:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論勞動派遣之國際勞動基準
書刊名:輔仁法學
作者:焦興鎧
作者(外文):Chiao, Cing-kae
出版日期:2000
卷期:19
頁次:頁203-252
主題關鍵詞:勞動派遣派遣勞動者非常態勞動者國際勞工組織國際勞動基準國際勞動公約Dispatch employmentDispatched workersAtypical workersInternational labor organizationILOInternational labor standardsInternational labor conventions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:71
     本文之目的,是要對規範勞動派遣之國際勞動基準,做一全面之回顧與評析。除序後言結語外,全文共分三大部分:第一部份簡要敘述勞動派遣在近期之興起情形及所衍生之問題,並說明各國因應之相關立法情形。第二部份以三個階段為期,分析國際勞工組織建構勞動派遣國際基準規範之演進過程,主要是以它在一九三三年所通過之「收費就業機構公約」又及在一九四九年所通過之「收費就業機構(修正)公約」為探討重點,說明該組識在過去六十年來對收費勞務仲介立場之演進過程。第三部份則是對該組織在前年所通過「私營就業機構公約」之制定背景、重要內容及可能產生之影響等事項,做一綜合性之評析。
     The purpose of this paper is to make an over-all account of the historical backgrounds, current situations and future prospective of international labor standards governing dispatch employment, which has become a new trend in recent years. Aside from introductory and concluding remarks, the whole paper can be divided into three sections. First, it briefly describes the reasons for the surge of dispatch employment as employment flexibility has become a catchword currently and the consequences this atypical employment relationship has caused. In addition, new related legislation adopted by several countries to cope with this new issue are also examined. Secondly, it uses three stages to analyze the evolutionary process of the International Labor Organization (ILO) to set up international labor standards for dispatch employment in the past sixty years, and two related connections, i.e., the Fee-charging Employment (Revised) Conventions of 1949 are discussed respectively. Finally, the paper makes a critical assessment of the backgrounds, main contents and possible impacts of the Private Employment Agencies Convention which was adopted by the ILO in 1997.
期刊論文
1.Biagi, Marco、Treu, Tiziano(1997)。Italy's New Law on Promotion of Employment: An Explanation and Summary。Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal,1,97-111。  new window
2.Bronstein Arturo, S.(1991)。Temporary Work in Western Europe: Threat or Complement to Permanent Employment。International Labor Review,130,291-310。  new window
3.Bronstein Arturo, S.(1997)。Labor Law Reform in Latin America: Between State Protection and Flexibility。International Labor Review,136,5-26。  new window
4.Carnoy, Martin、Castells, Manuel、Benner, Chris(1997)。Labour Markets and Employment Practices in the Age of Flexibility: A Case Study of Silicon Valley。International Labour Review,136(1),27-48。  new window
5.De Grip, Andries、Hoevenberg, Jeroen、Willems, Ed(1997)。Atypical Employment in the European Union。International Labour Review,136,47-71。  new window
6.Fahlbeck, Reinhold(1998)。Flexibility: Potentials and Challenges for Labor Law。Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal,19,515-545。  new window
7.International Labor Office(1986)。Flexibility in Working Time。Conditions of Work Digest,5(2),1-394。  new window
8.International Labor Office(1989)。Part-Time Work。Conditions of Work Digest,8(1),3-312。  new window
9.Lee, Eddy(1994)。The Declaration of Philadelphia: Retrospect and Prospect。International Labour Review,133,467-484。  new window
10.Middleton, Jennifer(1996)。Contingent Workers in a Changing Economy: Endure, Adapt, or Organize?。Review of Law and Social Change,22,557-621。  new window
11.(1999)。New Temporary Work Legislation。European Industrial Relations Review,310,18-21。  new window
12.Ricca, Sergio(1988)。Changing Roles of Public Employment Services。International Labour Review,127,19-35。  new window
13.Trebilcock, Anne(1997)。A Comment on 'Legitimising the Triangular Employment Relationship。Comparative Labor Law Journal,19,79-84。  new window
14.Treu, Tiziano(1992)。Labour Flexibility in Europe。International Labour Review,131,497-512。  new window
15.Vosko, Lehr F.(1997)。Legitimizing the Triangular Employment Relationship: Emerging International Labour Standards from a Comparative Perspective。Comparative Labor Law Journal,19,43-77。  new window
16.Watson, Philippa(1991)。The Community Social Charter。Common Market Law Review,28,37-68。  new window
17.Willborn, Steven L.(1997)。Leased Workers: Vulnerability and the Need for Special Legislation。Comparative Labor Law Journal,19,85-95。  new window
18.邱駿彥(1998)。淺談勞動派遣法律問題。萬國法律,98,11-26。  延伸查詢new window
19.邱駿彥(1998)。日本勞動派遣法之現狀。就業與訓練,16(6),17-21。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳正良(1994)。派遣勞工之雇用關係與勞動條件。勞資關係月刊,12(12),6-15。  延伸查詢new window
21.李來希(19950700)。談派遣勞動之立法規範。勞工行政,87,52-56。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃程貫(19981200)。德國勞工派遣關係之法律結構。政大法學評論,60,271-301。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊通軒(19980700)。勞動派遣立法必要性之研究。全國律師,2(7),34-41。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉愛生(19931100)。派遣勞動的組織活動與外包承攬制的差異性。勞工行政,67,47-48。  延伸查詢new window
25.鄭津津(19981100)。勞動派遣相關法律問題之探討。就業與訓練,16(6),12-16。  延伸查詢new window
26.鄭津津(19990700)。派遣勞動之法律關係與相關法律問題之研究。國立中正大學法學集刊,2,237-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.成之約(19981100)。淺論「派遣勞動」及其對勞資關係的影響。就業與訓練,16(6),3-11。  延伸查詢new window
28.簡建忠(19990600)。臺灣派遣勞工對派遣工作看法之研究。勞資關係論叢,9,99-124。  延伸查詢new window
29.焦興鎧(19971200)。對部分時間工作者之法律保障--歐美國家之經驗。政大法學評論,58,285-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.International Labor Office(1997)。Provisional Record: Eighty-Fifth Session of the International Labour Conference。Eighty-Fifth Session of the International Labour Conference。Geneva:International Labour Office。  new window
2.焦興鎧(1999)。勞工法與人權保障 國際勞動基準之最新發展。勞動法、社會法與基本人權學術研討會,(會議日期: 1999/11/06)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Belous, Richard D.(1989)。The Contingent Economy: The Growth of the Temporary, Part-Time and Subcontracted Workforce。Mclean, Va:National Planning Association。  new window
2.Ellis, Eveyn(1998)。EC Sex Equality Law。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.International Labor Office(1949)。Revision of the Fee- charging Employment Agencies Convention(Revised), 1949 (No,96) Report IV。Geneva:International Labour Office。  new window
4.International Labour Organization(1992)。International Labour Conventions and Recommendations, 1919-1991。Geneva:International Labour Organization。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE