:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣政治獻金法及參選人政治獻金資料之實證研究
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:王鼎銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ding-ming
出版日期:2007
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁121-144
主題關鍵詞:政治獻金法選舉募款設限資料雙受限Tobit模型Campaign donationsPolitical contribution actTruncated dataTwo-limit tobit
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:77
民主國家的政黨或參選公職的人,為了支應龐大政治活動的開銷,接受外界的金錢捐款早已不足為奇。重要的是,民主國家會研擬政治獻金相關法令,以規範捐獻的透明化與公開化,避免金權政治對民主體制所造成的負面影響。我國「政治獻金法」在各界的努力催生下,於 2004 年總統大選前二日,終於在立法院正式三讀通過。而這部「政治獻金法」的相關規範,自第六屆立法委員選舉開始,便成為我國規範政治獻金收受與使用的最高準則。準此,本文除細就條文重要規範外,並以該屆區域立委參選者為對象,彙整監察院公告之政治獻金資料,分析參選人獲得捐款多寡的背景要素。其中除了各參選人的黨派、性別、年齡、學歷、連任等因素外,並將他們的選區特徵納入分析。在統計模型方面,雖然國外相關研究顯示獻金型態呈現「設限資料」(censored data)的偏態分佈而多採下端受限的Tobit模型,但本文依據台灣法令的特殊規定,提出台灣獻金資料呈現雙尾設限(two-tail censored)的分佈型態,故另採所謂的雙受限 Tobit 模型(Two-Limit Tobit)加以比較。
It is not surprise to see the parties and candidates in a democracy need the donations and fundraising to support the campaign activities and expenses. What is more important for a democratic country, to prevent the negative influence of money politics, is to make the regulation to legalize the transition of political contributions. In Taiwan, The Political Contribution Act was finally passed in March 2004 and started to implement for the legislative election in the end of same year. Based on the political contribution data collected for this election, this paper tries to find the factors that influencing the candidates to attract donations. In addition to several characters from the candidates themselves, including party affiliation, education and inclemency, this paper also finds district matters. Since the contribution data in Taiwan is featured with two-tail truncated distribution, Two-Limit Tobit is applied for the analysis.
期刊論文
1.彭錦鵬(19950300)。中華民國與美國國會議員競選經費之比較。歐美研究,25(1),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃秀端(19930600)。政治行動委員會的競選捐獻與國會選舉。美國月刊,8(6)=86,63-89。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳恆鈞(20011200)。團體在決策過程中的運作分析模式。政治科學論叢,15,241-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tobin, James(1958)。Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,26(1),24-36。  new window
5.Edelman, Murray(1988)。Skeptical Studies of Language, the Media, and Mass Culture。American Political Science Review,82(4),1333-1349。  new window
6.Endersby, James、Munger, Michael(1992)。The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Union PAC Contributions。Journal of Labor Research,12(4),79-97。  new window
7.Grier, Kevin、Munger, Michael、Murnger, Michael(1993)。Comparing Interest Group PAC Contributions to House and Senate Incumbents, 1980-1986。The Journal of Politics,55(3),615-643。  new window
8.Langbein, Laura、Lotwis, Mark(1990)。The Political Efficacy of Lobbying and Money: Gun Control in the U.S. House, 1986。Legislative Studies Quarterly,15(3),413-440。  new window
9.Snyder, James M. Jr.(1990)。Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986。Journal of Political Economy,98(6),1195-1227。  new window
10.Uhlaner, Carole Jean、Schlozman, Kay Lehman(1986)。Candidates Gender and Congressional Campaign Receipts。The Journal of Politics,48(1),30-50。  new window
11.劉宏隆、邵聖雄(1995)。政治捐獻之相關研究。社會科教育學刊,5,26-43。  延伸查詢new window
12.Grier, Kevin、Murnger, Michael、Torrent, Gray(1990)。Allocation Patterns of PAC Monies: The U.S. Senate。Public Choice,67,111-128。  new window
13.Chappell, Henry(1982)。Campaign Contributions, and Congressional Voting: A Simultaneous Probit-Tobit Model。The Review of Economics and Statistics,61,77-83。  new window
14.Malbin, Michael J.(1998)。Campaign Finance Legislation in the States。American Review of Politics,19,323-329。  new window
15.Grier, Kevin、Murnger, Michael(1991)。Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions to House Incumbents。Economic Inquiry,29,24-43。  new window
16.Wright, John(1990)。Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives。American Political Science Review,84,417-438。  new window
17.Siberman, Jonathan、Durden, Garey(1976)。Determining Legislative Preferences on the Minimum Wage: An Economic Approach。Journal of Political Economy,84,317-329。  new window
18.Cohen, Jeffrey E.、Hamman, John A.(2003)。Interest Group PAC Contributions and the 1992 Regulation of Cable Television。The Social Science Journal,40,357-369。  new window
19.Evans, Diana(1988)。Oil PACs and Aggressive Contribution Strategies。The Journal of Politics,50,1047-1056。  new window
20.Grenzke, Janet(1989)。Political Action Committees and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency Is Complex。American Journal of Political Science,33,1-24。  new window
21.Wright, John(1985)。Political Action Committees, Campaign Contributions, and Roll Calls: An Organizational Perspective。American Political Science Review,79,400-414。  new window
22.Grier, Kevin、Murnger, Michael(1986)。The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Interest Group Campaign Contributions。Journal of Labor Research,7,349-361。  new window
23.Box-Steffenmeier, J.、Zorn, C.(1997)。The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement。American Political Science Review,91,324-338。  new window
24.Wilhite, Allen(1988)。Union Political Action Committee Contributions and Legislative Voting。Journal of Labor Research,9,79-90。  new window
研究報告
1.許慶復(1992)。我國政治獻金問題之研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wilson, Graham K.(1993)。利益團體。利益團體。臺北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Elderveld, Samuel J.(1982)。Political Parties in American Society。New York, NY:Basic Books, Inc., Publishers。  new window
3.Wright, John(1996)。Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence。Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.王國璋(1993)。當代美國政治論衡。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Alexander, Herbert E.(1984)。Financing Politics。Financing Politics。Washington, DC。  new window
6.Sorauf, Frank J.(1998)。Money in American Elections。Money in American Elections。Glenview, IL。  new window
7.(2004)。政治獻金法研訂實錄。政治獻金法研訂實錄。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE