:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國防制電信詐騙執行策略之研究:全球治理之觀點
作者:林標油
作者(外文):Lin,Biau-You
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:政治學系
指導教授:林忠山
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:電信詐騙防制第三部門全球治理執行策略telecommunication fraudpreventionthe third sectorglobal governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
為探究目前電信詐騙犯罪氾濫之嚴重程度,本文以全球治理之觀點來探討公部門、私部門及第三部門在我國防制電信詐騙執行策略中分別在預防、偵查、緝捕及整合等四大面向所遭遇之主要困境有哪些?各部門解決途徑之策略、角色及協力又為何?以建構跨部門合作機制之電信詐騙犯罪防制策略作為,並將之具體展現出來。因此,本文採用情境犯罪預防理論、全球治理理論及系統理論等研究途徑,並輔以文獻分析、深度訪談及個案分析等研究方法,試圖探索我國警方執行電信詐騙犯罪防制策略時所遭遇之各種主要困境。藉此了解目前電信詐騙犯罪防制策略可能產生之疏漏,俾進一步思考電信詐騙犯罪防制策略變革之必要性與補救措施,從而建立防制電信詐騙犯罪之具體可行模式。
本研究主要發現計有下列數項:ㄧ、預防面向:1)詐騙案件起訴率和判決刑度低,以及行政檢查力道不足,未能發揮嚇阻的功能,是造成電信詐騙犯罪持續發生的心理誘因;2)預防詐騙宣導經費不足、宣導方式無法吸引民眾及金融機構聯防機制不足,是造成民眾防詐意識嚴重不足的主因;3)缺乏快速聯防機制,銀行資金凍結和相關資訊查詢不能快速便捷,成為電信詐騙防範的嚴重缺口;4)行業監管不落實確實與個資外洩、預付卡及信用卡發放不夠嚴謹、網路電話和遊戲點數成為詐騙犯罪的工具,具有因果關係。二、偵查面向:1)金融機構反洗錢可疑交易報案線索及境外竄改電話號碼,嚴重影響電信詐騙犯罪偵查之啟動;2)網路高科技、多元洗錢管道、虛擬帳戶及詐騙集團採分級管理,成為犯罪情資蒐集與判讀障礙的重要因素;3)通訊監察聲請不易及偵查人員對於詐騙集團之犯罪手法、犯罪工具不熟悉,導致偵查工作遭遇瓶頸;4)各地法制與司法主張差異、兩岸司法互助議的法律屬性不明及兩岸警方仍未完全建立官方直接聯繫渠道,係造成妨礙電信詐騙犯罪現場偵查之主要因素。三、緝捕面向:1)跨境犯案及犯罪分工細密,係造成查緝嫌犯只能緝到車手,無法緝獲高層或核心人員,成為電信詐騙犯罪「屢打不絕」蔓延國際的主因;2)兩岸的政治因素影響實為現行查緝打擊電信詐騙犯罪最大的障礙。四、整合面向:1)主權、法律程序、語言、社為風氣及兩岸關係,成為不同國家(區域)偵查機關之間合作障礙的癥結所在;2)績效管轄、業務職掌及追求的目標差異是造成不同偵查機關之間、政府不同部門之間及政府與業者之間協作存在障礙的主要因素。
關鍵詞:電信詐騙;防制;第三部門;全球治理;執行策略
To explore the current severity of crime proliferation regarding telecom fraud , this paper will, with the perspective of global governance, look into the primary dilemma encountered by the public sector, private sector, and the third sector of our country with its implementation strategy in prevention against telecom fraud by our law-enforcement authorities in four major aspects as prevention, investigation, arrest, and. integration What are the tactic, role-play, and cooperation by each of the department as they work to resolve such dilemma? With results obtained, they should help to construct the mechanism of cross-departmental cooperation against telecom fraud and crime prevention strategy so that cooperation measures can be realized in specific terms. As such, this paper will adopt research methods such as situational crime prevention, global governance, and system theory as supplemented by literature analysis, in-depth interviews and case analysis and others so as to view about dilemma encountered by our police when they implement telecom fraud and crime prevention strategies. The main purpose of these efforts is to appreciate possible omissions in current telecom fraud and crime prevention strategy as law-enforcement authorities further consider the necessity and remedial measures to reform telecom fraud and crime prevention strategy so that a specific and feasible model of crime prevention can be established against telecom fraud.
The primary findings of this study are found as follows; first: aspect of prevention: 1) prosecution rate and penalty against fraud cases being low, while the force by the administrative inspection power is lacking, so that they fail to play the role of deterrence, which is considered the psychological inducement of persisting telecom fraud; 2) insufficient funding to carry out publicity against fraud prevention, while measures of advertising methods can hardly attract people to have further understanding about it, and financial institutions do not have joint prevention mechanisms, which are reckoned as the primary reasons that result in the public from insufficient awareness against fraud; 3) lack of joint prevention mechanism, freeze of bank funding , and inquiry of related information are not fast enough and they turn to become a serious gap in telecom fraud prevention; 4) measures in trade supervision are not implemented, with leakage of individual information and loose issuance of prepaid cards and credit card, in addition to network phone and game points, which all have turned out to become tools of fraud crimes and resulted in an cause-effect relationship to fraud crime. Second, aspect of investigation: 1) report clue of suspicious transaction regarding anti-money laundering by financial institutes as well as overseas tampering of phone numbers, which have seriously affected the initiation of investigation against crime of telecom fraud; 2) network high-tech, diversified money laundering, virtual accounts, and graded management by fraud group, which have become the critical elements for collecting crime intelligence as well as interpretation barrier; 3) it is difficult to have obtained permission for monitoring, while investigators are unfamiliar with criminal techniques and criminal tools of the fraud group, leading to bottlenecks in investigation work; 4) differences in legal systems and judicial opinions, legal attributes of cross-strait justice cooperation protocol being unclear, and no direct and official contact has been established between cross-strait police, which are the primary factors that hinder investigation of crime scenes against telecom fraud. Third, .aspect of arrest: 1) because of cross-border crime and fine division of labor, it ends up that suspects arrested are but the middleman, while high-level or core personnel are not. As such, it turns out to be the main reason why crimes of telecomm fraud crimes have "continuously spread" internationally; 2) political factor cross-strait has turned out to be the biggest obstacle against current investigation cracking down on crimes against telecomm fraud. Fourth, aspect of integration: 1) sovereignty, legal procedures, language, social custom, and cross-strait relations have become the crux of barriers to cooperation between investigative agencies in different countries (regions); 2) differences in performance jurisdiction, areas of competent authorities , and difference of pursuit goals are the primary factors that have brought about obstacles to cooperation between different investigative agencies, between different government departments, and between government and the trade
Keywords: telecommunication fraud, prevention, the third sector,
global governance, implementation strategy
中文文獻
(一)書籍
王杰、張海濱、張志洲,2004。《全球治理中的國際非政府組織》。北
京:北京大學出版社。
王紹光,1999。《多元與統一:第三部門國際比較硏究》。杭州市:浙
江人民出版社。
王義桅,2008。《超越均勢:全球治理與大國合作》。上海市:三聯書店。
王榮霖,2013。《全球治理與臺灣的活絡模式》。臺北市:致知學術出版社。
司徒達賢,2000。《非營利組織的經營與管理》。臺北市:遠見天下文化。
江啟臣,2011。《國際組織與全球治理概念》。臺北市:五南書局。
何帆等譯,2006。《世界是平的:21世紀簡史》。長沙市:湖南科學技出
版社。
汪毓瑋,2012。《跨國(境)組織犯罪理論與執法實踐之研究》。臺北市:元照出版社。
呂亞力,1991。《政治學方法論》。臺北市:三民書局。
吳定,2013。《公共政策辭典》。臺北市:五南書局。
林鈺雄,2005。《刑事訴訟法》。臺北市:元照出版有限公司。
林大貴,2015。《大數據巨量分析與機器學習整合開發實戰》。新北市:
博碩文化。
林嘉誠,1982。《政治系統的工程師伊士頓》。臺北市:允晨文化。
林孟皇,20114。《金融犯罪與刑事審判(二版)》。臺北市:元照出版。
吳英明,1996。《公私部門協力關係之研究:兼論都市發展與公私部門聯
合開發》。高雄市:復文出版社。
周海濤,2005。《案例研究方法的應用》。重慶市:重慶大學出版社。
俞可平,2000。《治理與善治》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
俞可平,2003。《全球化:全球治理》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
侯友宜,與林豐裕,2010年。《網路電話偵查理論與實務》。桃園市:著
者自印。
胡杰,1986。《政治學分析辭典》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
連耀南,2013。《通訊網路概念》。臺北市:五南書局。
孫本初,2001。《公共管理》。臺北市:智勝文化。
紐文英,2015。《研究方法與論文寫作》。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
章光明,2006。《美國刑事偵查法制與實務》。臺北市:五南書局。
陳萬淇,1995。《個案研究法》。臺北市:華泰文化出版。
陳向明,2002。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北市:五南書局。
黃俊英,1991。《行銷研究個案》。臺北市:華泰書局。
黃朝義,2014。《通聯紀錄調取與另案監聽修法評析》。桃園市:警察大
學印行。
許春金,2013。《犯罪學》。臺北市:三民書局。
許春金,2008。《犯罪預防與犯罪分析》。臺北市:三民書局。
許福生,2016。《犯罪學與犯罪預防》。臺北市:元照出版社。
許南雄,2010。《行政學術語》。臺北市,商鼎數位出版有限公司。
曹俊漢,2009。《全球化與全球治理:理論發展的建構與詮釋》。新北市:韋伯文化出版。
曹俊漢,2003。《政現代化的迷思:全球化下台灣行政發展面臨的桃
戰》。臺北市:韋柏文化國際出版有限公司。
曹俊漢,1978。《研究報告寫作手冊》。臺北市:聯經出版。
張勝軍,2001。《沒有政府的治理》。南昌市:江西人民出版社。
焦興鎧、王松柏、王能君、成之約、林佳和、陳淳文、潘世偉、與謝棋楠
,2012。《公部門勞動關係》。臺北市:國立空中大學。
彭芸,2011。《NCC與數位匯流-匯流政策晝芻議》。臺北市,風雲論談出版社。
楊士隆,2012。《犯罪心理學》。臺北市:五南書局。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、與李亦園,1989。《社會及行為科學研究法》
。臺北市:東華書局。
楊雪東,2012。《全球大變革》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
詹中原,2003。《新公共政策:史學、哲學、全球化》。臺北市:華泰文化。
詹中原,1999。《新公共管理:政府再造的理論與實務》。臺北市:五南書局。
詹德恩,2011。《金融犯罪的剋星:金融調查》。臺北市:三民書局。
鄧煌發、與李修安,2015。《犯罪預防》。臺北市:新保成出版。
蔡徳輝、與楊士隆,2004。《犯罪學》。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
蔡蒼柏,2006。《經濟犯罪偵查實務》。臺北市:刑偵協會印行。
謝立功、與蔡庭榕。《跨境犯罪偵查之理論與實務》。桃園市:警察大學印
行。
蕭新煌,2009。《非營利部門:組織與運作》。臺北市:遠流圖書公司。
顧良,2007。《保衛馬克思》。北京:商務印書館。
(二)期刊
丘昌泰,2011。〈政府施政與民眾感受之間的連接器:政策行銷〉,《研習
論壇》,第129期,頁1-13。
李宗動,2003。〈全球化、社會資本下的政府再造一兼論海峽兩岸政府職能之轉換〉,《競爭力評論》,5期,頁1-32。
李湧清、林逢泉、與黃啟賓,2012。〈165反詐騙諮詢專線效能之研究〉
《中央警察大學警學叢刊》,第42卷第6期,頁1-42。
宋筱元,1991。〈依賴理論的淺析〉,《警政學報》,第19期,頁499-511。
宋筱元,1994。〈中共外交政策的基本概念與研究途徑〉,《警政學報》,第25期,頁421-438。
宋筱元,1998。〈貪污發生原因之分析〉,《人力發展》,頁16-24。
宋筱元,1999。〈論專責肅貪機構之設立〉,《人力發展》,頁28-33。
林忠山,1984。〈亞蒙結構功能分析法之研究〉,《華岡政治論壇》,期14,
頁69-89。
桂宏誠,2002。〈經濟全球化與公共管理新環境〉,《國家政策論壇》,2卷
6期,頁20-26。
姜皇池,2002。〈論「肯亞案」之相關國際法問題-以管轄權競合之處理
為重心之探討〉,《臺灣法學雜誌》,第296期,頁72-81。
孫本初與鍾京佑,2005。〈治理理論之初探:政府、市場與社會治理架構
〉,《公共行政學報》,16期,頁112-119。
孫同文,2005。〈全球化與治理:政府角色與功能的轉變〉,《國家菁英季刊》,卷1,期4,頁8-14。
孫同文,2002。〈公共行政理論與實務的發展:一個全球化的觀點〉,《行
政管理論文選輯》,16輯,頁39-48。
許春金、謝文彥,2006。〈台灣地區未來犯罪趨向之研究〉,《犯罪防治學報》,第六期,頁1-28。
許春金,2010。〈慢性犯罪者與犯罪理論〉,《犯罪防治學報》,第八期,
頁1-20。
許春金、游士嫺、陳玉書,2012。〈臺灣犯罪被害調查執行模式之德菲法研究〉。《犯罪防治學報》,第十期,頁43-76。
許春金、朱庭亞,2014。〈錄影監視系統犯罪偵查效益之評估研究〉。《執法新知論衡》,第12期,頁1-27。
章光明、陳世煌,2006。〈非營利組織參與治安政策之研究〉,《第三部門學刊》,第四期,頁53-88。
章光明,2007。〈警察政策評估方法之演進〉,《警政論叢》,第七期,頁15-38。
章光明,2007。〈建構安全管理機制之研究,〉,《中央警察大學學報》,第四十四期頁119-136。
章光明,2008,〈美國警察制度與警政策略〉,《警學叢刊》,第39卷第3期,頁25-46。
張維平與陳正凱,2012。〈無線通訊犯罪偵查之研究>,《警學叢刊》,第42卷第6期,頁159-185。
張亞中,2001。〈全球治理:主權與權力的解析〉,《問題與研究》,第40卷4期,頁13-19。
蔡佩芬,2016。〈肯亞詐騙案簡要分析〉,《臺灣法學雜誌》,第296期,頁85-89。
蘇彩足,2008。〈我國公共治裡之挑戰與因應〉,《公共治理季刊》,卷1,
期1,頁52-60。
龐建國,2016。〈從國際政治經濟學看兩岸關係〉,《科際整合月刊》,第1
卷第5期,頁94-103。
龐建國,2016。〈從經濟效益看兩岸關係〉,《台海研究》,第3期,頁57-64。
龐建國,2017。〈從2017年「全國兩會」看中國大陸情勢與兩岸關係〉,《中
共研究雜誌社》,第51卷第3期,頁71-77。
龐建國,2015。〈第十屆兩岸經貿文化論壇對國共關係發展及兩岸局勢之
影響〉,《亞太評論》,第一卷第四期,頁31-44。
(三)學位論文
邱佩俞,2011。《電信詐欺犯罪運作歷程及期查緝因應策略之研究》。桃園市:中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
陳信良,2013。《詐欺犯罪量刑差異及其影響因素之研究-以刑法第339條第1項為例》。桃園市:中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
陳順和,2015。《電信詐欺犯罪模式與防制對策之研究》。嘉義縣:中正大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
許妙雲,2014。《線上拍賣之詐欺偵測》。桃園市:元智大學資訊管理學系所博士論文。
黃宗仁,2009。《建構詐騙犯罪預防宣導指標之研究-以網路及電信詐騙犯罪為例》。桃園市:中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
曾雅芬,2016。《行騙天下:臺灣跨境電信詐欺犯罪網絡之分析》。臺北市:國立政治大學國家發展研究所博士論文。
張文熙,2012。《線上拍賣詐騙之有效偵測》。新北市:淡江大學管理科學學系所博士論文。
游政憲,2012。《網路拍賣詐騙者偵測之研究》。桃園市:國立中央大學資訊管理學系所博士論文。
謝開平,2002。《電腦詐欺在比較刑法上之研究》。新北市:國立臺北大
學法律學系所博士論文。
(四)研討會論文
王俊元,2012。〈刑事司法供應鏈對抗電信網路詐欺之研究〉,發表於「第
七屆海峽兩岸暨香港、澳門警學研討會」,澳門特別行政區政府新聞
局,頁1-13。
江慶興,2006。〈防詐騙最佳守門員-165專線功能研析〉,發表於「犯罪
防治學術研討會」,桃園市中央警察大學,頁48-60。
宋燕輝,2001。〈人類安全之發展與推動:亞太國家的態度與作法〉,發
表於「人類安全與二十一世紀的兩岸關係學術研討會」,臺灣綜合研
究院戰略與國際研究所,頁30-41。
林忠山,2011。〈百年民國-自由民主與兩岸和平之際遇〉,發表於「中國政治學會年會暨學術研討會」,臺中市東海大學,頁69-85。
林忠山,2011。〈全球化下兩岸智庫在公共治理的互動模式〉,發表於「台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會國際學術研討會」,臺北市立教育大學,頁25-33。
林碧炤,2001。〈全球化與人類安全〉,發表於「人類安全與二十一世紀 的兩岸關係學術研討會」,臺灣綜合研究院戰略與國際研究所,頁6-15。
陳永安、羅越榮與劉嘉豪,2013。〈維護網路安全的警務策略-理論與實
踐〉,發表於「第八屆海峽兩岸暨香港、澳門警學研討會」,香港警
察總部,頁121-133。
張維平與楊華中,2012。〈刑事司法供應鏈對抗電信網路詐欺之研究〉,發表於「第七屆海峽兩岸暨香港、澳門警學研討會」,澳門特別行政區政府新聞局,頁13-29。
鄧煌發與李修安,2013。〈兩岸跨境電信詐欺犯罪防治策略之探討〉,發
表於「第八屆海峽兩岸暨香港、澳門警學研討會」,香港警察總部,
頁149-161。
顧慕晴,2005。〈行政人員倫理困境之研究:角色多元的觀點〉,發表於「首
屆兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會」,北京市中國人民大學,頁1-14。
顧慕晴,2011。〈轉換型領導觀點下公務人員核心價值之強化〉,發表於「第
七届两岸四地公共管理學術研討會」,蘇州市中國人民大學,頁1-12。
顧慕晴,2014。〈雙重權威結構下台灣廉政組織之研究〉,發表於「第十届
两岸四地公共管理學術研討會」,天津市南開大學,頁1-12。
(五)網路文獻
陳建甫,2003,〈全球化下的新鄉村權力關係〉,頁16。http://www.docin.com/p-8905169.html。檢視日期:2016年4月20日。
英文文獻
(一)Books
Abbott, Abbott,2001.Time Matters.Chcago:Uiversity Chicago Press.
Albrow, Martin,1996.The Global Age: State and Society Beyond Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press
Almond, Gabriel and Powell G.Bingham,1965.Comparative politics:A Developmental Approach.Boston:Little Brown.
Ashby,W. Ross,1952.Design for a Brain .New York:Chapman&Hall,Ltd.
Campbell,John L., 2004.Institutional Change and Globalization.
Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Clarke, Ronald V. and John E.Eck, 2003.Crime Analysis for Problem solvers.
Washington, D.C.:Dept of Justice.
Clark, William C.Clark, 2000.Environmental Globalization in Joseph S. Nye
and John D. Donahue(eds), Governance in a Globalizing World.
Coglianese, Cary,2000. In Governance in a Globalizing World. University of
Pennsylvania Law School.
Cornish, Derek and Clarke,R.V.,2003.Opportunities,Precipitators and Crimin
al Decisions:A Reply to Wortley's Critique of Situational Crime Prevent
ion, Crime Prevention Studies, New York:Criminal Justice Press.
Cutler, Claire A., Virginia Haufler and Tony Poter Albany, 1999.Private
Authority and International Affairs.NY: State University of New York
Press.
Deutsch, Karl W.,1966.The Nerves of Government.NewYork:Free Press of
Glencoe.
Director, Stephen W. , Rohrer, Introduction to systems theory. McGraw-Hill.
Easton, David,1987. Systems Analysis in Political Science. Uppal Publishing
House.
Easton, David,1965.A Framework for political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ:Prentice Hall.
Evans, Peter B.,1997.State-Society Synergy:Government and Social Capital in
Develoment.C.A.:University of California International and Area Studie.
Graeme, Newman, Clarke Ronald V., 2016. Rational Choice and Situational
Crime Prevention: Theoretical Foundations. Routledge.
Held, David,and Anthny G.McGrew,David Golblatt,and Jonathan Perraton, 1999.Global Transformations politics.Economics and Culture:C.A. Stanford University.
Held, David,and Anthny G.McGrew,2002.Governing Governing Globalization
:Power,Authority and Global Governance.M.A.:Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Heal, Kevin, Laycock Gloria K, 1986.Situational crime prevention: from
theory into practice. H.M.S.O., University of Michigan.
Hindelang, M. R., Gottfredson, & Garofalo, J. ,1978. Victims of P ersonal
Crime:An Empirical Forndation for a Theory of Person al Victimization.
Cambridge, Mass:Ballinger.
Hirsch , Andreas von,David Garland,Alison Wakefield, 2000. Ethical and
Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention. Bloomsbury
Publishing.
Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla , 2000 .Globalization and Public Administration.
Reform in Nye Jr., Joseph S. & John D. Donahue, eds., Governance in a
Globalizing World.Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. Jr eds. 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph S. Nye, Jr., 2000. Governance in a Globalizing
World.Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Klingner, Donald E., & J. Nalbandian, 2002. Public Personnel Management:
Contextsand Strategies. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kooiman, Jan, 1993. Modern Government-Society Internations.London:Sage Publicationpp.
Kooiman, Jan ,1993. Governance and Governability: Using Complexity,
Dynamicsand Diversity. in Jan Kooiman (ed.), Modern Governance:
New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage.
Lessig, Lawrence, 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace .New York:
Basic Books.
Migdal, Joel, 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States. State-Society Relations
and State Capabilities in the Third World .Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Morton, R.Davies and Vaughan A Lewis,1971,Models of political. New York:
Praeger Publishers.
Nye, Joseph S. and John D.Donahue,2000.Governance in a Globalizing
World. Washington D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.
Phil, williams,1994.Transnational criminal Organizations and Internatiooal Securiy Survial:Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Rhodes, R. A. W., 2000.Forward: Governance and Networks. in Gerry
Stoker, ed., The New Politics of British Local Governance.Basingstoke,
England: Macmillan.
Rosenau, James N., 2000 .Change, complexity, and governance in globalizing
Space.in Jon Pierre ed.,Debating Governance .New York: Oxford
University Press.
Shields, John & Mitchell Evans, 1998. Shrinking the State: Globalization and
PublicAdministration“Reform. Canada: Fernwood Publish.
Skyttner, Lars,2006.General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice
(2nd Edition). World Scientific.
Smith, Martha J., Cornish Derek B,2003. Theory for Practice in Situational
Crime Prevention. Criminal Justice Press.
Weiss, Thomas G., 2005. Governance, Good Governance and Global
Governance:Conceptual and Actual Challenges. in Rorden Wilkinson
(ed.), The Global Governance Reader, New York: Routledge.
Yin,Robert K., 1994.Case study research:Design and methods(2nd
ed.)Thosand Oaks,CA:Sage.
Young,Oran,1968.Systems of Political Science.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice
Hall.


(二)Journals and Articles
Ali, Farazmand, 1999.“Globalization and Public Administration,” Public
Administration Review,Vol.59,No.6, pp.510-519.
Ali, Farazmand, & Jack pinkowski, 2007. “governance, and public administration. ” Handbook of globalization,USA:Taylor & Francis.
Amos, Bruce Amos,2003. “governance principles for protected areas in the 21ST entury, ”Paper prepared for the institute of Governance,Canada Ottawa,Setember11. ,pp.56-78.
Atkin,C.K.,&Freimuth,V.S. , 2001. “Formative Evaluation Research in Cam
Paign Design, ”Public Communication Campaign. pp.125­145.
Beltramini,R.& Blasko,V., 986.“A Analysis of Award­Winning Adve
Rtising Headlines,”Journal of Advertising Research (April/May):48­52.
Bernstein,Steven & Benjamin Cashore,2000.“Globalization,Four paths of
Internalization and Domestic Policy Change:The Case of Ecoforestry in
British Columbia,Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol.33,
No.1,pp.67-99.
Brewer, Paul R. et al. 2004. “International Trust and Public Opinion about World Affairs,”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp.93-109.
Buzan, Barry, 1991/(July/August). “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty- FirstCentury,” International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 431- 440.
Cohen, L.E.&Felson,M.,1979.“Social Change and Crime Rate rends:A R
Outine Activity Approach,”American Sociological Review, 44,588­608.
Dingwerth, Klaus and Philipp Pattberg, 2006/(Apr-Jun). “Global Governance
as a Perspective on World Politics,” Global Governance, Vol. 12, Issue 2,
pp.188-196.
Gordenker, L., and T. G. Weiss. 1996. “Pluralizing Global Governance:
Analytical Approaches and Dimension.”In NGOs, the UN, and Global
Governance,eds.L.Gordenker,and T.G. Weiss. Boulder:Lynne
Rienner.pp.357-387.
Hoffman, Aaronm M., 2002. “A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.375-401.
Kettl, Donald F.,2000.“The Transformation of Governance: Globalization,
Devolution and the Role of Government,” Public Administration Review,
Vol.60,No.6, pp.488-497.
Klosek,J, 1999. “The Development of International Police Cooperation within
the EU and Between the EU and Third Party States:A Discussion of the
Legal Bases of Such Cooperation and the Problems and Pomises Resulting
Thereof.”Amercam University International Law Review 4(3).pp.
600-656.
Munk, Peter Cristiansen, 1998. “A Prescription Rejected: Market Solutions to
Problems to Public Sector Governance,” Global Governance, Vol. 11, No. 3. pp273-295.
Rhode, R., 1996. “ The New Governance: Governing without Government,” Political Studies, Vol. 44, pp. 652-667.
Rosenau, James N.,1995. “Governance in the Twenty-first Century,Global Governance, ” Vol.1,No.1. ,pp.25-36.
Salamon, Lester M., 1994. “The rise of the non-profit sector,” Freign Affairs,
Vol. 73, No. 4. ,pp.120-144.
Stoker, Gerry, 1998/March. "Governance as Theory : Five Proposition", InternationalSocial Science Journal, Vol. 50, Issue 155, pp. 17-28.
Tompkins, J. 2002. “Strategic Human Resources Management in Government:
Unresolved Issues,”Public Personnel Management, Vol.31., No.1., pp.95-
110.
United Nations Development Program, 1995/May. “Redefining Security: The Human Dimension,” Current History. pp. 229-236.
Werlin, Herbert H., 2003. “Poor Nations, Rich Nations: A Theory of
Governance, ”Public Administration Review, Vol.63, Issue 3, pp.329-342.
Williams, Phil, 1995/Winter. “Transnational Criminal Organizations: Strategic Alliance,”The Washington Quarterly. Vol.18, No.1, pp.57-72.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE