:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:WISC-Ⅲ分測驗組合之假設解釋與信度估計
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:陳心怡 引用關係朱建軍陳榮華
作者(外文):Chen, Hsin-yiZhu, JianjunChen, Yung-hwa
出版日期:2000
卷期:19
頁次:頁1-14
主題關鍵詞:魏氏兒童智力量表分測驗組合假設臺灣信度認知能力非認知性特質WISC-ⅢSubtest compositesTaiwanReliabilityCognitive abilitiesNoncognitive traits
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:28
     魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(WISC-III)是國內現有重要的智力測量工具之一,其測驗結果可做為6至16歲兒童智力鑑定與進一步診斷分析之應用。然而,國內對測驗結果得分之解釋往往僅止於傳統三個智商分數及新近提供的四個因素基準指數分數。對於如何應用WISC-III得分於後續之診斷分析教學上普遍感到陌生。實務界往往忽略WISC-III的每一個分測驗均在測不同之認知能力,兒童在某一組分測驗得分顯著高或低事實上均提供極富臨床意義之資訊。有鑑於實際應用分析上之需要,本研究歸納整理Kaufamn(1994)與Sattler(1992)對WISC-III分測驗組合所提出之建議假設,並以臺灣標準化樣本1,100位兒童之分數為依據,計算每一組合之信度。研究發現66組分測驗組合平均信度於.80至.96之間,其中有64%更具.90以上之信度,足見所列出之分測驗組合可實際幫助主試者對受試之認知與非認知特性建立適當假設,提供實務界人士智商分數以外豐富之臨床資料,進而對受試兒童做出更適宜之後續教學幫助。本研究之重要限制,以及對未來研究之建議亦在文中有所討論。
     The reliabilities of 66 meaningful subtest-composites suggested by both Kaufman (1994) and Sattler (1992) were examined for children from age 6 to 16 using the 1,100 Taiwan standardization data of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children, the third edition (WISC-III). The average WISC-III composite reliabilities range from .80 to .96. Among them, 64% showed reliabilities higher than .90. Result revealed that all of these composites are sufficiently reliable for screening, and hypothesis generation purpose. Limitations and suggestions for practical usage of these composites were also discussed in details.
期刊論文
1.陳心怡、陳榮華、朱建軍(19990700)。「簡式」魏氏兒童智力量表之建立研究--四個分測驗之組合。測驗年刊,46(2),13-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bracken, B. A.、McCallum, S. R.、Crain, M. R.(1993)。WISC-III subtest composite reliabilities and specificities: interpretive aids。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Monograph Series,22-34。  new window
3.McDermott, P. A.、Fantuzzo, J. W.、Glutting, J. J.(1990)。Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique of the Wechsler theory and practice。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,8,290-302。  new window
4.Tellegen, A.、Briggs, P. F.(1967)。Old wine in new skins: grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales。Journal of Consulting Psychology,31(5),499-506。  new window
5.Piotrowski, R. J.、Siegel, D. J.(1984)。Interpreting WISC-R profiles: reliability of subtest composites。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,2,183-190。  new window
會議論文
1.Kaufman, A. S.、Balgopal, R.、Kaufman, J. C.、McLean, J. E.(1994)。WISC-III short forms: psychometric properties vs. clinical relevance vs. practical utility。The annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association。Nashville, TN。  new window
圖書
1.Guilford, J. P.、Fruchter, B.(1978)。Fundamental statistics in psychology and education。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.陳榮華(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三(中文版)指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張蓓莉(1999)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明手冊。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaufman, A. S.(1979)。Intelligent testing with the WISC-R。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Kaufman, A. S.(1990)。Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Kaufman, A. S.(1994)。Intelligent testing with the WISC-III。New York:Wiley。  new window
7.Sattler, J. M.(1992)。Assessment of children。San Diego, CA:Jerome Sattler。  new window
8.Salvia, J.、Ysseldyke, J. E.(1978)。Assessment in special and remedial education。Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
9.Wechsler, D.(1999)。Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) Manual。San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation。  new window
10.Wechsler, D.(1997)。Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, (WAISIII) Manual。San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation。  new window
11.Wechsler, D.(1991)。Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, the third edition (WISC-III) Manual。San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation。  new window
12.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE