:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:司馬遷之心--〈報任少卿書〉析論
書刊名:臺大歷史學報
作者:阮芝生
作者(外文):Juan, Chih-sheng
出版日期:2000
卷期:26
頁次:頁151-205
主題關鍵詞:司馬遷報任少卿書太史公牛馬走包世臣趙翼王國維錢穆錢賓四Ssu-ma Ch'ienPao Jen Shao-ch'ing shuT'ai-shih kung niu-ma tsouPao Shih-chenChao YiWang Kuo-weiChien Mu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(3) 專書(5) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:1027
本文旨在結合相關資料與古今研究,解析司馬遷〈報任少卿書〉的內容與作意,以闡明「司馬遷之心」。研究過程必然涉及任安來書的時間與目的、史公〈報書〉的寫作年月與真意、司馬遷行年、漢代官制,以及漢武帝晚年的政情等基本問題的考訂,最後歸結於破解〈報書〉開頭「太史公牛馬走」六字。本文首創「司馬遷之心」一詞,以有別於「司馬昭之心」。「司馬遷之心」者,就是自乞宮刑,隱忍苟活,完成《史記》,以雪恥揚親,並對自己、對父親、對歷史文化做出交代。這個意思可從「太史公牛馬走」六字的正確解讀上看出來。
This article draws upon related historical materials and research, old and new, to explicate the content and purpose of Ssu-ma Ch’ien’s letter in reply to Jen An in order to elucidate “Ssu-ma Ch’ien’s mind.” The research process for this inquiry necessarily involved embarking on a review of the following issues: 1) the time and purpose of Jen An’s original letter to Ssu-ma Ch’ien, 2) the time (month and year) and purpose of Ssu-ma Ch’ien’s letter in reply, 3) Ssu-ma Ch’ieh’s age, 4) the Han system of officials, and 5) the political situation during the latter part of Han emperor Wu’s reign. Finally, we are in a position to break through and interpret the six words with which Ssu-ma Ch’ien opened his letter: T’ai-shihkung niu-ma tsou (太史公牛馬走): Grand Historian master cow horse f1ees.This article first established the expression “Ssu-ma Ch’ien’s mind” so as to distinguish it from, say, “Ssu-ma Chao’s mind”. castration and suffering patiently despite people’s talk, so he could complete the Historical Records(Shih chi) for the purpose of washing away his disgrace and bringing honor to his father. Indeed, he made this exchange for his father and for history and culture. This essential meaning can be explicated from the six words: T'ai-shin, kung niu-ma tsou.
期刊論文
1.阮芝生(19901200)。《史記.河渠書》析論。國立臺灣大學歷史學系學報,15,65-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.袁傳璋(1987)。從任安的行跡考定《報任安書》的作年。淮北煤師院學報.社會科學版,1987(2)。  延伸查詢new window
3.林礽乾(19990300)。太史公牛馬走析辨。中國學術年刊,20,91-118+598-599。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王達津(1956)。讀郭沫若先生〈《太史公行年考》有問題〉後。歷史研究,3。  延伸查詢new window
5.何世華(1982)。報任安書並非作於太始四年考。人文雜誌,6,90。  延伸查詢new window
6.袁傳璋(1987)。報任安書「會冬從上來」辨證。安徽師大學報:哲學社會科學版。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳直(1956)。太史公書名考。國立臺灣大學文史哲學報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李長之(1983)。司馬遷的人格與風格。臺北:蒲公英書屋。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭鶴聲(195602)。司馬遷年譜。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.施丁(1995)。司馬遷行年新考。西安:陜西人民教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.(西漢)司馬遷、(唐)司馬貞、(唐)張守節、(宋)裴駰、瀧川龜太郎。史記會注考證。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳昌廉(1996)。兩漢計偕考。臺北:蘭臺出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.錢穆(1973)。中國史學名著。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.王鳴盛(1985)。十七史商榷。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.趙生群(1994)。太史公書研究。陝西人民。  延伸查詢new window
9.凌稚隆、李光縉、有井範平、司馬遷(1992)。史記評林。臺北:地球出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.程文(1985)。論王國維考定報任安書的時代與內容。史記管窺。西安。  延伸查詢new window
11.張鵬一。太史公年譜。  延伸查詢new window
12.程金造(1985)。從報任安書商榷司馬遷的卒年。史記管窺。西安。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)沈欽韓。漢書疏證。  延伸查詢new window
2.過珙(1926)。言文對照古文評詮全集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.史記評註。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1990)。漢官舊儀,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.易經,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)趙翼。廿二史劄記。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)包世臣。藝舟雙輯‧復石贛州書。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)周壽昌。漢書校注補。  延伸查詢new window
9.資治通鑑。  延伸查詢new window
10.漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊樹達(1971)。積微居金文說,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.于省吾(1996)。雙劍誃吉金文選,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(漢)劉向。晏子敘錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1959)。文選,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.五臣注文選,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.三國志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.錢穆(1977)。太史公考釋。中國學術思想史論叢。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE