科學概念的指稱與投射__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	科學概念的指稱與投射
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	陳瑞麟
作者(外文)：	Chen, Ruey-lin
出版日期：	2003
卷期：	33:1
頁次：	頁125-192
主題關鍵詞：	科學實在論；指稱的因果理論；投射；科學概念；科學哲學；Scientific realism；The causal theory of reference；Projection；Scientific concepts；Philosophy of science
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(2) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:6 點閱:117

本文將論證，針對說明「科學語詞 (也就是「科學概念」) 和世界的關係」這個議題上，分析傳統的「指稱的因果理論」和「指稱」觀念兩者都將面對難以解決的困境。「投射」的觀念才是更好的途徑，科學語詞和科學概念是透過「投射」而和世界建立一定的相互關係。本文試圖提出一個科學概念的「經驗投射理論」。我們將以量熱學、熱力學、燃素理論等等實際的科學案例，來詳細論證下列論旨：1.心智將科學概念投射到世界，並建構可落實模型來印證它們。2.每個科學概念是一概念網絡的一部分。3.科學概念與現象的關聯由其在概念網絡中的位置來決定。4. 科學概念投射的對象被落實後，此概念才指稱該被落實的物體。5.出現在不同理論中的語詞對應了不同的科學概念。

以文找文

What is the relation between scientific terms (scientific concepts) and the world? In this article I argue that the several versions of causal theory of reference fail to provide a good answer to this question. As the notion of reference is presupposed, the versions encounter some unsolvable difficulties. But there is a better approach along the notion of projection. I claim that some degree of correlation between scien-tific terms or concepts and the world can be established through projection. This article proposes and develops an Empirical Projection The-ory (EPT) for scientific concepts. The theory exhibits an essential char-acteristic of the scientific concept: empirical projectibility. EPT claims the following theses. (1) Scientific concepts can be projected onto the world by the mind and confirmed by constructing realizable models. (2) Each scientific concept is a part of a conceptual network that is constituted by a classificatory system. (3) The correlation between each scientific concept and phenomena depends on the concept’s topological location or the way it is linked to the other concepts. (4) When the object projected by a scientific concept is confirmed or re-alized, the scientific concept and its correspondent scientific term re-fers to the realized object. (5) The same scientific term occurring in different scientific theories would then correspond to different scien-tific concepts. Some scientific cases, such as carloimetry, thermodynamics, and phlogiston theory, are taken as examples to justify EPT in this article.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	陳瑞麟(19990400)。組織科學理論：分類、分疇和模型。東吳哲學學報，4，1-36。延伸查詢
2.	Komatsu, L. K.(1992)。Recent Views of Conceptual Structure。Psychological Bulletin，112，500-526。
3.	Dupré, John(1981)。Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa。The Philosophical Review，90(1)，66-90。
4.	Dupré, John(1994)。The Philosophical Basis of Biological Classification。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A，25(2)，271-279。
5.	Nersessian, Nancy(1989)。Conceptual Change in Science and In Science Education。Synthese，80，163-183。
6.	Fu, Daiwie(1995)。Higher Taxonomy and Higher Incommensurability。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science，26(2)，273-294。
7.	Chen, Ruey-Lin(2000)。Theory Versions Instead of Articulations of a Paradigm。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A，31(3)，449-471。
8.	Kitcher, Philip(1978)。Theories, Theorists, and Theorical Change。The Philosophical Review，87(4)，519-547。
9.	Chappell, T. D. J.(1998)。The incomplete projectivist: How to be an objectivist and an attitudinist。The Philosophical Quarterly，48(190)，50-66。
10.	Enc, B.(1976)。Reference of theoretical terms。Nous，10，261-282。
11.	Hardin, C.、Rosenberg, Alex(1982)。A defense of convergent realism。Philosophy of Science，49，604-615。
12.	Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(1998)。Conceptual integration networks。Cognitive Science，22(2)，133-187。
13.	陳瑞麟(19961200)。以說話行事模式來說明意向性的結構。國立臺灣大學文史哲學報，45，173+175-200。延伸查詢
14.	Fu, Daiwie(19960400)。Crossing Taxonomies and Boundaries: A Critical Note on Comparative History of Science and Zhao Youqin's "Optics"。Taiwanese Journal for Philosophy & History of Science，5(1)=8，103-127。
15.	Bishop, M.、Stich, S.(1996)。The flight into reference or how not to make progress in the philosophy of science。Philosophy of Science，63(1)，33-49。
16.	Rubinstein, A.(1998)。Induction, grue emeralds and lady Macbeth's fallacy。The Philosophical Quarterly，48(190)，37-49。
17.	Sainbury, R. M.(1998)。Projections and relations。The Monist，81(1)，133-160。
18.	Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(1998)。Conceptual Integration Network。Cognitive Science，22(2)，133-187。
19.	Bishop, M.、Stich, S.(1996)。The flight into reference or how not to make progress in the philosophy of science。Philosophy of Science，63(1)，33-49。
20.	Dupre, J.(1994)。The philosophical basis of biological classification。Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences，25(2)，271-279。
21.	Rubinstein, A.(1998)。Induction, grue emeralds and lady Macbeth’s fallacy。The Philosophical Quarterly，48(190)，37-49。
22.	Sainbury, R. M.(1998)。Projections and relations。The Monist，81(1)，133-160。

會議論文
1.	傅大為(1995)。H2O的一個不可共量史--重論「不可共量性」及其與意義理論之爭。第四屆美國文學與思想研討會。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。95-122。延伸查詢
2.	Kuhn, Thomas S.(1983)。Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability。The 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association。East Lansing, MI：Philosophy of Science Association。669-688。
3.	陳瑞麟(1998)。科學理論的模型和分類。臺北市。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Putnam, Hilary(1981)。Reason, Truth and History。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Blackburn, Simon(1984)。Spreading the Word。Oxford：Clarendon Press。
3.	Lea, Susan M.、Burke, John R.(1997)。Physics: The Nature of Things。New York：Brooke/Cole Publishing Company & West Publishing company。
4.	Mechelen, Iven Van、Hampton, James、Michalski, Ryszard S.、Theuns, Peter(1993)。Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis。London：Academic Press。
5.	Neisser, Ulric(1987)。Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
6.	Psillos, Stathis(1999)。Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth。London：Routledge Press。
7.	Neisser, Ulric(1987)。Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors inf Categorization。Cambridge。
8.	Newton-Smoth, William H.(1981)。The Rationality of Science。London。
9.	Goodman, Nelson(1965)。Fact, Fiction, and Forecast。Indianapolis/New York。
10.	Newton-Smith, W. H.(1981)。The Rationality of Science。The Rationality of Science。London, UK：Routledge Press。
11.	Smith, Edward E.、Medin, Douglas L.(1981)。Categories and Concepts。Categories and Concepts。Cambridge, MA.。
12.	Estes, W. K.(1994)。Classification and Cognition。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
13.	Hanson, N. R.(1965)。Patterns of Discovery。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
14.	Smith, Edward E.、Medin, Douglas L.(1981)。Categories and concepts。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。
15.	Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas(1983)。Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。
16.	Kripke, Saul Aaron(1980)。Naming and Necessity。Harvard University Press。
17.	Carnap, Rudolf、Gardner, M.(1966)。Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science。Basic Books。
18.	Thagard, Paul(1992)。Conceptual Revolutions。Princeton University Press。
19.	Hacking, Ian(1983)。Representing and Intervening Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science。Cambridge University Press。
20.	Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。
21.	林正弘(1985)。瑞姆濟的理論性概念消除法。邏輯．知識．科學哲學。臺北市。延伸查詢
22.	Blackburn, S.(1984)。Spreading the Word。Spreading the Word。Oxford。
23.	Blackburn, S.(1986)。Morals and modals。Fact, Science, and Morality: Essays on A. J. Ayer's Language, Truth and Logic。Oxford。
24.	Boyd, R.(1979)。Metaphor and theory change: What is 'metaphor' a metaphor for?。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge。
25.	Boyd, R.(1990)。Realism, conventionality, and 'realism about'。Meaning and Method。Cambridge。
26.	Boyd, R.(1992)。Constructivism, realism, and philosophical method。Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations。Berkeley。
27.	Dampier, W. C.(1966)。A History of Science。A History of Science。Cambridge。
28.	(1993)。The New Physics。The New Physics。沒有紀錄。延伸查詢
29.	Drestke, F.(1999)。Perception。The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy。Cambridge。
30.	Fodor, J.(1998)。Concept: Why cognitive science went wrong。Concept: Why cognitive science went wrong。Oxford。
31.	Freedman, E. G.(1992)。Understanding scientific controversies from a computational perspective: The case of latent learning。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis, MN。
32.	Goodman, N.(1965)。Fact, Fiction, and Forecast。Fact, Fiction, and Forecast。Indianapolis, IN。
33.	Hacking, I.(1992)。World-making by kind-making: child abuse for example。How Classification Works。Edinburgh。
34.	Kitcher, P.(1993)。The Advancement of Science。The Advancement of Science。Oxford。
35.	Maxwell, G.(1989)。The ontological status of theoretical entities。Readings in the Philosophy of Science。New Jersey。
36.	Nowak, G.、Thagard, P.(1992)。Copernicus, ptolemy, and explanatory coherence。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis, MN。
37.	Palmer, S. E.(1978)。Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation。Cognition and Categorization。Hillsdale, NJ。
38.	Percival, P.(2000)。Theoretical terms: meaning and reference。A Companion to the Philosophy of Science。Oxford。
39.	Putnam, H.(1975)。Explanation and reference。Mind, Language and Reality。Cambridge。
40.	Tweney, R. D.(1992)。Serial and parallel processing in scientific discovery。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis, MN。
41.	Usher, A. P.(1982)。A History of Mechanical Inventions。A History of Mechanical Inventions。New York, NY。
42.	林正弘(1985)。瑞姆濟的理論性概念消除法。知識．邏輯．科學哲學。臺北。延伸查詢
43.	Blackburn, Simon(1986)。Morals and modals。Fact, Science, and Morality: Essays on A. J. Ayer's Language, Truth and Logic。Oxford。
44.	Boyd, Richard(1979)。Metaphor and theory change: What is "metaphor" a metaphor for?。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge/New York。
45.	Boyd, R.(1990)。Realism, conventionality, and "realism about"。Meaning and method。Cambridge。
46.	Boyd, Richard(1992)。Constructivism, reralism, and philosophical method。Inference, explanation, and other frustrations。Berkeley。
47.	Dampier, William Cecil(1966)。A history of science。A history of science。Cambridge。
48.	Davies, P.(1993)。The new physics。The new physics。
49.	Drestke, F.(1999)。Perception。The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy。Cambridge。
50.	Fodor, Jerry A.(1998)。Concept: Why cognitive science went wrong。Concept: Why cognitive science went wrong。Oxford。
51.	Freedman, E. G.(1992)。Understanding scientific controversies from a computational perspective: The case of latent learning。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis。
52.	Fu, D.(1993)。Problem domain, taxonomy, and comparativity in histories of science-with a case study in the comparative history of "Optics"。Philosophy and Conceptual History of Science in Taiwan。Dordrecht。
53.	Hacking, Ian(1992)。World-making by kind-making: child abuse for example。How Classification Works-Nelson Goodman among the Social Science。Edinburgh。
54.	Johnson-Laird, Philip N.(1983)。Mental model。Mental model。Cambridge, Mass.。
55.	Kitcher, P.(1993)。The advancement of science。The advancement of science。Oxford。
56.	Kuhn, Thomas S.(1993)。Afterwords。World Changes。Cambridge, Masssachusetts。
57.	Lea, Susan M.、Burke, John Robert(1997)。Physics: The nature of things。Physics: The nature of things。New York。
58.	Maxwell, Grover(1989)。The ontological status of theoretical entities。Readings in the Philosophy of Science。Englewood Cliffs, NJ.。
59.	Mechelem, I. V.、Hampton, Jean、Michalski, R. S.、Theuns, P.(1993)。Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis。Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis。London。
60.	Nowak, G.、Thagard, P.(1992)。Copernicus, ptolemy, and explanatory coherence。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis。
61.	Palmer, S. E.(1978)。Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation。Cognition and Categorization。Hilldale, .J.。
62.	Percival, P(2000)。Theoretical terms: meaning and reference。A Companion to the Philosophy of Science。Oxford。
63.	Putnam, H.(1975)。Explanation and reference。Mind, Language and Reality。Cambridge。
64.	Tweney, R. D.(1992)。Serial and parallel processing in scientific discovery。Cognitive Models of Science。Minneapolis。
65.	Usher, A. P.(1982)。A history of mechanical inventions。A history of mechanical inventions。New York。
66.	Hacking, Ian(1993)。Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution。World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science。Massachusetts。

其他
1.	陳瑞麟(1998)。科學理論的模型和分類，臺北。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	陳瑞麟(2001)。《科學革命的結構》之後。孔恩：評論集。臺北：巨流。延伸查詢
2.	Hacking, Ian(1993)。Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution。World Changes。Massachusetts：The MIT Press。
3.	Kuhn, T.(1993)。Afterwords。World Changes。Cambridge, Massachusetts：The MIT Press。
4.	Fu, Daiwie(1993)。Problem Domain, Taxonomy, and Comparativity in Histories of Science--With a Case Study in the Comparative History of 'Optics'。Philosophy and Conceptual History of Science in Taiwan。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。
5.	Putnam, H.(1975)。The Meaning of "Meaning"。Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
6.	Putnam, Hilary(1975)。The meaning of meaning。Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	泥岩區農民的生活世界與環境識覺形構--以燕巢、田寮為例
2.	邏輯實證論在臺灣：透過殷海光對思想與文化產生的影響
3.	科學的戰爭與和平--「科學如何運作」的建構論與實在論之爭
4.	科學現象的觀察與建構
5.	組織科學理論：分類、分疇和模型
6.	語言表現
7.	以說話行事模式來說明意向性的結構

1.	臺灣西南部泥岩區農民生活世界與環境識覺之研究

1.	認知與評價 : 科學理論與實驗的動力學
2.	科學理論版本的結構與發展
3.	島嶼上的科哲
4.	科學實在論對抗反實在論

無相關著作

1.	臺灣史學的「變」與「不變」：1949∼1999年
2.	從醫療史到身體文化的研究--從「健與美的歷史」研討會談起
3.	解構中國性：論族群意識作為文化作為認同之曖昧不明
4.	展望臺灣的科技與醫療史研究：一個當代臺灣知識社群的分析
5.	人能弘道．道通為一：心理學本土化的方法論挑戰及其回應
6.	告別式已結束：我們活在不同的世界嗎？--紀念孔恩
7.	跨文化知識傳播的個案研究--明末清初關於地圓說的爭議, 1600-1800
8.	臺灣女性科學家的九零年代風貌--試析「科學/女性/社會脈絡」諸相關領域
9.	歷史中的臺灣科學--關於「臺灣科學史」研究的回顧與檢討
10.	肥胖科學、醫療化與性別身體政治
11.	STS教學心得分享：傅大為教授

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫