:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國教育政策網絡治理之研究-以國民小學補救教學政策為例
作者:陳盈宏
作者(外文):Chen,Ying-Hong
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:黃乃熒
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:治理政策網絡網絡治理教育政策網絡治理補救教學政策GovernancePolicy NetworkNetwork GovernanceThe Governance of Education Policy NetworkRemedial Instruction Program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:279
本研究以「教育政策網絡治理」為研究主題,以「補救教學政策」為政策個案,透過訪談、文件分析及焦點團體座談等蒐集研究資料,從鉅觀面向探討教育部、教育局及學校間的互動過程,主要研究目的包括闡明我國教育政策網絡治理之現況、探討教育政策網絡治理之效益、分析教育政策網絡治理之困境及探究教育政策網絡治理困境之因應策略;本研究主要結論如下:
一、我國教育政策網絡治理的現況,包括:行動者組成多元、治理資源具有差異性、各行動者重視協力合作、課責方式為科層課責等。
二、我國教育政策網絡治理的實際效益,包括落實民主化的教育政策治理、提升教育政策的認同度、發揮教育政策資源整合綜效、加強教育政策的回應性、強化教育政策發展過程的透明性等。
三、我國教育政策網絡治理的目前困境,包括:各行動者初始條件不一致、教育政策資源分配不均、治理權力不相等、受到政策時效性的壓力、無法有效落實課責等。
四、我國教育政策網絡治理的目前困境之因應策略,包括:調整教育政策法令規章、做好事前的教育政策規劃工作、提升教育政策領導能力、建立教育政策資源整合機制等。
This research is written from the perspective of the Governance of Education Policy, and focusing on the interaction between Ministry of Education、local Department of Education and schools. By analyzing the variously data resources, such as: documents、focus groups、interview and so on, to clarify and keep abreast of the status、functions and predicaments of the Governance of Education Policy in Taiwan. In order to narrow down the size of the target audiences, and also to present the data about the Governance of Education Policy more specifically, this studying will use the Remedial Instruction Program as the policy case. The four major conclusions as below:
Firstly, the current status is Ministry of Education、local Department of Education and schools play the key actors. The process of the Governance of Education Policy Network involves interacting and cooperating between all actors. The role of Ministry of Education is to rule and plan the missions specifically for each actor under its legitimate power. The resources each actor own are diversity and interdependent, all actors need to trust each other.
Secondly, the key actors can produce the best possible results include implementing democratized Governance of Education Policy、improving the assurance of Education Policy、playing the effect of integrating Education Policy resources、establishing independent and equal interaction、reinforcing the responsiveness of education policy and the transparency during the process of education policy development, and also providing the possibility of education policy innovation.
Thirdly, due to the contradictions in the hierarchy, the predicaments of the Governance of Education Policy Network includes the problems in resources allocation and operation、the conflicts in policy dialogue and communication、the asymmetry of policy information、the restrictions of policy timeliness、the accountability cannot be implemented, and etc.
Eventually, for Ministry of Education、local Department of Education and schools, the strategies to solve the predicaments which mentioned above are including timely adjustment of laws and regulations、doing the education policy planning in advance、implementing systematic thinking paradigm of education policy decision-making、elevating policy leaders’ professional capacity、implementing power-sharing policy leadership strategy、establishing sustainable policy resources integration mechanism, and etc.
參考文獻
中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2012)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。new window
王如哲(2001)。全球化的教育改革動向之一:因應知識經濟的國家教育改革策略。教育資料與研究雙月刊,43,9-12。new window
王惠玉(2009)。從政策網絡理論探究宜蘭縣高中職學校安全聯防。國立東華大學公共行政研究所在職專班(未出版之碩士論文),花蓮縣。
丘昌泰(2013)。當代政策科學理論發展之研究。臺北市:巨流。
江大樹、張力亞(2012)。社區營造、政策類型與網絡治理-六星計畫比較分析。政策與人力管理,3(2),1-42。new window
江吟梓、蘇文賢(譯)(2010)。M.Lichtman著。教育質性研究:實用指南(Qualitative Research in Education:A user’s Guide)。臺北市:學富。
吳定(2003)。公共政策。臺北市:空大。
吳政達(2007)。教育政策分析新論。高等。
吳清山(2011)。未來黃金十年教育政策之分析。教育行政研究,1(1),1-36。new window
吳瓊恩(2002)。行政學。臺北市:三民。
呂育誠(2006)。網絡治理與治理網絡:政府變革的新課題。臺灣民主季刊,3(3),207-212。
李世暉、郭國興(2011)。日本政黨輪替思維之探析-兼論民主黨的角色與定位。問題與研究季刊。50(1),1-32。new window
李長晏、林煥笙(2009)。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析-以臺中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例。公共行政學報,31,49-100。new window
李紀欣(2006)。政策網絡分析─以花蓮縣吉安學區九年一貫課程之社會領域為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所(未出版之碩士論文),花蓮縣。

李素貞(2011)。學校特色課程治理網絡建構過程之研究─以埔心國小二十四節令鼓為例。開南大學公共事務管理學系(未出版之碩士論文),桃園縣。
杜文苓、陳致中(2007)。民眾參與公共決策的反思:以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例。臺灣民主季刊,4(3),33-62。new window
周曼琳(2011)。論治理互賴的政策執行機制建構。臺灣警察專科學校警專學報,5(1),171-192。new window
林子倫(2008)。台灣氣候變遷政策之批判論述分析。公共行政學報,28,153-175。new window
林子倫(2008)。台灣氣候變遷政策之批判論述分析。公共行政學報,28,153-175。new window
林天祐(2005)。教育研究倫理準則。教育研究月刊,132 ,70-86。new window
林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統整與分析。臺北市:心理。
林妮燕(2008)。英國1988年教育改革法案之政策網絡分析。暨南國際大學比較教育學系(未出版之碩士論文),南投縣。new window
林昱瑄(2013)。教育改革的治理方式與實作過程-以臺北市推展性別平等教育為例,教育學刊,41,87-122。new window
林斌(2009)。臺日教師組織政策參與機制之比較研究:政策網絡的觀點。當代教育研究季刊,17(4),103-146。new window
孫本初、鍾京佑(2005)。治理理論之初探:政治、市場與社會治理架構。公共行政學報,16,107-135。new window
孫志麟(2007)。教育資源的管理與應用:學校經營新主張。教師天地,147,29-37。
徐昌義(2010)。學校行銷正當性之批判論述分析-以一所國民中學為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系(未出版之博士論文),臺北市。new window
馬財專(2007)。網絡分析在政策領域的分析脈絡。政治科學論叢,33:1-42。
秦夢群(2011)。教育行政理論與模式。五南。

張世杰(2009)。第二代治理網絡的研究-一些理論觀點的省思。臺灣民主季刊,6(4),253-264。
張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。new window
張芳全(2009)。教育政策導論。臺北市:五南。
張奕華、劉文章(2012)。教育正義的實踐觀點與個案分析。教育資料與研究,106,1-22。new window
張倍安(2010)。從政策網絡觀點探討學校體適能政策之執行-以臺中市中小學為例。國立臺中教育大學體育學系碩士班(未出版之碩士論文),臺中市。
張淵菘(2005)。國民小學教科書自由化之政策網絡研究。逢甲大學公共政策所(未出版之碩士論文),臺中市。
張源泉(2012)。德國高等教育治理之改革動向。教育研究集刊,58(4),91-137。new window
張鈿富(1995)。教育政策分析理論與實務。台北:五南。
張榮華(2011)。非營利組織執行原住民學童教育網絡治理策略分析:「博幼基金會閱讀角落方案」個案研究。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系(未出版之碩士論文),南投縣。
張輝山(2003)。九年一貫課程政策網絡分析。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所(未出版之碩士論文),高雄市。
曹俊漢(2009)。全球化與全球治理。臺北市:韋伯文化。
莊文忠(2013)。網絡治理的難題與前景。載於許立一(主編),當代治理新趨勢(19-50頁)。新北市:空大。
莊文忠、張鐙文、徐明莉(2011)。非營利組織的政策倡議與策略結盟:多元主義與統合主義觀點的詮釋。第三部門學刊,16,1-37。
許添明、蘇美琅(2007)。教育政策在學校執行之研究:以原住民學校執行傳統文化之教育政策為例。教育研究與發展期刊,3(3),55-82。new window
許添明(2014)。我們唯一的出路-縮短城鄉學習落差。發表於「2014全球教育論壇:教育革新與學生學習」國際學術研討會,2014年10月17-18日假國家教育研究院臺北院區舉行。
陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。new window
陳亮瑋(2011)。學校社區化的網絡治理模式之探討-以宜蘭縣岳明國小為例。佛光大學公共事務學系(未出版之碩士論文),宜蘭縣。
陳建志、鐘巧如(2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊,10(3),1-24。new window
陳恆鈞(2008)。協力網絡治理之優點與罩門,研習論壇月刊,第92期,40-54。
陳恆鈞(2012)。治理互賴理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
陳盈宏(2013)。由政治遊戲隱喻思考進行教育政策對話之原則。國家教育研究院電子報,72。
陳淑娟、陳盈宏(2014)。 初探偏遠學校執行弱勢教育政策之影響要素-網絡治理觀點。發表於「教改20年:回顧與前瞻」國際學術研討會,2014年11月14-15日假國立臺灣師範大學舉行,臺北市。
陳淑麗(2008)。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。臺東大學教育學報,9(1),1-32。new window
陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71new window
陳無邪(2010)。地方治理的課責研究-以北北基一綱一本政策為例。臺灣大學政治學研究所(未出版之碩士論文),臺北市。
陳穎琦(2010)。臺北市性別平等教育政策執行網絡之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所(未出版之碩士論文),臺北市。
曾冠球(2011)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊,3(1),27-52。new window
鈕文英(2007)。教育研究方法論文寫作。臺北市,雙葉。
黃乃熒(1998)。教育政策對話權力運用的研究。中學教育學報,5,165-191。
黃乃熒(2001)。從學校組織權力弔詭管理觀點建構學校組織變革模式。師大學報:教育類,45(2),145-164。new window
黃宗顯(1999)。學校行政對話研究:組織中影響力行為的微觀探討。臺北市:五南。new window
黃瑞琴(2001)。質的教育研究方法。心理。
葉志傑、謝傳崇(2013)。國民中學校長關係領導、協力治理與關係績效之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,30(2),101-137。new window
葉明勳(2007)。基隆港市合一的政策分析-網絡治理觀點。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系(未出版之碩士論文),南投縣。
廖俊松(2007)。從網絡治理觀點觀察重建區社區總體營造計畫之執行。政策研究學報,7,35-64。new window
劉佳蕙(2007)。建構在地化老人安養治理網絡之研究-以「菩提長青老人福利社區」實驗計畫為例。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系(未出版之碩士論文),南投縣。
劉淑瓊(2008)。推倒柏林圍牆-論家庭暴力防制之網絡治理課題。東吳社會工作學報,19,1-35。new window
潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。new window
蔡允棟(2006)。民主行政與網絡治理:「新治理」的理論探討及類型分析。台灣政治學刊,10(1),163-209。new window
蔡勝男(2005)。公共行政治理模式的研究:歷史詮釋分析的觀點。T &;D 飛訊,34,1-17。
魯俊孟(2013)。政策網絡。載於許立一(主編),當代治理新趨勢(109-130頁)。新北市:空大。

賴彥全、王麗雲(2014)。地方政府教育課責系統現況與成效探究。教育科學研究期刊,59(3),97-132。new window
謝百傑、史美強(2011)。都會網絡治理課責之研究。研習論壇,123,47-61。
謝百傑、史美強(2012)。都會網絡治理課責之實證研究。政策與人力管理,3(1),89-121。new window
藍毓仁(譯)(2008)。J.Lewis & J.Ritchie主編。質性研究方法(Qualitative Research Practice:A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers)。臺北市:巨流。
顏國樑(1998)。教育政策執行研究的演進、檢討與展望。教育研究資訊,6(2),87-100。new window

英文部分
Agranoff, R., &; McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.
Agranoff, R., &; McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review, 66 (1): 56-65.
Anderson, L. (2002). Resource acquisition and allocation. In T.Bush &; L.Bell (Eds), The principles and practice of educational management (pp. 207-221). London: Paul Hapman.
Ansell, C. &; Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571.
Aughinbaugh, A. (2001). Does head start yield long-term benefits. The Journal of Human Resources, 36(4), 641-665.
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Beatriz, A. &; Richard Common, R. (2006). Governance and the Management of Networks in the Public Sector: Drugs policy in the United Kingdom and the Case of Cannabis Reclassification. Public Management Review, 8(3): 395-414.
Blanke,V. (1990). Knowledge and administration. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Bogason, P. &; Zolner, M. (2007). Methods in Democratic network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Compston, H. (2009). Policy Networks and Policy Change. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Considine, M., &; Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131-140.
Denhardt, R. B. &; Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford and London: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford and London: Oxford University Press.
Dyer, C. (1999). Researching the implementation of educational policy: A backward mapping approach. Comparative Education, 35(1), 45-61.
Elmore, R. (1980). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601-616.

Fischer, F., &; J. Forester (Eds.). (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fitch, K. (2001). The ethnography of speaking: Sapir/Whorf, Hymes and Moerman. In M. Wetherell, S. T. &; Yates, S. J. (Eds.). Discourse theory and practice: a reader (pp. 57-63). London: Sage.
Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W. (2004). Governing By Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
Goss, S. (2001). Making Local Governance Work: Network, Relationships, and the Management of Change. London: Plagrave.
Grimsey, D., &; Lewis, M. K. (2004). Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hajer, M. A., &; Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Hayton, K. and J. Gray (1996). Developing Partnerships: Public Involvement, Private Control? Town and Country Planning, 65(3): 85-97.
Heinrich, C. J. &; Lynn, L.E. (2000). Governance and Performance new Perspectives. American: Georgetown University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. London: University of Oklahoma Press.

Hutchinson, J. (1994). The Practice of Partnership in Local Economic Development, Local Government Studies, 20(3): 335-54.
Jay, R. (1995). Democratic Dilemmas. Fortnight, 345: 16-27.
Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Joyner, K. (2007). Dynamic Evolution in Public-private Partnerships: The Role of Key Actors in Managing Multiple Stakeholders. Managerial Law, 49 (5/6): 206-217.
Kapucu, N., &; Demiroz, F. (2011). Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools. Public Performance&; Management Review, 34(4), 549–579.
Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K. &; Woolcock, G. (2004). Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations. Public Administration Review, 64 (3): 363-371.
Kelly, M., &; Maynard-Moody, S. (1993). Policy Analysis in the Post-Positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development Districts Program. Public Administration Review, 53(2): 135-142.
Kettl, D. F. (2000). Public Administration at Millennium: the State of the Field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10: 7-34.
Kickert, W. J. M. and Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Public Management and Network Management. In W J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn, &; J. F. M. Koppenjian(eds.). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector (pp.1-13). London: Sage Publication.
Koliba,C., Meek, J. W., &; Zia, A.(2011).Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., &; Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Noble, G., &; Jones, R. (2006). The Role of Boundary-Spanning Managers in the Establishment of Public-Private Partnerships. Public Administration, 84 (4): 891-917.
O’Leary, R., &; Bingham, L. B. (2009). Surprising Findings, Paradoxes, and Thought on the Future of Collaborative Public Management Research. In R. O’Leary, &; L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 255-269). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
O’Looney, J. (1992). Public-Private Partnerships in Economic Development: Negotiating the Trade-Off between Flexibility and Accountability. Economic development Review, 14(22): 14-22.
O’Toole, L. J., (1997).Implementing Public Innovations in Network Setting. Administration and Society, 29, 115-138.
O’Toole, L. J., &; Kenneth J. M. (2004). Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 14(4), 469-494.
Philip, W. K. C., &; Seddon, T. (2012). Network governance in education: The case of Chinese state-owned enterprise schools. International Journal of Continuing Education &; Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 117-136.
Phillips, N., &; Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. London: Sage.
Pierre, J., &; Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance,politics amd the state. London: Macmillan Press.
Plumptre, T., &; Grsham, J. (1999). Governance and Good Governance. Retrieved from http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11075/1/Governance%20and%20Good%20Governance.pdf?1
Provan, K. G., &; Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure,management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
Provan, K.G., &; Milward, H. B.(2001). Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4):414-423.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-672.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ring, P. S., &; Andrew H.V.D.V. (1992). Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483-498.
Sadao, K. C., &; Robinson, N. B. (2002). Interagency Systems Development and Evaluation in the Pacific Islands: A Process Model for Rural Communities. Infants and Young Children. 15(1), 69-84.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.).The Tools of Government (pp.1-47). New York: Oxford University press.
Sorensen, E., and Torfing, J. (2009). Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234-258.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 155: 17-28.
Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy Paradox: The Art of Public Decision Making . New York: W. W. Norton.
Sullivan, H. &; Skelcher, C. (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
The Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: oxford University Press.
Tofing, J. (2007). Methods in Democratic network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Warrden, F. (1992). Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1), 29-52.
Walker, A. (2004). Understanding social capital within community/government policy networks. Social policy Journal of New Zealand, 22, 1-18.
Wälti, S., &; Kübler, D. (2003). New Governance and Associative Pluralism: The Case of Drug Policy in Swiss Cities. Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 499-525.
White, L. G. (1994). Policy Analysis as Discourse. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(3), 506-525.
Williams, P. (2002). The Competent Boundary Spanner. Public Administration, 80 (1), 103-124.
World Bank(1989). Sub-Saharan Africa: From Crisis to Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE