:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從質疑歷史到爭奪詮釋權--以「洛陽伽藍記」的歷史論述為例
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:王美秀 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Mei-hsiu
出版日期:2003
卷期:18
頁次:頁139-141+143-161
主題關鍵詞:洛陽伽藍記楊衒之文化認同北魏文學Louyang Qielan JiYang XuanzhiCultural identityThe literature of Northern Wei
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:50
楊衒之《洛陽伽藍記》的歷史特質深受囑目,但學者大多著意於此書與《魏書》之間,對於相同事件所呈現的不同敘事與觀點,以及此書中所保存的大量文史資料。然而,楊衒之身處中國歷史中民族激烈衝突的時代,在北魏長期漠化之後又遭遇所謂鮮卑化的文化逆流,其中牽動的身分/認同的問題勢難規避。身分/認同的建構與歷史密不可分,此書所顯露的歷史特質其實與此深有淵源。本文自史學與文化論角度,探討楊氏如何藉由顛覆歷史的權威性與穩固性,為身分/認同建構預作鋪路。全文分為:一、疑史與反古觀點的提出,直指歷史的敘事與虛構本質;二、發掘古蹟古物之預/寓言式敘事,凸顯記憶重現與修復之必要性;三、詮釋權之爭奪,凸顯歷史建/重構的關鍵。
Historicity is regarded as the most important content of Luoyang Qielan Ji, written by Yang Xuanzhi. Researchers have mostly paid attention to the historical and literary resources reflected in the book and the differences concerning Northern Wei's history between the version described in this book and that in Wei Shu, the official history of Northern Wei. Living in a time of serious racial conflict, he also had to exist in a kind of cultural backwater of so - called Xianbeilise after a long term of sinification. For Yang and the people liked him at that time the problem of identity must have become unavoidable. The historicity of Luoyang Qielan Ji was probably deeply concerned with the construction of identity for it could not be apart from history. From the points of view of history and culture this research focuses on a discussion of how Yang Xaunzhi proposed his historical viewpoints. How this historical viewpoint could overturn the authority and the stability of traditional historical ideology and how it could offer helps in preparing work of identity construction. The three parts of this article are: (1) How Yang Xuanzhi pointed out directly that narrative and fiction were essential qualities of history by questioning the accepted historical viewpoints and challenging them; (2) How Yang Xuanzhi described digging out history from underneath as a kind of allegory, and showing how re - assessing the accepted viewpoint was a necessary procedure in constructing or reconstructing history; and (3) How Yang Xuanzhi fought for the right of historical interpretation and tried his best to obtain the key to successfully constructing or reconstructing history.
會議論文
1.陳儒修(1998)。歷史與記憶:從《好男好女》到《超極大國民》。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳清僑(1997)。離析「中國」想像:試論文化現代性中主體的分裂構形。認同、差異、主體性:從女性主義到後殖民文化想像。臺北:立緒。  延伸查詢new window
2.Foucault, Michel、王德威(1993)。知識的考掘。麥田出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.王文進(1982)。淨土上的烽煙:洛陽伽藍記。淨土上的烽煙:洛陽伽藍記。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.李記祥(2001)。何謂歷史?。時間.歷史.敘事:史學傳統與歷史理論再思。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.王德威(2001)。千言萬語,何若莫言─談莫言的小說。眾聲喧嘩以後:點評當代中文小說。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1959)。重刊洛陽伽藍記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李有成(1994)。《唐老亞》中的記憶政治。文化屬性與華裔美國文學。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李紀祥(2001)。時間.歷史.敘述:可逆性、可斷性、轉述及其他。時間.歷史.敘事:史學傳統與歷史理論再思。臺北:麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE