. V. (2007-2008). Climate Change Justice: The Challenge for Global Governance. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 20, 553-571
3.Adler, Jonathan H. (2007). When is two a crowd? The impact of federal action on state environmental regulation. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 31, 67-114
4.Asselt, Harro van., & Joyeeta Gupta.(2009). Stretching Too Far? Developing Countries and the Role of Flexibility Mechanisms Beyond Kyoto. Stanford Environmental Law Journal J. 28, 311-378
5.Barry Rabe et al., (2005). State competition as a source of driving climate change mitigation. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 14, 1-53
6.Berman, Paul Schiff. (2005). From International Law to Law and Globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43, 485-556
7.Betsill, Michele. (2002) Environmental NGOs Meet The Sovereign State: The Kyoto Protocol Negotiations On Global Climate Change, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 13, 49-64.
8.Bodansky, Daniel. (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451-559
9.Bodansky, Daniel. (1999). The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?. American Journal of International Law. 93 (3), 596-624.
10.Bodansky, Daniel. (2009). Is There an International Environmental Constitution?. Indiana Journal Of Global Legal Study, 16, 565-584
11.Boyd, William. (2011). Climate Change, Fragmentation, and The Challenges of Global Environmental Law: Elements of a Post-Copenhagen Assemblage. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 32, 457-547
12.Breidenich, Clare., Magraw, Daniel, Rowley, Anne, & Rubin, James W. (1998). The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. American Journal of International law, 92, 315-331
13.Bruch, Carl. (2006). Is International Environmental Law Really“Law”? An Analysis of Application in Domestic Courts. Pace Environmental Law Review, 23, 423-464
14.Brunnee, Jutta. (2002) COPing with Consent: Law-Making Under Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15, 1-52
15.Buchahan, Ruth. (2003). Perpetual Peace or Perpetual Process: Global Civil Society and Cosmopolitan Legality at the World Trade Organization. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16, 673-699.
16.Burleson, Elizabeth. (2010). Climate Change Consensus: Emerging International Law. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 34, 542-588
17.Burton, Ian., Huq Saleemul, Lim, Bo, Pilifpsova, Olga, Schipper, Emma Lisa. (2002). From Impacts Assessment to Adaptation Priorities: The Shaping of Adaptation Policy. Climate Policy, 2, 145-159
18.Buzan, Barry. (2001). The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Study, 27, 4823-464
19.Camacho, Alejandro E. (2009). Adapting Governance to Climate Change: Managing Uncertainty Through a Learning Infrastructure. Emory Law Journal, 59, 1-78
20.Carlarne, Cinnamon. (2010) The Glue That Binds or The Straw That Broke the Camel’s Back?:Exploring The Implications of U.S. Reengagement in Global Climate Change Negotiations. Tulane Journal International Law & Comparative Law, 19, 113-150
21.Carlson, Ann E. (2009). Iterative Federalism and Climate Change. Northwestern University Law Review, 103, 1097-1162
22.Cassese, Sabino. (2004-2005). Administrative Law Without State? The Challenge of Global Regulation. New York University Journal of International L & Policy, 37, 663-694
23.Cassese, Sabino. (2005). The Globalization of Law. New York University Journal of International L & Policy, 37, 973-993
24.Cassese, Sabino. (2005). Global Standards for National Administrative Procedure. Law And Contemporary Problems, 68, 109-126
25.Cerny, (1999). Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 1-26.
26.Chesterman, Simon. (2008). Globalization Rules: Accountability, Power, and the Prospects for Global Administrative Law. Global Governance. 14 (1), 39-52.
27.Chimni, Bhupinder S. (2005). Cooption and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law. New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, 37, 799-828
28.Christopher, Caleb W. (2008). Success By A Thousand Cuts: The Use of Environmental Impact Assessment In Addressing Climate Change. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 9, 549-613
29.Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles F. (2006). Global Democracy? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 37, 763-797.
30.Cooper, Deborah E. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol and china: Global Warming’s Sleeping Giant. Georgetown International Law Review, 11, 401-438
31.Craig, Robin Kundis. (2010). "Stationarity is Dead" -Long Live Transformation: Five Principles for Climate Change Adaptation Law. Harvard Environemtnal Law Review, 34, 9-74
32.Dellapenna, Joseph W. (2000). Law in a Shrinking World: The Interaction of Science and Technology with International law. Kentucky Law Journal, 88, 809-880
33.Downs, George., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom, (1996) Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?. International Organization, 50, 379-406.
34.Driesen, David M. (2008). Sustainable Development And Market Liberalism''s Shotgun Wedding: Emissions Trading Under The Kyoto Protocol, Indiana Law Journal, 83, 21-70.
35.Durrant, Nicola. (2007) Tortious Liability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Climate Change, Causation and Public Policy Considerations, QUT Law and Justice Journal, 7, 403-424
36.Eritja, Mars Campins et al. (2004). Compliance Mechanism in the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, 34 Revue Generale de droit, 34, 51-105
37.Estlund, David. (1993). Making Truth Safe for Democracy, in David Copp et al. (eds.,) The Idea Of Democracy (pp. 1-100), Cambridge University Press
38.Esty, Daniel C. (2006), Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law, Yale Law Journal, 115, 1490-1560.
39.Farber, Daniel A. (2008). Climate Change, Federalism, and the Constitution, Arizona Law Review, 50, 879-924
40.Franck, Thomas M. (1988). Legitimacy in the International System, American Journal of International Law, 82, 705-759
41.Gerrard, M. B. (2009). .Introductory Comment: The Current State of Climate Change law, Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 10, 1-2
42.Georgiev, Dencho. (1993).Politics or Rule of Law: Deconstruction and Legitimacy in International Law, European Journal of International Law, 4, 1-14.
43.Grant, R.W. & R.O. Keohane, (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, American Political Science Review, 99, 29-43
44.Grubb, Michael. (1995) Seeking Fair Weather: Ethics And International Debate On Climate Change, International Affairs, 71, 463-496
45.Gutherie, Peter. (2004) Security Council Sanctions and the Protection of Individual Rights, NYU Annual Survey Of American Law, 60, 491-542
46.Harlow, Carol. (2006). Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values, European Journal Of International Law, 17, 158-214
47.Harris, Paul G. (1999). Common But Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United State Policy, New York University of Environmental law Journal, 7, 27-48
48.Harrison, Kathryn. and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, (2007). The comparative politics of Climate Change, Global Environmental Policy, 7, 1-18
49.Hathaway, Oona A.(2005). Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law, Chicago Law Review, 72, 469-536
50.Heinzerling, Lisa. (1998). Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions, Yale Law Journal, 107, 1981-2069
51.Heike Schroeder & Harriet Bulkeley, (2009). Global Cities and the Governance of Climate Change: What is the Role of Law in Cities?, 36 Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 313-358
52.Hunter, David B. (2009). Human Rights Implications For Climate Change Negotiations, Oregon Review Of International Law, 11, 331-364
53.Jayasuriya, Kanishkia. (1999). Globalization, Law, and the Transformation of Sovereignty: The Emergence of Global Regulatory Governance, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6, 425-456
54.Kaplow, Louis. (2007). Discounting Dollars, Discounting Lives: Intergenerational Distributive Justice and Efficiency, University of Chicago Law Review, 74, 79-118
55.Kennedy, David. (2008). The Mystery of Global Governance, Ohio Northern University Law Review, 34, 827-860.
56.Kingsbury, Benedict., Nico Krisch and Richard B. Stewart. (2005). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, Law & Contemporary Problems, 68, 15-61
57.Kingsbury, Benedict. (2009). The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law, European Journal of International Law, 20, 23-57,
58.Kinney, Eleanor D. (2002). The Emerging Field of International Administrative Law: Its Content and Potential, Administrative Law Review, 54, 415-433
59.Kingsbury, Benedict. (2005). The Administrative Law frontier in Global Governance, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 99, 143-153
60.Klass, Alexandra B. & Wilson, Elizabeth J. (2008). Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: Assessing a Liability Regime for Long-term Storage of Carbon Dioxide, Emory Law Journal, 58, 103-178.
61.Koh, Harold Hongju. (1997). Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, Yale Law Journal, 106, 2599-2659
62.Koh, Harold Hongju. (1999). How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced?, Indiana Law Journal, 74, 1397-1417
63.Koskenniemi, M. (1990). The Politics of International Law, European Journal of International law, 1-32
64.Koskennieni, Martti. (2007). The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics, Modern Law Review, 70, 1-30
65.Krasner, S.D. (1991). Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier, World Politics, 43, 336-366
66.Kravchenko, Svitlana. (2007). The Aarhus Convention and Innovations in Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 18, 1-50
67.Kravchenko, Svitlana. Right To Carbon Or Right To Life: Human Rights Approaches To Climate Change, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 9, 513-547(2008)
68.Krisch, Nico. (2006). The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law, European Journal of International Law, 17, 247-278
69.Kuo, Ming-Sung. (2010). The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law: A Reply to Benedict Kingsbury, European Journal of International Law, 20, 997-1004
70.Lazarus, Richard J. (2009). Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future, Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153-1234
71.Marr, S. (2000). The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: The Precautionary Approach and Conservation and Management of Fish Resources, European Journal of International Law, 11, 815-831
72.McKinstry, ,Robert B. Jr. (2003). Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: state, local and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the cause and effects of climate change, Penn State Environmental Law Review, 12(1), 15-82
73.Mark, S. (2005). Naming Global Administrative Law, New York University International Law and Policy, 37, 995-1001
74.Martin, Lisa L., & Simmons, Beth A. (1998). Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions, International Organization, 52, 729-757
75.Meijer, Ernestine E. (2007). The International Institutions of the Clean Development Mechanism Brought Before National Courts: Limiting Jurisdictional Immunity to Achieve Access to Justice, New York University Journal of International law and Policy, 39, 873-928
76.Melkas, Eriika. (2007). Equitable as Equal: the Kyoto Protocol Project Based Flexibility Mechanisms in an Unequal World, International Community Law Review, 9263, 263-289
77.Michaels, Ralf. (2009). Global Legal Pluralism, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 243-262.
78.Mickelson, Karin. (2009). Beyond a Politics of the Possible? South-North Relations and Climate Justice, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10, 411-423
79.Pallis, M. (2005). The Operation of UNHCR’s Accountability Mechanisms, NYU Journal of International Law and Policy, 37, 869-918
80.Peel, Jacqueline. (2008). Climate Change Law: The Emergence of a New Legal Discipline, Melbourne University Law Review, 32, 922-979
81.Perkins, John. (1997). The Changing Foundation of International law: from State Consent to State Responsibility, Boston University International Law Journal, 15, 433-508
82.Posner, Eric A. & Sunstein, Cass R. (2008). Climate Change Justice, Georgetown Law Journal, 96, 1565--1612
83.Purdy, Jedediah. (2010). The Politics of Nature: Climate Change, Environmental Law, and Democracy, Yale Law Journal, 119, 1122-1207
84.Revesz, Richard. (1999). Environmental Regulation, Cost-benefit Analysis, and the discounting of Human Lives, Columbia Law Review, 99, 941-1017
85.Rhode, Deborah L. & Ross, Lee D. (2008). Environmental Value and Behaviors: Strategies To Encourage Public Support for Initiatives to Combat Global Warming, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 26, 161-188
86.Rinkema, Richard A. (2003). Environmental Agreements, Non-State Actors, And The Kyoto Protocol: A ‘Third Way’ For International Climate Action? University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 24, 729-757
87.Ross, Christina., Evan Mills & Sean B. Hecht. (2007) Limiting Liability in the Greenhouse Insurance Risk-management Strategies in the Context of Global Climate Change, Stanford Law Journal of International Law Journal, 26, 251-316
88.Ruhl, J.B. & Salzman, James (2010). Climate Change, Dead Zones, and Massive Problems in the Administrative State: A Guide for Whittling Away, California Law Review, 98, 59-120
89.Savino, Mario. (2011). Global Administrative Law Meets “Soft” Powers: The Uncomfortable Case of Interpol Red Notice, New York University Journal of International Law, 43, 263-332
90.Schenck, Lisa. (2008). Climate Change “Crisis” - Struggling For Worldwide Collective Action, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 19, 319-379
91.Schmdt, Lauren E. & Geoffrey M. Williamson.(2008). Recent Development in Climate Change Law, The Colorado Lawyer, 37, 63-72
92.Shapiro, Martin. (1993). The Globalization of Law, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Study, 1, 37-64
93.Shapiro, Martin. 2001). The institutionalization of European Administrative Space, In A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz, & N. Fligstein (Eds.), The Institutionalization Of Europe (PP.111-140)
94.Silverstein, Gordon. (2003). Globalization and the Rule of Law: “A Mechanism that runs itself?”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 427-445
95.Sinden, Amy. (2010). Allocating the Costs of the Climate Crisis: Efficiency Versus Justice, Washington Law Review, 85, 293-354
96.Slaughter, Anne-Marie. (1994). A Typology of Transjudicial Communication, University of Rich Law Review, 29, 99-137
97.Snyder, F. (2002). Governing Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism And EU Law, European Law Journal, 5, 334-374
98.Stone Sweet, (1994). What is a Supranational Constitution? An Essay in International Relations Theory, The Review of Politics, 3, 441-474
99.Stewart, Richard B. (1975). The Reformation of American Administrative Law, Harvard Law Review, 88, 1667-1813
100.Stewart, Richard B. (2005). U.S. Administrative Law: A Model for Global Administrative Law?, Law & Contemporary Problems, 68, 63-108
101.Tarasofsky, Richard G. Heating Up International Trade Law: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by Efforts to Combat Climate Change, Carbon & Climate Law Review, 2008, 7-15(2008)
102.Thompson, Alexander. (2011). Efficiency, Distribution and the Soft Law Future of the Climate Regime, presented at International Policymaking and Agreements Conference, Yale University, April 8-9, 2011.
103.Trisolini, Katherine A. (2010). All Hands on Deck: Local Governments and the Potential for Bidirectional Climate Change Regulation, Stanford Law Review, 62, 669-746
104.Van Zeben, Josephine A.W. (2010). The Untapped Potential of Horizontal Private Enforcement Within European Environmental Law, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 22, 241-270
105.Vandenbergh, Michael P. & Anne C. Steinmann, (2007). The Carbon-Neutral Individual, New York University Law Review, 82, 1673-1741
106.Vandenbergh, Michael P. and Mark Cohen, (2011). Climate Change Governance: Boundaries and Leakage, New York University Environmental Law Journal, 18, 221-292
107.Viscusi, W. Kip. (1995). Equivalent Frames of Reference for Judging Risk Regulation Policies, New York University Environmental Law Journal, 3, 431-468
108.von Unger, Moritz. and Charlotte Streck, An Appellate Body for the Clean Development Mechanism: A Due Process Requirement, 2009 Carbon & Climate Law Review, 31, 35 (2009)
109.Walker, N. (2008). Taking Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Political Studies, 56, 519-543
110.Wara, Michael. (2007). Measuring The Clean Development Mechnism’s Performance and Potential, UCLA Law Review., 55, 1759--1830
111.Weinberg, Jonathan. (2000). ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy, Duke Law Journal, 50, 187-260
112.Weisbach, David. & Cass R. Sunstein, (2009). Climate Change and Discounting the Future: A Guide for the Perplexed, Yale Law and Policy Review, 27, 443-458
113.Weiler, J.H.H. (2004). The Geology of International Law—Governance, Democracy and legitimacy, German Yearbook of International Law, 64, 547--562
114.Weil, Prosper. (1983) Towards relative normativity in international law?”, American Journal of International Law, 77, 413－442.
115.Weiner, Jonathan B. (2008). Radiative Forcing: Climate Policy to Break the Logjam in Environmental Law, New York University Environmental Law Journal, 17, 210-255
116.Wiener, Jonathan Baert. (1999). Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice In Legal Context, Yale Law Journal, 108, 677-800
117.Wiersema, Annecoos. (2009). The New International Law-Makers? Conferences Of The Parties To Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Michigan Journal of International Law, 31, 231-287
118.Yang, Tseming & Robert V. Percival, (2009). The Emergence Of Global Environmental Law, Ecology Law Quarterly, 36, 615-664
119.Yeh, Jiunn-rong Globalization, Government Reform and the Paradigm Shift of Administrative Law, National Taiwan University Law Review, 5, 113, 118 (2010)
120.Zittrain, Jonathan. (1999). ICANN: Between the Public and the Private Comments Before Congress, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14, 1074-1091
11.2.3報告、網路資源與其他
1Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. (2010). Measurable, Reportable And Verifiable (MRV)—Trends And Developments In Climate Change Negotiations. Retrieved from http://enviroscope.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/upload/3060/attach/mrv_dec2010.pdf
2Bettell,i Paola. et al., (1997) Report of the Third conference of the Parties to the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change: 1-11 December 1997. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 1, 76, Retrieved from http;//www.iisd.ca/lianages/vol12/enb1276e.html. (visited Dec. 22, 2010)
3Young, O.R. et al. eds. (2008). Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Application and Research Frontiers. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
4Biermann, Frank et al. (2009). Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. ESG Report 1, Bonn, IHDP: The Earth System Governance Project.
5Bruce, James P. et al. eds., (1996). IPCC, Climate Change 1995: Economic And Social Dimension Of Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6Cassese, Sabino. (2004). Shrimps, Turtles and Procedure: Global Standards for National Administrations. IILJ Working Paper 2004/4, Global Administrative Law Series. Retrieved from http://www.iilj.org/courses/documents/HC2004.Cassese.pdf
7Cassese, Sabino. (2006, September). A Global Due Process of Law? . Paper presented at Hauser Colloquium on Globalizations and its discontents, New York University. Retrieved from http://www.iilj.org/courses/documents/Cassese.AGlobalDueProcess.pdf
8Clark, William J.- Paul J. Crutzen- Hans J. Schellnuber. (2005). Science for Global Sustainability. Toward a New Paradigm. CID Working Paper No. 120, Science, Environment and Development Group. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/cid/publications/faculty/wp/120.pdf
9Haites, Eric. (2004). Estimating the Market Potential For the Clean Development Mechanism: Review of Models and Lessons Learned, available at http://carbonfinance.org/docs/EstimatingMarketPotential.pdf.
10International Energy Agency. (2007), Energy Security and Climate Policy: Assessing Interactions, Paris: International Energy Agency.
11Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1996: Climate Change 1995 - Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. J.P. Bruce, H. Lee, E.F. Haites [eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 448 pp.
12Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
13Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart, J. Pan eds,.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
15Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B.M.Tignor and H.L. Miller eds.) UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate Change 2007. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, (Eds.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/spm.html
17Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer, eds.) Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
18Morrissey, Wayne A et al. (2005) CRS Issue Brief for Congress 89005: Global Climate change, Retrieved from http://www.cnie.org.
19Stadelmann, Martin J., Robert, Timmons. & Alex Michaelowa, The Messy Puzzle of Climate Finance: Why Rules for MRV are essential and a Case for “Official Climate Finance” 01 December 2010, http://www.stakeholderforum.org/sf/outreach/index.php/day3-item1
20Study Group of the Int’l Law Comm’n, (2006). Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising From The Diversification and Expansion Of International Law, U.N. Doc. A/CN/L.682 (Apr. 13, 2006)