:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論島嶼制度之法理與實踐:以中國大陸南沙島礁填礁建島為例
作者:鄭仁智
作者(外文):Cheng, Jen-Chih
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:王冠雄
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:填礁建島岩礁南海仲裁案島嶼制度land reclamationrocksarbitral tribunalthe regime of islands
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
島嶼制度自1982年《海洋法公約》立約通過至今,始終是國際海洋法中一個頗受爭論的議題。因島嶼制度不僅牽涉島礁本身所享有的法律地位,且涉及沿海國與相鄰或相向國家間海洋區域的劃分,尤以200海里專屬經濟海域制度的建立,益使島礁的法律地位倍受各國重視。2012年4月,菲律賓與中國大陸於黃岩島軍事對峙事件後,引發菲律賓提起「南海仲裁案」,希冀藉由強制仲裁對中國大陸產生遏制效應。然該案最具爭議處,即是臨時仲裁庭意圖將島嶼制度原本保有的模糊空間予以明確化、具體化,對島嶼制度條文的重新定義。而其做法非但無益於解決現存的島嶼制度爭端,反而衍生更多紛爭。本論文試圖以島嶼制度之立法過程、各重要時期之會議及重要討論事項為立基點,著重探討島嶼制度規範模糊處,並綜整各家論述,兼論中國大陸於南沙所屬島礁填礁建島、臨時仲裁庭重新定義島嶼制度所蘊含之法律意涵及面臨之挑戰,最後輔以案例研究,期能勾勒出一條較為周全的理路,作為修約之討論。
Since United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was adopted in 1982, the regime of islands has been a considerable subject of debate in international law of the sea. Not only the regime of islands involves the legal status of the island (or reef) itself, but also involves the division of the marine area between the coastal state and the adjacent or opposite States. Especially the establishment of the regime of the Exclusive Economic Zone of 200 nautical miles, countries around the world are keeping close eye on the legal status of the island (or reef). In April 2012, after the military confrontation between the Philippines and China on Scarborough Shoal, Philippines initiated a “South China Sea Arbitration Case”, which hoped to have a containment effect on mainland China through compulsory arbitration. The most controversial issue of the case is the Provisional Arbitration Tribunal’s intent to clarify the fuzziness of the original regime of islands and give more specific and precise definition of the regime of islands provision. Rather than solving the existing regime of islands disputes, these efforts had raised more disputes instead. This thesis attempts to adopt the legislative process of the regime of islands, and the important timeline of meetings and discussions as basis; examines in-depth focus on the ambiguity of the regime of islands norms; provides comprehensive views and perspectives, including the land reclamation of the Chinese mainland in the Spratlys, and the legal implications and challenges based on Provisional Arbitral Tribunal’s new definition of the regime of islands. Lastly, supplemented case studies to map a more comprehensive rationale as reference to amend the convention in the future.
壹、中文資料
一、中文書籍(按姓氏筆劃順序)
王冠雄,2002年11月。《南海諸島爭端與漁業共同合作》。臺北:秀威資訊。
王雲五,1988年。《社會科學大辭典第一冊社會學》。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
中國國際法學會,2018年5月。《南海仲裁案裁決之批判》。北京:外文出版社。
丘宏達著、陳純一修訂,2014年。《現代國際法》。臺北:三民書局。
朱浤源,1999年。《撰寫碩博士論文實戰手冊》。臺北:正中書局。
何思慎、王冠雄主編,2012年。《東海及南海爭端與和平展望》。臺北:遠景基金會。
易君博,1991年12月。《政治理論與研究方法》。臺北:三民書局。
侯木仲,1992年。《國際海洋法》。臺北:環球書局。
俞寬賜,2007年。《國際法新論》。臺北:國立編譯館。
陳義彥等譯,David Mash等著,2009年1月。《政治學方法論與途徑》。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
陳荔彤,2002年。《海洋法論》。臺北:元照出版有限公司。
陳荔彤,2008年。《國際海洋法論》。臺北:元照出版有限公司。
陳荔彤院長論文集編輯委員會編,2017年。《國際法與國內法的一元論–陳荔彤教授六秩晉五華誕祝壽論文集(上)》。臺北:瑞興圖書股份有限公司。
陳德恭,1988年。《現代國際海洋法》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
陳鴻瑜,1997年。《南海諸島之發現、開發與國際衝突》。臺北:國立編譯館。
高之國、賈宇主編,2018年4月。《中國海洋法年刊》。北京:中國民主法制出版社。
鞠海龍主編,2015年。《南海地區形勢報告2013­2014》。北京:時事出版社。
傅崐成編校,2001年。《聯合國海洋法公約暨全部附件、相關公約》。臺北:協容國際顧問有限公司。
傅崐成,1992年。《國際海洋法》。臺北:三民書局。
黃 異,2006年。《海洋秩序與國際法》。臺北:三民書局股份有限公司。
黃 異,2010年。《海洋與法律》。臺北:新學林出版股份有限公司。
楊日然,2005年10月。《法理學》。臺北:三民書局股份有限公司。
廖文章,2008年5月。《國際海洋法論–海域劃界與公海漁業》。新北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
劉復國、甘逸驊主編,2017年1月。《南海仲裁案裁決後我國的因應之道》。臺北:政治大學臺灣安全研究中心。
劉復國、吳士存主編,2017年11月。《南海地區形勢報告2016­2017》。臺北:政大安全研究中心。
蕭曦清,2009年12月。《南沙風雲》。臺北:臺灣學生書局有限公司。
閻學通、孫學峰,2001年9月。《國際關係研究實用方法》。北京:人民出版社。
薛桂芳,2011年。《聯合國海洋法公約與國家實踐》。北京:海洋出版社。

二、翻譯書籍
David Mash、Gerry Stoker等著,陳義彥等譯,2009年1月。《政治學方法論與途徑》(Theory and Methods in Political Science)。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
John Mearsheimer著,王義桅、唐小松譯,2014年9月。《大國政治的悲劇–修訂版》(The Tragedy of Great Power Politics)。上海:上海人民出版社。
Larenz, Karl著,陳愛娥譯,2001年9月。《法學方法論》(Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft)。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

三、中文期刊
王冠雄,2006/12。〈析論國際海洋法中之島嶼制度—以日本『沖之鳥』礁為例〉,《律師雜誌》,第327期,頁52-59。
———,2011/8。〈南海爭端之國際法觀點分析〉,《展望與探索》,第9卷第8期,頁13-20。
———,2016/8。〈南海仲裁案分析及其後續影響〉,《海峽評論》,第308期,
李令華,2007/7。〈關於領海基點和基線的確定問題〉,《中國海洋大學學報》,2007年第3期,頁14-18。
林正義,2016/3。〈歐巴馬政府的南海政策:中國的回應及對臺灣的影響〉,《東吳政治學報》,第三十四卷第1期,頁1-80。
何思慎,2016/7。〈南海仲裁案判決之意義及其影響〉,《戰略安全研析》,第135期,頁6-14。
宮守業,2016/5。〈太平島是礁還是島?〉,《PanSci 泛科學》,國立自然科學博物館館訊第342 期,頁5,
陳荔彤,2004/4。〈臺灣之海域紛爭〉,《臺灣國際法季刊》,第1卷第2期,頁113-148。
陳鴻瑜,2010/10。〈南海爭端的政治與法律面分析〉,《全球政治評論》,第32期,頁1-6。
陳鴻瑜,2016/8。〈評析聯合國仲裁庭對菲國控「中國」之南海案之裁決〉,《展望與探索》,第14卷第8期,頁1-9。
孫傳香,2016/5。〈岩礁的法律地位與劃界效力析論〉,《湖南人文科技學院學報》,2016年第2期,頁58-61。
薛桂芳,徐向欣,2014/1。〈由島嶼維持其本身的“經濟生活”標準的界定談對我國南海島礁的保護性開發〉,《比較法研究》,2013年第6期,頁63。
鄒立剛,2013/7。〈適用於南沙群島的領海基線法律問題研究〉,《河南財經政法大學學報》,2013年第3期,頁134。

貳、外文資料
1. Books
Bowett, Derek W., 1979. The legal regime of islands in international law. New York: Oceana Publications, INC.
Evans, Malcolm D., 2003. International Law 1st Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jayewardene, Hiran W., 1989. The regime of islands in international law. London: Martinus Nijhoff.
Mahan, Alfred Thayer, 1890. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660-1783. Boston: Little, Brown.
Munavvar, Mohamed, 1995. Ocean States: Archipelagic regimes in the law of the sea. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
O'Connell Daniel P., 1984. The international law of the sea, Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Articles
Alex G. Oude Elferink, 1998/Summer. “Clarifying Article 121(3) of the Law of the Sea Convention: The Limits Set by the Nature of International Legal Processes,” IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin, pp. 58-68, .
Alex G. Oude Elferink, 2016/9/7. “The South China Sea Arbitration’s Interpretation of Article 121(3) of the LOSC: A Disquieting First,” UiT, .
Akshay Parashar, Anuraag Srivastava, Avadhi Patni, Balsera Sangma, “Understanding the difference between an Island and a Rock in context of South China Sea Dispute,” .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2017/2/23. “A Look at China’s Sam Shelters in The Spratlys,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2017/12/14. “A Constructive Year for Chinese Base Building,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, 2016/1/14. “Airstrips Near Completion,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, 2018/5/9. “An Accounting of China’s Deployments to The Spratly Islands,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, 2016/8/1. “Build It And They Will Come,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, 2016/12/13. “China’s New Spratly Island Defenses,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, 2017/6/29. “Updated: China’s Big Three Near Completion,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, 2015/6/18. “Diplomacy Changes, Construction Continues: New Images of Mischief And Subi Reefs,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Bonnie S. Glaser, 2015/11/30. “Maintaining Peace in the South China Sea,” Nippon, .
Chinese Society of International Law, 2016/3/23. “In The Matter of An Arbitration Under Annex VII to The 1982 United Nations Convention on The Law of The Sea,” Chinese Society of International Law, pp. 1-22, .
Gregory Poling, 2015/9/15. “Spratly Airstrip Update: Is Mischief Reef Next?,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, .
Ibiblio, “Clipperton Island Lighthouse,” Ibiblio, .
Jonathan I. Charney, 1999/October. “Rocks that Cannot Sustain Human Habitation,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 863-878.
Jon Van Dyke, 1988/1/21. “Speck in the Ocean Meets Law of the Sea,” NYTimes.com, .
Jesse Johnson, 2016/7/13. “After South China Sea ruling, could tiny Okinotorishima be the next flash point?,” The Japan Times, .
Kai He, Huiyun Feng, 2016/8/6. “South China Sea Danger Zone: Why Pushing China into a Corner Is Dangerous,” National Interest, .
Keri Phillips, 2013/12/10. “Is this a rock or an island? The tiny differences that could define a region,” Abc, .
Marius Gjetnes, 2001. “The Spratlys: Are They Rocks or Islands?,” Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 32, issue 2, pp. 191-204.
Michael Wood, 1947/11/21. “Statute of the International Law Commission,” United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, .
Myron Nordquist, 2017/1/5. “UNCLOS Article 121 and ITU ABA /TAIPING in The South China Sea Arbitration Award: A Correct Interpretation?,” Centre for International Law, pp. 1-20, .
Mira Rapp-Hooper, 2015/2/18. “Before And After: The South China Sea Transformed,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative: Home, .
Moise, Florentina, 2008/9/1. “Islands and their Capacity to Generate Maritime Zones-Case Law Romania v. Ukraine,” UiO - DUO, pp. 1-50, .
Mem Research, “Baker Island,” Mem Research, .
Maine at Lighthousefriends, “Baker Island Lighthouse,” Maine at Lighthousefriends.com, .
Nilufer Oral, 2016/12/12. “Symposium on The South China Sea Arbitration: ‘Rocks’ or ‘Islands’? Sailing Towards Legal Clarity in the Turbulent South China Sea,” American Society of International Law, pp. 279-284, .
National Geographic Society, 2016/March. “Clipperton Atoll,” National Geographic Society, .
Robert C. Beckman, 2014/10/29. “Large-Scale Reclamation Projects in the South China Sea: China and International Law,” RSIS, .
Republic of Molossia, “Clipperton Island,” Republic of Molossia, .
Song, Yann-Huei, 2015/5/7. “Taiping Island: An Island or A Rock Under UNCLOS,” Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, .
Song, Yann-Huei, 2011/3/23. “The Application of Article 121(3) of the law of the Sea Convention to the Five Selected Disputed Islands in the South China Sea,” East Sea (South China Sea) Studies, .
Sean D. Murphy, 2016/12/13. “Event Report: Lecture by Professor Sean Murphy on ‘International Law Relating to Islands’,” International Law Association, pp. 1-4, .
Ted L. McDorman, 2016/11/18. “The South China Sea Arbitration,” American Society of International Law, .
Wan Siti Adibah Wan Dahalan, Adina Kamarudin, Mahmud Zuhdi Mohd Nor, “Article 121 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and the Maritime Delimitation in the Straits of Singapore,” Jurnal Undang-undang, pp. 227-240, .
Warwick Gullett, 2018/2/28. “No Man Is An Island’, But… What Is An Island? The South China Sea Arbitration’s contribution to the concept of juridical islands,” American Society of International Law, pp. 5-38, .
Yale Law School, 1933/12/26. “Convention on the Rights and Duties of States,” Yale Law School, .

參、官方資料
CIA, 2018/2/28. “Clipperton Island Government, History, Population & Geography,” CIA, .
CIA, 2018/2/28. “Kingman Reef Government, History, Population & Geography,” CIA, .
Harry S. Truman Presidential Library & Museum, 1945/9/28. Harry S. Truman, “Proclamation 2668 Policy of the United States with Respect to Coastal Fisheries in Certain Areas of The High Seas (1),” Harry S. Truman Presidential Library & Museum, .
PCA-CPA, 2016/7/12. Permanent Court of Arbitration, “PCA Case Nº 2013-19, IN THE MATTER OF The South China Sea Arbitration(The Republic of Philipines v. The People's Republic of China),” PCA-CPA, pp. 1-479, .
The White House, 2000/5/26. William J. Clinton, “Executive Order 13158–Marine Protected Areas,” The White House, .
The White House, 2014/9/25. Barack Obama, “Presidential Proclamation - Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument Expansion,” The White House, .
The White House, 2017/12/18. “National Security Strategy of the United States of America,” The White House, pp. 1-55, .
United Nations, “Articles concerning the Law of the Sea with commentaries 1956,” United Nations, pp.265-301, .
United Nations, 1956/7/4. “Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1956 Volume II,” pp. 1-303, .
United Nations, “Codification and Progressive Development of International Law,” United Nations, .
United Nations Treaty Series, 1958/4/29. “Convention on the Continental Shelf 1958,” vol.499, .
United Nations Treaty Series, 1958/4/29. “Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone 1958,” vol.516, pp. 1-10, .
United Nations, 1958/2/24 to 1958/4/27. “First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - /CONF.13/18–Certain Legal Aspects Concerning the Delimitation of the Territorial Waters of Archipelagos,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1958/3/27. “First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.13/C.1/L.62–United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: proposal,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1958/3/31. “First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.13/C.1/L.112–United States of America: proposal,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1958/3/31. “First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.13/C.1/L.113–Spain: proposal,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1958/4/24. “First United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document:-A/CONF.13/C.1/L.167–Report by the Secretariat on the work of the Drafting Committee of the First Committee,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1958/4/29. Tullio Treves, “1958 Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea,” United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, .
United Nations, 1960/4/22. “Second United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.19/L.11 Canada and United States of America: proposal,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1969/5/23. “Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,” United Nations Treaty Collection, .
United Nations, “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences, .
United Nations, 1974/7/19. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/33,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/7/26. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/L.4,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/7/30. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.30,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/9. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.50,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/12. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.53,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/13. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.55,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/13. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.58,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/12. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/SR.36,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/13. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/SR.38,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/14. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/SR.39,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/22. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.74,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/22. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.75,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, 1974/8/27. “Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea - Document: - A/CONF.62/C.2/L.62/Rev. 1,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .
United Nations, “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(A historical perspective),” United Nations, .
United Nations, 1982/12/10. Tullio Treves, “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, .
United Nations, 1983/3/10. Ronald Reagan, “Proclamation 5030 by the President of the United States of America on the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States of America,” United Nations, .
United Nations, 1983/3/10. Ronald Reagan, “Statement by the President Dated 10 March 1983,” United Nations, .
US Government Publishing Office, 2009/1/6. George W. Bush, “Proclamation 8336 – Establishment of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument,” US Government Publishing Office, .
U. S. Department of State, 2014/12/5. “Limits of the Seas, N0.143, China: Maritime Claims in the South China Sea,” Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U. S. Department of State, pp. 1-24, .
United Nations, 2017/7/31. “League of Nations Codification Conference,” United Nations Diplomatic Conferences - Office of Legal Affairs, .

肆、網路資料
Permanent Court of Arbitration,2015/11/24。〈新聞稿菲律賓訴中國仲裁案–PCA〉,《Permanent Court of Arbitration》,
王冠雄,2015/8/27。〈中國大陸填海造陸工程之戰略安全面探討〉,《台北論壇》,
王時齊,2016/7/18。〈南海仲裁案 國際學者:裁決毫無法律意義〉,《ettoday新聞雲王時齊專欄》,
中央廣播電臺,2014/6/21。〈大陸南沙建島 國際法恐難認同〉,《中央廣播電臺》,
中華民國政府,2016/3/24。〈中華民國南海政策說帖〉,《ROC Taiwan.org》,
中國社會科學網,2014/5/3。〈中國在南沙赤瓜礁填海擴建 無視越軍 海軍大批軍艦護衛〉,《中國社會科學網》,
中華人民共和國外交部,2014/12/7。〈中華人民共和國政府關於菲律賓共和國所提南海仲裁案管轄權問題的立場文件〉,《中華人民共和國外交部》,‎。
尹章華,〈第七章 群島國制度和島嶼制度〉,《台灣法律網》,
朱鳳嵐,2005/9/10。〈日本打造“沖之鳥島”岩礁〉,《中國社會科學院亞洲太平洋研究所》,
行政院大陸委員會,2016/1/23。〈太平島是島不是礁–事實可證:我太平島擁有《海洋法公約》所賦專屬經濟海域及大陸礁層之完整權利〉,《行政院大陸委員會》,
宋燕輝,2016/7/16。〈南海仲裁案法仲裁員有關島嶼 地位之判斷或見解〉,《中華民國國際法學會》,
南沙群島在線,2005/3/25。〈南海諸島地名地名誌–154–永暑礁〉,《南沙群島在線》,
南沙群島在線,2005/3/25。〈南海諸島地名地名誌–136–東門礁〉,《南沙群島在線》,
南沙群島在線,2005/3/4。〈南海諸島地名志–113–渚碧礁〉,《南沙群島在線》,
南海諸島網,2014/6/25。〈南海諸島地名資料彙編〉,《南海諸島網》,
南海諸島網,2014/7/22。〈南海諸島地名資料彙編〉,《南海諸島網》,
姚凌,2017/10/25。〈習近平總書記肯定的南海島礁建設,是什麼樣?〉,《中國南海網》,
栗林忠男,〈「沖ノ鳥島」の国際法上の地位〉,《日本財團圖書館》,‎。
髙聖惕,2017/9/29。〈仲裁庭在南海仲裁案中對聯合國海洋法公約第121條(3)的解釋–一種批判〉,《中國社會科學網》,
高雄市政府,2016/8/16。〈太平島南沙醫院 南沙2號正式掛牌〉,《高雄市政府》,
索拉布•古普塔(Sourabh Gupta),2016/8/25。〈海牙在南海問題上的狹隘正義〉,《中美聚焦網》,
海洋委員會海巡署南部分署,〈地理位置〉,《海洋委員會海巡署南部分署》,
張湘蘭、樊懿,2015/10/27。〈國際法公約下的島礁之辨〉,《北緯40度》,‎。
張志文、俞懿春、陳然,2016/7/17。〈臨時仲裁庭樹立違反國際法壞典型〉,《人民日報》,
黃麗蓉,2016/7/27。〈投書華爾街日報 馬英九:南海仲裁不公 台人深感氣憤〉,《中時電子報》,
趙國材,2016/10/20。〈杜特蒂親中 美戰略破局〉,《中時電子報》,http://opinion.chinatimes.com/20161020005795-262105>‎。
傅崐成、李敬昌,2016/9/16。〈南海若干國際法律問題〉,《廈門大學南海研究院》,
傅崐成,2016/3/26。〈南海關鍵問題釋疑〉,《US-China Forum (Chinese)》,
愛國知識網,2017/11/8。〈2017年中國南海填海造島最新消息 中國南海造島現狀〉,《愛國知識網》,
劉瑋哲,2016/2/1。〈什麼是美海軍「自由航行行動」(FONOP)?〉,《洞知識》,
韓愛勇,2016/4/25。〈南海「航行自由」問題中的兩類規則〉,《求是網》,
戴宗翰,2017/2/23。〈南海的前世今生–從歷史證據到後仲裁時代(演講紀錄)〉,《國立臺灣海洋大學海洋事務與資源管理研究所》,
戴昌鳳,2016/6/14。〈南沙太平島 珊瑚礁生態陷危機〉,《國家地理雜誌中文網》,

伍、新聞媒體
人民網,2005/5/8。〈美國本土外小島嶼〉,《人民網》,
Jane Perlez,2016/7/18。〈幫助菲律賓贏得南海仲裁的律師〉,《紐約時報中文網》,
BBC中文網,2015/5/30。〈香格里拉對話:美防長抨擊中國南海填海活動〉,《BBC中文網》,
大陸中心,2016/11/25。〈衛星照拍到軍事建設外 南沙4島礁大片面積綠化中〉,《ettoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2016/1/11。〈永暑島花3500億賺30兆 大陸造島速度是越南的100倍〉,《ETtoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2016/4/26。〈東門島、赤瓜礁列裝76毫米艦砲 南海五大島礁街景曝光〉,《ETtoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2016/1/11。〈南沙赤瓜島完工 渚碧島進度輸『面積最大』的美濟礁〉,《ettoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2016/6/9。〈渚碧礁現生態農場 68頭豬每天出門蹓躂半小時〉,《ettoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2017/6/8。〈華陽島高頻雷達被偷拍 監測400公里的威力嚇到越南了〉,《ettoday新聞雲》,
大陸中心,2016/11/25。〈衛星照拍到軍事建設外 南沙4島礁大片面積綠化中〉,《ettoday新聞雲》,
大公網,2016/3/15。〈赤瓜礁收復28年後建成機場 構戰略前沿“鐵三角”〉,《大公網》,
中新網,2012/11/14。〈港媒:十八大首提海洋強國 海洋維權力度或將加大〉,《中新網》,
中商情報網,2014/10/8。〈震撼曝光中國南海諸島的實際控制狀況〉,《中商情報網》,‎。
尹航、蕭德倫,2011/11/22。〈中國邊海防巡禮之南薰礁〉,《騰訊網》,
孔傑榮(Jerome A. Cohen),2016/7/25。〈菲律賓仲裁對國際法的貢獻–「島嶼」何時僅構成「岩礁」?〉,《明報》,‎。
田士臣,2017/8/10。〈一年後看南海仲裁案三個失敗點〉,《鳳凰網》,
世界新聞網,2016/6/3。〈日越『攝』南沙 曝『中國東門』雷達站〉,《世界新聞網》,
世界新聞網,2017/11/14。〈李克強:東協中國「南海行為準則」啟動協商〉,《世界新聞網》,
呂正韜,2013/11/30。〈專家:「島鏈」戰略鎖不住中國〉,《中國評論新聞網》,
余曉潔,2012/7/1。〈中國海監南海定巡編隊與華陽礁中國駐守官兵互致問候〉,《新華網》,
吳政峯,2016/7/16。〈台灣專家湯熙勇逐點駁斥南海仲裁裁決〉,《中評社》,
吳姣,2012/11/13。〈專訪十八大代表、國家海洋局局長劉賜貴 建設「海洋強國」難在保護海洋生態和維護海洋權益〉,《中國日報網》,
宋承恩,2016/8/17。〈南海仲裁與台灣 解密來自海牙的情書〉,《報導者The Reporter》,
社評,2016/5/2。〈美國航行自由報告別有用心〉,《中時電子報》,
周意岷,2013/10/15。〈構建南海機制〉,《人民論壇網》,
林滿紅,2016/2/2。〈中日和約 重要南海法律基礎〉,《聯合報》,版A14。
信報,2014/4/30。〈沖之鳥化礁為島 日本深謀奪資源〉,《信報》,
美國之音,2017/11/13。〈川習齊訪越南 川普受“擁戴”〉,《美國之音》,
美國之音,2016/2/26。〈美推動「東南亞海事安全倡議」提升與亞洲關係〉,《美國之音》,
胡念祖,2016/7/18。〈南海仲裁 5人敵160國的法官造法〉,《聯合報》,版A13。
郭匡超,2014/9/14。〈吹填 大陸南沙島礁快速成長〉,《中時電子報》,
馬來西亞詩華日報新聞網,2016/9/11。〈中國扼守南海 軍艦進駐渚碧島〉,《馬來西亞詩華日報新聞網》,
馬靜,2017/5/26。〈【話你知】美濟礁:中國南沙第一大島〉,《香港文匯報》,
陳一新,2018/8/7。〈南海行為準則 還有得喬〉,《中時電子報》,
陳昶睿,2014/11/25。〈陸駐軍:永暑島擴建速度太慢〉,《中時電子報》,
陳建仲,2015/5/27。〈時論–小英訪美 南海也是考題〉,《中時電子報》,
國際中心,2017/10/19。〈挺印度!提勒森重砲中國 「破壞國際秩序」〉,《ETtoday新聞雲》,
新華網,2016/7/24。〈國際法不能淪為政治工具–德國專家塔爾蒙談南海仲裁案〉,《新華網》,
雷光涵、曹國維,2016/4/29。〈沖之鳥是島? 國際打臉日本外相〉,《聯合新聞網》,
蔡佑駿,2018/2/26。〈川普首次國情咨文:正視中國威脅、投資基礎建設〉,《聯合新聞網》,
網易軍事,2012/7/11。〈國家海洋局:沖之鳥礁大陸架未劃界至日本(全文)〉,《網易軍事》,
歌籃,2016/7/29。〈日學者著書稱南海仲裁於日本不利〉,《美國之音》,‎。
鳳凰軍事,2016/3/11。〈南海換新天:渚碧礁擴大400萬平米 跑道令美忌憚〉,《鳳凰軍事》,
蔣永佑,2016/7/15。〈何思慎:兩岸關係不好 美南海下手才這麼狠〉,《中國評論新聞網》,‎。
德國之聲中文網,2015/5/30。〈美中頻頻過招 南中國海問題持續高溫〉,《德國之聲中文網》,
劉子維,2015/10/27。〈新聞焦點:南海主權爭議島礁〉,《BBC中文網》,
賴昭穎,2015/5/15。〈美亞太助卿:南海填土不能造主權〉,《聯合報》,版A16。
閻宇赫、韓馥檀,2016/7/18。〈海洋爭端解決國際法研討會閉幕 專家批駁南海仲裁結果〉,《香港新聞網》,‎。
藍孝威,2015/10/11。〈南海2人工島礁 大陸燈塔發光〉,《中時電子報》,
藍孝威,2017/12/25。〈美濟礁造島神速已成南海最大島〉,《中時電子報》,
魏國金編譯,2016/5/24。〈南海緊張 美對越軍售全面解禁〉,《自由時報》,
聯合新聞網,2017/6/30。〈美衛星照片顯示 陸在南海島礁大建工事〉,《聯合新聞網》,
聯合早報,2011/9/15。〈許通美:南中國海的主權紛爭〉,《聯合早報》,
鍾辰芳,2016/7/13。〈仲裁認定太平島並非島嶼 專家大感意外〉,《美國之音》,
簡立欣,2014/10/21。〈永暑礁填海 躍南沙第1大島〉,《中時電子報》,
觀察者網,2017/11/14。〈中國東盟宣布:將正式啟動“南海行為準則”磋商〉,《觀察者網》,
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE