:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國軍老舊眷村改建的公平和效率問題
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:覃怡輝蔡吉源
作者(外文):Chin, Tom Yee-hueiTsai, Chi-yuan
出版日期:2000
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁527-561
主題關鍵詞:住宅政策公平效率住者有其屋租賃住宅Housing policyEquityEfficiencyHome ownershipRental housing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
住宅是社會政策中十分重要的一個課題,但是到目前為止,臺灣並沒有一個全面性的住宅政策,有的只是一個以低收入戶為對象的「國民住宅政策」。民國85年,政府為解決國軍老舊眷村的重建和更新問題,特別通過了「國軍老舊眷村改建條例」的法案。由於眷村固然居住了許多低收入戶,但其中也居住了不少的中產和中上的眷戶,因此眷村改建案的推行,已使政策所照顧的對象,由純粹低收入戶擴大到中產甚至中上的範圍,於是突顯了其中的公平性和效率性的問題。本文在簡述了住宅政策的意義和老舊眷村的現狀之後,進而分析各個不同改建方案所賦有的公平性和效率性。由於在公平和效率的標準下,各個改建方案的優劣順序頗不相同,甚至跡近於相反。無論在「公平優於效率」或是「公平和效率兼顧」的前提下,政府推行眷村改建政策理想的作法都應該是:從現在所採行的「政府統建」政策,朝「售屋租地」的方向去改革、修正。
Housing is a very important subject in the field of social policy. But until now, ther has been no real universal housing policy in Taiwan. Thenly policy, the so-called "National Housing Policy", is actually restricted to only qualified low income earners. At present, for the sake of solving the reconstruction and renovation issues of obsolete military residences, the Act of Reconstruction of Obsolete Military Residences was passed by the Legislative Yuan in 1996. The passing of this Act demonstrates that the present housing policy's coverage has been enlarged from qualified low income earners to include middle income or even upper-middle income earners. Thus, the issue of equity and efficiency have become more explicit through this housing policy. According to our analysis, the function order of equity and efficiency varies in different renovation policies. Under the principle of either 'equity is more important than efficiency' or 'equity is as important as efficiency,' rather than modify present policies that focus on "government planning and building," governments should instead create policies that offer "private housing on governmental land."
期刊論文
1.張金鶚(1991)。住宅問題與政策架構之研究(上)。國立政治大學學報,62,155-184。  延伸查詢new window
2.張金鶚(1991)。住宅問題與政策架構之研究(下)。國立政治大學學報,63,263-292。  延伸查詢new window
3.張金鶚(1992)。住者適其屋:我國住宅政策與問題之探討。人事月刊,15(5),20-32。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.華昌宜(1991)。引言。臺北市。5-7。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.覃怡輝(1998)。新加坡住宅政策的探討。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Forrest, Ray、Murie, Alan、Williams, Peter(1990)。Home Ownership: Differentiation and Fragmentation。London, UK:Unwin and Hyman。  new window
2.Gilbert, Neil、Terrell, Paul(1998)。Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.李如南(1988)。臺灣地區軍眷村更新配合都市發展之研究。臺灣地區軍眷村更新配合都市發展之研究。臺北市:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
4.張金鶚(1990)。住宅問題與住宅政策之研究。住宅問題與住宅政策之研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.覃怡輝(1991)。社會安全政策的公平和效率問題。正義及其相關問題。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.Baugh, W. E.(1987)。Introduction to the Social Services。Introduction to the Social Services。London, UK。  new window
7.Brown, Muriel(1983)。Introduction to Social Administration in Britain。Introduction to Social Administration in Britain。London, UK。  new window
8.Central Office of Information(1993)。Housing。Housing。London, UK。  new window
9.Doling, John(1997)。Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrial Countries。Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrial Countries。London, UK。  new window
10.George, Vic、Wilding, Paul(1984)。The Impact of Social Policy。The Impact of Social Policy。London, UK。  new window
11.Hill, Michael(1983)。Understanding Social Policy。Understanding Social Policy。Oxford。  new window
12.Le Grand, Julian、Robbinson, Ray(1984)。The Economics of Social Problems: The Market versus the State。The Economics of Social Problems: The Market versus the State。London, UK。  new window
13.McGuire, Chester C.(1981)。International Housing Policies: A Comparative Analysis。International Housing Policies: A Comparative Analysis。Lexington。  new window
14.Oxley, Michael、Smith, Jacqueline(1966)。Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe。Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe。London, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE