:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:城鄉學童休閒活動與親子間互動關係之調查研究
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:江中皓周靈山吳運全林秀穗
作者(外文):Jiang, Chung-hauChou, Ling-shanWu, Yun-chuanLee, Shu-swei
出版日期:2000
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁61-75
主題關鍵詞:城鄉休閒活動親子關係City-countryLeisure activityParents-children relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:53
本研究旨在了解城、鄉學童對休閒活動喜愛的傾向分析、休閒活動看法的差異,以及男、女學童對休閒活動的認知與對父母在休閒活動對親子間的互動關係,以臺北縣、桃園縣及臺東縣三縣市269位之男、女學童為對象,採自編休閒活動之自覺量表為問卷工具。資料收集後,經處理獲得結論如下: 一、在城、鄉學童對休閒活動喜愛的向結論有:休閒教育的重視都有提高與逐漸縮短差距、城市組比鄉鎮組對休閒的追求、價值觀來得高、仍以從事消遣性與動態性的休閒活動最普遍。在靜態項目方面:兩組的傾向都偏愛於打電動玩與電腦,顯示高科技的產物與吸引力,也漸漸地對學童產生很大的影響;且都以極高比率希望能與父母及全家人一同從事休閒活動。 二、城、鄉學童對休閒活動的看法有:(一)想去從事休閒活動的因素:1.城市組較同意休閒活動是快樂的,顯示城中該年齡層的學童更能對休閒活動的認知層面,較鄉鎮組的學童有明確的體驗感。2.想去從事休閒活的前五大因素為(1)休閒活動是快樂的;(2)可增強身體功能(例:長高、變壯等);(3)可促進健康;(4)可與父母親相處在一起;(5)可享受休閒運動樂趣,(二)不想去從事休閒活動因素1.父母親對社會環境因素,並在無形中已漸漸限制許多學童的休閒活動空間。2.休閒活動空間狹小以及不足已是不爭的事實,不僅大人需求,學童也反映出對休閒活動的場地的需求心態。 三、男、女學童對休閒活動的認知有(一)男學童認為事休閒活動是可增進身體的強壯與長高,顯然較女學童在意,並較肯定休閒活動可以促進生理上發育的滿足;而女學童卻認為能從事休閒活動是跟得上潮流的觀念。(二)男學童在從事休閒活動的因素裡,認為休感受較具刺激、挑戰性的反應要比女學童來得強烈。(三)男學童的認知上,比較傾向休閒活動並不一定要花錢才是可以從事。 四、父母在休閒活動對親子間的互動關係的研究結論為,(一)鄉鎮組在對父母關心自己休閒活動的需求上,呈現較高的反應,也期望父母多能共同參與學童休閒活動,要比城市組來得高。(二)城市組在活動空間與自由度卻不如鄉鎮組。(三)城、鄉學童對父母親在休閒活間關係狀況之滿意來看,兩組持共同的看法,說明學童希望父母能多給孩童自由的休閒活動空間,並且能關心學童們正想的休閒活動是什麼。
The purpose of this study were to realize the analysis of a favorite tendency toward leisure activity for city-country school children, the difference of opinions for leisure activity, boys’ and girls’ recognition’s for leisure activity, and the mutual relationship among parents-children in leisure activity. The subject included two hundred sixty-nine boy and girl school children of three counties-Taipei, Taoyuan and Taitung. Choosing Perceived Scale of self-edit leisure activity as questionnaire, After collecting the data, the conclusion of the study was as follows: A、A favorite tendency toward leisure activity for city-country school children:: 1. Owing to the rising of people’s income, it makes city-country parents pay much attention to leisure education and gradually helps their difference become less. 2. School children of the city group have higher pursuit and values of leisure than those of the country group. 3. The recreational and motive activity is most popular for children. In motionless ways, children of two groups prefer to play computer games and video game, which show high technological products and attraction gradually have a great influence on children. 4. School children hope to do leisure activity with their parents and family in a high per-centage for two groups. B、City-country school children’s opinions for leisure activity: 1. Factors of doing leisure activity: a. Children of the city group thought an activity is pleasant. For the recognition, children in cities have more definite experience than those in the country. b. Two groups’ the first five factors are the same. (1)Doing leisure activity is happy. (2)Strengthen the function of body (for example: become taller, stronger) (3)Make the body healthy. (4)Get along with their parents. (5)Enjoy the fun of leisure sport 2. Factors of not doing leisure activity: a. Parents despair of the social environment and, a little by little, imperceptibly restrain children’s active space. b. Active space is too narrow and not enough. Not only adults but also children reflect the need to leisure activity field. C、Boy’s and girl’s recognition for leisure activity: 1. In boys’ opinions, doing the activity makes bodies stronger and taller, and positively helps physiological satisfaction of growing up. But girls thought doing it can catch up with the current. 2. Boys thought it is exciting and challenging. Their response is higher than girls. 3. Comparatively, boys thought it is not necessarily to spend money doing the activity. D、 The mutual relationship between parents and children in doing leisure activity: 1. Children of country group show higher response than those of city group-whether their parents care about their need to leisure activity and they expect their parents take part in activities with them. 2. The activity ground and freedom of city group are less than those of country group, With the city-country school children’s satisfaction for parents doing activity, two groups. 3. have common views for the two items
期刊論文
1.邱金松(19851200)。臺灣省推展社區全民運動之探討。體育學報,7,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張孝銘(19980600)。休閒與社會互動。大專體育,37,87-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.趙廣復、田愛華(19961000)。加強體育課程建設以促進大學體育發展。大專體育,28,46-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳鏡淸(1997)。傳統體育與休閒活動。大專體育,32,115-121。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.辛晚教(1990)。休閒、教育、人生。七十九年休閒教育研討會,9-30。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王柏壽(1985)。父母與同儕對青少年作決定的影響之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李世昌(2000)。同儕對休閒活動影響之研究-以南開工商專科學校為例(碩士論文)。朝陽大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅明訓(1999)。桃園縣國小六年級學生休閒活動之調查研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.林建地(1996)。我國青少年休閒活動之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉素秋(1997)。青少年的休閒活動與犯罪相關性之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.王美芬(1993)。單親青少年休閒狀況之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴哲民(1989)。臺北市國小兒童休閒活動之調查研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃中科(1990)。都市在學少年休閒活動之研究--以臺灣中市在學少年為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.張少熙(1994)。青少年自我概念與休閒活動傾向及其阻礙因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳芳惠(1984)。村落地理學。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(1995)。台灣居民的休閒生活。台北:東大。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳伯中(1990)。都市地理學。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.文崇一(1990)。台灣居民的休閒生活。台北市:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE