:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:必要之惡﹖--從McCain-Feingold法案看政治行動委員會的功能與影響
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:吳重禮 引用關係黃綺君
作者(外文):Wu, Chung-liHuang, Chi-chun
出版日期:2001
卷期:15
頁次:頁45-61
主題關鍵詞:政治行動委員會軟錢硬錢政黨利益團體Political action committeesSoft moneyHard moneyPolitical partyInterest group
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:61
     無疑地,競選經費在選舉活動中扮演著舉足輕重的角色,而如何規範選舉經費係成為近來美國政壇主要的爭議焦點之一。在選舉過程中,由於競選支出所需驟增,迫使各候選人嘗試開拓各種資金管道。除了向選民幕集小額捐款之外,各類型「政治行動委員會」(Political Action Committees, PACs)的捐款,即成為候選人籌幕競選經費的主要來源。二○○一年四月,參議院表決通過McCain-Feingold法案,以期大幅修改「聯邦選舉競選法」(Federal Election Campaign Act, FECA)。這項旨在遏制「軟錢」(soft money)介入競選過程的改革法案,早已引發美國社會各界的關切,尤其利益團體左右政黨運作的現象,再度成為注目的焦點。鑑此,本文旨在探討兩項議題。其一,探究政治行動委員會在選舉中所扮演的角色與功能,並進一步分析其運作的策略與技巧。其二,瞭解政治行動委員會對於美國政治生態所導致的影響,評估政治行動委員會的存廢爭議與改革芻議。以美國經驗為例證,或許可以做為我國選舉經費規範的參考。
     Undoubtedly, campaign finance plays an important role in the electoral process and how to regulate the financing has been one of the major disputes in American politics during the past decade. Due to the sharply rising electoral expenditures, candidates are forced to expand all possible ways for raising funds in the election. Except for the small contributions by the voters, all types of contributions by political action committees (PACs) become the main source of raising electoral funds for candidates. On April 2001, the House passed the McCain-Feigold Act, looking forward to revising Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) on a large scale. The reform aiming at curbing soft money intervening with the electoral process has already raised lively concerns; especially, the phenomenon of interest groups' interference with the party function becomes the political focus again. With respect to this line of argument, this study intends to analyze two related issues: 1) to investigate the role of PACs in the electoral process and further to analyze the strategies for PACs; and, 2) to comprehend the impact of PACs on American politics and to evaluate the debates and reforms of PACs. The American experience probably could serve well as an example for us to follow in regulating campaign finance.
期刊論文
1.黃秀端(19930600)。政治行動委員會的競選捐獻與國會選舉。美國月刊,8(6)=86,63-89。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭端耀(19981200)。一九九六年美國民主黨政治獻金案與選舉經費制度改革之探討。歐美研究,28(4),63-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Corrado, Anthony J., Jr.(1998)。Campaign Finance Reform in the 105th Congress: A Focus on Soft Money and Issue Advocacy。American Review of Politics,19(Winter),337-343。  new window
4.Donnelly, David(1998)。Mobilizing Citizens for Public Financing of State Elections: Coalition Building for Ballot Initiatives。American Review of Politics,19(Winter),361-366。  new window
5.Farrar-Myers, Victoria、Dwyre, Diana(1998)。Campaign Finance Reform in the 105th Congress: A Behind-the Sciences Look at Bipartisan Maneuvering。American Review of Politics,19(Winter),345-360。  new window
6.Malbin, Michael J.(1998)。Campaign Finance Legislation in the States。American Review of Politics,19(2),323-329。  new window
7.Rosenkranz, E. Joshua(1998)。Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution: The Current Legal Quandaries。America Review of Politics,19(Winter),307-321。  new window
8.陳恆鈞(1998)。政黨競選經費策略之規劃。中國行政評論,7(2),121-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃秀端(1989)。政黨與現代民主政治。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,4(3),6-19。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃秀端(1990)。政治行動委員會與國會議員的關係。美國月刊,5(7),60-71。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃競涓(1986)。政治行動委員會--影響美國國會選舉與政策的新勢力。美國月刊,1(4),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林世哲(1990)。美國商業政治行動委員會之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sorauf, Frank J.(1992)。Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
2.劉青雷(1988)。衝突與妥協:美國利益團體與遊說活動。臺北:時報。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sorauf, Frank J.(1988)。Money in American Elections。Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown College Division。  new window
4.Sabato, Larry J.(1989)。Paying For Elections: the Campaign Finance Thicket。New York, NY:Priority Press Publications。  new window
5.Alexander, Herbert E.(1984)。Financing Politics: Money, Elections, and Political Reform。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
6.Malbin, Michael J.、Gais, Thomas L.(1998)。The Day after Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States。Albany, NY:The Rockefeller Institute of Government。  new window
7.Herrnson, Paul S.(1995)。Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
8.王國璋(1993)。當代美國政治論衡。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張寶樹(1986)。美國政黨與選舉制度。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.Alexander, Herbert E.、Bauer, Monica(1991)。Financing the 1988 Election。Financing the 1988 Election。Boulder, CO。  new window
11.Back, Paul Allen(1998)。Party Politics in America。Party Politics in America。New York, NY。  new window
12.(1995)。Interest Group Politics。Interest Group Politics。Washington, DC。  new window
13.Clawson, Dan、Neustadtl, Alan、Denise, Scott(1992)。Money Talks: Corporate PACs and Political Influence。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
14.Conway, M. Margaret、Green, Joanne C.(1995)。Political Action Committees and the Political Process in the 1990s。Interest Group Politics。Washington, DC。  new window
15.Eismeier, Theodore J.、Pollock, Philip H., III(1984)。Political Action Committees: Varieties of Organization and Strategy。Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s。Chatham, NJ。  new window
16.Luntz, Frank I.(1988)。Candidates, Consultants, and Campaigns: The Style and Substance of American Electioneering。Basil Blackwell。  new window
17.Matasar, Ann B.(1986)。Corporate PACs and Federal Campaign Financing Laws: Use or Abuse of Power?。Corporate PACs and Federal Campaign Financing Laws: Use or Abuse of Power?。New York, NY。  new window
18.Sorauf, Frank J.(1984)。What Prices PACs?。What Prices PACs?。New York, NY。  new window
19.李月華(1995)。買通美國國會。買通美國國會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE