“Shi-Ji” is in fact has the “Gongyang Commentary” told of the doctrines and the “Zhou’s Spring and Autumn Annals” told of the narratives in the third edition.With that, “Spring and Autumn Annals” referred by “Shi-Ji” would have been the“Gongyang Commentary”. In the study of the narrative literature, there is not to be any overkill between metaphor and rhetoric, but both need to be emphasized equally.With the “Gongyang Commentary” that conveys the imperial teaching through doctrines serving to interpret the meaning of “Spring and Autumn Annals”, great or small, Sima Qian perceives his historical writing of the “Spring and Autumn Annals”extending the teaching of the Confucius is a manifestation of extending the doctrines and rationale of the “Gongyang Commentary”. He has adopted the form of historic narrative to manifest the “Voice of one school”, where his narrative contains historic interpretation, narrative suggestions subtly hinting the historians, and his worldly assessment. The narrative of “Shi-ji” has been a unique technique that Sima Qian has adopted to describe the history and to praise or denounce the characters. While as Sima Qian’s thinking is profoundly influenced by the “Gongyang Commentary”, just how does he manifest thoughts of “Gongyang Commentary” in his narratives, and denounce that of the historians? Between the non-written and the carefully crafted writing, what kind of doctrine and rationale has been manifested in the blank spots of a narrative? This suggests that between, how Sima Qian fulfills his historic mission as a historian in his narrative and writing of the “Shi-ji” has emerged as a study subject that the project aims to explore in in-depth examination.